Do short-term laboratory experiments provide valid descriptions of long-term economic interactions? A study of Cournot markets

Experimental Economics

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 371-390

  Normann, Hans Theo ^a   Requate, Till ^b   Waichman, Israel ^c  

^a HEINRICH HEINE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KIEL   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cournot oligopoly; Internet experiment; Internet vs. laboratory experiment; Long term interactions; Methodology

Indexed keywords

EID: 84939807156     PISSN: 13864157     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10683-013-9373-9     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Anderhub, V., Müller, R., & Schmidt, C. (2001). Design and evaluation of an economic experiment via the Internet. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 46, 227–247.
2. Andreoni, J., & Blanchard, E. (2006). Testing subgame perfection apart from fairness in ultimatum games. Experimental Economics, 9, 307–321.
3. Baik, K. H., Cherry, T., Kroll, S., & Shogren, J. (1999). Endogenous timing in a gaming tournament. Theory and Decision, 47(1), 1–21.
4. Bellemare, C., & Kröger, S. (2007). On representative social capital. European Economic Review, 51, 183–202.
5. Bosch-Doménech, A., & Vriend, N. J. (2003). Imitation of successful behavior in Cournot markets. The Economic Journal, 113, 495–524.
6. Camerer, C. F. (2011). The promise and success of lab-field generalizability in experimental economics: a critical reply to Levitt and List. Available at SSRN. doi:10.2139/ssrn.1977749.
7. Cassar, A. (2007). Coordination and cooperation in local, random and small world networks: experimental evidence. Games and Economic Behavior, 58, 209–230.
8. Charness, G., Haruvy, E., & Sonsino, D. (2007). Social distance and reciprocity: an Internet experiment. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 63, 88–103.
9. Chesney, T., Chuah, S.-H., & Hoffmann, R. (2009). Virtual world experimentation: an exploratory study. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 72, 618–635.
10. Egas, M., & Riedl, A. (2008). The economics of altruistic punishment and the maintenance of cooperation. Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, 275, 871–878.
11. Falk, A., & Heckman, J. J. (2009). Lab experiments are a major source of knowledge in the social sciences. Science, 326, 535–538.
12. Feltovich, N. (2003). Nonparametric tests of differences in medians: comparison of the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney and robust rank-order tests. Experimental Economics, 6, 273–297.
13. Fiedler, M., & Haruvy, E. (2009). The lab versus the virtual lab and virtual field—an experimental investigation of trust games with communication. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 72, 716–724.
14. Fligner, M. A., & Policello, G. E. (1981). Robust rank procedures for the Behrens-Fisher problem. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 76, 162–168.
15. Frederick, S., Loewenstein, G., & O’Donoghue, T. (2002). Time discounting and time preference: a critical review. Journal of Economic Literature, 40, 351–401.
16. Friedman, D., & Oprea, R. (2012). A continuous dilemma. The American Economic Review, 102, 337–363.
17. Füllbrunn, S., Richwien, K., & Sadrieh, A. (2011). Trust and trustworthiness in anonymous virtual worlds. Journal of Media Economics, 24, 48–63.
18. Gneezy, U., & List, J. A. (2006). Putting behavioral economics to work: testing for gift exchange in labor markets using field experiments. Econometrica, 74, 1365–1384.
19. Hamilton, W. D. (1970). Selfish and spiteful behavior in an evolutionary model. Nature, 228, 1218–1225.
20. Hergueux, J., & Jacquemet, N. (2012). Social preferences in the online laboratory: a randomized experiment. CES working papers 2012.70.
21. Hong, J. T., & Plott, C. R. (1982). Rate filing policies for inland water transportation: an experimental approach. Bell Journal of Economics, 13, 1–19.
22. Horton, J. J., Rand, D. G., & Zeckhauser, R. J. (2011). The online laboratory: conducting experiments in a real labor market. Experimental Economics, 14, 399–425.
23. Huck, S., Normann, H.-T., & Oechssler, J. (1999). Learning in Cournot oligopoly—an experiment. The Economic Journal, 109, 80–95.
24. Huck, S., Normann, H.-T., & Oechssler, J. (2004). Two are few and four are many: number effects in experimental oligopolies. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 53, 435–446.
25. Isaac, R. M., Walker, J. M., & Williams, A. W. (1994). Group size and the voluntary provision of public goods: experimental evidence utilizing large groups. Journal of Public Economics, 54, 1–36.
26. Koenigs, M., & Tranel, D. (2007). Irrational economic decision making after ventromedial prefrontal damage: evidence from the ultimatum game. The Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 951–956.
27. Lei, V., Noussair, C. N., & Plott, C. R. (2001). Nonspeculative bubbles in experimental asset markets: lack of common knowledge of rationality vs. actual irrationality. Econometrica, 69, 831–859.
28. Levitt, S., & List, J. A. (2007). What do laboratory experiments measuring social preferences reveal about the real world. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21, 153–174.
29. Loewenstein, G. (2000). Emotions in economic theory and economic behavior. The American Economic Review, 90, 426–432.
30. Loewenstein, G. (2005). Hot cold empathy gaps and medical decision making. Health Psychology, 24, S49–S56.
31. Loewenstein, G., & Schkade, D. (1999). Wouldn’t it be nice? Predicting future feelings. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well being: the foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 85–105). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
32. Mason, C. F., & Phillips, O. R. (1997). Information and cost asymmetry in experimental duopoly markets. Review of Economics and Statistics, 79, 290–299.
33. Mason, C. F., Phillips, O. R., & Nowell, C. (1992). Duopoly behavior in asymmetric markets: an experimental evaluation. Review of Economics and Statistics, 74, 662–670.
34. Normann, H.-T., & Wallace, B. (2012). The impact of the termination rule in a prisoners’ dilemma experiment. International Journal of Game Theory, 41, 707–718.
35. Oechssler, J., Roider, A., & Schmitz, P. (2008). Cooling-off in negotiations—does it work? Technical report 6807.
36. Potters, J., & Suetens, S. (2009). Cooperation in experimental games of strategic complements and substitutes. Review of Economic Studies, 76, 1125–1147.
37. Requate, T., & Waichman, I. (2011). “A profit table or a profit calculator?” A note on the design of Cournot oligopoly experiments. Experimental Economics, 14, 36–46.
38. Rilling, J. K., Gutman, D. A., Zeh, T. R., Pagnoni, G., Berns, G. S., & Kilts, C. D. (2002). A neural basis for social cooperation. Neuron, 35, 395–405.
39. Rilling, J. K., Sanfey, A. G., Aronson, J. A., Nystrom, L. E., & Cohen, J. D. (2004). Opposing BOLD responses to reciprocated and unreciprocated altruism in putative reward pathways. NeuroReport, 15, 2539–2543.
40. Sanfey, A. G., Rilling, J. K., Aronson, J. A., Nystrom, L. E., & Cohen, J. D. (2003). The neural basis of economic decision making in the ultimatum game. Science, 300, 1755–1757.
41. Schmelz, K., & Ziegelmeyer, A. (2012). Hierarchical distance and control aversion: evidence from the Internet and the laboratory. Working paper.
42. Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M., & Huber, O. (2003). Information search in the laboratory and on the web: with or without an experimenter. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 2, 227–235.
43. Suri, S., & Watts, D. J. (2011). Cooperation and contagion in web-based, networked public goods experiments. PLoS ONE, 6, 16836.