Information search in the laboratory and on the Web: With or without an experimenter

Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 227-235

  Schulte Mecklenbeck, Michael ^a   Huber, Oswald ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FRIBOURG   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DECISION MAKING; HIGH RISK BEHAVIOR; HUMAN; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; INFORMATION SERVICE; INTERNET; LEARNING; METHODOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; PSYCHOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT;

DECISION MAKING; HUMANS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INFORMATION SERVICES; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; INTERNET; LEARNING; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RISK-TAKING; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT;

EID: 0042978607     PISSN: 07433808     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03202545     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. ANDERHUB, V., MÜLLER, R., & SCHMIDT, C. (2001). Design and evaluation of an economic experiment via the Internet. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 46, 227-247.
2. BATINIC, B., REIPS, U.-D., & BOSNJAK, M. (EDS.) (2002). Online social sciences. Seattle: Hogrefe & Huber.
3. BIRNBAUM, M. (1999). Testing critical properties of decision making on the Internet. Psychological Science, 10, 399-407.
4. BIRNBAUM, M. (2000). Psychological experiments on the Internet. San Diego: Academic Press.
5. BUCHANAN, T., & SMITH, J. L. (1999). Using the Internet for psychological research: Personality testing on the World-Wide Web. British Journal of Psychology, 90, 125-144.
6. EPSTEIN, J., KLINKENBERG, W., WILEY, D., & McKINLEY, L. (2001). Insuring sample equivalence across Internet and paper-and-pencil assessments. Computers in Human Behavior, 17, 339-346.
7. FRICK, A., BÄCHTIGER, M. T., & REIPS, U.-D. (2001). Financial incentives, personal information, and drop out in online studies. In U.-D. Reips & M. Bosnjak (Eds.), Dimensions of Internet science (pp. 209-219). Lengerich, Germany: Pabst Science.
8. GANGESTAD, S. W., & SNYDER, M. (1985). To carve nature at its joints: On the existence of discrete classes in personality. Psychological Review, 92, 317-340.
9. HUBER, O., BEUTTER, C., MONTOYA, J., & HUBER, O. W. (2001). Risk defusing behaviour: Towards an understanding of risky decision making. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 13, 409-426.
10. HUBER, O., & MACHO, S. (2001). Probabilistic set-up and the search for probability information in quasi-naturalistic decision tasks. Risk Decision & Policy, 6, 1-16.
11. HUBER, O., WIDER, R., & HUBER, O. W. (1997). Active information search and complete information presentation in naturalistic risky decision tasks. Acta Psychologica 95, 15-29.
12. KRANTZ, J. H., BALLARD, J., & SCHER, J. (1997). Comparing the results of laboratory and World-Wide Web samples on the determinants of female attractiveness, Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 29, 264-269.
13. KRANTZ, J. H., & DALAL, R. (2000). Validity of Web-based psychological research. In M. Birnbaum (Ed.), Psychological experiments on the Internet (pp. 36-60). San Diego: Academic Press.
14. LOPES, L. L. (1995). Algebra and process in the modeling of risky choice. In J. Busemeyer, R. Hastie, & D. L. Medin (Eds.), Decision making from a cognitive perspective (pp. 177-220). San Diego: Academic Press.
15. McGRAW, K. O., TEW, M. D., & WILLIAMS, J. E. (2000). The integrity of Web-delivered experiments: Can we trust the data? Psychological Science, 11, 502-506.
16. MEHTA, R., & SIVADA, E. (1995). Comparing response rates and response content in mail vs. electronic mail surveys. Journal of the Market Research Society, 17, 429-440.
17. MUSCH, J., & KLAUER, K. C. (2002). Psychological experimenting on the World Wide Web: Investigating content effects in syllogistic reasoning. In B. Batinic, U.-D. Reips, & M. Bosnjak (Eds.), Online social sciences. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
18. POHL, R. F., BENDER, M., & LACHMANN, G. (2002). Hindsight bias around the world. Experimental Psychology, 49, 270-282.
19. RANYARD, R., HINKLEY, L., & WILLIAMSON, J. (2001). Risk management in consumers' credit decision making. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 32, 152-161.
20. REIPS, U.-D. (2000). The web experiment method: Advantages, disadvantages, and solutions. In M. Birnbaum (Ed.), Psychological experiments on the Internet (pp. 89-114). San Diego: Academic Press.
21. REIPS, U.-D. (2002a). Internet-based psychological experimenting: Five dos and five don'ts. Social Science Computer Review, 20, 241-249.
22. REIPS, U.-D. (2002b). Standards for Internet-based experimenting. Experimental Psychology, 49, 243-256.
23. REIPS, U.-D., & BOSNJAK, M. (2001). Dimensions of Internet science. Lengerich, Germany: Pabst Science.
24. SHAVIT, T., SONSINO, D., & BENZION, U. (2001). A comparative study of lotteries-evaluation in class and on the Web. Journal of Economic Psychology, 22, 483-491.
25. WILLIAMSON, J., RANYARD, R., & CUTHBERT, L. (2000). Risk management in naturalistic insurance decisions: Evidence from a simulation study. Risk Decision & Policy, 5, 19-38.