Testing subgame perfection apart from fairness in ultimatum games

Experimental Economics

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 307-321

  Andreoni, James ^a   Blanchard, Emily ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Fairness; Learning; Subgame perfection; Utimatum game

Indexed keywords

EID: 33845611512     PISSN: 13864157     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10683-006-0064-7     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Abbink, K., Bolton, G., Sadrieh, A., & Tang, F. (2001). Adaptive learning versus punishment in ultimatum bargaining. Games and Economic Behavior, 37(1), 1-25.
2. Andreoni, J. (1995). Cooperation in public-goods experiments: Kindness or confusion? American Economic Review, 85(4), 891-904.
3. Andreoni, J., Castillo, M., & Petrie, R. (2003). What do bargainers' preferences look like? Exploring a convex ultimatum game. American Economic Review, 93(3), 672-685.
4. Andreoni, J., Castillo, M., & Petrie, R. (2004). Revealing preferences for fairness in ultimatum bargaining: Parametric and non-parametric estimates of preferences, working paper, University of Wisconsin.
5. Bolton, G. (1991). A comparative model of bargaining: Theory and evidence. American Economic Review, 81(5), 1096-1136.
6. Bolton, G., & Ockenfels, A. (2000). ERC: A theory of equity, reciprocity, and competition. American Economic Review, 90(1), 166-193.
7. Camerer, C., & Ho, T. (1999). Experience-weighted attraction learning in normal form games. Econometrica, 67(4), 827-874.
8. Erev, I., & Roth, A. (1995). Learning in extensive-form games: Experimental data and simple dynamic models in the intermediate term. Games and Economic Behavior, 8(1), 164-212.
9. Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. (1999). Theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(3), 817-868.
10. Fudenberg, D., & Levine, D. (1997). Measuring players' losses in experimental games. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(2), 507-536.
11. Gale, J., Binmore, K., & Samuelson, L. (1995). Learning to be imperfect: The ultimatum game. Games and Economic Behavior, 8(1), 56-90.
12. Goeree, J., & Holt, C. (2000). Asymmetric inequality aversion and noisy behavior in alternating-offer bargaining games. European Economic Review, 44, 1079-1089.
13. Guth, W., Schmittberger, R., & Schwarze, B. (1982). An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 3(4), 367-388
14. Houser, D., & Kurzban, R. (2002). Revisiting kindness and confusion in public goods experiments. American Economic Review, 94(4), 1062-1069.
15. Li, J. (2004). A model of ethical behavior, working paper. University of Wisconsin-Madison.
16. Ochs, J., & Roth, A. E. (1989). An experimental study of sequential bargaining. American Economic Review, 79(3), 355-384.
17. Rabin, M. (1993). Incorporating fairness into game theory and economics. American Economic Review, 83(5), 1281-1302.
18. Rabin, M., & Charness, G. (2002). Understanding social preferences with simple tests. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117, 817-861.
19. Roth, A. E., Prasnikar, V., Okunofujiwara, M., & Zamir, S. (1991). Bargaining and market behavior in Jerusalem, Ljubljana, Pittsburgh, and Tokyo: An experimental study. American Economic Review, 81(5), 1068-1095.
20. Slonim, R., & Roth, A. (1998). Learning in high stakes ultimatum games: An experiment in the slovak republic. Econometrica, 66(3), 569-596.