"A profit table or a profit calculator?" A note on the design of Cournot oligopoly experiments

Experimental Economics

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 36-46

  Requate, Till ^a   Waichman, Israel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KIEL   (Germany)

Author keywords

Best response calculator; Cournot oligopoly; Laboratory experiment; Profit calculator; Profit table

Indexed keywords

EID: 79551581446     PISSN: 13864157     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10683-010-9256-2     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Altavilla, C., Luini, L., & Sbriglia, P. (2006). Social learning in market games. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 61, 632-652.
2. Beil, R. O. (1988) Collusive behavior in experimental oligopoly markets. PhD thesis, Texas A& M.
3. Bigoni, M. (2010). What do you want to know? Information acquisition and learning in experimental Cournot games. Research in Economics, 64, 1-17.
4. Binger, B. R., Hoffman, E., & Libecap, G. D. (1991). Experimental methods to advance historical investigation: an examination of cartel compliance by large and small firms. In J. Mokyr (Ed.), The vital one: essays in honor of Jonathan R. T Hughes, Research in Economic History, Supplement 6, pp. 309-324.
5. Bosch-Doménech, A., & Vriend, N. J. (2003). Imitation of successful behavior in Cournot markets. Economic Journal, 113, 495-524.
6. Bru, L., Gomez, R., & Ordonez, J. M. (2002). Information in repeated experimental Cournot games. In R. M. Isaac & C. A. Holt (Eds.), Experiments investigating market power (pp. 191-215). Amsterdam: JAI/Elsevier.
7. Cason, T. N., & Mason, C. F. (1999). Information sharing and tacit collusion in laboratory duopoly markets. Economic Inquiry, 37, 258-281.
8. Cox, J. C., & Walker, M. (1998). Learning to play Cournot duopoly strategies. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 36, 141-161.
9. Daughety, A. F., & Forsythe, R. (1987a). The effects of industry-wide price regulation on industrial organization. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 3, 397-434.
10. Daughety, A. F., & Forsythe, R. (1987b). Industrywide regulation and the formation of reputations: a laboratory analysis. In E. E. Bailey (Ed.), Public regulation: new perspectives on institutions and policies (pp. 347-398). Cambridge: MIT Press.
11. Davis, D. D., Reilly, R. J., & Wilson, B. (2003). Cost structures and Nash play in repeated Cournot games. Experimental Economics, 6, 209-226.
12. Duersch, P., Kolb, A., Oechssler, J., & Schipper, B. (2010). Rage against the machines: how subjects play against learning algorithms. Economic Theory, 43, 407-430.
13. Feltovich, N. (2003). Nonparametric tests of differences in medians: comparison of the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney and Robust rank-order tests. Experimental Economics, 6, 273-297.
14. Fischbacher, U. (2007). z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiment. Experimental Economics, 10, 171-178.
15. Fligner, M. A., & Policello, G. E. (1981). Robust rank procedures for the Behrens-Fisher problem. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 76, 162-168.
16. Fonseca, M., Huck, S., & Normann, H. T. (2005). Playing Cournot although they shouldn't. Economic Theory, 25, 669-677.
17. Fonseca, M., Müller, W., & Normann, H. T. (2006). Endogenous timing in duopoly: experimental evidence. International Journal of Game Theory, 34, 443-456.
18. Fouraker, L., & Siegel, S. (1963). Bargaining behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill.
19. Hoggatt, A. C. (1959). An experimental business game. Behavioral Science, 4, 192-203.
20. Holcomb, J. H., & Nelson, P. S. (1997). The role of monitoring in duopoly market outcomes. Journal of Socio-Economics, 79-93.
21. Holt, C. A. (1985). An experimental test of the consistent-conjectures hypothesis. American Economic Review, 75(3), 314-325.
22. Huck, S. (2004). Oligopoly. In D. Friedman & A. Cassar (Eds.), Economics lab: an intensive course in experimental economics (pp. 105-114). London: Routledge.
23. Huck, S., & Wallace, B. (2002). Reciprocal strategies and aspiration levels in a Cournot-Stackelberg experiment. Economics Bulletin, 3, 1-7.
24. Huck, S., Normann, H. T., & Oechssler, J. (1999). Learning in Cournot oligopoly-an experiment. Economic Journal, 109, 80-95.
25. Huck, S., Normann, H. T., & Oechssler, J. (2000). Does information about competitors' actions increase or decrease competition in experimental oligopoly markets? International Journal of Industrial Organization, 18, 39-57.
26. Huck, S., Müller, W., & Normann, H. T. (2001). Stackelberg beats Cournot: on collusion and efficiency in experimental markets. Economic Journal, 111, 749-765.
27. Huck, S., Müller, W., & Normann, H. T. (2002a). To commit or not to commit: endogenous timing in experimental duopoly markets. Games and Economic Behavior, 38, 240-264.
28. Huck, S., Normann, H. T., & Oechssler, J. (2002b). Stability of the Cournot process: experimental evidences. International Journal of Game Theory, 31, 123-136.
29. Huck, S., Normann, H. T., & Oechssler, J. (2004). Two are few and four are many: number effects in experimental oligopolies. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 53, 435-446.
30. Huck, S., Konrad, K. A., Müller, W., & Normann, H. T. (2007). The merger paradox and why aspiration levels let it fail in the laboratory. Economic Journal, 117, 1073-1095.
31. Le Coq, C., & Orzen, H. (2006). Do forward markets enhance competition? Experimental evidence. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 61, 415-431.
32. Mason, C. F., & Phillips, O. R. (1997). Information and cost asymmetry in experimental duopoly markets. Review of Economics and Statistics, 79, 290-299.
33. Mason, C. F., Phillips, O. R., & Redington, D. B. (1991). The role of gender in a non-cooperative game. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 15, 215-235.
34. Mason, C. F., Phillips, O. R., & Nowell, C. (1992). Duopoly behavior in asymmetric markets: an experimental evaluation. Review of Economics and Statistics, 74, 662-670.
35. Müller, W. (2006). Allowing for two production periods in the Cournot duopoly: experimental evidence. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 60, 100-111.
36. Oechssler, J., & Schuhmacher, F. (2004). The limited liability effect in experimental duopoly markets. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 22, 163-184.
37. Offerman, T., Potters, J., & Sonnemans, J. (2002). Imitation and belief learning in an oligopoly experiment. Review of Economic Studies, 63, 973-997.
38. Pantz, K., & Ziegelmeyer, A. (2005). Collaborative networks in experimental triopolies. Papers on Strategic Interaction 2005-38, Max Planck Institute of Economics.
39. Potters, J., & Suetens, S. (2009). Cooperation in experimental games of strategic complements and substitutes. Review of Economic Studies, 76, 1125-1147.
40. Raab, P., & Schipper, B. C. (2009). Cournot competition among teams: an experimental study. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 72, 691-702.
41. Rassenti, S., Reynolds, S. S., Smith, V. L., & Szidarovszky, F. (2000). Adaptation and convergence of behavior in repeated experimental Cournot games. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 41, 117-146.
42. Saijo, T., & Nakamura, H. (1995). The spite dilemma in voluntary contribution mechanism experiments. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 39, 535-560.
43. Selten, R., & Ostmann, A. (2001). Imitation equilibrium. Homo Oeconomicus, 18, 111-149.
44. Selten, R., & Sauermann, H. (1959). Ein Oligopolexperiment. Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatwissenschaft, 115, 427-471.
45. Waichman, I., Requate, T., & Siang, C. K. (2010). A Cournot experiment with managers and students: evidence from Germany and Malaysia. The BE Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy (Topics)10, Article 30.