What is healthy food? Objective nutrient profile scores and subjective lay evaluations in comparison

Appetite

Volumn 95, Issue , 2015, Pages 408-414

  Bucher, T ^a   Muller B ^a   Siegrist, M ^a  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Fake food buffet; Food choice; Health perception; Meal composition; Meal evaluation; Nutrient profiling

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BEVERAGE; BODY MASS; CONSCIOUSNESS; CONSUMER; CONTROLLED STUDY; FAT CONTENT; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; FOOD COMPOSITION; FRUIT VEGETABLE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MEAL; NORMAL HUMAN; NUTRIENT CONTENT; NUTRIENT PROFILE SCORE; NUTRITIONAL VALUE; PERCEPTION; PROTEIN CONTENT; SCORING SYSTEM; SEX DIFFERENCE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DIET; FOOD; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; MIDDLE AGED; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; DIET; FOOD; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; MEALS; MIDDLE AGED; NUTRITIVE VALUE; PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84939617481     PISSN: 01956663     EISSN: 10958304     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2015.08.005     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Arambepola C., Scarborough P., Rayner M. Validating a nutrient profile model. Public Health Nutrition 2008, 11(4):371-378. 10.1017/S1368980007000377.
2. Bucher T., Keller C. The web-buffet - development and validation of an online tool to measure food choice. Public Health Nutrition 2014, 1-10. 10.1017/S1368980014002456.
3. Bucher T., Siegrist M. Children's and parents' health perception of different soft drinks. British Journal of Nutrition 2015, 113(3):526-535.
4. Bucher T., van der Horst K., Siegrist M. Improvement of meal composition by vegetable variety. Public Health Nutrition 2011, 25(9):1-7. 10.1017/s136898001100067x.
5. Bucher T., van der Horst K., Siegrist M. The fake food buffet - a new method in nutrition behaviour research. British Journal of Nutrition 2012, 107(10):1553-1560.
6. Bucher T., van der Horst K., Siegrist M. Fruit for dessert. How people compose healthier meals. Appetite 2013, 60(1):74-80. S0195-6663(12)00406-0 [pii]. 10.1016/j.appet.2012.10.003.
7. Chernev A., Gal D. Categorization effects in value judgments: averaging bias in evaluating combinations of vices and virtues. Journal of Marketing Research 2010, 47(4):738-747.
8. Clark J.E. Taste and flavour: their importance in food choice and acceptance. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 1998, 57(4):639-643.
9. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Ernährung Referenzwerte für die Nährstoffzufuhr (2., korr. Nachdr. ed.) 2001, Umschau/Braus, Frankfurt a.M.
10. Federal Food Safety and Veterinary Office (FSVO) Swiss food composition database 2014, Retrieved 07.07.2014, 2103, from. http://www.naehrwertdaten.ch/.
11. Flegal K.M. Evaluating epidemiologic evidence of the effects of food and nutrient exposures. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1999, 69(6):1339S-1344S.
12. Furst T., Connors M., Bisogni C.A., Sobal J., Falk L.W. Food choice: a conceptual model of the process. Appetite 1996, 26(3):247-265. 10.1006/appe.1996.0019.
13. Grunert K. How changes in consumer behaviour and retailing affect competence requirements for food producers and processors. Economía Agraria y Recursos Naturales 2006, 6(11):3-22.
14. Jayanti R.K., Burns A.C. The antecedents of preventive health care behavior: an empirical study. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 1998, 26(1):6-15. 10.1177/0092070398261002.
15. LIVSMEDELSVERKET National Food Agency The keyhole symbol 2007, 25/02/2007, Retrieved 04/03/2015, 2015, from. http://www.slv.se/en-gb/Group1/Food-labelling/Keyhole-symbol/.
16. Lobstein T., Davies S. Defining and labelling 'healthy' and 'unhealthy' food. Public Health Nutrition 2009, 12(3):331-340. 10.1017/S1368980008002541.
17. McDonald's Switzerland. (2014). Official webpage. Retrieved 03.09.14, 2014, from. http://www.mcdonalds.ch/de/menuekarte/beilagen/pommes-frites.
18. Paquette M.C. Perceptions of healthy eating - state of knowledge and research gaps. Canadian Journal of Public Health-Revue Canadienne De Sante Publique 2005, 96:S15-S19.
19. Rayner M., Scarborough P., Boxer A., Stockley L. Nutrient profiles: Development of final model 2005, Final Report. Availible on. http://www.food.gov.uk/multime-dia/pdfs/nutprofr.pdf/.
20. Rayner M., Scarborough P., Lobstein T. The UK ofcom nutrient profiling model. Defining 'healthy' and 'unhealthy' foods and drinks for TV advertising to children 2009.
21. Roininen K., Tuorila H., Zandstra E.H., de Graaf C., Vehkalahti K., Stubenitsky K., et al. Differences in health and taste attitudes and reported behaviour among Finnish, Dutch and British consumers: a cross-national validation of the Health and Taste Attitude Scales (HTAS). Appetite 2001, 37(1):33-45. 10.1006/Appe.2001.0414.
22. Rolls B.J., Roe L.S., Halverson K.H., Meengs J.S. Using a smaller plate did not reduce energy intake at meals. Appetite 2007, 49(3):652-660. 10.1016/J.Appet.2007.04.005.
23. Scarborough P., Boxer A., Rayner M., Stockley L. Testing nutrient profile models using data from a survey of nutrition professionals. Public Health Nutrition 2007, 10(4):337-345. 10.1017/S1368980007666671.
24. Scarborough P., Rayner M., Stockley L. Developing nutrient profile models: a systematic approach. Public Health Nutrition 2007, 10(4):330-336. 10.1017/S1368980007223870.
25. Stunkard A.J., Waxman M. Accuracy of self-reports of food intake. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 1981, 79(5):547-551.
26. The Choices International Foundation The choices programme 2014, Retrieved 4/03/2015, 2015, from. http://www.choicesprogramme.org/about/the-programme.
27. Wansink B., Chandon P. Meal size, not body size, explains errors in estimating the calorie content of meals. Annals of Internal Medicine 2006, 145(5):326-332. 145/5/326 [pii].
28. Werle C.O.C., Trendel O., Ardito G. Unhealthy food is not tastier for everybody: the "healthy = tasty" French intuition. Food Quality and Preference 2013, 28(1):116-121. 10.1016/J.Foodqual.2012.07.007.