Identifying Characteristics of Dissemination Success Using an Expert Panel

Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 357-380

  Bourrie, David M ^a   Cegielski, Casey G ^b   Jones Farmer, L Allison ^c   Sankar, Chetan S ^b  

^a University of South Alabama   (United States)

^b AUBURN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c MIAMI UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

And framework; Delphi method; Diffusion; Dissemination; Educational innovations

Indexed keywords

EID: 84939240906     PISSN: 15404595     EISSN: 15404609     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/dsji.12049     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211.
2. American Society for Engineering Education (2009). Creating a culture for scholarly and systematic innovation in engineering education, accessed June 20, 2013, available at http://www.asee.org/about-us/the-organization/advisory-committees/CCSSIE/CCSSIEE_Phase1Report_June2009.pdf.
3. American Society for Engineering Education (2012). Innovation with impact, accessed May 16, 2013, available at http://www.asee.org/Innovation with Impact.
4. Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business (2013). 2013 Accreditation standards, accessed January 28, 2014, available at http://aacsb.edu/accreditation/2013standards/.
5. Balasubramanian, G., Lohani, V. K., Puri, I. K., Case, S. W., & Mahajan, R. L. (2011). Nanotechnology education: First step in implementing a spiral curriculum. The International Journal of Engineering Education, 27(2), 333-353.
6. Blankinship, D. G. (2010). Foundations offer $506 million for education innovation, accessed November 5, 2013, available at https://www.ncstem.org/blog/foundations-offer-506-million-for-education-innovation.
7. Borrego, M. J., Froyd, J. E., & Hall, T. S. (2010). Diffusion of engineering education innovations: A survey of awareness and adoption rates in U.S. engineering departments. Journal of Engineering Education, 99(3), 185-207.
8. Brancheau, J. C., & Wetherby, J. C. (1987). Key issues in information systems managment. MIS Quarterly, 1(11), 23-46.
9. Cagiltay, N. E. (2008). Using learning styles theory in engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 33(4), 415-424.
10. Cegielski, C. G., Bourrie, D. M., & Hazen, B. T. (2013). Evaluating adoption of emerging IT for corporate IT strategy: Developing a model using a qualitative method. Information Systems Management, 30(3), 235-249.
11. st century: Student development through the curriculum. Advances in Engineering Education, 2(4), 1-37.
12. Churchman, C. W., & Schainblatt, A. (1965). The researcher and the manager: A dialectic of implementation. Management Science, 11(4), 469-487.
13. Compeau, D. R., Meister, D. B., & Higgins, C. A. (2007). From prediction to explanation: Reconceptualizing and extending the perceived characteristics of innovating. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8(8), 409-439.
14. D'Amours, S., & Rönnqvist, M. (2013). An educational game in collaborative logistics. INFORMS Transactions on Education, 13(2), 102-113.
15. Dalkey, N., & Helmer, O. (1963). An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts. Management Science, 9(3), 458-467.
16. Dancy, M. H., & Henderson, C. (2010). Pedagogical practices and instructional change in physics faculty. American Journal of Physics, 78(10), 1056-1063.
17. Delbecq, A. L., Van de Ven, A. H., & Gustafson, D. H. (1975). Group techniques for program planning: A guide to nominal group and Delphi processes: Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
18. Dufresne, R. L., & Offstein, E. H. (2012). Holistic and intentional student character development process: Learning from West Point. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11(4), 570-590.
19. Erzurumlu, S. S., & Rollag, K. (2013). Increasing student interest and engagement with business cases by turning them into consulting exercises. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 11(4), 359-381.
20. Fairweather, J. (2008). Linking evidence and promising practices in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) undergraduate education. Washington, DC: Board of Science Education, National Research Council, The National Academies.
21. Felder, R. M., & Silverman, L. (1988). Learning and teaching styles in engineering education. Engineering Education, 91(1), 3-17.
22. Fincher, S. (2000). From transfer to transformation: Towards a framework for successful dissemination of engineering education. Frontiers in Education Conference. Kansas City, MO: IEEE, F4F/14-F4F/19 vol. 2.
23. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA.: Addison-Wesley.
24. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1981). Attitudes and voting behavior: An application of the theory of reasoned action. In G. M. Stephenson & J. M. Davis (Eds.), Progress in applied social psychology. London, UK: Wiley, 253-313.
25. Gravestock, P. (2002). Making an impact through dissemination. In C. Baume, P. Martin, & M. Yorke (Eds.), Managing educational development projects: Effective management for maximum impact. London, UK: Kogan Page, 109-124.
26. Gropper, G. L. (1974). Instructional strategies. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications, Inc.
27. Hannon, J. (2009). Breaking down online teaching: Innovation and resistance. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(1), 14-29.
28. Hawk, T. F., & Shah, A. J. (2007). Using learning style instruments to enhance student learning. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 5(1), 1-19.
29. Hazen, B. T., Wu, Y., & Sankar, C. S. (2012a). Factors that influence dissemination in engineering education. IEEE Transactions on Education, 55(3), 384-393.
30. Hazen, B. T., Wu, Y., Sankar, C. S., & Jones-Farmer, L. A. (2012b). A proposed framework for educational innovation dissemination. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 40(3), 301-321.
31. Henderson, C., & Dancy, M. H. (2007). Barriers to the use of research-based instructional strategies: The influence of both individual and situational characteristics. Physical Review Special Topics: Physics Education Research, 3(2), 200102.
32. Henderson, C., Dancy, M. H., & Niewiadomska-Bugaj, M. (2012). Use of research-based instructional strategies in introductory physics: Where do faculty leave the innovation-decision process? Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 8(2), 020104.
33. Henderson, C., Finkelstein, N., & Beach, A. (2010). Beyond dissemination in college science teaching: An introduction to four core change strategies. Journal of College Science Teaching, 39(5), 18-25.
34. Hu, X., & Kumar, A. (2013). Case-Beijing Opera mask sales in four cities in the United States. INFORMS Transactions on Education, 13(3), 145-151.
35. Hutchinson, J. R., & Huberman, M. (1994). Knowledge dissemination and use in science and mathematics education: A literature review. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 3(1), 27-47.
36. Kaleelur Rahuman, M. A., Wikramanayake, G. N., & Hewagamage, K. P. (2011). Case study on adaptability to ICT enabled childhood education in Sri Lanka. 2nd International Conference on Advances in ICT for Emerging Regions. Colombo, Sri Lanka: IEEE Computer Society, 112-116.
37. Katz, E. (1961). The social itineray of social change: Two studies on the diffusion of innovation. In W. Scharamm (Ed.), Studies of Innovation and Communication to the Public. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.
38. King, H. (2003). Disseminating educational developments. In P. Kahn & D. Baume (Eds.), A guide to staff and educational development. London, UK: Kogan Page, 79-94.
39. Kolmos, A., Kofoed, L. B., & Du, X. Y. (2008). Ph.D. students' work conditions and study environment in university- and industry-based PhD programmes. European Journal of Engineering Education, 33(5/6), 539-550.
40. Krishnan, M., Paulik, M. J., Yost, S., & Stoltz, T. (2008). Shared projects with a multi-sub-disciplinary flavor: Providing integration and context in a new ECE spiral curriculum. ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. Saratoga Springs, NY: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. F1H1-F1H6.
41. Lee, Y., Kozar, K. A., & Larsen, K. R. T. (2003). The technology acceptance model: Past, present, and future. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 12(50), 752-780.
42. Leemkuil, H., & De Jong, T. O. N. (2012). Adaptive advice in learning with a computer-based knowledge management simulation game. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11(4), 653-665.
43. Legner, C., Estier, T., Avdiji, H., & Boillat, T. (2013). Designing Capstone courses in management education: Knowledge activation and integration using and ERP-based simulation game. Thirty Fourth International Conference on Information Systems. Milan, accessed January 31, 2014, available at http://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2013/proceedings/ISCurriculum/8/.
44. Linstone, H. A., & Turoff, M. (2011). Delphi: A brief look backward and forward. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(9), 1712-1719.
45. Loo, R. (2002). The Delphi method: A powerful tool for strategic management. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 25(4), 762-769.
46. Malhotra, M. K., Steele, D. C., & Grover, V. (1994). Important strategic and tactical manufacturing issues in the 1990s. Decision Sciences, 25(2), 189-214.
47. Martino, J. P. (1972). Technological forecasting for decision making. New York, NY: Elsevier Publishing.
48. McKenzie, J., Alexander, S., Harper, C., & Anderson, S. (2005). Dissemination, adoption, & adaptation of project innovations in higher education. A report for the Carrick Institute for Learning and Teaching in Higher Education: University of Technology Sydney.
49. Moore, G. C., & Benbasat, I. (1991). Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information Systems Research, 2(3), 192-222.
50. Morgan, J., & Barroso, L. (2008). North Texas STEM center: An engineer's perspective. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. Pittsburg, PA: American Society for Engineering Education.
51. Mykytyn, K., Pearson, A., Paul, S., & Mykytyn, P. P. (2008). The use of problem-based learning to enhance MIS education. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 6(1), 89-113.
52. Nambisan, S., Agarwal, R., & Tanniru, M. (1999). Organizational mechanisms for enhancing user innovation in information technology. MIS Quarterly, 23(3), 365-395.
53. National Academy of Education. (2009). Education policy white paper on science and mathematics education, accessed August 20, 2012, available at http://www.naeducation.org/xpedio/groups/naedsite/documents/webpage/NAED_080865.pdf.
54. National Academy of Sciences. (2012). Discipline-based education research: Understanding and improving learning in undergraduate science and engineering. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
55. National Research Council. (2011). Promising practices in undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education: Summary of two workshops, accessed November 15, 2012, available at http://crpde.ou.edu/sites/crpde.ou.edu/files/NRC%20Report%20on%20Promising%20Practices%20in%20STEM%20Education.pdf.
56. National Science and Technology Council. (2011). The federal science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education portfolio, accessed November 3, 2013, available at http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/costem__federal_stem_education_portfolio_report.pdf.
57. National Science Foundation (2013). Widening implementation and demonstration of evidence-based reforms (WIDER): Program soliciation, accessed May 14, 2013, available at http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2013/nsf13552/nsf13552.htm.
58. Nkhoma, M., Sriratanaviriyakul, N., Pham, H. C., & Lam, T. K. (2013). Understanding the paradox of information systems case studies. Nineteenth Americas Conference on Information Systems. Chicago, IL, accessed January 30, 2014, available at http://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2013/ISEducation/GeneralPresentations/23/.
59. OECD (2010). OECD economic surveys: United States 2010. OECD Publishing.
60. Okoli, C., & Pawlowski, S. D. (2004). The Delphi method as a research tool: An example, design considerations and applications. Information & Management, 42(1), 15-29.
61. Oppermann, R., & Rasher, R. (1997). Adaptability and adaptivity in learning systems. In A. Behrooz (Ed.), Knowledge transfer. London, UK: pAce, 173-179.
62. Paliwoda, S. J. (1983). Predicting the future using Delphi. Management Decision, 21(1), 31-38.
63. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative evaluation and research methods Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
64. President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. (2012). Report to the President: Engage to excel: Producing one million additional college graduates with degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Washington DC: Executive Office of the President, accessed October 21, 2012, available at http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/pcast-engage-to-excel-final_feb.pdf.
65. Riggs, W. E. (1983). The Delphi technique: An experimental evaluation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 23(1), 89-94.
66. Riley, K., Davis, M., Cox, A., & Maciukenas, J. (2007). "Ethics in the details": An NSF project to integrate ethics into the graduate engineering curriculum. IEEE International Professional Communication Conference, Seattle, WA: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.
67. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York, NY: Free Press/Simon & Schuster.
68. Rohrbaugh, J. (1979). Improving the quality of group judgment: Social judgment analysis and the Delphi technique. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 24(1), 73-92.
69. Romano, A. R. (2010). Malleable Delphi: Delphi research technique, its evolution, and business applications. International Review of Business Research Papers, 6(5), 235-243.
70. Ross, A. M., Rhodes, D. H., & Hastings, D. E. (2008). Defining changeability: Reconciling flexibility, adaptability, scalability, modifiability, and robustness for maintaining system lifecycle value. Systems Engineering, 11(3), 246-262.
71. Schunk, D. H., Pintrich, P. R., & Meece, J. L. (2008). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
72. Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22(2), 63-75.
73. Siegel, S. (1956). Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill.
74. Smith, K. A., Sheppard, S. D., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2005). Pedagogies of engagement: Classroom-based practices. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 87-101.
75. Snider, B., & Balakrishnan, J. (2013). Lessons learned from implementing web-based simulations to teach operations management concepts. INFORMS Transactions on Education, 13(3), 152-161.
76. Taras, V. A. S., Caprar, D. V., Rottig, D., Sarala, R. M., Zakaria, N., Zhao, F., Jimenez, A., Wankel, C., Si Lei, W., Minor, M. S., Bryla, P., Ordenana, X., Bode, A., Schuster, A., Vaiginiene, E., Jintae Froese, F., Bathula, H., Yajnik, N., Baldegger, R., & Zengyu Huang, V. (2013). A global classroom? Evaluating the effectiveness of global virtual collaboration as a teaching tool in management education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 12(3), 414-435.
77. Taylor, R. E., & Meinhardt, D. J. (1985). Defining computer information needs for small business: A Delphi method. Journal of Small Business Management, 23(2), 3-10.
78. Taylor, S., & Todd, P. (1995). Decomposition and crossover effects in the theory of planned behavior: A study of consumer adoption intentions. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 12(2), 137-155.
79. Tornatzky, L. G., & Fleischer, M. (1990). The processes of technological innovation. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
80. Wu, Y., & Sankar, C. S. (2013). Impact of hands-on research experience on students' learning in an introductory management information system course. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 11(4), 335-358.