Adaptive advice in learning with a computer-based knowledge management simulation game

Academy of Management Learning and Education

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 653-665

  Leemkuil, Henny ^a   De Jong, Ton ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84879469056     PISSN: 1537260X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5465/amle.2010.0141     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Alfieri, L., Brooks, P. J., Aldrich, N. J., & Tenenbaum, H. R. 2011. Does discovery-based instruction enhance learning? Journal of Educational Psychology, 103: 1-18.
2. Bell, B. S., Kanar, A. M., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. 2008. Current issues and future directions in simulation-based training. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19: 1416-1434.
3. Bell, B. S., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. 2002. Adaptive guidance: Enhancing self-regulation, knowledge, and performance in technology-based training. Personnel Psychology, 55: 267-306.
4. Berry, D., & Broadbent, D. 1988. Interactive tasks and the implicit-explicit distinction. British Journal of Psychology, 79: 251-272.
5. Bravo, C., van Joolingen, W. R., & de Jong, T. 2006. Modeling and simulation in inquiry learning: Checking solutions and giving intelligent advice. Simulation: Transactions of the Society for Modeling and Simulation International, 82: 769-784.
6. Cameron, B., & Dwyer, F. 2005. The effect of online gaming, cognition and feedback type in facilitating delayed achievement of different learning objectives. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 16: 243-258.
7. Cohen, K. J., & Rhenman, E. 1961. The role of management games in education and research. Management Science, 7: 131-166.
8. Davis, E. A. 2000. Scaffolding students' knowledge integration: Prompts for reflection in KIE. International Journal of Science Education, 22: 819-837.
9. de Jong, T. 2006. Computer simulations - Technological advances in inquiry learning. Science, 312: 532-533.
10. de Jong, T. 2010a. Instruction based on computer simulations. In R. E. Mayer & P. A. Alexander, (Eds.), Handbook of research on learning and instruction: 446-466. New York: Routledge.
11. de Jong, T. 2010b. Cognitive load theory, educational research, and instructional design: Some food for thought. Instructional Science, 38: 105-134.
12. de Jong, T., Martin, E., Zamarro, J.-M., Esquembre, F., Swaak, J., & van Joolingen, W. R. 1999. The integration of computer simulation and learning support; an example from the physics domain of collisions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36: 597-615.
13. de Jong, T., van Joolingen, W. R., Giemza, A., Girault, I., Hoppe, U., & Kindermann, J. 2010. Learning by creating and exchanging objects: The SCY experience. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41: 909-921.
14. Deslauriers, L., & Wieman, C. E. 2011. Learning and retention of quantum concepts with different teaching methods. Physical Reviews Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 7: 010101.
15. Eysink, T. H. S., de Jong, T., Berthold, K., Kollöffel, B., Opfermann, M., & Wouters, P. 2009. Learner performance in multimedia learning arrangements: An analysis across instructional approaches. American Educational Research Journal, 46: 1107-1149.
16. Faria, A. J., Hutchinson, D., Wellington, W. J., & Gold, S. 2008. Developments in business gaming: A review of the past 40 years. Simulation and Gaming, 40: 464-487.
17. Garris, R., Ahlers, R., & Driskell, J. E. 2002. Games, motivation, and learning: A research and practice model. Simulation and Gaming, 33: 441-467.
18. Gee, J. P. 2003. What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
19. Gosen, J. J., & Washbush, J. 2004. A review of scholarship on assessing experiential learning effectiveness. Simulation and Gaming, 35: 270-293.
20. Houghton, J. 2007. SimProject: A project management simulation for classroom instruction. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 6: 576-578.
21. Jacobs, J. W., & Dempsey, J. V. 1993. Simulation and gaming: Fidelity, feedback and motivation. In J. V. Dempsey & G. C. Sales, (Eds.), Interactive instruction and feedback: 197-228. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
22. Knotts, U. S., & Keys, J. B. 1997. Teaching strategic management with a business game. Simulation and Gaming, 28: 377-394.
23. Leemkuil, H., & de Jong, T. 2011. Instructional support in games. In S. Tobias & D. Fletcher, (Eds.), Computer games and instruction: 353-370. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
24. Leemkuil, H., de Jong, T., de Hoog, R., & Christoph, N. 2003. KM Quest: A collaborative internet-based simulation game. Simulation and Gaming, 34: 89-111.
25. Leutner, D. 1993. Guided discovery learning with computerbased simulation games: Effects of adaptive and nonadaptive instructional support. Learning and Instruction, 3: 113-132.
26. Liu, C. C., Cheng, Y. B., & Huang, C.-W. 2011. The effect of simulation games on the learning of computational problem solving. Computers and Education, 57: 1907-1918.
27. Mautone, P. D., & Mayer, R. E. 2001. Signaling as a cognitive guide in multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93: 377-389.
28. Mayer, R. E. 2004. Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? The case for guided methods of instruction. American Psychologist, 59: 14-19.
29. Mayer, R. E., & Johnson, C. I. 2010. Adding instructional features that promote learning in a game-like environment. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 42: 241-265.
30. Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. 2002. Aids to computer-based multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 12: 107-119.
31. Minner, D. D., Levy, A. J., & Century, J. 2010. Inquiry-based science instruction - What is it and does it matter? Results from a research synthesis years 1984-2002. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47: 474-496.
32. Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. 2005. Role of guidance, reflection, and interactivity in an agent-based multimedia game. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97: 117-128.
33. Nelson, B. C. 2007. Exploring the use of individualized, reflective guidance in an educational multi-user virtual environment. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16: 83-97.
34. Nelson, B. C., & Erlandson, B. E. 2008. Managing cognitive load in educational multi-user virtual environments: Reflection on design practice. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56: 619-641.
35. O'Neil, H. F., Wainess, R., & Baker, E. L. 2005. Classification of learning outcomes: Evidence from the computer games literature. Curriculum Journal, 16: 455-474.
36. Pasin, F., & Giroux, H. 2011. The impact of a simulation game on operations management education. Computers and Education, 57: 1240-1254.
37. Peters, V. A. M., & Vissers, G. A. N. 2004. A simple classification model for debriefing simulation games. Simulation and Gaming, 3: 70-84.
38. Quintana, C., Zhang, J., & Krajcik, J. 2005. A framework for supporting metacognitive aspects of online inquiry through soft-ware based scaffolding. Educational Psychologist, 40: 235-244.
39. Reid, D. J., Zhang, J., & Chen, Q. 2003. Supporting scientific discovery learning in a simulation environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19: 9-20.
40. Salas, E., Wildman, J. L., & Piccolo, D. F. 2009. Using simulationbased training to enhance management education. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 8: 559-573.
41. Swaak, J., & de Jong, T. 2001. Discovery simulations and the assessment of intuitive knowledge. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17: 284-295.
42. Swaak, J., van Joolingen, W. R., & de Jong, T. 1998. Supporting simulation-based learning; the effects of model progression and assignments on definitional and intuitive knowledge. Learning and Instruction, 8: 235-253.
43. Thomas, J. M., & Young, R. M. 2010. Annie: Automated generation of adaptive learner guidance for fun serious games. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 3: 329-343.
44. Tobias, S., Fletcher, J. D., Dai, D. Y., & Wind, A. P. 2011. Review of research on computer games. In S. Tobias & J. D. Fletcher, (Eds.), Computer games and instruction: 127-222. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
45. van der Spek, E. D., van Oostendorp, H., Wouters, P., & Aarnoudse, L. 2010. Attentional cueing in serious games. In K. Debattista, M. Dickey, A. Proenca, & L. P. Santos, (Eds.) Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Games and Virtual Worlds for Serious Applications: 119-125.
46. van Eck, R., & Dempsey, J. V. 2002. The effect of competition and contextualized advisement on the transfer of mathematics skills in a computer-based instructional simulation game. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50: 23-41.
47. Vandercruysse, S., Vandewaetere, M., & Clarebout, G. 2012. Game-based learning: A review on the effectiveness of educational games. In M. M. Cruz-Cunha, ed., Handbook of research on serious games as educational, business and research tools: Development and design. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
48. Veermans, K. H., van Joolingen, W. R., & de Jong, T. 2006. Using heuristics to facilitate scientific discovery learning in a simulation learning environment in a physics domain. International Journal of Science Education, 28: 341-361.
49. Vogel, J. J., Vogel, D. S., Cannon-Bowers, J., Bowers, C. A., Muse, K., & Wright, M. 2006. Computer gaming and interactive simulations for learning: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 34: 229-243.
50. Wolfe, J. 1997. The effectiveness of business games in strategic management course work. Simulation and Gaming, 28: 360-376.
51. Wouters, P., van der Spek, E., & van Oostendorp, H. 2009. Current practices in serious game research: A review from a learning outcomes perspective. In T. M. Connolly, M. Stansfield, & L. Boyle, (Eds.), Games-based learning advancements for multisensory human computer interfaces: Techniques and effective practices: 232-250. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
52. Wu, W. H., Hsiao, H. C., Wu, P. L., Lin, C. H., & Huang, S. H. 2012. Investigating the learning-theory foundations of gamebased learning: A meta-analysis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28: 265-279.