Breaking down online teaching: Innovation and resistance

Australasian Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 14-29

  Hannon, John ^a  

^a LA TROBE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 65449170091     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14495554     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14742/ajet.1178     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (40)

1. Alexander, S. (2006). Dissemination of innovations: A case study. In Who's learning? Whose technology? Proceedings ascilite Sydney 2006. http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/sydney06/proceeding/ pdf_papers/p182.pdf
2. Alvesson, M. & Sveningsson, S. (2008). Changing organizational culture: Cultural change work in progress. London; New York, NY: Routledge.
3. Arnold, M. (2007). The concept of community and the character of networks. The Journal of Community Informatics, 3(2).
4. Bacsich, P. (2005). Lessons to be learned from the failure of the UK e-University. In Breaking down boundaries: 17th Biennial Conference of the Open and Distance Learning Association of Australia. http://www.unisa.edu.au/odlaaconference/PDFs/32%20odlaa2005%20- %20bacsich.pdf [viewed 26 July 2008, verified 16 Jan 2009]
5. Bigum, C. & Rowan, L. (2004). Flexible learning in teacher education: Myths, muddles and models. Asia Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 32(3), 213-226.
6. Callon, M. (1986). Some elements in a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and fishermen of St. Brieuc Bay. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, action and belief: A new sociology of knowledge? (pp. 196-233). London: Routledge
7. Charette, R. (2005). Why software fails. IEEE Spectrum, September. [verified 16 Jan 2009} http://www.spectrum.ieee.org/sep05/1685
8. Conole, G., de Laat, M., Dillon, T. & Darby, J. (2008). 'Disruptive technologies','pedagogical innovation': What's new? Findings from an in-depth study of students' use and perception of technology. Computers & Education, 50, 511-524.
9. Conole, G. (2007). Distilling lessons from across different types of elearning interventions. In WWWrong: What went wrong? What went right? Exchanging experiences in technology enhanced learning, 17-18 September, Crete, Greece.
10. Cooren, F., Matte, F., Taylor, J. & Vasquez, C. (2007). A humanitarian organization in action: Organizational discourse as an immutable mobile. Discourse & Communication, 1(2), 153-190.
11. Cornford, J. & Pollock, N. (2003). Putting the university online: Information, technology and organizational change. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
12. Couldry, N. (2008). Form and power in an age of continuous spectacle. In D. Hesmondhalgh & J. Toynbee (Eds.), Media and social theory. Routledge.
13. Downes, S. (2006). Learning networks and connective knowledge. Instructional Technology Forum. [verified 16 Jan 2009] http://it.coe.uga.edu/itforum/paper92/DownesPaper92.pd
14. Edwards, R., Nicoll, K., Solomon, N. & Usher, R. (2004). Rhetoric and educational discourse: Persuasive texts? London: RoutledgeFalmer.
15. Fox, S. (2005). An actor network critique of community in higher education: implications for networked learning. Studies in Higher Education, 30(1), 95-110.
16. Goodyear, P. & Ellis, R. (2008). University students' approaches to learning: Rethinking the place of technology. Distance Education, 29(2), 141-152.
17. Hannon, J. (2008). Doing staff development: Practices, dilemmas and technologies. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(1), 15-29. http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet24/hannon.html
18. Ihde, D. (2002). Bodies in technology. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
19. Land, R. (2004). Issues of embodiment and risk in online learning. In Beyond the comfort zone: Proceedings ASCILITE Perth 2004. http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/perth04/procs/land.html
20. Latour, B. (1999a). On recalling ANT. In J. Law & J. Hassard (Eds.), Actor network theory and after. Boston, Mass: Blackwell Publishers.
21. Latour, B. (1999b). Pandora's hope: Essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press.
22. Latour, B. (1992). Where are the missing masses? The sociology of a few mundane artifacts. In W. Bijker & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology/building society: Studies in sociotechnical change. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, pp. 225-258.
23. Latour, B. (1987). Science in action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24. Latour, B. (1986). The powers of association. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, action and belief: A new sociology of knowledge? London: Routledge, pp. 264-280.
25. Law, J. (2000). Networks, relations, cyborgs: On the social study of technology. http://www.lancs.ac.uk/fass/sociology/research/ resalph.htm [viewed 26 July, 2008].
26. Law, J. (1999a). Objects, spaces, others. http://www.lancs.ac.uk/ fass/sociology/papers/law-objects-spaces-others.pdf [viewed 26 July, 2008].
27. Law, J. (1999b). After ANT: Complexity, naming and typology. In J. Law & J. Hassard (Eds.), Actor network theory and after. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 1-14.
28. Law, J. (1992). Notes on the theory of the actor network: Ordering, strategy and heterogeneity. Systems Practice, 5, 379-393.
29. Lewis, T., Marginson, S. & Snyder, I. (2005). The network university? Technology, culture and organisational complexity in contemporary higher education. Higher Education Quarterly, 59(1), 56-75.
30. McLoughlin, C. & Lee, M. (2007). Future learning landscapes: Transforming pedagogy through social software. Innovate, 4(5). http://innovateonline.info/?view=article&id=539
31. McMullin, B. (2005). Putting the learning back into learning technology. In G. O'Neill, S. Moore & B. McMullin (Eds.), Emerging issues in the practice of university learning and teaching. Dublin: AISHE.
32. Oblinger, D. G. & Oblinger, J. L. (2005). Educating the net generation. An Educause e-book publication. http://www.educause.edu/ ir/library/pdf/pub7101.pdf [viewed 26 July 2008]
33. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications.
34. Potter, J. (2000). Representing reality: Discourse, rhetoric and social construction (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
35. Potter, J. & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour. London, Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
36. Roberts, G. (2004). The new covert curriculum: A critical actor-network approach to learning technology policy. In Proceedings of the fourth international conference on networked learning, Lancaster University and the University of Sheffield. [verified 16 Jan 2009] http://www.networkedlearningconference.org.uk/past/nlc2004/proceedings/ individual_papers/roberts.htm
37. Romiszowski, A. (2004). How's the e-learning baby? Factors leading to success or failure of an educational technology innovation. Educational Technology, 44(1), 5-27.
38. Warzynski, C. (2006). An actor-network approach to leading technological change: Implementing a new technology at a prominent U. S. research university. In A. M. Poorthuis (Ed.), The network approach: Building organisations and society. Amsterdam: Van Gorcum.
39. Weisenberg, F. & Stacey, E. (2005). Reflections on teaching and learning online: Quality program design, delivery and support issues from a cross-global perspective. Distance Education, 26(3), 385-404.
40. Zemsky, R. & Massy, W. (2004). Thwarted innovation: What happened to e-learning and why. A final report for the Weatherstation Project of the Learning Alliance at the University of Pennsylvania in cooperation with the Thomson Corporation. [viewed 26 July 2008] http://www.irhe.upenn.edu/Docs/Jun2004/ThwartedInnovation.pdf