Engineering students for the 21st century: Student development through the curriculum

Advances in Engineering Education

Volumn 2, Issue 4, 2010, Pages

  Cheville, Alan ^a   Bunting, Chuck ^a  

^a Oklahoma State University   (United States)

Author keywords

Department level reform; Engineering taxonomy; Student development

Indexed keywords

DEPARTMENT LEVEL REFORM; ELECTRICAL AND COMPUTER ENGINEERING CURRICULUMS; FORMATIVE EVALUATION; GRADUATE STUDENTS; NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATIONS; OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY; PROJECT EVALUATION; PROJECT SUCCESS; SELF REFLECTION; STUDENT DEVELOPMENT; STUDENT LEARNING; UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAM;

CURRICULA; ENGINEERING; ENGINEERS; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; SCAFFOLDS; TAXONOMIES; TEACHING;

STUDENTS;

EID: 82855169387     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19411766     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Abe, T., and P. J. Starr. 2004. "Work in Progress - Using Bloom's Taxonomy as a Format for Self-Evaluation of Design Education Activities". Paper read at Frontiers in Education, at Savannah, GA. http://fie-conference.org/fie2004/papers/1603.pdf.
2. Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology. 2008. Criteria For Accrediting Engineering Programs. Baltimore: Engineering Accreditation Commision. http://www.abetorg/Linked%20Documents-UPDATE/Criteria%20and%20PP/ E001%2010-11%20EAC%20Criteria%201-27-10.pdf.
3. Alkon, D. L. 1982. Memory's Voice: Deciperhing the Brain-Mind Code. New York: Harper-Collins.
4. Barrows, H. S., and R.M. Tamblyn. 1980. Problem-Based Learning: An Approach to Medical Education. New York: Springer.
5. Besterfield-Sacre, M., L. J. Shuman, H. Wolfe, C. J. Atman, J. McGourty, R. L. Miller, B. M. Olds, and G. M. Rogers. 2000. "Defining the Outcomes: A Framework for EC-2000". IEEE Trans. Educ. 43:100-110.
6. Bjork, R. 1994. "Memory and metamemory considerations in the training of human beings". In Metacognition: Knowing about Knowing, edited by A. J. Metcalf and A. Shinamura, P. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. Bodner, G. M., and M. Orgill. 2007. Theoretical Frameworks for Research in Chemistry/Science Education. New York: Prentice-Hall.
8. Bucciarelli, L. L. 1994. Designing Engineers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. Burbules, N. C., and M. C. Linn. 1992. "Response to contradiction: scientific reasoning during adolescence". Journal of Educational Psychology 80:67-85.
10. Bush, S. D., et al. 2008. "Science Faculty with Education Specialties". Science 322:1795-1796.
11. Cheville, R. A. 2009a. "Electrical and Computer Engineering Online Catalog". [web site] cited August 2009. Available from http://ecendesign.okstate.edu/catalog/.
12. Cheville, R. A. 2009b. "The Engineering Taxonomy". [web site] cited August 2009. Available from http://es21c.okstate.edu/resources/Engineering%20Taxonomy.html.
13. Cheville, R. A. 2010. "Transformative Experiences: Scaffolding Design Learning Through the Vygotsky Cycle". International Journal of Engineering Education, 26(4), 2010, pp. 760-770.
14. Cheville, R. A. 2009d. "Kridnix's YouTube Channel". [web site] cited August 2009. Available from http://www.youtube.com/kridnix.
15. Cheville, R. A., et al. 2007. "Communication as a Proxy Measure for Student Design Ability in Capstone Design Courses". Paper read at ASEE American Society of Engineering Educational Annual Conference and Exposition. Honolulu. http://search.asee.org/search/fetch;jsessionid=43i50gj0hfidj?url=file%3A %2F%2Flocalhost%2FE%3A%2Fsearch%2Fconference%2F14%2FAC%25202007Full262.p df&index=conference_papers&space=129746797203605791716676178 &type=application%2Fpdf&charset=.
16. Cheville, R. A., and J. Duvall. 2008. "Evaluation of different aspects of peer interaction using an on-line instrument". Paper read at American Society of Engineering Educational Annual Conference and Exposition, Pittsburgh. http://search.asee.org/search/fetch?url=file%3A%2F%2Flocalhost%2FE%3A%2F search%2Fconference%2F17%2FAC%25202008Full897.pdf&index=conference_p apers&space=129746797203605791716676178&type=application%2Fpdf &charset=.
17. Cheville, R. A., and J. Duvall. 2009. "The Simple Team Experience Assessment Measure". [web site] cited August 2009. Available from http://peereval.okstate.edu/.
18. Cheville, R. A., et al. 2008. "Work in progress - assessing the engineering curriculum through Bloom's Taxonomy". In Frontiers in Education. Saratoga Springs, NY. http://fie-conference.org/fie2008/papers/1832.pdf.
19. Chi, M. 2005. "Commonsense Conceptions of Emergent Processes: Why Some Misconceptions are Robust". Journal of the Learning Sciences 14 (2):161-195.
20. Chi, M., et al. 1994. "Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding". Cognitive Science 18:439-477.
21. Co, C., et al. 2007. "A pre-capstone course designed to improve student performance on open-ended design projects". In American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exhibition. Honolulu. http://search.asee.org/search/fetch?url=file%3A%2F%2Flocalhost%2FE%3A%2F search%2Fconference%2F14%2FAC%25202007Full267.pdf&index=conference_p apers&space=129746797203605791716676178&type=application%2Fpdf &charset=.
22. Collins, H. M. 2001. "Tacit Knowledge, Trust and the Q of Sapphire". Social Studies of Science 31:71-85.
23. National Research Council. 2000. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Edited by J. D. Bransford, A. L. Brown and R. R. Cocking. Washginton, DC: National Academy Press.
24. Druckman, D. L., and R. A. Bjork, eds. 1991. In the Mind's Eye: Enhancing Human Performance. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
25. Epstein, S. 1994. "Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconcious". American Psychologist 49:709-724.
26. Ericsson, K. A., et al. 1993. "The role of deliberate practice in the acquisiton of expert performance". Psychological Review 100:363-406.
27. Felder, R. M., et al. 2000. "The future of engineering education VI: making reform happen". Chem. Eng. Educ. 34 (3):208-215.
28. Ford, R. M., and C. S. Coulston. 2007. Design for Electrical and Computer Engineers. New York: McGraw-Hill.
29. Froyd, J. E. 2007. "Evidence for the Efficacy of Student-active Learning Pedagogies. College Station: Texas A&M University. [electronic document] cited October 2009. Available from http://www.pkal.org/documents/BibliographyofSALPedagogies.cfm.
30. Gee, J. P. 2004. Situated Language and Learning. Edited by D. Barton, Literacies. New York: Routledge.
31. Gick, M. L., and K. J. Holyoak. 1983. "Schema induction and analogical transfer". Cognitive Psychology 15:1-38.
32. Glaser, R. 1992. "Expert knowledge and processes of thinking". In Enhancing Thinking Skills in the Sciences and Mathematics, edited by D. F. Halpern. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
33. James, W., et al. 2007. "Distinguishing the art from the scienc of teaching within research-based curricula and assessment". American Society of Engineering Educational Annual Conference and Exposition, Honolulu. http://search.asee.org/search/fetch?url=file%3A%2F%2Flocalhost%2FE%3A%2F search%2Fconference%2F14%2FAC%25202007Full2062.pdf&index=conference_ papers&space=129746797203605791716676178&type=application%2Fpdf &charset=.
34. Jonassen, D. H. 2000. "Toward a Design Theory of Problem Solving". Educ. Tech. Res. & Dev. 48 (4):63.
35. Klingbeil, N., et al. 2005. "Work in progress - the WSU model for engineering mathematics education". In Frontiers in Education, 2005. FIE '05. Proceedings 35th Annual Conference. Indianapolis. http://fie-conference.org/fie2005/papers/1527.pdf.
36. Krathwohl, D. R. 2002. "A revision of Bloom's Taxonomy: An Overview". Theory into Practice 41 (4):212-218.
37. Kruger, J., and D. Dunning. 1999. "Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizign One's Own Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77 (6):1121-1134.
38. W. LeFevre, et al. 2005. Engineering Program Assessment. Clemson, SC: National Council of Examiners for Engineering and Surveying.
39. Lundeberg, M. A., and G. Schuerman. 1997. "Looking twice means seeing more: developing pedagogical knowledge through case analysis". Teaching and Teacher Education 13 (8):783-797.
40. McClymer, J. F., and L. Z. Knoles. 1992. "Erstaz Leraning, Inauthentic Testing". Journal on Excellence in College Teaching 3:33-50.
41. McCombs, B. L. 1996. "Alternative perspectives for motivation". In Developing Engaged Readers in School and Home Communities, edited by L. Baker, P. Afflerback and D. Reinking. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
42. McVee, M. B., et al. 2005. "Schema Theory Revisited". Rev. Ed. Res. 75 (4):531-566.
43. Minniger, J. 1984. Total Recall: How to boost your memory power. Emmaus, PA: Rodale.
44. National Research Council. 2004. The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.
45. National Research Council. 2005. Educating the Engineer of 2020: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century. Washington, D. C.: The National Academies Press.
46. National Research Council. 2007. Rising Above the Gathering Storm: Energizing and Employing America for a Brighter Economic Future. Washington, D. C.: The National Academies Press.
47. National Research Council. 2009. Rising Above the Gathering Storm Two Years Later: Accelerating Progress Toward a Brighter Economic Future. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.
48. Noam, Eli. 1995. "Electronics and the dim future of the university". Science 270 (5234):247-249.
49. Ohland, M. 2009. CATME: Comprehensive Assessment of Team Member Effectiveness 2009 [web site] cited July 2009. Available from https://engineering.purdue.edu/CATME/index.htm.
50. Oswald, N. et al. 2009. "Work in Progress: Motivation for Mathematics, Using Design with the Wright State Model". Paper read at Frontiers in Education, at Savannah, GA.
51. Pintrich, P. R., and D. Schunk. 1996. Motivation in Education: Theory, Research, and Application. Columbus, OH: Merrill Prentice-Hall.
52. Schraw, G. and Dennison, R. S. 1994. "Assessing Metacognitive Awareness". Contemporary Educational Psychology 19:460-475.
53. Schwartz, D. L., et al. 1999. "Toward the development of flexibly adaptive instructional designs". In Instructional Design Theories and Models, Vol. II, edited by C. M. Reigelut. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
54. Seymour, E., and N. Hewitt. 1994. Talking About Leaving: Factors Contributing to High Attrition Rates Among Science, Mathematics, and Engineering Undergraduate Majors. Boulder, CO: Bureau of Sociological Research, University of Colorado.
55. Sheppard, S. D., et al. 2008. Educating Engineers: Designing for the Future of the Field. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
56. Smith, K. A., et al. 2005. "Pedagogies of Engagement- Classroom-Based Practices". Journal of Engineering Education 94:87-101.
57. PBL Website, Southern Illinois University. Problem Based Learning 2002. Available from http://www.pbli.org/pbl/pbl.htm.
58. Virgil. 1990. The Aenid. Translated by R. Fitzgerald. New York: Knopf Doubleday.
59. Wellman, J., et al. 2009. Trends in College Spending. The Delta Foundation. [electronic document] cited December 2008. Available from http://www.deltacostproject.org/resources/pdf/trends_in_spending-report. pdf.
60. University of Wisconsin. Student Assessment of Learning Gains [web site] cited July 2009. Available from http://www.salgsite.org/.
61. Woods, Donald R. 1996. Problem-based Learning: how to gain the most from PBL. third ed. Hamilton, ON: Waterdown.
62. Yadav, A., et al. 2011. "Problem-based learning: Influence on students' learning in an electrical engineering course". Journal of Engineering Education. 100 (2), pp. 253-280.