Structural and evolutionary versatility in protein complexes with uneven stoichiometry

Nature Communications

Volumn 6, Issue , 2015, Pages

  Marsh, Joseph A ^a,b   Rees, Holly A ^b   Ahnert, Sebastian E ^c   Teichmann, Sarah A ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^b WELLCOME TRUST SANGER INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BACTERIAL PROTEIN; CELL PROTEIN; HOMODIMER; MICROORGANISM PROTEIN; MULTIPROTEIN COMPLEX; PROTEIN; PROTEIN SUBUNIT;

ASYMMETRY; BACTERIUM; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EUKARYOTE; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; PROTEIN; STOICHIOMETRY; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BACTERIUM; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; EUKARYOTE EVOLUTION; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; IN VITRO STUDY; IN VIVO STUDY; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; NONHUMAN; PROTEIN ASSEMBLY; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN QUATERNARY STRUCTURE; PROTEOMICS; STOICHIOMETRY; YEAST; BINDING SITE; BIOLOGY; CHEMISTRY; CRYSTALLIZATION; ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; PROTEIN DATABASE; PROTEIN SUBUNIT; X RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHY;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); EUKARYOTA;

BACTERIAL PROTEINS; BINDING SITES; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; CRYSTALLIZATION; CRYSTALLOGRAPHY, X-RAY; DATABASES, PROTEIN; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, QUATERNARY; PROTEIN SUBUNITS; PROTEINS;

EID: 84938932863     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20411723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms7394     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Gavin, A.-C. et al. Proteome survey reveals modularity of the yeast cell machinery. Nature 440, 631-636 (2006).
2. Krogan, N. J. et al. Global landscape of protein complexes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 440, 637-643 (2006).
3. Havugimana, P. C. et al. A census of human soluble protein complexes. Cell 150, 1068-1081 (2012).
4. Fermi, G., Perutz, M. F., Shaanan, B. & Fourme, R. The crystal structure of human deoxyhaemoglobin at 1.74A resolution. J. Mol. Biol. 175, 159-174 (1984).
5. Friedman, J. M. Structure, dynamics, and reactivity in hemoglobin. Science 228, 1273-1280 (1985).
6. Baumeister, W., Walz, J., Zühl, F. & Seemüller, E. The proteasome: paradigm of a self-compartmentalizing protease. Cell 92, 367-380 (1998).
7. Sprangers, R. & Kay, L. E. Quantitative dynamics and binding studies of the 20 S proteasome by NMR. Nature 445, 618-622 (2007).
8. Gallastegui, N. & Groll, M. The 26 S proteasome: assembly and function of a destructive machine. Trends Biochem. Sci. 35, 634-642 (2010).
9. Lai, Y.-T., Cascio, D. & Yeates, T. O. Structure of a 16-nm cage designed by using protein oligomers. Science 336, 1129 (2012).
10. Lai, Y.-T., King, N. P. & Yeates, T. O. Principles for designing ordered protein assemblies. Trends Cell Biol. 22, 653-661 (2012).
11. Fleishman, S. J. et al. Computational design of proteins targeting the conserved stem region of influenza hemagglutinin. Science 332, 816-821 (2011).
12. Karanicolas, J. et al. A de novo protein binding pair by computational design and directed evolution. Mol. Cell 42, 250-260 (2011).
13. Levy, E. D., Erba, E. B., Robinson, C. V. & Teichmann, S. A. Assembly reflects evolution of protein complexes. Nature 453, 1262-1265 (2008).
14. Marsh, J. A. et al. Protein complexes are under evolutionary selection to assemble via ordered pathways. Cell 153, 461-470 (2013).
15. Marsh, J. A. & Teichmann, S. A. Parallel dynamics and evolution: protein conformational fluctuations and assembly reflect evolutionary changes in sequence and structure. Bioessays 36, 209-218 (2014).
16. Klotz, I. M., Langebman, N. & Dahnall, D. Quaternary structure of proteins. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 39, 25-62 (1970).
17. Goodsell, D. S. & Olson, A. J. Structural symmetry and protein function. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 29, 105-153 (2000).
18. Levy, E. D., Pereira-Leal, J. B., Chothia, C. & Teichmann, S. A. 3D complex: a structural classification of protein complexes. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2, e155 (2006).
19. Marsh, J. A. & Teichmann, S. A. Structure, dynamics, assembly and evolution of protein complexes. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 84 doi:10.1146/annurev-biochem-060614-034142 (2015).
20. Blundell, T. L. et al. Asymmetry in the multiprotein systems of molecular biology. Struct. Chem. 13, 405-412 (2002).
21. Brown, J. H. Breaking symmetry in protein dimers: designs and functions. Protein Sci. 15, 1-13 (2006).
22. Maksay, G. & Tşoke, O. Asymmetric perturbations of signalling oligomers. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 114, 153-169 (2014).
23. Bonjack, M. & Avnir, D. The near-symmetry of proteins. Proteins. doi:10.1002/prot.24706 (2014).
24. Kleywegt, G. J. Use of non-crystallographic symmetry in protein structure refinement. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 52, 842-857 (1996).
25. Xu, Z., Horwich, A. L. & Sigler, P. B. The crystal structure of the asymmetric GroEL-GroES-(ADP) 7 chaperonin complex. Nature 388, 741-750 (1997).
26. Stock, D., Leslie, A. G. & Walker, J. E. Molecular architecture of the rotary motor in ATP synthase. Science 286, 1700-1705 (1999).
27. Garcia-Pino, A. et al. Allostery and intrinsic disorder mediate transcription regulation by conditional cooperativity. Cell 142, 101-111 (2010).
28. Swapna, L. S., Srikeerthana, K. & Srinivasan, N. Extent of structural asymmetry in homodimeric proteins: prevalence and relevance. PLoS ONE 7, e36688 (2012).
29. Shuart, N. G., Haitin, Y., Camp, S. S., Black, K. D. & Zagotta, W. N. Molecular mechanism for 3:1 subunit stoichiometry of rod cyclic nucleotide-gated ion channels. Nat. Commun. 2, 457 (2011).
30. Marsh, J. A. & Teichmann, S. A. Protein flexibility facilitates quaternary structure assembly and evolution. PLoS Biol. 12, e1001870 (2014).
31. Perica, T. et al. The emergence of protein complexes: quaternary structure, dynamics and allostery. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 40, 475-491 (2012).
32. Meldal, B. H. M. et al. The complex portal - an encyclopaedia of macromolecular complexes. Nucleic Acid Res. 43, D479-D484 (2015).
33. Quax, T. E. F. et al. Differential translation tunes uneven production of operon-encoded proteins. Cell Rep. 4, 938-944 (2013).
34. Li, G.-W., Burkhardt, D., Gross, C. & Weissman, J. S. Quantifying absolute protein synthesis rates reveals principles underlying allocation of cellular resources. Cell 157, 624-635 (2014).
35. Wang, M. et al. PaxDb, a database of protein abundance averages across all three domains of life. Mol. Cell Proteomics 11, 492-500 (2012).
36. Wilhelm, M. et al. Mass-spectrometry-based draft of the human proteome. Nature 509, 582-587 (2014).
37. Nooren, I. M. A. & Thornton, J. M. Structural characterisation and functional significance of transient protein-protein interactions. J. Mol. Biol. 325, 991-1018 (2003).
38. Perkins, J. R., Diboun, I., Dessailly, B. H., Lees, J. G. & Orengo, C. Transient protein-protein interactions: structural, functional, and network properties. Structure 18, 1233-1243 (2010).
39. Schneider, A., Seidl, M. F. & Snel, B. Shared protein complex subunits contribute to explaining disrupted co-occurrence. PLoS. Comput. Biol. 9, e1003124 (2013).
40. Matalon, O., Horovitz, A. & Levy, E. D. Different subunits belonging to the same protein complex often exhibit discordant expression levels and evolutionary properties. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 26 C, 113-120 (2014).
41. Loll, B., Gebhardt, M., Wahle, E. & Meinhart, A. Crystal structure of the EndoG/EndoGI complex: mechanism of EndoG inhibition. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, 7312-7320 (2009).
42. Haebel, P. W., Goldstone, D., Katzen, F., Beckwith, J. & Metcalf, P. The disulfide bond isomerase DsbC is activated by an immunoglobulin-fold thiol oxidoreductase: crystal structure of the DsbC-DsbDalpha complex. EMBO J 21, 4774-4784 (2002).
43. Li, P. et al. Complex structure of the activating immunoreceptor NKG2D and its MHC class I-like ligand MICA. Nat. Immunol. 2, 443-451 (2001).
44. Kajander, T. et al. Dual interaction of factor H with C3d and glycosaminoglycans in host-nonhost discrimination by complement. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 2897-2902 (2011).
45. Su, D. et al. Structure and histone binding properties of the Vps75-Rtt109 chaperone-lysine acetyltransferase complex. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 15625-15629 (2011).
46. He, X.-L. & Garcia, K. C. Structure of nerve growth factor complexed with the shared neurotrophin receptor p75. Science 304, 870-875 (2004).
47. Levy, E. D. PiQSi: protein quaternary structure investigation. Structure 15, 1364-1367 (2007).
48. Dobbins, S. E., Lesk, V. I. & Sternberg, M. J. E. Insights into protein flexibility: The relationship between normal modes and conformational change upon protein-protein docking. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 10390-10395 (2008).
49. Marsh, J. A. & Teichmann, S. A. Relative solvent accessible surface area predicts protein conformational changes upon binding. Structure 19, 859-867 (2011).
50. Marsh, J. A., Teichmann, S. A. & Forman-Kay, J. D. Probing the diverse landscape of protein flexibility and binding. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 22, 643-650 (2012).
51. Hall, Z., Hernández, H., Marsh, J. A., Teichmann, S. A. & Robinson, C. V. The role of salt bridges, charge density, and subunit flexibility in determining disassembly routes of protein complexes. Structure 21, 1325-1337 (2013).
52. Marsh, J. A. Buried and accessible surface area control intrinsic protein flexibility. J. Mol. Biol. 425, 3250-3263 (2013).
53. Lynch, M. The evolution of multimeric protein assemblages. Mol. Biol. Evol. 29, 1353-1366 (2012).
54. Zhang, J. Protein-length distributions for the three domains of life. Trends Genet. 16, 107-109 (2000).
55. Pereira-Leal, J. B., Levy, E. D., Kamp, C. & Teichmann, S. A. Evolution of protein complexes by duplication of homomeric interactions. Genome Biol. 8, R51 (2007).
56. Finn, R. D. et al. Pfam: the protein families database. Nucleic Acid Res. gkt1223 42, D222-D230 (2013).
57. Kabsch, W. A solution for the best rotation to relate two sets of vectors. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A 32, 922-923 (1976).
58. Winn, M. D. et al. Overview of the CCP 4 suite and current developments. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr. 67, 235-242 (2011).
59. Chen, X., Liu, H., Focia, P. J., Shim, A. H.-R. & He, X. Structure of macrophage colony stimulating factor bound to FMS: diverse signaling assemblies of class III receptor tyrosine kinases. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 18267-18272 (2008).