The 26S proteasome: assembly and function of a destructive machine

Trends in Biochemical Sciences

Volumn 35, Issue 11, 2010, Pages 634-642

  Gallastegui, Nerea ^a   Groll, Michael ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

19S REGULATORY PARTICLE; 26S PROTEASOME; ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASE; CHAPERONE; PROTEASOME; UMP1 PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

COMPLEX FORMATION; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; HYDROLYSIS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ASSEMBLY; PROTEIN CLEAVAGE; PROTEIN DEGRADATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; REVIEW;

ANIMALS; HUMANS; PROTEASOME ENDOPEPTIDASE COMPLEX; PROTEIN BINDING; SUBSTRATE SPECIFICITY; UBIQUITIN;

EID: 78049264771     PISSN: 09680004     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tibs.2010.05.005     Document Type: Review

References (85)

1. Hershko A., Ciechanover A. The ubiquitin system. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1998, 67:425-479.
2. Voges D., et al. The 26S proteasome: a molecular machine designed for controlled proteolysis. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1999, 68:1015-1068.
3. Löwe J., et al. Crystal structure of the 20S proteasome from the archaeon T. acidophilum at 3.4 A resolution. Science 1995, 268:533-539.
4. Groll M., et al. Structure of 20S proteasome from yeast at 2.4Å resolution. Nature 1997, 386:463-471.
5. Unno M., et al. The structure of the mammalian 20S proteasome at 2.75Å resolution. Structure 2002, 10(5):609-618.
6. Seemüller E., et al. Proteasome from Thermoplasma acidophilum: a threonine protease. Science 1995, 268:579-582.
7. Coux O., et al. Structure and functions of the 20S and 26S proteasomes. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1996, 65:801-847.
8. Groll M., et al. Molecular machines for protein degradation. Chem. Bio. Chem. 2005, 6:222-256.
9. Marques A.J., et al. Catalytic mechanism and assembly of the proteasome. Chem. Rev. 2009, 109:1509-1536.
10. Murata S., et al. Molecular mechanisms of proteasome assembly. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2009, 10:104-115.
11. Ramos P.C., Dohmen R.J. PACemakers of proteasome core particle assembly. Structure 2008, 16:1296-1304.
12. Park S., et al. Assembly manual for the proteasome regulatory particle: the first draft. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2010, 38:6-13.
13. Besche H.C., et al. Getting to first base in proteasome assembly. Cell 2009, 138:25-28.
14. Zwickl P., et al. Expression of functional Thermoplasma acidophilum proteasomes in Escherichia coli. FEBS Lett. 1992, 312:157-160.
15. Groll M., et al. Investigations on the maturation and regulation of archaebacterial proteasomes. J. Mol. Biol. 2003, 327:75-83.
16. Chen P., Hochstrasser M. Autocatalytic subunit processing couples active site formation in the 20S proteasome to completion of assembly. Cell 1996, 86:961-972.
17. Ditzel L., et al. Conformational constraints for protein self-cleavage in the proteasome. J. Mol. Biol. 1998, 279:1187-1191.
18. Davies A.M., et al. Crystal structure of a putative phosphinothricin acetyltransferase (PA4866) from Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAC1. Proteins 2005, 61:677-679.
19. Hirano Y., et al. Cooperation of multiple chaperones required for the assembly of mammalian 20S proteasomes. Mol. Cell 2006, 24:977-984.
20. Le Tallec B., et al. 20S proteasome assembly is orchestrated by two of chaperones in yeast distinct pairs and in mammals. Mol. Cell 2007, 27:660-674.
21. Ramos P.C., et al. Ump1p is required for proper maturation of the 20S proteasome and becomes its substrate upon completion of the assembly. Cell 1998, 92:489-499.
22. Hirano Y., et al. A heterodimeric complex that promotes the assembly of mammalian 20S proteasomes. Nature 2005, 437:1381-1385.
23. Kusmierczyk A.R., et al. A multimeric assembly factor controls the formation of alternative 20S proteasomes. Nat. Struct Mol. Biol. 2008, 15:237-244.
24. Yashiroda H., et al. Crystal structure of a chaperone complex that contributes to the assembly of yeast 20S proteasomes. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2008, 15:228-236.
25. Hirano Y., et al. Dissecting beta-ring assembly pathway of the mammalian 20S proteasome. EMBO J. 2008, 27:2204-2213.
26. Schmidtke G., et al. Maturation of mammalian 20 S proteasome: purification and characterization of 13 S and 16 S proteasome precursor complexes. J. Mol. Biol. 1997, 268:95-106.
27. Marques A.J., et al. The C-terminal extension of the beta 7 subunit and activator complexes stabilize nascent 20 S proteasomes and promote their maturation. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282:34869-34876.
28. Jager S., et al. Proteasome beta-type subunits: unequal roles of propeptides in core particle maturation and a hierarchy of active site function. J. Mol. Biol. 1999, 291:997-1013.
29. Groll M., et al. The catalytic sites of 20S proteasomes and their role in subunit maturation: a mutational and crystallographic study. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1999, 96:10976-10983.
30. Groll M., et al. A gated channel into the proteasome core particle. Nat. Struct. Biol. 2000, 7:1062-1067.
31. Whitby F.G., et al. Structural basis for the activation of 20S proteasomes by 11S regulators. Nature 2000, 408:115-120.
32. Köhler A., et al. The axial channel of the proteasome core particle is gated by the Rpt2 ATPase and controls both substrate entry and product release. Mol. Cell 2001, 7:1143-1152.
33. Glickman M.H., et al. A subcomplex of the proteasome regulatory particle required for ubiquitin-conjugate degradation and related to the COP9-signalosome and eIF3. Cell 1998, 94:615-623.
34. Rubin D.M., et al. Active site mutants in the six regulatory particle ATPases reveal multiple roles for ATP in the proteasome. EMBO J. 1998, 17:4909-4919.
35. Lam Y.A., et al. A proteasomal ATPase subunit recognizes the polyubiquitin degradation signal. Nature 2002, 416:763-767.
36. Husnjak K., et al. Proteasome subunit Rpn13 is a novel ubiquitin receptor. Nature 2008, 453:481-488.
37. Schreiner P., et al. Ubiquitin docking at the proteasome through a novel pleckstrin-homology domain interaction. Nature 2008, 453:548-552.
38. van Nocker S., et al. The multiubiquitin-chain-binding protein Mcb1 is a component of the 26S proteasome in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and plays a nonessential, substrate-specific role in protein turnover. Mol. Cell Biol. 1996, 16:6020-6028.
39. Jorgensen J.P., et al. Adrm1, a putative cell adhesion regulating protein, is a novel proteasome-associated factor. J. Mol. Biol. 2006, 360:1043-1052.
40. Walz J., et al. 26S proteasome structure revealed by three-dimensional electron microscopy. J. Struct. Biol. 1998, 121:19-29.
41. da Fonseca P.C., Morris E.P. Structure of the human 26S proteasome: subunit radial displacements open the gate into the proteolytic core. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283:23305-23314.
42. Forster A., et al. The 1.9 A structure of a proteasome-11S activator complex and implications for proteasome-PAN/PA700 interactions. Mol. Cell 2005, 18:589-599.
43. Yu Y.D., et al. Interactions of PAN's C-termini with archaeal 20S proteasome and implications for the eukaryotic proteasome-ATPase interactions. EMBO J. 2010, 29:692-702.
44. Stadtmueller B.M., et al. Structural models for interactions between the 20S proteasome and its PAN/19S activators. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285:13-17.
45. Kohler A., et al. The substrate translocation channel of the proteasome. Biochimie 2001, 83:325-332.
46. Gillette T.G., et al. Differential roles of the COOH termini of AAA subunits of PA700 (19 S regulator) in asymmetric assembly and activation of the 26 S proteasome. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283:31813-31822.
47. Smith D.M., et al. Docking of the proteasomal ATPases' carboxyl termini in the 20S proteasome's alpha ring opens the gate for substrate entry. Mol. Cell 2007, 27:731-744.
48. Saeki Y., et al. Multiple proteasome-interacting proteins assist the assembly of the yeast 19S regulatory particle. Cell 2009, 137:900-913.
49. Nakamura Y., et al. Structure of the oncoprotein gankyrin in complex with S6 ATPase of the 26S proteasome. Structure 2007, 15:179-189.
50. Nakamura Y., et al. Structural basis for the recognition between the regulatory particles Nas6 and Rpt3 of the yeast 26S proteasome. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm. 2007, 359:503-509.
51. Funakoshi M., et al. Multiple assembly chaperones govern biogenesis of the proteasome regulatory particle base. Cell 2009, 137:887-899.
52. Roelofs J., et al. Chaperone-mediated pathway of proteasome regulatory particle assembly. Nature 2009, 459:861-865.
53. Le Tallec B., et al. Hsm3/S5b participates in the assembly pathway of the 19S regulatory particle of the proteasome. Mol. Cell 2009, 33:389-399.
54. Rabl J., et al. Mechanism of gate opening in the 20S proteasome by the proteasomal ATPases. Mol. Cell 2008, 30:360-368.
55. Pick E., et al. PCI Complexes: Beyond the Proteasome, CSN, and elF3 Troika. Mol. Cell 2009, 35:260-264.
56. Sharon M., et al. Structural organization of the 19S proteasome lid: Insights from MS of intact complexes. PLOS Biol. 2006, 4:1314-1323.
57. Taverner T., et al. Subunit architecture of intact protein complexes from mass spectrometry and homology modeling. Acc. Chem. Res. 2008, 41:617-627.
58. Imai J., et al. The molecular chaperone Hsp90 plays a role in the assembly and maintenance of the 26S proteasome. EMBO J. 2003, 22:3557-3567.
59. Zuhl F., et al. Dissecting the assembly pathway of the 20S proteasome. FEBS Lett. 1997, 418:189-194.
60. Leggett D., et al. Multiple associated proteins regulate proteasome structure and function. Mol. Cell 2002, 10:495-507.
61. Ustrell V., et al. PA200, a nuclear proteasome activator involved in DNA repair. EMBO J. 2002, 21:3516-3525.
62. Schmidt M., et al. The HEAT repeat protein Blm10 regulates the yeast proteasome by capping the core particle. Nat. Struct Mol. Biol. 2005, 12:294-303.
63. Fehlker M., et al. Blm3 is part of nascent proteasomes and is involved in a late stage of nuclear proteasome assembly. EMBO Rep. 2003, 4:959-963.
64. Lehmann A., et al. Blm10 binds to pre-activated proteasome core particles with open gate conformation. EMBO Rep. 2008, 9:1237-1243.
65. Lavabre-Bertrand T., et al. Plasma proteasome level is a potential marker in patients with solid tumors and hemopoietic malignancies. Cancer 2001, 92:2493-2500.
66. Rousseau E., et al. Misfolding of proteins with a polyglutamine expansion is facilitated by proteasomal chaperones. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284:1917-1929.
67. Borissenko L., Groll M. Diversity of proteasomal missions: fine tuning of the immune response. Biol. Chem. 2007, 388:947-955.
68. Zwickl P., et al. An archaebacterial ATPase, homologous to ATPases in the eukaryotic 26 S proteasome, activates protein breakdown by 20 S proteasomes. J. Biol. Chem. 1999, 274:26008-26014.
69. Benaroudj N., Goldberg A. PAN, the proteasome-activating nucleotidase from archaebacteria, is a protein-unfolding molecular chaperone. Nat. Cell Biol. 2000, 2(11):833-839.
70. Benaroudj N., et al. ATP hydrolysis by the proteasome regulatory complex PAN serves multiple functions in protein degradation. Mol. Cell 2003, 11:69-78.
71. Navon A., Goldberg A.L. Proteins are unfolded on the surface of the ATPase ring before transport into the proteasome. Mol. Cell 2001, 8(6):1339-1349.
72. Zhang F., et al. Structural insights into the regulatory particle of the proteasome from Methanocaldococcus jannaschii. Mol. Cell 2009, 34:473-484.
73. Zhang F., et al. Mechanism of substrate unfolding and translocation by the regulatory particle of the proteasome from Methanocaldococcus jannaschii. Mol. Cell 2009, 34:485-496.
74. Djuranovic S., et al. Structure and activity of the N-terminal substrate recognition domains in proteasomal ATPases. Mol. Cell 2009, 34:580-590.
75. Wang T., et al. Structural Insights on the Mycobacterium tuberculosis Proteasomal ATPase Mpa. Structure 2009, 17:1377-1385.
76. Smith D.M., et al. Proteasomes and their associated ATPases: a destructive combination. J. Struct. Biol. 2006, 156:72-83.
77. Smith D.M., et al. ATP binding to PAN or the 26S ATPases causes association with the 20S proteasome, gate opening, and translocation of unfolded proteins. Mol. Cell 2005, 20:687-698.
78. Martin A., et al. Pore loops of the AAA+ ClpX machine grip substrates to drive translocation and unfolding. Nat. Struct Mol. Biol. 2008, 15:1147-1151.
79. Rohrwild M., et al. HslV-HslU: A novel ATP-dependent protease complex in Escherichia coli related to the eukaryotic proteasome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1996, 93:5808-5813.
80. Bochtler M., et al. Crystal structure of heat shock locus V (HslV) from Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1997, 94:6070-6074.
81. Bochtler M., et al. The structures of HsIU and ATP-dependent protease HsIU-HsIV. Nature 2000, 403:800-805.
82. Sousa M.C., et al. Crystal and solution structures of an HslUV protease-chaperone complex. Cell 2000, 103:633-643.
83. Wang J., et al. Crystal structures of the HslVU peptidase-ATPase complex reveal an ATP-dependent proteolysis mechanism. Structure (Camb.) 2001, 9:177-184.
84. Sousa M., et al. Crystal structure of HslUV complexed with a vinyl sulfone inhibitor: corroboration of a proposed mechanism of allosteric activation of HslV by HslU. J. Mol. Biol. 2002, 318:779-785.
85. Park, S.R., J. Kim, W. Robert, J. Schmidt, M. Gygi, SP. Finley, D. (2009) Hexameric assembly of the proteasomal ATPases is templated through their C termini. Nature 459, 866-870.