Spatial positioning of all 24 chromosomes in the lymphocytes of six subjects: Evidence of reproducible positioning and spatial repositioning following DNA damage with hydrogen peroxide and ultraviolet B

PLoS ONE

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2015, Pages

  Ioannou, Dimitrios ^a   Kandukuri, Lakshmi ^a,d   Quadri, Ameer ^a   Becerra, Victor ^a   Simpson, Joe Leigh ^a,b   Tempest, Helen G ^a,c  

^a FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b March of Dimes Birth Defects Foundation   (United States)

^c FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d CENTRE FOR CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HYDROGEN PEROXIDE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CELLULAR PARAMETERS; CHROMOSOME ANALYSIS; CHROMOSOME POSITIONING; CHROMOSOME REPOSITIONING; CHROMOSOME STRUCTURE; CHROMOSOME TERRITORY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA DAMAGE; EXPOSURE; FEMALE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOTOXICITY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; IN VITRO STUDY; KARYOTYPING; LYMPHOCYTE; MALE; MITOSIS INDEX; NUCLEAR ORGANIZATION; REPRODUCIBILITY; ULTRAVIOLET B RADIATION; YOUNG ADULT; CELL CULTURE; DRUG EFFECTS; GENETICS; HUMAN CHROMOSOME; KARYOTYPE; METABOLISM; RADIATION RESPONSE; ULTRASTRUCTURE; ULTRAVIOLET RADIATION;

ADULT; CELLS, CULTURED; CHROMOSOMES, HUMAN; DNA DAMAGE; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYDROGEN PEROXIDE; KARYOTYPE; LYMPHOCYTES; MALE; MITOTIC INDEX; ULTRAVIOLET RAYS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84938555654     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118886     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Khalil A, Grant JL, Caddle LB, Atzema E, Mills KD, Arneodo A. Chromosome territories have a highly nonspherical morphology and nonrandom positioning. Chromosome Res. 2007; 15: 899-916. PMID: 17926137
2. Manuelidis L. A view of interphase chromosomes. Science. 1990; 250: 1533-1540. PMID: 2274784
3. Marshall WF. Order and disorder in the nucleus. Curr Biol. 2002; 12: R185-192. PMID: 11882311
4. Oliver B, Misteli T. A non-random walk through the genome. Genome Biol. 2005; 6: 214. PMID: 15833129
5. Cremer M, von Hase J, Volm T, Brero A, Kreth G, Walter J, et al. Non-random radial higher-order chromatin arrangements in nuclei of diploid human cells. Chromosome Res. 2001; 9: 541-567. PMID: 11721953
6. Meaburn KJ, Misteli T. Cell biology: chromosome territories. Nature. 2007; 445: 379-781. PMID: 17251970
7. Lieberman-Aiden E, van Berkum NL, Williams L, Imakaev M, Ragoczy T, Telling A, et al. Comprehensive mapping of long-range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome. Science. 2009; 326: 289-293. doi: 10.1126/science.1181369 PMID: 19815776
8. Cavalli G, Misteli T. Functional implications of genome topology. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2013; 20: 290-299. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2474 PMID: 23463314
9. Croft JA, Bridger JM, Boyle S, Perry P, Teague P, Bickmore WA. Differences in the localization and morphology of chromosomes in the human nucleus. J Cell Biol. 1999; 145: 1119-1131. PMID: 10366586
10. Boyle S, Gilchrist S, Bridger JM, Mahy NL, Ellis JA, Bickmore WA. The spatial organization of human chromosomes within the nuclei of normal and emerin-mutant cells. Hum Mol Genet. 2001; 10: 211-219. PMID: 11159939
11. Tanabe H, Muller S, Neusser M, von Hase J, Calcagno E, Cremer M, et al. Evolutionary conservation of chromosome territory arrangements in cell nuclei from higher primates. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002; 99: 4424-4429. PMID: 11930003
12. Tanabe H, Kupper K, Ishida T, Neusser M, Mizusawa H. Inter- and intra-specific gene-density-correlated radial chromosome territory arrangements are conserved in Old World monkeys. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2005; 108: 255-261. PMID: 15545738
13. Cremer T, Cremer M. Chromosome territories. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2010; 2: a003889. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a003889 PMID: 20300217
14. Koehler D, Zakhartchenko V, Froenicke L, Stone G, Stanyon R, Wolf E, et al. Changes of higher order chromatin arrangements during major genome activation in bovine preimplantation embryos. Exp Cell Res. 2009; 315: 2053-2063. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2009.02.016 PMID: 19254712
15. Habermann FA, Cremer M, Walter J, Kreth G, von Hase J, Bauer K, et al. Arrangements of macro- and microchromosomes in chicken cells. Chromosome Res. 2001; 9: 569-584. PMID: 11721954
16. Bridger JM, Boyle S, Kill IR, Bickmore WA. Re-modelling of nuclear architecture in quiescent and senescent human fibroblasts. Curr Biol. 2000; 10: 149-152. PMID: 10679329
17. Foster HA, Bridger JM. The genome and the nucleus: a marriage made by evolution. Genome organisation and nuclear architecture. Chromosoma. 2005; 114: 212-229. PMID: 16133352
18. Bolzer A, Kreth G, Solovei I, Koehler D, Saracoglu K, Fauth C, et al. Three-dimensional maps of all chromosomes in human male fibroblast nuclei and prometaphase rosettes. PLoS Biol. 2005; 3: e157. PMID: 15839726
19. Cavalli G. Chromosome kissing. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2007; 17: 443-450. PMID: 17933509
20. Takizawa T, Meaburn KJ, Misteli T. The meaning of gene positioning. Cell. 2008; 135: 9-13. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.09.026 PMID: 18854147
21. Bourne G, Moir C, Bikkul U, Ahmed MH, Kill IR, Eskiw CH, et al. Interphase chromosome behavior in normal and diseased cells. In: Yurov YB, Vorsanova SG, Iourov IY, editors. Human interphase chromosomes. New York: Springer; 2013. pp.9-33.
22. Szczerbal I, Foster HA, Bridger JM. The spatial repositioning of adipogenesis genes is correlated with their expression status in a porcine mesenchymal stem cell adipogenesis model system. Chromosoma. 2009; 118: 647-663. doi: 10.1007/s00412-009-0225-5 PMID: 19585140
23. Verschure PJ. Positioning the genome within the nucleus. Biol Cell. 2004; 96: 569-577. PMID: 15519692
24. Postberg J, Lipps HJ, Cremer T. Evolutionary origin of the cell nucleus and its functional architecture. Essays Biochem. 2010; 48: 1-24. doi: 10.1042/bse0480001 PMID: 20822483
25. Marella NV, Bhattacharya S, Mukherjee L, Xu J, Berezney R. Cell type specific chromosome territory organization in the interphase nucleus of normal and cancer cells. J Cell Physiol. 2009; 221: 130-138. doi: 10.1002/jcp.21836 PMID: 19496171
26. Misteli T. Concepts in nuclear architecture. Bioessays. 2005; 27: 477-487. PMID: 15832379
27. Bridger JM, Arican-Gotkas HD, Foster HA, Godwin LS, Harvey A, Kill IR, et al. The Non-random Repositioning of Whole Chromosomes and Individual Gene Loci in Interphase Nuclei and Its Relevance in Disease, Infection, Aging, and Cancer. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2014; 773: 263-279. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4899-8032-8-12 PMID: 24563352
28. Elcock LS, Bridger JM. Exploring the relationship between interphase gene positioning, transcriptional regulation and the nuclear matrix. Biochem Soc Trans. 2010; 38: 263-267. doi: 10.1042/BST0380263 PMID: 20074071
29. Liu WF, Yu SS, Chen GJ, Li YZ. DNA damage checkpoint, damage repair, and genome stability. Yi Chuan Xue Bao. 2006; 33: 381-390. PMID: 16722332
30. Ghosal G, Chen J. DNA damage tolerance: a double-edged sword guarding the genome. Transl Cancer Res. 2013; 2: 107-129. PMID: 24058901
31. Gopalakrishnan K, Low GK, Ting AP, Srikanth P, Slijepcevic P, Hande MP. Hydrogen peroxide induced genomic instability in nucleotide excision repair-deficient lymphoblastoid cells. Genome Integr. 2010; 1: 16. doi: 10.1186/2041-9414-1-16 PMID: 21176161
32. Sinha RP, Hader DP. UV-induced DNA damage and repair: a review. Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2002; 1: 225-236. PMID: 12661961
33. Green MH, Petit-Frere C, Clingen PH, Bentham G, Cole J, Arlett CF. Possible effects of sunlight on human lymphocytes. J Epidemiol. 1999; 9: S48-57. PMID: 10709350
34. Wijeratne SS, Cuppett SL, Schlegel V. Hydrogen peroxide induced oxidative stress damage and antioxidant enzyme response in Caco-2 human colon cells. J Agric Food Chem. 2005; 53: 8768-8774. PMID: 16248583
35. Houtgraaf JH, Versmissen J, van der Giessen WJ. A concise review of DNA damage checkpoints and repair in mammalian cells. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2006; 7: 165-172. PMID: 16945824
36. Hsu TC. A possible function of constitutive heterochromatin: the bodyguard hypothesis. Genetics. 1975; 79 Suppl: 137-150.
37. Folle GA. Nuclear architecture, chromosome domains and genetic damage. Mutat Res. 2008; 658: 172-183. PMID: 17921046
38. Sanders MH, Bates SE, Wilbur BS, Holmquist GP. Repair rates of R-band, G-band and C-band DNA in murine and human cultured cells. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2004; 104: 35-45. PMID: 15162013
39. Shaffer LG, Slovak ML, Cambell LJ. An International System for Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature (2009). 1st ed. Basel: Karger Publishers; 2009.
40. Ioannou D, Meershoek EJ, Christopikou D, Ellis M, Thornhill AR, Griffin DK. Nuclear organisation of sperm remains remarkably unaffected in the presence of defective spermatogenesis. Chromosome Res. 2011; 19: 741-753. doi: 10.1007/s10577-011-9238-z PMID: 21947956
41. Millan NM, Lau P, Hann M, Ioannou D, Hoffman D, Barrionuevo M, et al. Hierarchical radial and polar organisation of chromosomes in human sperm. Chromosome Res. 2012; 20: 875-887. doi: 10.1007/s10577-012-9323-y PMID: 23143649
42. Naidoo N, Pawitan Y, Soong R, Cooper DN, Ku CS. Human genetics and genomics a decade after the release of the draft sequence of the human genome. Hum Genomics. 2011; 5: 577-622. PMID: 22155605
43. Cremer T, Cremer C. Rise, fall and resurrection of chromosome territories: a historical perspective. Part II. Fall and resurrection of chromosome territories during the 1950s to 1980s. Part III. Chromosome territories and the functional nuclear architecture: experiments and models from the 1990s to the present. Eur J Histochem. 2006; 50: 223-272. PMID: 17213034
44. Celik A, Eke D. The Assessment of Cytotoxicity and Genotoxicity of Tetracycline Antibiotic in Human Blood Lymphocytes Using CBMN and SCE Analysis in Vitro. Int J Hum Genet. 2011; 11: 23-29.
45. Kasurka CB, Sekeroglu ZA, Sekeroglu V. Evaluation of the genotoxicity and cytotoxicity of fexofenadine in cultured human peripheral blood lymphocytes. Toxicol In Vitro. 2011; 25: 1480-1484. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2011.05.002 PMID: 21575710
46. Buyukleyla M, Rencuzogullari E. The effects of thymol on sister chromatid exchange, chromosome aberration and micronucleus in human lymphocytes. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2009; 72: 943-947. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2008.10.005 PMID: 19046601
47. Roos WP, Kaina B. DNA damage-induced cell death: from specific DNA lesions to the DNA damage response and apoptosis. Cancer Lett. 2013; 332: 237-248. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2012.01.007 PMID: 22261329
48. Estervig D, Wang RJ. Sister chromatid exchanges and chromosome aberrations in human cells induced by H2O2 and other photoproducts generated in fluorescent light-exposed medium. Photochem Photobiol. 1984; 40: 333-336. PMID: 6484002
49. Seguin LR, Tarone RE, Liao KH, Robbins JH. Ultraviolet light-induced chromosomal aberrations in cultured cells from Cockayne syndrome and complementation group C xeroderma pigmentosum patients: lack of correlation with cancer susceptibility. Am J Hum Genet. 1988; 42: 468-475. PMID: 3348214
50. Parshad R, Taylor WG, Sanford KK, Camalier RF, Gantt R, Tarone RE. Fluorescent light-induced chromosome damage in human IMR-90 fibroblasts. Role of hydrogen peroxide and related free radicals. Mutat Res. 1980; 73: 115-124. PMID: 6789192
51. Cremer M, Kupper K, Wagler B, Wizelman L, von Hase J, Weiland Y, et al. Inheritance of gene density-related higher order chromatin arrangements in normal and tumor cell nuclei. J Cell Biol. 2003; 162: 809-820. PMID: 12952935
52. Dion V, Gasser SM. Chromatin movement in the maintenance of genome stability. Cell. 2013; 152: 1355-1364. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.02.010 PMID: 23498942
53. Mehta IS, Kulashreshtha M, Chakraborty S, Kolthur-Seetharam U, Rao BJ. Chromosome territories reposition during DNA damage-repair response. Genome Biol. 2013; 14: R135. doi: 10.1186/gb-2013-14-12-r135 PMID: 24330859
54. Aten JA, Stap J, Krawczyk PM, van Oven CH, Hoebe RA, Essers J, et al. Dynamics of DNA double-strand breaks revealed by clustering of damaged chromosome domains. Science. 2004; 303: 92-95. PMID: 14704429
55. Gazave E, Gautier P, Gilchrist S, Bickmore WA. Does radial nuclear organisation influence DNA damage? Chromosome Res. 2005; 13: 377-388. PMID: 15973502
56. Dimitrova N, Chen YC, Spector DL, de Lange T. 53BP1 promotes non-homologous end joining of telomeres by increasing chromatin mobility. Nature. 2008; 456: 524-528. doi: 10.1038/nature07433 PMID: 18931659
57. Kruhlak MJ, Celeste A, Dellaire G, Fernandez-Capetillo O, Muller WG, McNally JG, et al. Changes in chromatin structure and mobility in living cells at sites of DNA double-strand breaks. J Cell Biol. 2006; 172: 823-834. PMID: 16520385
58. Meaburn KJ, Levy N, Toniolo D, Bridger JM. Chromosome positioning is largely unaffected in lymphoblastoid cell lines containing emerin or A-type lamin mutations. Biochem Soc Trans. 2005; 33: 1438-1440. PMID: 16246140
59. Sharp AJ, Locke DP, McGrath SD, Cheng Z, Bailey JA, Vallente RU, et al. Segmental duplications and copy-number variation in the human genome. Am J Hum Genet. 2005; 77: 78-88. PMID: 15918152
60. Emanuel BS, Shaikh TH. Segmental duplications: an 'expanding' role in genomic instability and disease. Nat Rev Genet. 2001; 2: 791-800. PMID: 11584295
61. Agmon N, Liefshitz B, Zimmer C, Fabre E, Kupiec M. Effect of nuclear architecture on the efficiency of double-strand break repair. Nat Cell Biol. 2013; 15: 694-699. doi: 10.1038/ncb2745 PMID: 23644470