A comparison of a continuous noninvasive arterial pressure (CNAP™) monitor with an invasive arterial blood pressure monitor in the cardiac surgical ICU

Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 180-184

  Jagadeesh, A M ^a   Singh, Naveen G ^a   Mahankali, Subramanyam ^a  

^a SRI JAYADEVA INSTITUTE OF CARDIOVASCULAR SCIENCES AND RESEARCH   (India)

Author keywords

Arterial blood pressure; Continuous noninvasive arterial pressure; Monitoring

Indexed keywords

ANESTHETIC EQUIPMENT; ARTERIAL PRESSURE; ARTICLE; BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIASTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; MEAN ARTERIAL PRESSURE; NON INVASIVE MEASUREMENT; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE;

BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORS; CARDIAC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; HUMANS; INTENSIVE CARE UNITS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84864270411     PISSN: 09719784     EISSN: 09745181     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4103/0971-9784.97973     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Scheer B, Perel A, Pfeiffer UJ. Clinical review: Complications and risk factors of peripheral arterial catheters used for haemodynamic monitoring in anaesthesia and intensive care medicine. Crit Care 2002;6:199-204.
2. Heard SO, Lisbon A, Toth I, Ramasubramanian R. An evaluation of a new continuous blood pressure monitoring system in critically ill patients. J Clin Anesth 2000;12:509-18.
3. Siebig S, Rockmann F, Sabel K, Zuber-Jerger I, Dierkes C, Brünnler T, et al. Continuous non-invasive arterial pressure technique improves patient monitoring during interventional endoscopy. Int J Med Sci 2009;6:37-42.
4. Hanss R, Ilies C, Missala H, Steinfath M, Bein B. Continuous noninvasive blood pressure monitoring during spinal anesthesia for caesarean section. 11AP2-3. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2010;27:166-67.
5. Jeleazcov C, Krajinovic L, Munster T, Birkholz T, Fried R, Schüttler J, et al. Precision and accuracy of a new device (CNAP) for continuous non-invasive arterial pressure monitoring: Assessment during general anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 2010;105:264-72.
6. Penaz J. A portable finger plethysmograph. Scr Med (Brno) 1954; 27:213-34.
7. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307-10.
8. Krouwer JS, Monti KL. A simple, graphical method to evaluate laboratory assays. Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 1995;33:525-7.
9. ANSI/AAMI. American national standard for manual, electronic, or automated sphygmomanometers. Arlington, VA: Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation, 2002
10. O'Brien E, Petrie J, Littler W, de Swiet M, Padfield PL, O'Malley K, et al. The British Hypertension Society protocol for the evaluation of automated and semiautomated blood pressure measuring devices with special reference to ambulatory systems. J Hypertens 1990;8:607-19.
11. Szmuk P, Pivalizza E, Warters RD, Ezri T, Gebhard R. An evaluation of the T-Line Tensymeter continuous noninvasive blood pressure device during induced hypotension. Anaesthesia 2008;63:307-12.
12. Janelle GM, Gravenstein N. An accuracy evaluation of the T-Line Tensymeter (continuous noninvasive blood pressure management device) versus conventional invasive radial artery monitoring in surgical patients. Anesth Analg 2006;102:484-90.
13. Fortin J, Marte W, Grullenberger R, Hacker A, Habenbacher W, Heller A, et al. Continuous non-invasive blood pressure monitoring using concentrically interlocking control loops. Comput Biol Med 2006;36:941-57.
14. Bause GS, Weintraub AC, Tanner GE. Skin avulsion during oscillometry. J Clin Monit 1986;2:262-3.