Democratizing kompromat: the affordances of social media for state-sponsored harassment

Information Communication and Society

Volumn 18, Issue 10, 2015, Pages 1158-1174

  Pearce, Katy E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

authoritarian; Azerbaijan; cyberbullying; harassment; Internet; meme; opposition

Indexed keywords

EID: 84938415352     PISSN: 1369118X     EISSN: 14684462     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2015.1021705     Document Type: Article

References (103)

1. S.Abbasov, (2010). Civil society in Azerbaijan: Under fire but still resisting. Caucasus Analytical Digest, 12. Retrieved from http://kms1.isn.ethz.ch/serviceengine/Files/ISN/111716/ipublicationdocument_singledocument/5801e755-43be-4f82-b7a9-8acd36fd0c3b/en/CaucasusAnalyticalDigest12.pdf
2. J.P.Abbott, (2012). Democracy@internet.org revisited: Analysing the socio-political impact of the internet and new social media in East Asia. Third World Quarterly, 33(2), 333–357. doi:10.1080/01436597.2012.666015
3. J.L.Albini,, & J.Anderson, (1998). Whatever happened to the KGB? International Journal of Intelligence and CounterIntelligence, 11(1), 26–56. doi:10.1080/08850609808435363
4. T.Ambrosio, (2014). Beyond the transition paradigm: A research agenda for authoritarian consolidation. Demokratizatsiya, 22(3), 471–495. Retrieved from http://essential.metapress.com/content/f36147p1h427841v/
5. M.Atwal, (2009). Evaluating Nashi's sustainability: Autonomy, agency and activism. Europe-Asia Studies, 61(5), 743–758. doi:10.1080/09668130902904878
6. M.Atwal,, & E.Bacon, (2012). The youth movement Nashi: Contentious politics, civil society, and party politics. East European Politics, 28(3), 256–266. doi:10.1080/21599165.2012.691424
7. C.S.Bailard, (2012a). A field experiment on the internet's effect in an African election: Savvier citizens, disaffected voters, or both? Journal of Communication, 62(2), 330–344. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01632.x
8. C.S.Bailard, (2012b). Testing the internet's effect on democratic satisfaction: A multi-methodological, cross-national approach. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 9(2), 185–204. doi:10.1080/19331681.2011.641495
9. C.S.Bailard, (2014). Democracy’s double-edged sword: How internet use changes citizens' views of their government. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
10. S.Bedford, (2014). Introduction to the special section: Political mobilization in Azerbaijan – The January 2013 protests and beyond. Demokratizatsiya, 22(1), 3–14. Retrieved from http://www.metapress.com/content/b3×93t5760335272/
11. G.Blank, (2013). Who creates content? Information, Communication & Society, 16(4), 590–612. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2013.777758
12. M.Bondes,, & G.Schucher, (2014). Derailed emotions: The transformation of claims and targets during the Wenzhou online incident. Information, Communication & Society, 17(1), 45–65. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2013.853819
13. D.boyd, d. (2010). Social network sites as networked publics: Affordances, dynamics, and implications. In Z.Papacharissi (Ed.), A networked self: Identity, community and culture on social network sites (pp. 39–58). New York, NY: Routledge.
14. D.boyd, d. (2014). It's complicated: The social lives of networked teens. New Brunswick: Yale University Press.
15. A.Breuer,, T.Landman,, & D.Farquhar, (2014). Social media and protest mobilization: Evidence from the Tunisian revolution. Democratization, 1–29. doi:10.1080/13510347.2014.885505
16. V.J.Bunce,, & S.L.Wolchik, (2009). Defeating dictators: Electoral change and stability in competitive authoritarian regimes. World Politics, 62(1), 43. doi:10.1017/S0043887109990207
17. T.Carothers, (2002). The end of the transition paradigm. Journal of Democracy, 13(1), 5–21. doi:10.1353/jod.2002.0003
18. E.Chebankova, (2012). State-sponsored civic associations in Russia: Systemic integration or the “war of position”? East European Politics, 28(4), 390–408. doi:10.1080/21599165.2012.674939
19. K.A.Darden, (2001). Blackmail as a tool of state domination: Ukraine under Kuchma. East European Constitutional Review, 10, 67–71.
20. P.Davison, (2012). The language of internet memes. In M.Mandiberg (Ed.), The social media reader (pp. 120–134). New York: New York University Press.
21. R.Deibert,, & R.Rohozinski, (2010). Control and subversion in Russian cyberspace. In R.Deibert, J.Palfrey, R.Rohozinski & J.Zittrain (Eds.), Access controlled: The shaping of power, rights, and rule in cyberspace (pp. 15–34). Cambridge: MIT Press.
22. L.J.Diamond, (2002). Thinking about hybrid regimes. Journal of Democracy, 13(2), 21–35. doi:10.1353/jod.2002.0025
23. L.J.Diamond,, F.Fukuyama,, D.L.Horowitz,, & M.F.Plattner, (2014). Reconsidering the transition paradigm. Journal of Democracy, 25(1), 86–100. doi:10.1353/jod.2014.0018
24. N.DiFonzo,, & P.Bordia, (2007). Rumor psychology: Social and organizational approaches. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
25. N.M.Diuk, (2012). The next generation in Russia, Ukraine, and Azerbaijan: Youth, politics, identity, and change. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
26. W.Dobson, (2012). The dictator's learning curve: Inside the global battle for democracy. New York: Doubleday.
27. D.Donno, (2013). Elections and democratization in authoritarian regimes. American Journal of Political Science, 57(3), 703–716. doi:10.1111/ajps.12013
28. J.Earl,, & K.Kimport, (2011). Digitally enabled social change: Activism in the internet age. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
29. N.B.Ellison,, & D.M.boyd, d. m. (2013). Sociality through social network sites. In W.H.Dutton (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of internet studies (pp. 151–172). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30. N.B.Ellison,, & J.Vitak, (2015). Social media affordances and their relationship to social capital processes. In S.Sundar (Ed.), The handbook of psychology of communication technology (pp. 205–237). Boston, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
31. H.Farrell, (2012). The consequences of the internet for politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 15(1), 35–52. doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-030810-110815
32. G.A.Fine, (2005). Introduction: Rumor matters. An introductory essay. In G.A.Fine, V.Campion-Vincent, & C.Heath (Eds.), The social impact of rumor and legend (pp. 1–7). New Brunswick, NJ: Aldine Transaction.
33. A.Franke,, A.Gawrich,, & G.Alakbarov, (2009). Kazakhstan and Azerbaijan as post-Soviet rentier states: Resource incomes and autocracy as a double “curse” in post-Soviet regimes. Europe-Asia Studies, 61(1), 109–140. doi:10.1080/09668130802532977
34. M.Frichova Grono, (2011). Nations in transit: Azerbaijan. Washington, DC: Freedom House.
35. A.Gahramanova, (2009). Internal and external factors in the democratization of Azerbaijan. Democratization, 16(4), 777–803. doi:10.1080/13510340903083919
36. B.Geddes,, & J.Zaller, (1989). Sources of popular support for authoritarian regimes. American Journal of Political Science, 33(2), 319–347. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/2111150?uid=3739960&uid=2&uid=4&uid=3739256&sid=21104602030627 doi: 10.2307/2111150
37. J.Gerschewski, (2013). The three pillars of stability: Legitimation, repression, and co-optation in autocratic regimes. Democratization, 20(1), 13–38. doi:10.1080/13510347.2013.738860
38. S.C.Greitens, (2013). Authoritarianism online: What can we learn from Internet data in nondemocracies? PS: Political Science & Politics, 46(2), 262–270. doi:10.1017/S1049096513000346
39. F.Guliyev, (2009). Oil wealth, patrimonialism, and the failure of democracy in Azerbaijan. Caucasus Analytical Digest, 2. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1329483
40. F.Guliyev, (2012). Political elites in Azerbaijan. In A.Heinrich & H.Pleines (Eds.), Challenges of the Caspian resource boom: Domestic elites and policy-making (pp. 117–130). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2218769
41. F.Guliyev, (2013). Oil and regime stability in Azerbaijan. Demokratizatsiya, 21(1), 113–147. Retrieved from http://essential.metapress.com/content/r2g1w8r80862kn3h/
42. S.Gunitsky, (2015). Corrupting the cyber-commons: Social media as a tool of autocratic stability. Perspectives on Politics. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2506038
43. H.E.Hale, (2005). Regime cycles: Democracy, autocracy, and revolution in post-Soviet Eurasia. World Politics, 58(1), 133–165. doi:10.1353/wp.2006.0019
44. J.Heathershaw, (2012). Of national fathers and Russian elder brothers: Conspiracy theories and political ideas in post-Soviet Central Asia. The Russian Review, 71(4), 610–629. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9434.2012.00671.x
45. J.D.Hemment, (2009). Soviet-style neoliberalism? Nashi, youth voluntarism, and the restructuring of social welfare in Russia. Problems of Post-Communism, 56(8), 36–50. doi: 10.2753/PPC1075-8216560604
46. M.M.Howard,, & P.G.Roessler, (2006). Liberalizing electoral outcomes in competitive authoritarian regimes. American Journal of Political Science, 50(2), 365–381. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00189.x
47. H.Huang, (2014). Countering the counter-power: The political effects of internet rumors and rumor rebuttals in China. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2131538
48. R.Huang,, & X.Sun, (2013). Weibo network, information diffusion and implications for collective action in China. Information, Communication & Society, 17(1), 1–19. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2013.853817
49. Human Rights Watch Country Report: Azerbaijan. (2014). Retrieved from http://www.hrw.org/world-report/2014/country-chapters/azerbaijan
50. K.D.Hyun,, & J.Kim, (2014). The role of new media in sustaining the status quo: Online political expression, nationalism, and system support in China. Information, Communication & Society, 1–16. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2014.994543
51. C.W.Johnson, (2014). Anti-social networking: Crowdsourcing and the cyber defence of national critical infrastructures. Ergonomics, 57(3), 419–433. doi:10.1080/00140139.2013.812749
52. S.Kalathil,, & T.C.Boas, (2003). Open networks, closed regimes: The impact of the internet on authoritarian rule. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment.
53. A.Kazimova, (2011). Media in Azerbaijan: The ruling family dominates TV, the opposition has some papers. Caucasus Analytical Digest, 25. Retrieved from http://kms1.isn.ethz.ch/serviceengine/Files/ISN/127759/ipublicationdocument_singledocument/bcce560a-61c7-4b4e-91d3-0cc7ef45a167/en/CaucasusAnalyticalDigest25.pdf
54. M.E.Keck,, & K.Sikkink, (1998). Activists beyond borders: Advocacy networks in international politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
55. A.Kendall-Taylor, (2012). Purchasing power: Oil, elections and regime durability in Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan. Europe-Asia Studies, 64(4), 737–760. doi:10.1080/09668136.2012.671567
56. D.Lane, (2009). “Coloured revolution” as a political phenomenon. Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 25(2–3), 113–135. doi:10.1080/13523270902860295
57. J.LaPorte, (2014). Hidden in plain sight: Political opposition and hegemonic authoritarianism in Azerbaijan. Post-Soviet Affairs (September), 1–28. doi:10.1080/1060586X.2014.951184
58. A.Ledeneva, (2006). How Russia really works. Ithica, NY: Cornell University Press.
59. I.Leijendekker,, & B.Mutsvairo, (2014). On digitally networked technologies, hegemony and regime durability in authoritarian regimes: A Zimbabwean case study. Information, Communication & Society, 17(8), 1034–1047. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2014.920399
60. S.Levitsky,, & L.A.Way, (2010). Competitive authoritarianism: Hybrid regimes after the Cold War. America (Vol. 44). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
61. M.Lynch, (2011). After Egypt: The limits and promise of online challenges to the authoritarian Arab state. Perspectives on Politics, 9(2), 301–310. doi:10.1017/S1537592711000910
62. L.Lyytikäinen, (2013). Gendered and classed activist identity in the Russian oppositional youth movement. The Sociological Review, 61(3), 499–524. doi:10.1111/1467-954X.12063
63. R.Mackinnon, (2012). China's “networked authoritarianism.” In L.J.Diamond & M.F.Plattner (Eds.), Liberation technology: Social media and the struggle for democracy (pp. 78–94). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
64. L.March, (2004). Russian parties and the political internet. Europe-Asia Studies, 56(3), 369–400. doi:10.1080/09668130410001682681
65. G.T.Marx, (2002). What's new about the “new surveillance”? Classifying for change and continuity. Surveillance & Society, 1(1), 9–29.
66. K.Meredith, (2013). Social media and cyber utopianism: Civil society versus the Russian state during the “White Revolution,” 2011–2012. St Antony's International Review, 8(2), 89–105.
67. I.Mijnssen, (2012). The quest for an ideal youth in Putin's Russia I. Stuttgart: Ibidem.
68. E.Morozov, (2011). The net delusion: The dark side of internet freedom (Vol. 1). New York, NY: PublicAffairs.
69. Z.Nabi, (2014). Censorship is futile. First Monday, 19(11). doi:10.5210/fm.v19i11.5525
70. O.Nikolayenko, (2012). Tactical interactions between youth movements and incumbent governments in postcommunist states. In S.E.Nepstad & L.R.Kurtz (Eds.), Nonviolent conflict and civil resistance (Research in social movements, conflicts and change, volume 34) (pp. 27–61). Bingley: Emerald Group.
71. S.Ortmann,, & J.Heathershaw, (2012). Conspiracy theories in the post-Soviet space. The Russian Review, 71(4), 551–564. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9434.2012.00668.x
72. K.E.Pearce, (2014). Two can play at that game: Social media opportunities in Azerbaijan for government and opposition. Demokratizatsiya, 22(1), 39–66. doi:10.1080/09668136.2012.671567.3
73. K.E.Pearce,, D.Freelon,, & S.Kendzior, (2014). The effect of the internet on civic engagement under authoritarianism: The case of Azerbaijan. First Monday, 19(6). doi:10.5210/fm.v19i6.5000
74. K.E.Pearce,, & A.Hajizada, (2014). No laughing matter: Humor as a means of dissent in the digital era: The case of authoritarian Azerbaijan. Demokratizatsiya, 22(443), 67–85. doi:10.5210/fm.v18i7.3885
75. K.E.Pearce,, & S.Kendzior, (2012). Networked authoritarianism and social media in Azerbaijan. Journal of Communication, 62(2), 283–298. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01633.x
76. S.Radnitz, (2012). Oil in the family: Managing presidential succession in Azerbaijan. Democratization, 19(1), 60–77. doi:10.1080/13510347.2012.641300
77. A.Rauchfleisch,, & M.S.Schäfer, (2014). Multiple public spheres of Weibo: A typology of forms and potentials of online public spheres in China. Information, Communication & Society, 18(2), 139–155. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2014.940364
78. O.J.Reuter,, & D.Szakonyi, (2013). Online social media and political awareness in authoritarian regimes. British Journal of Political Science, 1–23. doi:10.1017/S0007123413000203
79. E.Schatz, (2009). The soft authoritarian tool kit: Agenda-setting power in Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan. Comparative Politics, 41(2), 203–222. doi:10.5129/001041509X12911362972034
80. A.Schedler, (2002). The menu of manipulation. Journal of Democracy, 13(2), 36–50. doi:10.1353/jod.2002.0031
81. A.Schedler, (2013). The politics of uncertainty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
82. Searching for Freedom: Online Expression in Azerbaijan. (2012). Baku. Retrieved from http://expressiononline.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/Report_EO_1.pdf
83. L.Shifman, (2013). Memes in a digital world: Reconciling with a conceptual troublemaker. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 18(3), 362–377. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12013
84. D.Skillen, (2007). The next general elections in Russia: What role for the media? Europe-Asia Studies, 59(8), 1263–1278. doi:10.1080/09668130701655143
85. A.C.Stepan, (1990). On the tasks of a democratic opposition. Journal of Democracy, 1(2), 41–49. doi:10.1353/jod.1990.0021
86. J.Sullivan, (2013). China's Weibo: Is faster different? New Media & Society, 16(1), 24–37. doi:10.1177/1461444812472966
87. S.Sultanova, (2014). Challenging the Aliyev regime: Political opposition in Azerbaijan. Demokratizatsiya, 22(1), 15–37. Retrieved from http://www.metapress.com/content/bl1543g0116n0277/
88. Q.Tai, (2014). China's media censorship: A dynamic and diversified regime. Journal of East Asian Studies, 14(2), 185–209. doi:10.5555/1598-2408-14.2.185
89. M.Tang,, & N.Huhe, (2013). Alternative framing: The effect of the internet on political support in authoritarian China. International Political Science Review, 35(5), 559–576. doi:10.1177/0192512113501971
90. Tightening the screws: Azerbaijan's crackdown on civil society and dissent. (2013). Retrieved from http://www.hrw.org/node/118310
91. F.Toepfl, (2011). Managing public outrage: Power, scandal, and new media in contemporary Russia. New Media & Society, 13(8), 1301–1319. doi:10.1177/1461444811405021
92. J.W.Treem,, & P.M.Leonardi, (2012). Social media use in organizations: Exploring the affordances of visibility, editability, persistence, and association. Communication yearbook (vol. 36, pp. 143–189). doi:10.2139/ssrn.2129853
93. D.Trottier,, & D.Lyon, (2012). Key features of social media surveillance. In C.Fuchs, K.Boersma, A.Albrechtslund, & M.Sandoval (Eds.), The internet and surveillance: The challenge of web 2.0 and social media (pp. 89–105). New York, NY: Routledge.
94. U.S. Department of State human rights report: Azerbaijan. (2013). Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://photos.state.gov/libraries/azerbaijan/749085/hrr/2013_Human_Rights_Report.pdf
95. G.G.Vaillant, (2012). Authoritarian regimes. In G.Ritzer (Ed.), Wiley-Blackwell encyclopedia of globalization. Oxford: Blackwell. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9780470670590.wbeog038/abstract
96. R.Vanderhill, (2014). Promoting democracy and promoting authoritarianism: Comparing the cases of Belarus and Slovakia. Europe-Asia Studies, 66(2), 255–283. doi:10.1080/09668136.2014.882621
97. L.A.Way, (2008). The real causes of the color revolutions. Journal of Democracy, 19(3), 55–69. doi:10.1353/jod.0.0010
98. C.Wilkinson, (2005). Kyrgyzstan: e-Revolution. EurasiaNet. Retrieved from http://www.eurasianet.org/departments/insight/articles/pp072105.shtml
99. A.Wilson, (2005). Virtual politics: Faking democracy in the post-Soviet world. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
100. M.Wojcieszak,, & B.Smith, (2013). Will politics be tweeted? New media use by Iranian youth in 2011. New Media & Society, 16(1), 91–109. doi:10.1177/1461444813479594
101. I.Yablokov, (2014). Pussy Riot as agent provocateur: Conspiracy theories and the media construction of nation in Putin's Russia. Nationalities Papers, 42(4), 622–636. doi:10.1080/00905992.2014.923390
102. W.L.Youmans,, & J.C.York, (2012). Social media and the activist toolkit: User agreements, corporate interests, and the information infrastructure of modern social movements. Journal of Communication, 62(2), 315–329. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01636.x
103. X.Zhang,, & W.-Y.Lin, (2014). Political participation in an unlikely place: How individuals engage in politics through social networking sites in China. International Journal of Communication, 8, 21–42. Retrieved from http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/2003