Memes in a digital world: Reconciling with a conceptual troublemaker

Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 362-377

  Shifman, Limor ^a  

^a HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

Author keywords

"Leave Britney alone"; Digital culture; Imitation; Internet memes; Memes; User generated content; YouTube

Indexed keywords

"LEAVE BRITNEY ALONE"; DIGITAL CULTURE; DIGITAL ERA; DIGITAL WORLD; IMITATION; INTERNET MEME; MEME; USER-GENERATED; USER-GENERATED-CONTENT; YOUTUBE;

COMPUTER NETWORKS;

EID: 84876194094     PISSN: None     EISSN: 10836101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/jcc4.12013     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Alvarez, A. (2004). Memetics: An evolutionary theory of cultural transmission. Sorites, 15, 24-28. Retrieved from http://www.sorites.org/Issue_15/alvarez.htm.
2. Atran, S. (2001). The trouble with memes: Inference versus imitation in cultural creation. Human Nature, 12(4), 351-381. doi: 10.1007/s12110-001-1003-0.
3. Aunger R. (2000). Introduction. In R. Aunger (Ed.) Darwinizing culture: The status of memetics as a science (pp. 1-24). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
4. Baym, N., & Burnett, R. (2009). Amateur experts: International fan labor in Swedish independent music. International Journal of Cultural Studies 12(5), 433-449. doi: 10.1177/1367877909337857.
5. Benitez-Bribiesca, L. (2001). Memetics: A dangerous idea. Interciecia 26, 29-31. Retrieved from http://redalyc.uaemex.mx/pdf/339/33905206.pdf.
6. Benkler, Y. (2006). The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
7. Bennett, W. L.(2003). New media power: The Internet and global activism. InN. Couldry and J. Curran (Eds.) Contesting media power(pp. 17-37). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
8. Blackmore, S. (1999). The meme machine. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
9. Blondheim, M. (1994). When bad things happen to good technologies: Three phases in the diffusion and perception of American telegraphy. In Y. Ezrahi and E. Mendelsohn (Eds.) Technology, pessimism, and postmodernism (pp. 77-114). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
10. Blum-Kulka, S., Huck-Taglicht, D., & Avni, H. (2004). The social and discursive spectrum of peer talk. Discourse Studies 6(3), 307-328. doi: 10.1177/1461445604044291.
11. Boon, M. (2010). In praise of copying. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12. Boyd, D. (2008). Taken out of context: American teen sociality in networked publics. PhD Dissertation. University of California-Berkeley, School of Information.
13. Boyd, R., & Richerson, P.J. (2005). Not by genes alone: How culture transformed human evolution. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
14. Brodie, R. (1996). Virus of the mind: The new science of the meme. Seattle, WA: Integral Press.
15. Burgess, J. (2008). All your chocolate rain are belong to us? Viral video, YouTube and the dynamics of participatory culture. In G. Lovink and S. Niederer (Eds.), Video vortex reader: Responses to YouTube (pp.101-109). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Institute of Network Cultures.
16. Burgess, J., & Green JB. (2009). YouTube: Online video and participatory culture. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
17. Christian, A. J. (2010). Camp 2.0: A queer performance of the personal. Communication, Culture & Critique, 13(3), 352-376. doi:0.1111/j.1753-9137.2010.01075.x.
18. Chesterman, A. (2005). The memetics of knowledge. In H.V. Engberg and H. Gerzymisch-Arbogast (Eds.), Knowledge systems and translation (pp. 17-30). Berlin, Germany and New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter.
19. Chielens, K., & Heylighen, F. (2005). Operationalization of meme selection criteria: Procedures to empirically test memetic hypotheses. Proceedings AISB. Retrieved from http://www.aisb.org.uk/publications/proceedings/aisb05/9_Soc_Final.pdf.
20. Conte, R. (2000). Memes through (social) minds. In R. Aunger (Ed.), Darwinizing culture: The status of memetics as a science (pp. 83-120). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
21. Dawkins, R. (1976). The selfish gene. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
22. Dawkins, R. (1982). The extended phenotype. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
23. Dawkins, R. (2004). A devil's chaplain: Reflections on hope, lies, science, and love. Boston, MA: Mariner Books.
24. Dennett, D.C. (1990). Memes and the exploitation of the imagination. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 48, 127-13. retrieved from http://ase.tufts.edu/cogstud/papers/memeimag.htm.
25. Dennett, D.C. (1993). Consciousness explained. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Co.
26. Dennett, D.C. (1995). Darwin's dangerous idea: Evolution and the meanings of life. New York, NY: Touchstone.
27. Dearen, J. (November 20, 2011). UC Davis Pepper Spray Incident Prompts Suspension Of Officers. The Huffington Post. Retrieved November 21, 2011 from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/11/20/uc-davis-pepper-spray-inc_n_1104104.html.
28. Distin, K. (2005). The selfish meme: A critical reassessment. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
29. Englebretson, R. (2007). Stancetaking in discourse: An introduction. In R. Englebretson (Ed.). Stancetaking in discourse (pp. 1-26). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Benjamins.
30. Gatherer, D. (1998). Why the "thought contagion" metaphor is retarding the progress of memetics. Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission. Retrieved from http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit/1998/vol1992/gatherer_d.html.
31. Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
32. Hariman, R. (2008). Political parody and public culture. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 94, 247-272. doi: 10.1080/00335630802210369.
33. Heylighen F., & Chielens K. (2009). Cultural evolution and memetics. In B. Meyers (Ed.), Encyclopedia of complexity and system science. Retrieved from http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/Papers/Memetics-Springer.pdf.
34. Hull, D.L. (2000). Taking memetics seriously: Memetics will be what we make it. In R. Aunger (Ed.), Darwinizing culture: The status of memetics as a science (pp. 43-168). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
35. Hutcheon, L. (1985). A theory of parody: The teachings of twentieth-century art forms. London, England: Methuen.
36. Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York, NY: New York University Press.
37. Jenkins, H., Li, X, Krauskopf, A.D., & Grean, J. (Feb 2009). If it doesn't spread, it's dead (part one): Media viruses and memes. Retrieved from http://henryjenkins.org/2009/02/if_it_doesnt_spread_its_dead_p.html.
38. Johnson, D. (2007). Mapping the meme: A geographical approach to materialist rhetorical criticism. Communication & Critical/Cultural Studies, 4(1), 27-50. doi: 10.1080/14791420601138286.
39. Jones, G. M. & Schieffelin, B. B. (2009). Talking text and talking back: "My BFF Jill" from boob tube to YouTube. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(4), 1050-1079. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01481.x.
40. Katz, E. (1999). Theorizing diffusion: Tarde and Sorokin revisited. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 566, 144-55. doi: 10.1177/000271629956600112.
41. Kilpinen, E. (2008). Memes versus signs: On the use of meaning concepts about nature and culture. Semiotica. 171(1-4), 215-237. doi: 10.1515/SEMI.2008.075.
42. Knobel, M., & Lankshear, C. (2007). A new literacies sampler. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
43. Lessig, L. (2008). Remix: Making art and commerce thrive in the hybrid economy. New York, NY: Penguin.
44. Lynch, A. (1996). Thought contagion: How belief spreads through society. New York, NY: Basic Books.
45. Manovich, L. (2005). Remixing and remixability. Retrieved from http://www.manovich.net/DOCS/Remix_modular.doc.
46. O'Reilly, T. (2007). What is Web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. International Journal of Digital Economics, 65, 17-37. Retrieved from http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/4578/.
47. Peters, B. (2009). And lead us not into thinking the new is new: A bibliographic case for new media history. New Media and Society, 11(1-2), 13-30. doi: 10.1177/1461444808099572.
48. Peres, R., Muller, E., & Mahajan, V. (2010). Innovation diffusion and new product growth models: A critical review and research directions. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 27, 91-106. Retrieved from http://renanaperes.homestead.com/files/PeresMullerMahajan2010.pdf.
49. Phillips, S. (1972). Participant structures and communicative competence: Warm Springs children in community and classroom. In C. Cazden, V.P. John, & D. Hymes (Eds.), Functions of language in the classroom (pp. 370-394). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
50. Rogers, E.M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free Press.
51. Rose, N. (1998). Controversies in meme theory. Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission, 2. Retrieved from http://cfpm.org/jom-emit/1998/vol2/rose_n.html.
52. Salvato, N. (2009). Out of hand: YouTube amateurs and professionals. The Drama Review, 53(3), 67-83. Retrieved from http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/the_drama_review/v053/53.3.salvato.html.
53. Schwartz, H. (1996). The culture of the copy: Striking likenesses, unreasonable facsimiles. New York: Zone Books.
54. Shifman, L. & Thelwall, M. (2009). Assessing global diffusion with web memetics: The spread and evolution of a popular joke. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(12), 2567-2576. doi:10.1002/asi.21185.
55. Shifman, L. (2012). An anatomy of a YouTube meme. New Media and Society, 14(2), 187-203. doi:10.1177/1461444811412160.