Inappropriately applying natural number properties in rational number tasks: characterizing the development of the natural number bias through primary and secondary education

Educational Studies in Mathematics

Volumn 90, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 39-56

  Van Hoof, Jo ^a   Verschaffel, Lieven ^a   Van Dooren, Wim ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Fraction; Natural number bias; Primary education; Rational number; Secondary education

Indexed keywords

EID: 84938333283     PISSN: 00131954     EISSN: 15730816     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10649-015-9613-3     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Clarke, D. M., & Roche, A. (2009). Students’ fraction comparison strategies as a window into robust understanding and possible pointers for instruction. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 72, 127–138. doi:10.10007/s10649-009-9198-9
2. Cramer, K. A., Post, T. R., & delMas, R. C. (2002). Initial fraction learning by fourth- and fifth- grade students: A comparison of the effects of using commercial curricula with the effects of using the rational number project curriculum. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33, 111–144.
3. De Wolf, M., & Vosniadou, S. (2011). The whole number bias in fraction magnitude comparisons with adults. In L. Carlson, C. Hoelscher, & T. F. Shipley (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 1751–1756). Austin: Cognitive Science Society.
4. Debou, E., & Verschetze, L. (2012). De overgang van natuurlijke naar rationale getallen. Een curriculumanalyse van drie Vlaamse wiskundemethoden [From natural to rational numbers. A curriculum analysis of 3 Flemish mathematics textbooks] (Unpublished master's thesis). Belgium: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Faculteit Psychologie en Pedagogische Wetenschappen.
5. Gabriel, F., Coché, F., Szucs, D., Carette, V., Rey, B., & Content, A. (2013). A componential view of children’s difficulties in learning fractions. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1–12. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00715
6. Gemeenschapsonderwijs. (2014). Leerplannen. Geraadpleegd op Retrieved from http://www.gemeenschapsonderwijs.be/sites/portaal_nieuw/Prikbordvoorleerkrachten/Basisonderwijs/leerplannen/Leerplannen%2020102011/Wiskunde%20-%20LO.pdf
7. Gómez, D., Jiménez, A., Bobadilla, R., Reyes, C., & Dartnell, P. (2014). Exploring fraction comparison in school children. Enero, 10, 1–10.
8. Greer, B. (2004). The growth of mathematics through conceptual restructuring. Learning and Instruction, 14, 541–548. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2004.06.018
9. Hasemann, C. (1981). On difficulties with fractions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12, 171–187. doi:10.1007/BF00386047
10. Liang, K. Y., & Zeger, S. L. (1986). Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika, 73, 13–22. doi:10.1093/biomet/73.1.13
11. Mamede, E., Nunes, T., & Bryant, P. (2005). The equivalence and ordering of fractions in part-whole and quotient situations. In H. L. Chick & J. L. Vincent (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education: Vol. 3. (pp. 281–288). Melbourne, Australia: PME.
12. Mazzocco, M. M. M., & Devlin, K. T. (2008). Parts and ‘holes’: Gaps in rational number sense among children with vs. without mathematical learning disabilities. Developmental Science, 11, 681–691. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00717.x
13. McMullen, J., Laakkonen, E., Hannula-Sormunen, M. M., & Lehtinen, E. (2014). Modeling the developmental trajectories of rational number concept(s): A latent variable approach. Learning and Instruction. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.12.004
14. Meert, G. J., Grégoire, J., & Noël, M.-P. (2010). Comparing the magnitude of two fractions with common components: Which representations are used by 10- and 12-year-olds? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 107, 244–259.
15. Moss, J. (2005). Pipes, tubes, and beakers: New approaches to teaching the rational-number system. In M. S. Donovan & J. D. Bransford (Eds.), How students learn: Mathematics in the classroom (pp. 121–162). Washington: National Academic Press.
16. Ni, Y., & Zhou, Y.-D. (2005). Teaching and learning fraction and rational numbers: The origins and implications of whole number bias. Educational Psychologist, 40, 27–52. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4001_3
17. Obersteiner, A., Van Dooren, W., Van Hoof, J., & Verschaffel, L. (2013). The natural number bias and magnitude representation in fraction comparison by expert mathematicians. Learning and Instruction, 28, 64–72. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.05.003
18. Post, T., Cramer, K., Behr, M., Lesh, R., & Harel, G. (1993). Curriculum implications of research on the learning, teaching and assessing of rational number concepts. In T. Carpenter, E. Fennema, & T. Romberg (Eds.), Rational numbers: An integration of research (pp. 327–361). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19. Resnick, L. B., Nesher, P., Leonard, F., Magone, M., Omanson, S., & Peled, I. (1989). Conceptual bases of arithmetic errors: The case of decimal fractions. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20, 8–27.
20. Siegler, R. S., Duncan, G. J., Davis-Kean, P. E., Duckworth, K., Claessens, A., Engel, M., et al. (2012). Early predictors of high school mathematics achievement. Psychological Science, 23, 691–697. doi:10.1177/0956797612440101
21. Siegler, R. S., Fazio, L. K., Bailey, D. H., & Zhou, X. (2013). Fractions: The new frontier for theories of numerical development. Trends in Cognitive Science, 17, 13–19.
22. Smith, C. L., Solomon, G. E. A., & Carey, S. (2005). Never getting to zero: Elementary school students’ understanding of the infinite divisibility of number and matter. Cognitive Psychology, 51, 101–140. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2005.03.001
23. Stafylidou, S., & Vosniadou, S. (2004). The development of students’ understanding of the numerical value of fractions. Learning and instruction, 14, 503--518. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2004.06.015
24. Vamvakoussi, X., Christou, K. P., Mertens, L., & Van Dooren, W. (2011). What fills the gap between discrete and dense? Greek and Flemish students’ understanding of density. Learning and Instruction, 21, 676–685. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.03.005
25. Vamvakoussi, X., Van Dooren, W., & Verschaffel, L. (2012). Naturally biased? In search for reaction time evidence for a natural number bias in adults. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 31, 344–355. doi:10.1016/j.jmathb.2012.02.001
26. Vamvakoussi, X., & Vosniadou, S. (2004). Understanding the structure of the set of rational numbers: A conceptual change approach. Learning and Instruction, 14, 453–467. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2004.06.013
27. Vamvakoussi, X., & Vosniadou, S. (2010). How many decimals are there between two fractions? Aspects of secondary school students’ understanding of rational numbers and their notation. Cognition and Instruction, 28, 181–209. doi:10.1080/07370001003676603
28. Vamvakoussi, X., Vosniadou, S., & Van Dooren, W. (2013). The framework theory approach applied to mathematics learning. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 305–321). New York: Routledge.
29. Van Hoof, J., Janssen, R., Verschaffel, L., & Van Dooren, W. (2015). Inhibiting natural knowledge in fourth graders: Towards a comprehensive test instrument. ZDM Mathematics Education. Advance online publication.
30. Van Hoof, J., Lijnen, T., Verschaffel, L., & Van Dooren, W. (2013). Are secondary school students still hampered by the natural number bias? A reaction time study on fraction comparison tasks. Research in Mathematics Education, 15, 154–164. doi:10.1080/14794802.2013.797747
31. Van Hoof, J., Vandewalle, J., Verschaffel, L., & Van Dooren, W. (2014). In search for the natural number bias in secondary school students’ interpretation of the effect of arithmetical operations. Learning and Instruction. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.03.004
32. Vlaams Ministerie van Onderwijs en Vorming. (2011a). Eindtermen wiskunde: secundair onderwijs, eerste graad A-stroom. Retrieved from http://ond.vlaanderen.be/dvo/secundair/1stegraad/a-stroom/eindtermen/wiskunde.htm
33. Vlaams Ministerie van Onderwijs en Vorming. (2011b). Eindtermen wiskunde: secundair onderwijs, derde graad ASO. Retrieved from http://ond.vlaanderen.be/dvo/secundair/3degraad/aso/eindtermen/wiskunde.htm
34. Vosniadou, S. (1994). Capturing and modelling the process of conceptual change. Learning and Instruction, 4, 45–69. doi:10.1016/0959-4752(94)90018-3
35. Vosniadou, S., Vamvakoussi, X., & Skopeliti, I. (2008). The framework theory approach to conceptual change. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 3–34). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
36. Wearne, D., & Hiebert, J. (1988). A cognitive approach to meaningful mathematics instruction: Testing a local theory using decimal numbers. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 19, 371–384.