User Involvement throughout the Innovation Process in High-Tech Industries

Journal of Product Innovation Management

Volumn 32, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 793-807

  Bosch Sijtsema, Petra ^a   Bosch, Jan ^a  

^a CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORKS; HIGH-TECH FIRMS; HIGH-TECH INDUSTRIES; INNOVATION CYCLES; INNOVATION PROCESS; PRODUCT INNOVATION; QUALITATIVE DATA; USER INVOLVEMENT;

INNOVATION;

EID: 84937978867     PISSN: 07376782     EISSN: 15405885     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/jpim.12233     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Agarwal, D., B. Chen, P. Elango, R. Ramakrishnan, N. Motgi, S. Roy, and, J. Zachariah,. 2008. Online models for content optimization. Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS). Available at: http://papers.nips.cc/paper/3560-online-models-for-content-optimization.
2. Baruch, Y, 1997. High technology organization-what it is, what it isn't. International Journal of Technology Management 13: 179-195.
3. Boehm, B., and, R. Turner,. 2004. Balancing agility and discipline-A guide for the perplexed. Boston, MA: Pearson Education Inc.
4. Bogers, M., A. Afuah, and, B. Bastian,. 2010. Users as innovators: A review, critique, and future research directions. Journal of Management 36 (4): 857-875.
5. Bosch, J., 2012. Building products as innovation experiment systems. In ICSOB 2012, LNBIP 114, ed., M. A. Cusumano, B. Iyer, and, N. Venkatraman, 27-39. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
6. Bosch, J., and, P. M. Bosch-Sijtsema,. 2011. Introducing agile user-centred development in a legacy software product line. Software: Practice and Experience 41 (8): 871-882.
7. Bosch, J., and, U. Eklund, 2012. Eternal embedded software: Towards innovation experiment systems. Proceedings of International Symposium on Leveraging Applications, Crete, October 15-18.
8. Chesbrough, H. W., 2003. Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
9. Davenport, T. H., 2009. How to design smart business experiments. Harvard Business Review 87 (2): 68-76.
10. Eisenberg, B., and, J. Quarto-vonTivadar,. 2008. Always be testing: The complete guide to Google website optimizer. Indianapolis, IN: Wiley Publishing.
11. Eisenhardt, K. M., 1989. Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review 14: 532-550.
12. Eisenhardt, K. M., and, B. N. Tabrizi,. 1995. Accelerating adaptive processes: Product innovation in the global computer industry. Administrative Science Quarterly 40 (1): 84-110.
13. Enkel, E., C. Kausch, and, O. Gassmann,. 2005. Managing the risk of customer integration. European Management Journal 23 (2): 203-213.
14. Gupta, A. K., and, D. L. Wilemon,. 1990. Accelerating the development of technology-based new products. California Management Review 32 (2): 24-44.
15. Iansiti, M., and, K. B. Clark,. 1994. Integration and dynamic capability: Evidence from product development in automobiles and mainframe computers. Industrial and Corporate Change 3 (3): 557-605.
16. Janssen, K. L., and, B. Dankbaar,. 2008. Proactive involvement of consumers in innovation: Selecting appropriate techniques. International Journal of Innovation Management 12 (3): 511-541.
17. Jeppesen, L. B., 2005. User toolkits for innovation: Consumers support each other. Journal of Product Innovation Management 22 (4): 347-362.
18. Kaulio, M. A., 1998. User, consumer and user involvement in product development: A framework and a review of selected methods. Total Quality Management 9 (1): 141-149.
19. Kohavi, R., R. Longbotham, D. Sommerfield, and, R. M. Henne,. 2009. Controlled experiments on the web: Survey and practical guide. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 18 (1): 140-181.
20. Kristensson, P., A. Gustafsson, and, T. Archer,. 2004. Harnessing the creative potential among users. Journal of Product Innovation Management 21 (1): 4-14.
21. Lee, F., A. C. Edmondson, S. Thomke, and, M. Worline,. 2004. The mixed effects of inconsistency on experimentation in organizations. Organization Science 15 (3): 310-326.
22. Lincoln, Y. S., and, E. G. Guba,. 1985. Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
23. Locke, K., 2001. Grounded theory in management research. London: Sage.
24. Lüthje, C., and, C. Herstatt,. 2004. The lead user method: An outline of empirical findings and issues for future research. R&D Management 34 (5): 553-568.
25. Magnusson, P. R., 2009. Exploring the contributions of involving ordinary users in ideation of technology-based services. Journal of Product Innovation Management 26: 578-593.
26. McDonald, S., 2005. Studying actions in context: A qualitative shadowing method for organizational research. Qualitative Research 5: 455-473.
27. Olson, E. L., and, G. Bakke,. 2001. Implementing the lead user method in a high technology firm: A longitudinal study if intentions versus actions. Journal of Product Innovation Management 18 (6): 388-395.
28. Orlikowski, W. J., 2000. Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organization Science 13 (3): 249-273.
29. Poetz, M. K., and, M. Schreier,. 2012. The value of crowdsourcing: Can users really compete with professionals in generating new product ideas? Journal of Product Innovation Management 29 (2): 245-256.
30. Rohrbeck, R., F. Steinhoff, and, F. Perder,. 2010. Souring innovation from your customer: How multinational enterprises use web platforms for virtual customer integration. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 22 (2): 117-131.
31. Rosenthal, S. R., and, M. Capper,. 2006. Ethnographies in the front end: Designing for enhanced user experience. Journal of Product Innovation Management 23: 215-237.
32. Schaarschmidt, M., and, T. Kilian,. 2014. Impediments to customer integration into the innovation process: A case study in the telecommunications industry. European Management Journal 32 (2): 350-361.
33. Schultze, U., 2000. A confessional account of an ethnography about knowledge work. MIS Quarterly 24: 3-41.
34. Thomke, S., E. Von Hippel, and, R. Franke,. 1998. Modes of experimentation: An innovation process-and competitive-variable. Research Policy 27: 315-332.
35. Thomke, S. H., 1998. Managing experimentation in the design of new products. Management Science 44 (6): 743-762.
36. Thomke, S. H., 2001. Enlightened experimentation: The new imperative for innovation. Harvard Business Review 79 (2): 67-75.
37. Thomke, S. H., 2003. Experimentation matters: Unlocking the potential of new technologies for innovation. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
38. Ulwick, A. W., 2002. Turn user input into innovation. Harvard Business Review 80 (1): 91-97.
39. Van Kleef, E., H. C. M. Van Trijp, and, P. Luning,. 2005. Consumer research in the early stages of new product development: A critical review of methods and techniques. Food Quality and Preference 16: 181-201.
40. Veryzer, R. W., 1998. Key factors affecting customer evaluation of discontinuous new products. Journal of Product Innovation Management 15: 136-150.
41. von Hippel, E., 1986. Lead users: A source of novel product concepts. Management Science 32 (7): 791-805.
42. von Hippel, E., 1994. Sticky information and the locus of problem solving: Implications for innovation. Management Science 40 (4): 429-439.
43. von Hippel, E., and, R. Katz,. 2002. Shifting innovation to users via toolkits. Management Science 48 (7): 821-833.
44. Voss, C. A., 1985. The role of users in the development of applications software. Journal of Product Innovation Management 2 (2): 113-121.