Users as innovators: A review, critique, and future research directions

Journal of Management

Volumn 36, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 857-875

  Bogers, Marcel ^a   Afuah, Allan ^b   Bastian, Bettina ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN DENMARK   (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Co creation; Knowledge; Sources of innovation; Theory; User innovation

Indexed keywords

EID: 77953520699     PISSN: 01492063     EISSN: 15571211     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0149206309353944     Document Type: Review

References (106)

1. Abernathy, W.J., & Clark, K.B. 1985. Innovation: Mapping the winds of creative destruction. Research Policy, 14: 3-22.
2. Afuah, A. 2000. How much do your co-opetitors capabilities matter in the face of technological change? Strategic Management Journal, 21: 387-404.
3. Afuah, A. 2001. Dynamic boundaries of the firm: Are firms better off being vertically integrated in the face of a technological change. Academy of Management Journal, 44: 1211-1228.
4. Bacharach, S.B. 1989. Organizational theories: Some criteria for evaluation. Academy of Management Review, 14: 496-515.
5. Baldwin, C., Hienerth, C., & von Hippel, E. 2006. How user innovations become commercial products: A theoretical investigation and case study. Research Policy, 35: 1291-1313.
6. Barney, J.B. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17: 99-120.
7. Benkler, Y. 2006. The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
8. Bogers, M. 2009. The sources of process innovation in user firms: An exploration of the antecedents and impact of non-R&D innovation and learning-by-doing. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne.
9. Brusoni, S., Prencipe, A., & Pavitt, K. 2001. Knowledge specialization, organizational coupling, and the boundaries of the firm: Why do firms know more than they make? Administrative Science Quarterly, 46: 597-621.
10. Burns, T., & Stalker, G.M. 1961. The management of innovation. London: Tavistock.
11. Buur, J., & Matthews, B. 2008. Participatory innovation. International Journal of Innovation Management, 12: 255-273.
12. Chatterji, A.K., & Fabrizio, K. 2008. The impact of users on technological development: The role of physician innovation in the medical device industry. Working paper. Fuqua School of Business, Duke University.
13. Chesbrough, H.W. 2003. Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
14. Cohen, W.M., & Levinthal, D.A. 1990. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 128-152.
15. Dahlander, L., & Wallin, M.W. 2006. A man on the inside: Unlocking communities as complementary assets. Research Policy, 35: 1243-1259.
16. de Jong, J.P.J., & von Hippel, E. 2009. Transfers of user process innovations to process equipment producers: A study of Dutch high-tech firms. Research Policy, 38: 1181-1191.
17. Dosi, G. 1988. Sources, procedures, and microeconomic effects of innovation. Journal of Economic Literature, 26: 1120-1171.
18. Douthwaite, B., Keatinge, J.D.H., & Park, J.R. 2001. Why promising technologies fail: The neglected role of user innovation during adoption. Research Policy, 30: 819-836.
19. Enos, J.L. 1962. Petroleum progress and profits: A history of process innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20. Faulkner, P., & Runde, J. 2009. On the identity of technological objects and user innovations in function. Academy of Management Review, 34: 442-462.
21. Foxall, G.R., & Tierney, J.D. 1984. From CAP1 to CAP2: User-initiated innovation from the user's point of view. Management Decision, 22(5): 3-15.
22. Franke, N., & Shah, S. 2003. How communities support innovative activities: An exploration of assistance and sharing among end-users. Research Policy, 32: 157-178.
23. Franke, N., & von Hippel, E. 2003. Satisfying heterogeneous user needs via innovation toolkits: The case of Apache security software. Research Policy, 32: 1199-1215.
24. Franz, K. 2005. Tinkering: Consumers reinvent the early automobile. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
25. Freeman, C. 1968. Chemical process plant: Innovation and the world market. National Institute Economic Review, 45: 29-57.
26. Gans, J.S., & Stern, S. 2003. The product market and the market for ideas: Commercialization strategies for technology entrepreneurs. Research Policy, 32: 333-350.
27. Gilbert, R.J., & Newbery, D.M.G. 1982. Preemptive patenting and the persistence of monopoly. American Economic Review, 72: 514-526.
28. Haefliger, S., von Krogh, G., & Spaeth, S. 2008. Code reuse in open source software. Management Science, 54: 180-193.
29. Harhoff, D., Henkel, J., & von Hippel, E. 2003. Profiting from voluntary information spillovers: How users benefit by freely revealing their innovations. Research Policy, 32: 1753-1769.
30. Henderson, R.M. 1993. Underinvestment and incompetence as responses to radical innovation: Evidence from the photolithographic alignment industry. Rand Journal of Economics, 24: 248-270.
31. Henderson, R.M., & Clark, K.B. 1990. Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 9-30.
32. Henkel, J., & von Hippel, E. 2005. Welfare implications of user innovation. Journal of Technology Transfer, 30: 73-87.
33. Herstatt, C., & von Hippel, E. 1992. From experience: Developing new product concepts via the lead user method: A case study in a low-tech field. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 9: 213-221.
34. Hill, C.W.L., & Rothaermel, F.T. 2003. The performance of incumbent firms in the face of radical technological innovation. Academy of Management Review, 28: 257-274.
35. Hollander, S. 1965. The sources of increased efficiency: A study of DuPont rayon plants. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
36. Jacobides, M.G., & Billinger, S. 2006. Designing the boundaries of the firm: From make, buy, or ally to the dynamic benefits of vertical architecture. Organization Science, 17: 249-261.
37. Jensen, M.B., Johnson, B., Lorenz, E., & Lundvall, B.-Å. 2007. Forms of knowledge and modes of innovation. Research Policy, 36: 680-693.
38. Jeppesen, L.B. 2005. User toolkits for innovation: Consumers support each other. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 22: 347-363.
39. Jeppesen, L.B., & Frederiksen, L. 2006. Why do users contribute to firm-hosted user communities? The case of computer-controlled music instruments. Organization Science, 17: 45-63.
40. Lakhani, K.R., & von Hippel, E. 2003. How open source software works: Free user-to-user assistance. Research Policy, 32: 923-943.
41. Langlois, R.N., & Robertson, P.L. 1992. Networks and innovation in a modular system: Lessons from the microcomputer and stereo component industries. Research Policy, 21: 297-313.
42. Lee, K.R. 1996. The role of user firms in the innovation of machine tools: The Japanese case. Research Policy, 25: 491-507.
43. Leonard-Barton, D. 1988. Implementation as mutual adaptation of technology and organization. Research Policy, 17: 251-267.
44. Leonard-Barton, D. 1992. The factory as a learning laboratory. MIT Sloan Management Review, 34(1): 23-38.
45. Lerner, J., & Tirole, J. 2002. Some simple economics of open source. Journal of Industrial Economics, 50: 197-234.
46. Lettl, C., Herstatt, C., & Gemuenden, H.G. 2006. Learning from users for radical innovation. International Journal of Technology Management, 33: 25-45.
47. Lhuillery, S., & Bogers, M. 2006. Measuring user innovation: What can a standard innovation survey tell us? Paper presented at the International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators: History and New Perspectives, Lugano.
48. Lilien, G.L., Morrison, P.D., Searls, K., Sonnack, M., & von Hippel, E. 2002. Performance assessment of the lead user idea-generation process for new product development. Management Science, 48: 1042-1059.
49. Lundvall, B.-Å. 1988. Innovation as an interactive process: From user-producer interaction to the national system of innovation. In G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. R. Nelson, G. Silverberg, & L. Soete (Eds.), Technical change and economic theory: 349-369. London: Pinter.
50. Lüthje, C. 2004. Characteristics of innovating users in a consumer goods field: An empirical study of sport-related product consumers. Technovation, 24: 683-695.
51. Lüthje, C., & Herstatt, C. 2004. The lead user method: An outline of empirical findings and issues for future research. R&D Management, 34: 553-568.
52. Lüthje, C., Herstatt, C., & von Hippel, E. 2005. User-innovators and local information: The case of mountain biking. Research Policy, 34: 951-965.
53. Morrison, P.D., Roberts, J.H., & von Hippel, E. 2000. Determinants of user innovation and innovation sharing in a local market. Management Science, 46: 1513-1527.
54. Myers, S., & Marquis, D. 1969. Successful industrial innovations. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
55. Nelson, R.R., & Winter, S.G. 1982. An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.
56. Nonaka, I. 1994. A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5: 14-37.
57. Ogawa, S. 1998. Does sticky information affect the locus of innovation? Evidence from the Japanese convenience-store industry. Research Policy, 26: 777-790.
58. Ogawa, S., & Piller, F.T. 2006. Reducing the risks of new product development. MIT Sloan Management Review, 47(2): 65-71.
59. Oliveira, P., & von Hippel, E. 2009. Users as service innovators: The case of banking services. Working paper no. 4748-09, MIT Sloan School of Management.
60. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. 1997. The measurement of scientific and technological activities: Proposed guidelines for collecting and interpreting technological innovation data (Oslo Manual) (2nd ed.). Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
61. Piller, F.T., & Walcher, D. 2006. Toolkits for idea competitions: A novel method to integrate users in new product development. R&D Management, 36: 307-318.
62. Pisano, G.P. 1994. Knowledge, integration, and the locus of learning: An empirical analysis of process development. Strategic Management Journal, 15: 85-100.
63. Polanyi, M. 1958. Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy. Chicago: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
64. Prahalad, C.K., & Ramaswamy, V. 2003. The future of competition: Co-creating unique value with customers. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
65. Raasch, C., Herstatt, C., & Balka, K. 2009. On the open design of tangible goods. R&D Management, 39: 382-393.
66. Raasch, C., Herstatt, C., & Lock, P. 2008. The dynamics of user innovation: Drivers and impediments of innovation activities. International Journal of Innovation Management, 12: 377-398.
67. Reinganum, J.F. 1983. Uncertain innovation and the persistence of monopoly. American Economic Review, 73: 741-748.
68. Rice, R.E., & Rogers, E.M. 1980. Reinvention in the innovation process. Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 1: 499-514.
69. Riggs, W., & von Hippel, E. 1994. Incentives to innovate and the sources of innovation: The case of scientific instruments. Research Policy, 23: 459-469.
70. Rosenberg, N. 1982. Inside the black box: Technology and economics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
71. Rosenkopf, L., & Nerkar, A. 2001. Beyond local search: Boundary-spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry. Strategic Management Journal, 22: 287-306.
72. Rothwell, R. 1977. The characteristics of successful innovators and technically progressive firms. R&D Management, 3: 191-206.
73. Rothwell, R., & Gardiner, P. 1985. Invention, innovation, re-innovation and the role of the user: A case study of British hovercraft development. Technovation, 3: 167-186.
74. Sawhney, M., Verona, G., & Prandelli, E. 2005. Collaborating to create: The Internet as a platform for customer engagement in product innovation. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 19(4): 4-17.
75. Shah, S.K. 2006. Motivation, governance, and the viability of hybrid forms in open source software development. Management Science, 52: 1000-1014.
76. Shah, S.K., & Tripsas, M. 2007. The accidental entrepreneur: The emergent and collective process of user entrepreneurship. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1: 123-140.
77. Shaw, B. 1985. The role of the interaction between the user and the manufacturer in medical equipment innovation. R&D Management, 15: 283-292.
78. Simon, H.A. 1965. Administrative behavior: A study of decision-making processes in administrative organization. New York: Free Press.
79. Skiba, F., & Herstatt, C. 2009. Users as sources for radical service innovations: Opportunities from collaboration with service lead users. International Journal of Services Technology and Management, 12: 317-337.
80. Slaughter, S. 1993. Innovation and learning during implementation: A comparison of user and manufacturer innovations. Research Policy, 22: 81-95.
81. Smith, A. 1776/1999. An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. London: Penguin.
82. Spital, F. 1979. An analysis of the role of users in the total R&D portfolios of scientific instrument firms. Research Policy, 8: 284-296.
83. Stuermer, M., Spaeth, S., & von Krogh, G. 2009. Extending private-collective innovation: A case study. R&D Management, 39: 170-191.
84. Sutton, R.I., & Staw, B.M. 1995. What theory is not. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40: 371-384.
85. Teece, D.J. 1986. Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy, 15: 285-305.
86. Tietz, R., Morrison, P.D., Lüthje, C., & Herstatt, C. 2005. The process of user-innovation: A case study on user innovation in a consumer goods setting. International Journal of Product Development, 2: 321-338.
87. Tripsas, M. 1997. Unraveling the process of creative destruction: Complementary assets and incumbent survival in the typesetter industry. Strategic Management Journal, 18: 119-142.
88. Tushman, M.L., & Anderson, P. 1986. Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31: 439-465.
89. Urban, G.L., & von Hippel, E. 1988. Lead user analyses for the development of new industrial products. Management Science, 34: 569-582.
90. Utterback, J.M. 1994. Mastering the dynamics of innovation. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
91. Vargo, S.L., & Lusch, R.F. 2004. Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(1): 1-17.
92. von Hippel, E. 1976. The dominant role of users in the scientific instrument innovation process. Research Policy, 5: 212-239.
93. von Hippel, E. 1978. A customer-active paradigm for industrial product idea generation. Research Policy, 7: 240-266.
94. von Hippel, E. 1986. Lead users: A source of novel product concepts. Management Science, 32: 791-805.
95. von Hippel, E. 1988. The sources of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
96. von Hippel, E. 1994. Sticky information and the locus of problem solving: Implications for innovation. Management Science, 40: 429-439.
97. von Hippel, E. 2005. Democratizing innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
98. von Hippel, E. 2007. Horizontal innovation networks: By and for users. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16: 293-315.
99. von Hippel, E., & Katz, R. 2002. Shifting innovation to users via toolkits. Management Science, 48: 821-833.
100. von Hippel, E., & Tyre, M.J. 1995. How learning by doing is done: Problem identification in novel process equipment. Research Policy, 24: 1-12.
101. von Hippel, E., & von Krogh, G. 2003. Open source software and the private-collective innovation model: Issues for organization science. Organization Science, 14: 209-223.
102. von Krogh, G., & von Hippel, E. 2003. Special issue on open source software development. Research Policy, 32: 1149-1157.
103. von Krogh, G., & von Hippel, E. 2006. The promise of research on open source software. Management Science, 52: 975-983.
104. Voss, C.A. 1985. The role of users in the development of applications software. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2: 113-121.
105. West, J., & Gallagher, S. 2006. Challenges of open innovation: The paradox of firm investment in open-source software. R&D Management, 36: 319-331.
106. Whetten, D.A. 1989. What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 14: 490-495.