Perinuclear tethers license telomeric DSBs for a broad kinesin- and NPC-dependent DNA repair process

Nature Communications

Volumn 6, Issue , 2015, Pages

  Chung, Daniel K C ^a   Chan, Janet N Y ^a   Strecker, Jonathan ^a,b   Zhang, Wei ^a,b   Ebrahimi Ardebili, Sasha ^a   Lu, Thomas ^a   Abraham, Karan J ^a   Durocher, Daniel ^a,b,c   Mekhail, Karim ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

KINESIN; MOLECULAR MOTOR; BIR1 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; CARRIER PROTEIN; CIK1 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; KAR3 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; MICROTUBULE ASSOCIATED PROTEIN; MICROTUBULE PROTEIN; NUCLEOPORIN; NUP84 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN;

BIOTECHNOLOGY; CELLS AND CELL COMPONENTS; CHROMOSOME; DNA; ENZYME;

ARTICLE; CELL NUCLEUS MEMBRANE; CELL SURVIVAL; CHROMATIN; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPAIR; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA BREAK; GENOMIC INSTABILITY; MICROTUBULE; NUCLEAR PORE COMPLEX; SENESCENCE; TELOMERE; TELOMERE HOMEOSTASIS; METABOLISM; YEAST;

CARRIER PROTEINS; DNA BREAKS, DOUBLE-STRANDED; DNA REPAIR; MICROTUBULE PROTEINS; MICROTUBULE-ASSOCIATED PROTEINS; NUCLEAR PORE COMPLEX PROTEINS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; YEASTS;

EID: 84937839493     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20411723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms8742     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Shampay, J., Szostak, J. W. & Blackburn, E. H. DNA sequences of telomeres maintained in yeast. Nature 310, 154-157 (1984).
2. Greider, C. W. & Blackburn, E. H. Identification of a specific telomere terminal transferase activity in tetrahymena extracts. Cell 43, 405-413 (1985).
3. Gottschling, D. E., Aparicio, O. M., Billington, B. L. & Zakian, V. A. Position effect at s. cerevisiae telomeres: reversible repression of pol ii transcription. Cell 63, 751-762 (1990).
4. Mekhail, K. & Moazed, D. The nuclear envelope in genome organization, expression and stability. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 11, 317-328 (2010).
5. Kaeberlein, M., McVey, M. & Guarente, L. The sir2/3/4 complex and sir2 alone promote longevity in saccharomyces cerevisiae by two different mechanisms. Genes Dev. 13, 2570-2580 (1999).
6. Chan, J. N. et al. Perinuclear cohibin complexes maintain replicative life span via roles at distinct silent chromatin domains. Dev. Cell 20, 867-879 (2011).
7. Salvi, J. S. et al. Roles for pbp1 and caloric restriction in genome and lifespan maintenance via suppression of rna-DNA hybrids. Dev. Cell 30, 177-191 (2014).
8. Mekhail, K., Seebacher, J., Gygi, S. P. & Moazed, D. Role for perinuclear chromosome tethering in maintenance of genome stability. Nature 456, 667-670 (2008).
9. Torres-Rosell, J. et al. The smc5-smc6 complex and sumo modification of rad52 regulates recombinational repair at the ribosomal gene locus. Nat. Cell Biol. 9, 923-931 (2007).
10. Chiolo, I. et al. Double-strand breaks in heterochromatin move outside of a dynamic hp1a domain to complete recombinational repair. Cell 144, 732-744 (2011).
11. Jakob, B. et al. DNA double-strand breaks in heterochromatin elicit fast repair protein recruitment, histone h2ax phosphorylation and relocation to euchromatin. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, 6489-6499 (2011).
12. Nagai, S. et al. Functional targeting of DNA damage to a nuclear poreassociated sumo-dependent ubiquitin ligase. Science 322, 597-602 (2008).
13. Oza, P., Jaspersen, S. L., Miele, A., Dekker, J. & Peterson, C. L. Mechanisms that regulate localization of a DNA double-strand break to the nuclear periphery. Genes Dev. 23, 912-927 (2009).
14. Kalocsay, M., Hiller, N. J. & Jentsch, S. Chromosome-wide rad51 spreading and sumo-h2a.Z-dependent chromosome fixation in response to a persistent DNA double-strand break. Mol. Cell 33, 335-343 (2009).
15. Horigome, C. et al. Swr1 and ino80 chromatin remodelers contribute to DNA double-strand break perinuclear anchorage site choice. Mol. Cell 55, 626-639 (2014).
16. Taddei, A., Hediger, F., Neumann, F. R., Bauer, C. & Gasser, S. M. Separation of silencing from perinuclear anchoring functions in yeast ku80, sir4 and esc1 proteins. EMBO J. 23, 1301-1312 (2004).
17. Hediger, F., Dubrana, K. & Gasser, S. M. Myosin-like proteins 1 and 2 are not required for silencing or telomere anchoring, but act in the tel1 pathway of telomere length control. J. Struct. Biol. 140, 79-91 (2002).
18. Bennett, C. B., Lewis, A. L., Baldwin, K. K. & Resnick, M. A. Lethality induced by a single site-specific double-strand break in a dispensable yeast plasmid. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 90, 5613-5617 (1993).
19. Bupp, J. M., Martin, A. E., Stensrud, E. S. & Jaspersen, S. L. Telomere anchoring at the nuclear periphery requires the budding yeast sad1-unc-84 domain protein mps3. J. Cell Biol. 179, 845-854 (2007).
20. Schober, H., Ferreira, H., Kalck, V., Gehlen, L. R. & Gasser, S. M. Yeast telomerase and the sun domain protein mps3 anchor telomeres and repress subtelomeric recombination. Genes Dev. 23, 928-938 (2009).
21. Taddei, A. & Gasser, S. M. Structure and function in the budding yeast nucleus. Genetics 192, 107-129 (2012).
22. Therizols, P. et al. Telomere tethering at the nuclear periphery is essential for efficient DNA double strand break repair in subtelomeric region. J. Cell Biol. 172, 189-199 (2006).
23. Khadaroo, B. et al. The DNA damage response at eroded telomeres and tethering to the nuclear pore complex. Nat. Cell Biol. 11, 980-987 (2009).
24. Chapman, J. R., Taylor, M. R. & Boulton, S. J. Playing the end game: DNA double-strand break repair pathway choice. Mol. Cell 47, 497-510 (2012).
25. Martina, M., Bonetti, D., Villa, M., Lucchini, G. & Longhese, M. P. Saccharomyces cerevisiae rif1 cooperates with mrx-sae2 in promoting DNA-end resection. EMBO Rep. 15, 695-704 (2014).
26. Stafa, A., Donnianni, R. A., Timashev, L. A., Lam, A. F. & Symington, L. S. Template switching during break-induced replication is promoted by the mph1 helicase in saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 196, 1017-1028 (2014).
27. Ricchetti, M., Dujon, B. & Fairhead, C. Distance from the chromosome end determines the efficiency of double strand break repair in subtelomeres of haploid yeast. J. Mol. Biol. 328, 847-862 (2003).
28. Andrulis, E. D. et al. Esc1, a nuclear periphery protein required for sir4-based plasmid anchoring and partitioning. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22, 8292-8301 (2002).
29. Page, B. D., Satterwhite, L. L., Rose, M. D. & Snyder, M. Localization of the kar3 kinesin heavy chain-related protein requires the cik1 interacting protein. J. Cell Biol. 124, 507-519 (1994).
30. Chu, H. M. et al. Kar3 interaction with cik1 alters motor structure and function. EMBO J. 24, 3214-3223 (2005).
31. Sproul, L. R., Anderson, D. J., Mackey, A. T., Saunders, W. S. & Gilbert, S. P. Cik1 targets the minus-end kinesin depolymerase kar3 to microtubule plus ends. Curr. Biol. 15, 1420-1427 (2005).
32. Pan, X. et al. A DNA integrity network in the yeast saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cell 124, 1069-1081 (2006).
33. Kitamura, E., Tanaka, K., Kitamura, Y. & Tanaka, T. U. Kinetochore microtubule interaction during s phase in saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev. 21, 3319-3330 (2007).
34. Costanzo, M. et al. The genetic landscape of a cell. Science 327, 425-431 (2010).
35. Laporte, D., Courtout, F., Salin, B., Ceschin, J. & Sagot, I. An array of nuclear microtubules reorganizes the budding yeast nucleus during quiescence. J. Cell Biol. 203, 585-594 (2013).
36. Manning, B. D., Barrett, J. G., Wallace, J. A., Granok, H. & Snyder, M. Differential regulation of the kar3p kinesin-related protein by two associated proteins, cik1p and vik1p. J. Cell Biol. 144, 1219-1233 (1999).
37. Hediger, F., Neumann, F. R., Van Houwe, G., Dubrana, K. & Gasser, S. M. Live imaging of telomeres: Yku and sir proteins define redundant telomereanchoring pathways in yeast. Curr. Biol. 12, 2076-2089 (2002).
38. Williams, J. M., Ouenzar, F., Lemon, L. D., Chartrand, P. & Bertuch, A. A. The principal role of ku in telomere length maintenance is promotion of est1 association with telomeres. Genetics 197, 1123-1136 (2014).
39. Lydeard, J. R., Jain, S., Yamaguchi, M. & Haber, J. E. Break-induced replication and telomerase-independent telomere maintenance require pol32. Nature 448, 820-823 (2007).
40. Aylon, Y., Liefshitz, B. & Kupiec, M. The cdk regulates repair of double-strand breaks by homologous recombination during the cell cycle. EMBO J. 23, 4868-4875 (2004).
41. Ira, G. et al. DNA end resection, homologous recombination and DNA damage checkpoint activation require cdk1. Nature 431, 1011-1017 (2004).
42. Mimitou, E. P. & Symington, L. S. Sae2, exo1 and sgs1 collaborate in DNA double-strand break processing. Nature 455, 770-774 (2008).
43. Zhu, Z., Chung, W. H., Shim, E. Y., Lee, S. E. & Ira, G. Sgs1 helicase and two nucleases dna2 and exo1 resect DNA double-strand break ends. Cell 134, 981-994 (2008).
44. Schatz, P. J., Pillus, L., Grisafi, P., Solomon, F. & Botstein, D. Two functional alpha-tubulin genes of the yeast saccharomyces cerevisiae encode divergent proteins. Mol. Cell. Biol. 6, 3711-3721 (1986).
45. Ahmed, S. et al. DNA zip codes control an ancient mechanism for gene targeting to the nuclear periphery. Nat. Cell Biol. 12, 111-118 (2010).
46. Light, W. H., Brickner, D. G., Brand, V. R. & Brickner, J. H. Interaction of a DNA zip code with the nuclear pore complex promotes h2a.Z incorporation and ino1 transcriptional memory. Mol. Cell 40, 112-125 (2010).
47. Brickner, D. G. et al. Transcription factor binding to a DNA zip code controls interchromosomal clustering at the nuclear periphery. Dev. Cell 22, 1234-1246 (2012).
48. Lydeard, J. R., Lipkin-Moore, Z., Jain, S., Eapen, V. V. & Haber, J. E. Sgs1 and exo1 redundantly inhibit break-induced replication and de novo telomere addition at broken chromosome ends. PLoS Genet. 6, e1000973 (2010).
49. Song, H. & Endow, S. A. Decoupling of nucleotide- and microtubule-binding sites in a kinesin mutant. Nature 396, 587-590 (1998).
50. Jain, S. et al. A recombination execution checkpoint regulates the choice of homologous recombination pathway during DNA double-strand break repair. Genes Dev. 23, 291-303 (2009).
51. Ira, G., Malkova, A., Liberi, G., Foiani, M. & Haber, J. E. Srs2 and sgs1-top3 suppress crossovers during double-strand break repair in yeast. Cell 115, 401-411 (2003).
52. Le, S., Moore, J. K., Haber, J. E. & Greider, C. W. Rad50 and rad51 define two pathways that collaborate to maintain telomeres in the absence of telomerase. Genetics 152, 143-152 (1999).
53. Teng, S. C. & Zakian, V. A. Telomere-telomere recombination is an efficient bypass pathway for telomere maintenance in saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 8083-8093 (1999).
54. Cesare, A. J. & Reddel, R. R. Alternative lengthening of telomeres: Models, mechanisms and implications. Nat. Rev. Genet. 11, 319-330 (2010).
55. Dion, V., Kalck, V., Horigome, C., Towbin, B. D. & Gasser, S. M. Increased mobility of double-strand breaks requires mec1, rad9 and the homologous recombination machinery. Nat. Cell Biol. 14, 502-509 (2012).
56. Mine-Hattab, J. & Rothstein, R. Increased chromosome mobility facilitates homology search during recombination. Nat. Cell Biol. 14, 510-517 (2012).
57. Dion, V. & Gasser, S. M. Chromatin movement in the maintenance of genome stability. Cell 152, 1355-1364 (2013).
58. Mieck, C. et al. Non-catalytic motor domains enable processive movement and functional diversification of the kinesin-14 kar3. Elife 4, e04489 (2015).
59. Braun, M., Drummond, D. R., Cross, R. A. & McAinsh, A. D. The kinesin-14 klp2 organizes microtubules into parallel bundles by an atp-dependent sorting mechanism. Nat. Cell Biol. 11, 724-730 (2009).
60. Fink, G. et al. The mitotic kinesin-14 ncd drives directional microtubule-microtubule sliding. Nat. Cell Biol. 11, 717-723 (2009).
61. Mitchison, T. & Kirschner, M. Dynamic instability of microtubule growth. Nature 312, 237-242 (1984).
62. Haber, J. E. & Leung, W. Y. Lack of chromosome territoriality in yeast: promiscuous rejoining of broken chromosome ends. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, 13949-13954 (1996).
63. Nelms, B. E., Maser, R. S., MacKay, J. F., Lagally, M. G. & Petrini, J. H. In situ visualization of DNA double-strand break repair in human fibroblasts. Science 280, 590-592 (1998).
64. Aten, J. A. et al. Dynamics of DNA double-strand breaks revealed by clustering of damaged chromosome domains. Science 303, 92-95 (2004).
65. Kruhlak, M. J. et al. Changes in chromatin structure and mobility in living cells at sites of DNA double-strand breaks. J. Cell Biol. 172, 823-834 (2006).
66. Soutoglou, E. et al. Positional stability of single double-strand breaks in mammalian cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 9, 675-682 (2007).
67. Helleday, T., Petermann, E., Lundin, C., Hodgson, B. & Sharma, R. A. DNA repair pathways as targets for cancer therapy. Nat. Rev. Cancer 8, 193-204 (2008).
68. Vaze, M. B. et al. Recovery from checkpoint-mediated arrest after repair of a double-strand break requires srs2 helicase. Mol. Cell 10, 373-385 (2002).
69. Yeung, M. & Durocher, D. Srs2 enables checkpoint recovery by promoting disassembly of DNA damage foci from chromatin. DNA Repair (Amst) 10, 1213-1222 (2011).
70. Sage, D., Neumann, F. R., Hediger, F., Gasser, S. M. & Unser, M. Automatic tracking of individual fluorescence particles: application to the study of chromosome dynamics. IEEE Trans Image Process 14, 1372-1383 (2005).