Effect of pH, transmembrane pressure and whey proteins on the properties of casein micelle deposit layers

Journal of Membrane Science

Volumn 493, Issue , 2015, Pages 452-459

  Steinhauer, Tim ^a   Lonfat, Jonas ^a   Hager, Ilona ^a   Gebhardt, Ronald ^a   Kulozik, Ulrich ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Casein micelles; Deposit layer resistance; Deposit layer structure; Membrane fouling; Whey proteins

Indexed keywords

CASEIN; COMPRESSIBILITY; MEMBRANE FOULING; MICELLES; MICROFILTRATION; PROTEINS;

CASEIN MICELLES; FOULING RESISTANCE; LAYER RESISTANCE; LAYER STRUCTURES; PROTEIN FRACTIONS; PROTEIN LAYERS; TRANSMEMBRANE PRESSURES; WHEY PROTEINS;

DAIRIES;

CASEIN; MILK PROTEIN;

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; CELL SURFACE; MEMBRANE BIOLOGY; MICELLE; MICROFILTRATION; PARTICLE SIZE; PH; PRESSURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; TRANSMEMBRANE PRESSURE; WHEY;

EID: 84937796596     PISSN: 03767388     EISSN: 18733123     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2015.06.007     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Brans G., Schroën C., van der Sman R.G.M., Boom R.M. Membrane fractionation of milk: state of the art and challenges. J. Membr. Sci. 2004, 243:263-272.
2. Gésan-Guiziou G., Boyaval E., Daufin G. Critical stability conditions in crossflow microfiltration of skimmed milk: transition to irreversible deposition. J. Membr. Sci. 1999, 158:211-222.
3. Le Berre O., Daufin G. Skimmilk crossflow microfiltration performance versus permeation flux to wall shear stress ratio. J. Membr. Sci. 1996, 117:261-270.
4. Samuelsson G., Dejmek P., Trägårdh G., Paulsson M. Minimizing whey protein retention in cross-flow microfiltration of skim milk. Int. Dairy J. 1997, 7:237-242.
5. Heinrich M., Kulozik U. Study of chymosin hydrolysis of casein micelles under ultra high pressure: effect on re-association upon pressure release. Int. Dairy J. 2011, 21:664-669.
6. Bouchoux A., Debbou B., Gésan-Guiziou G., Famelart M.-H., Doublier J.-L., Cabane B. Rheology and phase behavior of dense casein micelle dispersions. J. Chem. Phys. 2009, 131:165106.
7. Bouchoux A., Cayemitte P.-E., Jardin J., Gésan-Guiziou G., Cabane B. Casein micelle dispersions under osmotic stress. Biophys. J. 2009, 96:693-706.
8. Bouchoux A., Qu P., Bacchin P., Gésan-Guiziou G. A general approach for predicting the filtration of soft and permeable colloids: the milk example. Langmuir ACS J. Surf. Colloids 2014, 30:22-34.
9. Rabiller-Baudry M., Gésan-Guiziou G., Roldan-Calbo D., Beaulieu S., Michel F. Limiting flux in skimmed milk ultrafiltration: impact of electrostatic repulsion due to casein micelles. Desalination 2005, 175:49-59.
10. Kühnl W., Piry A., Kaufmann V., Grein T., Ripperger S., Kulozik U. Impact of colloidal interactions on the flux in cross-flow microfiltration of milk at different pH values: a surface energy approach. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 352:107-115.
11. Tuinier R., de Kruif C.G. Stability of casein micelles in milk. J. Chem. Phys. 2002, 117:1290.
12. Steinhauer T., Kühnl W., Kulozik U. Impact of protein interactions and transmembrane pressure on physical properties of filter cakes formed during filtrations of skim milk. Procedia Food Sci. 2011, 1:886-892.
13. Qu P., Gésan-Guiziou G., Bouchoux A. Dead-end filtration of sponge-like colloids: the case of casein micelle. J. Membr. Sci. 2012, 417-418:10-19.
14. Bouchoux A., Gésan-Guiziou G., Pérez Javier, Cabane Bernard How to squeeze a sponge: casein micelles under osmotic stress, a 5SAXS6 study. Biophys. J. 2010, 99:3754-3762.
15. Yadav P.L., Roy N.K. Viscometric study of interaction between the major milk constituents in model milk systems. N. Role minerals cations. Indian J. Dairy Sci. 1977, 22:21-32.
16. I.C. de Carvalho, Über das Fliessverhalten von Ultrafiltrationskonzentraten aus Milch und dessen Abhängigkeit von der Wärmebehandlung und der Tiefkühllagerung, 1986.
17. Dahbi L., Alexander M., Trappe V., Dhont J.K.G., Schurtenberger P. Rheology and structural arrest of casein suspensions. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2010, 342:564-570.
18. Christensen M.L., Sedin P., Theliander H., Keiding K. Pressure and concentration profiles in filter cake consisting of core/shell latex particle. Colloids Surf. A: Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2006, 290:295-303.
19. Gebhardt R., Kulozik U. Simulation of the shape and size of casein micelles in a film state. Food Funct. 2014, 5:780-785.
20. Gebhardt R., Holzmüller W., Zhong Q., Müller-Buschbaum P., Kulozik U. Structural ordering of casein micelles on silicon nitride micro-sieves during filtration. Colloids surf. B Biointerfaces 2011, 88:240-245.
21. Gebhardt R., Steinhauer T., Meyer P., Sterr J., Perlich J., Kulozik U. Structural changes of deposited casein micelles induced by membrane filtration. Faraday Discuss. 2012, 158:77.
22. Steinhauer T., Kulozik U., Gebhardt R. Structure of milk protein deposits formed by casein micelles and β-lactoglobulin during frontal microfiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 2014, 468:126-132.
23. Qu P., Bouchoux A., Gésan-Guiziou G. On the cohesive properties of casein micelles in dense systems. Food Hydrocoll. 2015, 43:753-762.
24. Piry A., Heino A., Kühnl W., Grein T., Ripperger S., Kulozik U. Effect of membrane length, membrane resistance, and filtration conditions on the fractionation of milk proteins by microfiltration. J. Dairy Sci. 2012, 95:1590-1602.
25. Piry A., Kühnl W., Grein T., Tolkach A., Ripperger S., Kulozik U. Length dependency of flux and protein permeation in crossflow microfiltration of skimmed milk. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 325:887-894.
26. Voswinkel L., Kulozik U. Fractionation of whey proteins by means of membrane adsorption chromatography. Procedia Food Sci. 2011, 1:900-907.
27. Heinrich M. Untersuchungen zum hochdruckausgelösten Zerfall der Caseinmizelle 2012, Verl. Dr. Hut, München. 1st ed.
28. Bonfatti V., Grigoletto L., Cecchinato A., Gallo L., Carnier P. Validation of a new reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography method for separation and quantification of bovine milk protein genetic variants. J. Chromatogr. A 2008, 1195:101-106.
29. Bonizzi I., Buffoni J.N., Feligini M. Quantification of bovine casein fractions by direct chromatographic analysis of milk. Approaching the application to a real production context. J. Chromatogr. A 2009, 1216:165-168.
30. T. Steinhauer, M. Marx, K. Bogendörfer, U. Kulozik, Membrane fouling during ultra- and microfiltration of whey and whey proteins at different environmental conditions: the role of aggregated whey proteins as fouling initiators, J. Membr. Sci. (2015).
31. Hwang K.-J., Wang Y.-T., Iritani E., Katagiri N. Effects of porous gel particle compression properties on microfiltration characteristics. J. Membr. Sci. 2009, 341:286-293.
32. Wang X.-M., Waite T.D. Impact of gel layer formation on colloid retention in membrane filtration processes. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 325:486-494.
33. T. Steinhauer, J. Schwing, S. Krauß, U. Kulozik, Enhancement of ultrafiltration-performance and improvement of hygienic quality during the production of whey concentrates, Int. Dairy J. (2015).
34. Kühnl W. Kolloidale Wechselwirkungen zwischen Proteinen im Zusammenspiel mit fluid-dynamischen Kräften an der Grenzfläche von Filtrationsmembranen, gezeigt am Beispiel der Fraktionierung von Milchproteinen mittels Mikrofiltration 2010, VDI Verlag, Düsseldorf.
35. Tarabara V. Effect of hydrodynamics and solution ionic strength on permeate flux in cross-flow filtration: direct experimental observation of filter cake cross-sections. J. Membr. Sci. 2004, 241:65-78.
36. Rabiller-Baudry M., Bouzid H., Chaufer B., Paugam L., Delaunay D., Mekmene O., Ahmad S., Gaucheron F. On the origin of flux dependence in pH-modified skim milk filtration. Dairy Sci. Technol. 2009, 89:363-385.
37. Marchin S., Putaux J.-L., Pignon F., Léonil J. Effects of the environmental factors on the casein micelle structure studied by cryo transmission electron microscopy and small-angle x-ray scattering/ultrasmall-angle x-ray scattering. J. Chem. Phys. 2007, 126:045101.
38. Moitzi C., Menzel A., Schurtenberger P., Stradner A. The pH induced sol-gel transition in skim milk revisited. A detailed study using time-resolved light and x-ray scattering experiments. Langmuir ACS J. Surf. Colloids 2011, 27:2195-2203.
39. Gastaldi E., Laguade A., Tarado de la Fuente B. Micellar transition state in casein between pH 5.5 and 5.0. J. Food Sci. 1996, 61:59-64.
40. Kelly S.T., Senyo Opong W., Zydney A.L. The influence of protein aggregates on the fouling of microfiltration membranes during stirred cell filtration. J. Membr. Sci. 1993, 80:175-187.
41. Kelly S.T., Zydney A.L. Effects of intermolecular thiol-disulfide interchange reactions on BSA fouling during microfiltration. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1994, 44:972-982.
42. Kelly S.T., Zydney A.L. Mechanisms for BSA fouling during microfiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 1995, 107:115-127.
43. Mourouzidis-Mourouzis S., Karabelas A. Whey protein fouling of microfiltration ceramic membranes-pressure effects. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 282:124-132.
44. Mourouzidis-Mourouzis S., Karabelas A. Whey protein fouling of large pore-size ceramic microfiltration membranes at small cross-flow velocity. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 323:17-27.