A prezygotic transmission distorter acting equally in female and male zebra finches Taeniopygia guttata

Molecular Ecology

Volumn 24, Issue 15, 2015, Pages 3846-3859

  Knief, Ulrich ^a   Schielzeth, Holger ^b   Ellegren, Hans ^c   Kempenaers, Bart ^a   Forstmeier, Wolfgang ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR ORNITHOLOGY   (Germany)

^b BIELEFELD UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^c UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

genic drive; meiotic drive; segregation distortion; selfish DNA

Indexed keywords

AVES; TAENIOPYGIA GUTTATA;

MICROSATELLITE DNA;

ALLELE; ANIMAL; FEMALE; FINCH; GENE CONVERSION; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; HAPLOTYPE; INHERITANCE; MALE; MEIOSIS; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM;

ALLELES; ANIMALS; FEMALE; FINCHES; GENE CONVERSION; GENOTYPE; HAPLOTYPES; INHERITANCE PATTERNS; MALE; MEIOSIS; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE;

EID: 84937736899     PISSN: 09621083     EISSN: 1365294X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/mec.13281     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Aparicio JM, Ortego J, Calabuig G, Cordero PJ, (2010) Evidence of subtle departures from Mendelian segregation in a wild lesser kestrel (Falco naumanni) population. Heredity, 105, 213-219.
2. Axelrod R, Hamilton WD, (1981) The evolution of cooperation. Science, 211, 1390-1396.
3. Axelsson E, Albrechtsen A, van AP, et al,. (2010) Segregation distortion in chicken and the evolutionary consequences of female meiotic drive in birds. Heredity, 105, 290-298.
4. Backström N, Forstmeier W, Schielzeth H, et al,. (2010) The recombination landscape of the zebra finch Taeniopygia guttata genome. Genome Research, 20, 485-495.
5. Balakrishnan CN, Edwards SV, (2009) Nucleotide variation, linkage disequilibrium and founder-facilitated speciation in wild populations of the zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata). Genetics, 181, 645-660.
6. Balakrishnan CN, Edwards SV, Clayton DF, (2010) The Zebra Finch genome and avian genomics in the wild. EMU, 110, 233-241.
7. Balding DJ, (2006) A tutorial on statistical methods for population association studies. Nature Reviews Genetics, 7, 781-791.
8. Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S, (2014) Lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1.1-6.
9. Bernasconi G, Ashman TL, Birkhead TR, et al,. (2004) Evolutionary ecology of the prezygotic stage. Science, 303, 971-975.
10. Birdsell JA, (2002) Integrating genomics, bioinformatics, and classical genetics to study the effects of recombination on genome evolution. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 19, 1181-1197.
11. Burnham CR, (1962) Discussions in Cytogenetics, 1st edn. Burgess Publishing Company, Minneapolis, USA.
12. Burt A, Trivers R, (2006) Genes in Conflict: The Biology of Selfish Genetic Elements. Belknap Press, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, UK.
13. Champely S, (2012) pwr: Basic functions for power analysis. R package version 1.1.1.
14. Day T, Taylor PD, (1998) Chromosomal drive and the evolution of meiotic nondisjunction and trisomy in humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 95, 2361-2365.
15. Dreszer TR, Wall GD, Haussler D, Pollard KS, (2007) Biased clustered substitutions in the human genome: the footprints of male-driven biased gene conversion. Genome Research, 17, 1420-1430.
16. Duret L, Galtier N, (2009) Biased gene conversion and the evolution of mammalian genomic landscapes. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics, 10, 285-311.
17. Ellegren H, Smeds L, Burri R, et al,. (2012) The genomic landscape of species divergence in Ficedula flycatchers. Nature, 491, 756-760.
18. Fan JB, Oliphant A, Shen R, et al,. (2003) Highly parallel SNP genotyping. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology, 68, 69-78.
19. Fedyk S, Chetnicki W, (2007) Preferential segregation of metacentric chromosomes in simple Robertsonian heterozygotes of Sorex araneus. Heredity, 99, 545-552.
20. Fishman L, Saunders A, (2008) Centromere-associated female meiotic drive entails male fitness costs in monkeyflowers. Science, 322, 1559-1562.
21. Forstmeier W, Coltman DW, Birkhead TR, (2004) Maternal effects influence the sexual behavior of sons and daughters in the zebra finch. Evolution, 58, 2574-2583.
22. Forstmeier W, Schielzeth H, Schneider M, Kempenaers B, (2007) Development of polymorphic microsatellite markers for the zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata). Molecular Ecology Notes, 7, 1026-1028.
23. Foulkes AS, (2009) Applied Statistical Genetics with R: For Population-based Association Studies. Springer, Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London, New York.
24. Frésard L, Leroux S, Servin B, et al,. (2014) Transcriptome-wide investigation of genomic imprinting in chicken. Nucleic Acids Research, 42, 3768-3782.
25. Gabriel S, Ziaugra L, Tabbaa D, (2009) SNP genotyping using the Sequenom MassARRAY iPLEX platform. Current Protocols in Human Genetics Chapter 2, Unit 2 12.
26. Griffith SC, Buchanan KL, (2010) The Zebra Finch: the ultimate Australian supermodel. EMU, 110, v-xii.
27. Hartl DL, (1969) Dysfunctional sperm production in Drosophila melanogaster males homozygous for segregation distorter elements. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 63, 782-789.
28. Henikoff S, Ahmad K, Malik HS, (2001) The centromere paradox: stable inheritance with rapidly evolving DNA. Science, 293, 1098-1102.
29. Jeffreys AJ, May CA, (2004) Intense and highly localized gene conversion activity in human meiotic crossover hot spots. Nature Genetics, 36, 151-156.
30. Jeffreys AJ, Neumann R, (2002) Reciprocal crossover asymmetry and meiotic drive in a human recombination hot spot. Nature Genetics, 31, 267-271.
31. Knief U, Hemmrich-Stanisak G, Wittig M, et al,. (2015) Quantifying realized inbreeding in wild and captive animal populations. Heredity, 114, 397-403.
32. Koehler KE, Millie EA, Cherry JP, et al,. (2002) Sex-specific differences in meiotic chromosome segregation revealed by dicentric bridge resolution in mice. Genetics, 162, 1367-1379.
33. Lumley T, (2012) rmeta: Meta-analysis. R package version 2.16.
34. Lyon MF, (2003) Transmission ratio distortion in mice. Annual Review of Genetics, 37, 393-408.
35. Lyttle TW, (1991) Segregation distorters. Annual Review of Genetics, 25, 511-557.
36. Lyttle TW, (1993) Cheaters sometimes prosper: distortion of mendelian segregation by meiotic drive. Trends in Genetics, 9, 205-210.
37. Mendel G, (1865) Versuche über Pflanzen-Hybriden. Verhandlungen des naturforschenden Vereins in Brünn, 4, 3-47.
38. Meyer WK, Arbeithuber B, Ober C, et al,. (2012) Evaluating the evidence for transmission distortion in human pedigrees. Genetics, 191, 215-232.
39. Mitchell AA, Cutler DJ, Chakravarti A, (2003) Undetected genotyping errors cause apparent overtransmission of common alleles in the transmission/disequilibrium test. American Journal of Human Genetics, 72, 598-610.
40. Pardo-Manuel de Villena F, Sapienza C, (2001) Nonrandom segregation during meiosis: the unfairness of females. Mammalian Genome, 12, 331-339.
41. Presgraves DC, (2010) The molecular evolutionary basis of species formation. Nature Reviews Genetics, 11, 175-180.
42. R Core Team (2013) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. version 3.0.2.
43. Schielzeth H, (2010) Simple means to improve the interpretability of regression coefficients. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 1, 103-113.
44. Schielzeth H, Kempenaers B, Ellegren H, Forstmeier W, (2011) Data from: QTL linkage mapping of zebra finch beak color shows an oligogenic control of a sexually selected trait. Dryad Digital Repository, doi: 10.5061/dryad.r044b.
45. Schielzeth H, Kempenaers B, Ellegren H, Forstmeier W, (2012) QTL linkage mapping of zebra finch beak color shows an oligogenic control of a sexually selected trait. Evolution, 66, 18-30.
46. Traulsen A, Reed FA, (2012) From genes to games: cooperation and cyclic dominance in meiotic drive. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 299, 120-125.
47. Tsai JH, McKee BD, (2011) Homologous pairing and the role of pairing centers in meiosis. Journal of Cell Science, 124, 1955-1963.
48. Úbeda F, Haig D, (2005) On the evolutionary stability of Mendelian segregation. Genetics, 170, 1345-1357.
49. Visscher PM, Medland SE, Ferreira MAR, et al,. (2006) Assumption-free estimation of heritability from genome-wide identity-by-descent sharing between full siblings. Plos Genetics, 2, 316-325.
50. Warren WC, Clayton DF, Ellegren H, et al,. (2010) The genome of a songbird. Nature, 464, 757-762.
51. Weber CC, Boussau B, Romiguier J, Jarvis ED, Ellegren H, (2014) Evidence for GC-biased gene conversion as a driver of between-lineage differences in avian base composition. Genome Biology, 15, 549.
52. Webster MT, Smith NGC, Hultin-Rosenberg L, Arndt PF, Ellegren H, (2005) Male-driven biased gene conversion governs the evolution of base composition in human Alu repeats. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 22, 1468-1474.
53. Williams AL, Geneovese G, Dyer T, et al,. (2015) Non-crossover gene conversions show strong GC bias and unexpected clustering in humans. eLife, 4, e04637.
54. Wyttenbach A, Borodin P, Hausser J, (1998) Meiotic drive favors Robertsonian metacentric chromosomes in the common shrew (Sorex araneus, Insectivora, Mammalia). Cytogenetics and Cell Genetics, 83, 199-206.
55. Zann RA, (1996) The Zebra Finch: A Synthesis of Field and Laboratory Studies. Oxford University Press, New York, USA.
56. Zöllner S, Wen X, Hanchard NA, et al,. (2004) Evidence for extensive transmission distortion in the human genome. American Journal of Human Genetics, 74, 62-72.