Evidence of subtle departures from Mendelian segregation in a wild lesser kestrel (Falco naumanni) population

Heredity

Volumn 105, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 213-219

  Aparicio, J M ^a   Ortego, J ^a,b   Calabuig, G ^a   Cordero, P J ^a  

^a INSTITUTO DE INVESTIGACIÓN EN RECURSOS CINEGÉTICOS IREC CSIC UCLM JCCM   (Spain)

^b MUSEO NACIONAL DE CIENCIAS NATURALES   (Spain)

Author keywords

Falco naumanni; meiotic drive; Mendelian segregation; microsatellite; transmission ratio distortion

Indexed keywords

ALLELE; GENE FLOW; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC STRUCTURE; GENOME; HERITABILITY; RAPTOR;

FALCO NAUMANNI;

MICROSATELLITE DNA;

ALLELE; ANIMAL; FALCONIFORMES; FEMALE; GENETICS; MALE; MEIOSIS; WILD ANIMAL;

ALLELES; ANIMALS; ANIMALS, WILD; FALCONIFORMES; FEMALE; MALE; MEIOSIS; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS;

EID: 77954888145     PISSN: 0018067X     EISSN: 13652540     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2009.173     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Aparicio JM, Bonal R (2002). Effects of food supplementation and habitat selection on timing of lesser kestrel breeding. Ecology 83: 873-877.
2. Aparicio JM, Cordero PJ (2001). The effects of the minimum threshold condition for breeding on offspring sex ratio adjustment in the lesser kestrel. Evolution 55: 1188-1197.
3. Barton NH (2000). Genetic hitchhiking. Philos Trans R Soc London B 355: 1553-1562.
4. Bettencourt C, Fialho RN, Santos C, Montiel R, Bruges-Armas J, Maciel P et al. (2008). Segregation distortion of wild-type alleles at the Machado-Joseph disease locus, a study in normal families from the Azores islands (Portugal). J Hum Gen 53: 333-339.
5. Buckler IV ES, Phelps-Durr TL, Buckler CSK, Dawe RK, Doebley JF, Holtsford TP (1999). Meiotic drive of chromosomal knobs reshaped the maize genome. Genetics 153: 415-426.
6. Bratteler M, Lexer C, Widmer A (2006). A genetic linkage map of Silene vulgaris based on AFLP markers. Genome 49: 320-327.
7. Callen DF, Thompson AD, Shen Y, Phillips HA, Richards RI, Mulley JC et al. (1993). Incidence and origin of 'null' alleles in the (AC)n microsatellite markers. Am J Hum Genet 52: 922-927.
8. Charlesworth B, Hartl DL (1978). Population dynamics of the segregation distorter polymorphism of Drosophila melanoga- ster. Genetics 89: 171-192.
9. Chevin LM, Hospital F (2006). The hitchhiking effect of an autosomal meiotic drive gene. Genetics 173: 1829-1832.
10. Crow JF (1991). Why is Mendelian segregation so exact? BioEssays 13: 305-312.
11. Dermitzakis ET, Masly JP, Waldrip HM, Clark AG (2000). Non- Mendelian segregation of sex chromosomes in heterospecific Drosophila males. Genetics 154: 687-694.
12. Eshel I (1985). Evolutionary genetic stability of Mendelian segregation and the role of free recombination in the chromosomal system. Am Nat 125: 412-420.
13. Fishman L, Saunders A (2008). Centromere-associated female meiotic drive entails male fitness costs in monkeyflowers. Science 232: 1559-1562.
14. Haig D, Grafen A (1991). Genetic scrambling as a defence against meiotic drive. J Theor Biol 153: 531-558.
15. Hall DW (2004). Meiotic drive and sex chromosome cycling. Evolution 58: 925-931.
16. Hall MC, Willis JH (2005). Transmission ratio distortion in intraspecific hybrids of Mimulus guttatus, implications for genomic divergence. Genetics 170: 375-386.
17. Hartl DL (1975). Modifier theory and meiotic drive. Theor Popul Biol 7: 168-174.
18. Hartl DL, Hiraizumi Y, Crow JF (1967). Evidence for sperm dysfunction as the mechanism of segregation distortion in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 58: 2240-2245.
19. Hiraizumi Y, Crow JF (1960). Heterozygous effects on viability, fertility, rate of development, and longevity of Drosophila chromosomes that are lethal when homozygous. Genetics 45: 1071-1083.
20. Hernandez JL, Ortego J, Calabuig G, Bonal R, Munoz A, Garcia G et al. (2007). Casi dos decadas anillando primillas en La Mancha. In: Casas F, Arredondo A, Lopez-Jamar J (eds). Anuario Ornitologico de Ciudad Real, SEO-Ciudad Real: Ciudad Real. Vol 2003-2004, pp 165-170.
21. Hiraizumi Y, Dandler L, Crow JF (1960). Meiotic drive in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. III. Populational implications of segregation-distorter locus. Evolution 44: 433-444.
22. Hurst GDD, Werren JH (2001). The role of selfish genetic elements in eukaryotic evolution. Nat Rev Genet 2: 597-606.
23. Jaenike J (2008). X chromosome drive. Curr Biol 18: R508-R511.
24. Jenczewski E, Gherardi M, Bonnin I, Prosperi JM, Olivieri I, Huguet T (1997). Insight on segregation distortions in two intraspecific crosses between annual species of Medicago (Leguminosae). Theor Appl Genet 94: 682-691.
25. Jiggins FM, Hurst GDD, Majerus MEN (1999). How common are meiotically driving sex chromosomes? Am Nat 154: 481-483.
26. Kuittinen H, de Haan AA, Vogl C, Oikarinen S, Leppala J, Koch M et al. (2004). Comparing the linkage maps of the close relatives Arabidopsis lyrata and A. thaliana. Genetics 168: 1575-1584.
27. LeMaire-Adkins R, Hunt PA (2000). Nonrandom segregation of the mouse univalent X chromosome: evidence of spindle- mediated meiotic drive. Genetics 156: 775-783.
28. Lewontin RC (1968). The effect of differential viability on the population dynamics of t-alleles in the house mouse. Evolution 22: 262-273.
29. Lewontin RC, Dunn LC (1960). The evolutionary dynamics of a polymorphism in the house mouse. Genetics 45: 705-722.
30. Liberman U (1976). Modifier theory of meiotic drive: is Mendelian segregation stable? Theor Popul Biol 10: 127-132.
31. Lyon MF (1984). Transmission ratio distortion in mouse t-haplotypes is due to multiple distorter genes acting on a responder locus. Cell 37: 621-628.
32. Lyttle TW (1991). Segregation distorters. Ann Rev Genet 25: 511-557.
33. Lyttle TW (1993). Cheaters sometimes prosper: distortion of Mendelian segregation by meiotic drive. Trends Genet 9: 205-210.
34. Maynard-Smith J, Haigh J (1974). The hitchhiking effect of a favourable gene. Genet Res 23: 23-35.
35. McDaniel SF, Willis JH, Shaw AJ (2007). A linkage map reveals a complex basis for segregation distortion in an interpopulation cross in the moss Ceratodon purpureus. Genetics 176: 2489-2500.
36. McMeniman CJ, Barker SC (2006). Transmission ratio distortion in the human body louse, Pediculus humanus (Insecta: Phthiraptera). Heredity 96: 63-68.
37. Nesje M, Roed KH, Lifjeld JT, Lindberg P, Steen OF (2000). Genetic relationships in the peregrine falcon (Falco peregrinus) analysed by microsatellite DNA markers. Mol Ecol 9: 53-60.
38. Ortego J, Gonzalez EG, Sanchez-Barbudo I, Aparicio JM, Cordero PJ (2007). New highly polymorphic loci and cross- amplified microsatellites for the lesser kestrel Falco naumanni. Ardeola 54: 101-108.
39. Pardo-Manuel de Villena F, de la Casa-Esperon E, Briscoe TL, Sapienza C (2000). A genetic test to determine the origin of the maternal 1: meiotic drive at the mouse Om locus. Genetics 154: 333-342.
40. Pardo-Manuel de Villena F, Sapienza S (2001). Nonrandom segregation during meiosis: the unfairness of females. Mamm Genome 12: 331-339.
41. Purushothaman D, Elliott RW, Ruvinsky A (2008). A search for transmission ratio distortions in offspring from crosses between inbred mice. J Genet 87: 127-131.
42. Prout T, Bundgaard J, Bryant S (1973). Population genetics of modifiers of meiotic drive. The solution of a special case and some general implications. Theor Popul Biol 4: 446-465.
43. Sandler L, Novitski E (1957). Meiotic drive as an evolutionary. Am Nat 91: 105-110.
44. Taylor DR, Ingvarsson PK (2003). Common features of segregation distortion in plants and animals. Genetica 117: 27-35.
45. Topinka JR, May B (2004). Development of polymorphic microsatellite loci in the Northern Goshawk (Accipiter gentilis) and cross-amplification in other raptor species. Conser Genet 5: 861-864.
46. Ubeda F (2006). Why Mendelian segregation? Biochem Soc Trans 34:566-568.
47. Ubeda F, Haig D (2004). Sex-specific meiotic drive and selection at an imprinted locus. Genetics 167: 2083-2095.
48. Ubeda F, Haig D (2005). On the evolutionary stability of Mendelian segregation. Genetics 170: 1345-1357.
49. Weissing FJ, van Boven M (2001). Selection and segregation distortion in a sex-differentiated Population. Theor Popul Biol 60: 327-341.
50. Zolner S, Wen X, Hancgard NA, Herbert MA, Ober C, Pritchard JK (2004). Evidence for extensive transmission distortion in the human genome. Am J Hum Genet 74: 62-72.