On the evolutionary stability of Mendelian segregation

Genetics

Volumn 170, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 1345-1357

  Úbeda, Francisco ^a,b   Haig, David ^a  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b ST JOHN S COLLEGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BALANCED POLYMORPHISM; EVOLUTION; GENDER; GENE SEGREGATION; GENETIC MODEL; GENETIC POLYMORPHISM; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETIC STABILITY; GENOME IMPRINTING; HETEROZYGOTE; MENDELIAN SEGREGATION; OOCYTE DEVELOPMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE GENETICS; SEGREGATION RATIO; SPERMATOGENESIS;

CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENETIC LOAD; GENETICS, POPULATION; MEIOSIS; MODELS, GENETIC; SEX FACTORS;

EID: 23344435349     PISSN: 00166731     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.104.036889     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. AGULNIK, S. I., A. I. AGULNIK and A. O. RUVINSKY, 1990 Meiotic drive in female mice heterozygous for the HSR inserts on chromosome 1. Genet. Res. 55: 97-100.
2. CAMERON, D. R., and R. MOAV, 1957 Inheritance in Nicotiana tabacum XXVII. Pollen killer, an alien genetic locus inducing abortion of microspores not carrying it. Genetics 42: 326-335.
3. CHARLESWORTH, B., 1979 Selection for gamete lethals and s-alleles in complex heterozygotes. Heredity 43: 159-164.
4. CLELAND, R. E., 1972 Oenothera Cytogenetics and Evolution. Academic Press, London.
5. CROW, J. F., 1970 Genetic loads and the cost of natural selection, pp. 128-177 in Mathematical Topics in Population Genetics, edited by K. I. KOJIMA. Springer-Verlag, New York.
6. CROW, J. F., 1979 Genes that violate Mendel's rules. Sci. Am. 240: 134-146.
7. CROW, J. F., 1988 The ultraselfish gene. Genetics 118: 389-391.
8. ESHEL, L, 1985 Evolutionary genetic stability of Mendelian segregation and the role of free recombination in the chromosomal system. Am. Nat. 125: 412-420.
9. ESHEL, I., 1996 On the changing concept of evolutionary population stability as a reflection of a changing point of view in the quantitative theory of evolution. J. Math. Biol. 34: 485-510.
10. FOSTER, G. G., and M. J. WHITTEN, 1991 Meiotic drive in Lucilia cuprina and chromosomal evolution. Am. Nat. 137: 403-415.
11. GRANT, V., 1975 Variation and Evolution in Plants. Columbia University Press, New York.
12. GROPP, A., and H. WINKING, 1981 Robertsonian translocations: cytology, meiosis, segregation patterns and biological consequences of heterozygosity. Symp. Zool. Soc. Lond. 47: 141-181.
13. HAIG, D., and C. T. BERGSTROM. 1995 Multiple mating, sperm competition, and meiotic drive. J. Evol. Biol. 8: 265-282.
14. HAIG, D., and A. GRAFEN, 1991 Genetic scrambling as a defence against meiotic drive. J. Theor. Biol. 153: 531-558.
15. HAIG, D., and M. WESTOBY, 1991 Genomic imprinting in endosperm: its effects on seed development in crosses between species and between different ploidies of the same species, and its implications for the evolution of apomixis. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 333: 1-13.
16. HARTL, D. L., 1975 Modifier theory and meiotic drive. Theor. Popul. Biol. 7: 168-174.
17. HOLSINGER, K. E., and N. C. ELLSTRAND, 1984 The evolution and ecology of permanent translocation heterozygotes. Am. Nat. 124: 48-71.
18. LAVERY, P., and S. H. JAMES, 1987 Complex hybridity in Isotoma petraea. VI. Distorted segregation, gametic lethal systems and population divergence. Heredity 58: 401-408.
19. LESSARD, S., 1989 Resource allocation in Mendelian populations: further in ESS theory, pp. 207-246 in Mathematical Evolutionary Theory, edited by M. W. FELDMAN. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
20. LIBERMAN, U., 1976 Modifier theory of meiotic drive: Is Mendelian segregation stable? Theor. Popul. Biol. 10: 127-132.
21. LOEGERING, W. Q., and E, R. SEARS, 1963 Distorted inheritance of stem-rust resistance of timstein wheat caused by pollen-killing gene. Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 5: 65-72.
22. LYTTLE, T. W., 1991 Segregation distorters. Annu. Rev. Genet. 25: 511-557.
23. MAAN, S. S., 1975 Exclusive preferential transmission of an alien chromosome in common wheat. Crop Sci. 15: 287-292.
24. MAGUIRE, M. P., 1963 High transmission frequency of a tripsacum chromosome in corn. Genetics 48: 1185-1194.
25. MATHWORKS, 1991 Matlab. Prentice Hall, New York.
26. PARDO-MANUEL DE VILLENA, F., and C. SAPIENZA, 2001 Non-random segregation during meiosis: the unfairness of females. Mamm. Genome 12: 331-339.
27. PARDO-MANUEL DE VILLENA, F., E. DE LA CASA ESPERON, J. W. WILLIAMS, J. M. MALETTE, M. ROSA et al., 2000 Heritability of the maternal meiotic drive system linked to Om and high-resolution mapping of the Responder locus in mouse. Genetics 155: 283-289.
28. PEARCE, G. P., and H. G. SPENCER, 1992 Population genetic models of genomic imprinting. Genetics 130: 899-907.
29. PROUT, T., J. BUNDGAARD and S. BRYANT, 1973 Population genetics of modifiers of meiotic drive. The solution of a special case and some general implications. Theor. Popul. Biol. 4: 446-465.
30. REIK, W., and J. WALTER, 2001 Genomic imprinting: parental influence on the genome. Nat. Rev. 2: 21-32.
31. RHOADES, M. M., 1942 Preferential segregation in maize. Genetics 27: 395-407.
32. RICK, C. M., 1966 Abortion of male and female gametes in the tomato determined by allelic interaction. Genetics 53: 85-96.
33. SANDLER, L., and K. GOLIC, 1985 Segregation distortion in Drosophila. Trends Genet. 1: 181-185.
34. SANO, Y., 1990 The genic nature of gamete elimination in rice. Genetics 125: 183-191.
35. SILVER, L. M., 1985 Mouse t haplotypes. Annu. Rev. Genet. 19: 179-208.
36. ÚBEDA, F., and D. HAIG, 2004 Sex-specific meiotic drive and selection at an imprinted locus. Genetics 167: 2083-2095.
37. VAN HEERMERT, C., 1977 Somatic pairing and meiotic non-random disjunction in a pericentric inversion of Hylemya antiqua. Chromosoma 59: 193-206.
38. VON WANGENHEIM, K. H., 1962 Zur Ursache der abortion von samenanlagen in diploid-polyploid-kreuzungen. II. Unterschiedliche differenzierungvon endospermen mit gleichen genom. Z. Vererbungsl. 93: 319-334.