Ctbp2 Modulates NuRD-Mediated Deacetylation of H3K27 and Facilitates PRC2-Mediated H3K27me3 in Active Embryonic Stem Cell Genes during Exit from Pluripotency

Stem Cells

Volumn 33, Issue 8, 2015, Pages 2442-2455

  Kim, Tae Wan ^a   Kang, Byung Hee ^a   Jang, Hyonchol ^a,b   Kwak, Sojung ^a   Shin, Jihoon ^a   Kim, Hyunsoo ^a   Lee, Sang Eun ^c   Lee, Soon Min ^a   Lee, Jong Hyuk ^a   Kim, Jae Hwan ^a   Kim, Seon Young ^d   Cho, Eun Jung ^e   Kim, Ju Han ^f   Park, Keun Soo ^g   Che, Jeong Hwan ^g   Han, Dong Wook ^h   Kang, Min Jueng ⁱ   Yi, Eugene C ⁱ   Youn, Hong Duk ^a,i  

^a Ischemic Hypoxic Disease Institute   (South Korea)

^b Seoul National University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^c National Cancer Center   (South Korea)

^d Seoul National University Hospital   (South Korea)

^e Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology (KRIBB)   (South Korea)

^f Sungkyunkwan University   (South Korea)

^g Biomedical Center for Animal Resource Development N Bio   (South Korea)

^h Seoul National University   (South Korea)

ⁱ Konkuk University School of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Active embryonic stem cell genes; C terminal binding protein; Core transcription factor; Embryonic stem cells; Exit from pluripotency; H3K27 acetylation and trimethylation; Nucleosome remodeling and deacetylation complex; Polycomb repressive complex 2

Indexed keywords

C TERMINAL BINDING PROTEIN 2; COREPRESSOR PROTEIN; HISTONE H3; OCTAMER TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR 4; POLYCOMB REPRESSIVE COMPLEX 2; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; CTBP2 PROTEIN, MOUSE; DNA BINDING PROTEIN; HISTONE; HISTONE DEACETYLASE; NUCLEOSOME; PHOSPHOPROTEIN; REPRESSOR PROTEIN;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL LINEAGE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMBRYO; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; EMBRYONIC STEM CELL; EPIGENETICS; FEMALE; GENE ACTIVATION; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE FUNCTION; GENE SILENCING; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENETIC REGULATION; GENOME ANALYSIS; HISTONE ACETYLATION; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOSOME; NUCLEOSOME REMODELING AND DEACETYLATION; PLURIPOTENT STEM CELL; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; STABLE EXPRESSION; STEM CELL RESEARCH; ANIMAL; CELL LINE; CHROMATIN ASSEMBLY AND DISASSEMBLY; CYTOLOGY; GENETIC EPIGENESIS; GENETICS; METABOLISM; MOUSE EMBRYONIC STEM CELL; PHYSIOLOGY;

ANIMALS; CELL LINE; CHROMATIN ASSEMBLY AND DISASSEMBLY; DNA-BINDING PROTEINS; EPIGENESIS, GENETIC; HISTONES; MI-2 NUCLEOSOME REMODELING AND DEACETYLASE COMPLEX; MICE; MOUSE EMBRYONIC STEM CELLS; NUCLEOSOMES; PHOSPHOPROTEINS; REPRESSOR PROTEINS;

EID: 84937628573     PISSN: 10665099     EISSN: 15494918     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/stem.2046     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Boiani M, Scholer HR,. Regulatory networks in embryo-derived pluripotent stem cells. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2005; 6: 872-884.
2. Jaenisch R, Young R,. Stem cells, the molecular circuitry of pluripotency and nuclear reprogramming. Cell 2008; 132: 567-582.
3. Young RA,. Control of the embryonic stem cell state. Cell 2011; 144: 940-954.
4. Ng HH, Surani MA,. The transcriptional and signalling networks of pluripotency. Nat Cell Biol 2011; 13: 490-496.
5. Mikkelsen TS, Ku M, Jaffe DB, et al., Genome-wide maps of chromatin state in pluripotent and lineage-committed cells. Nature 2007; 448: 553-560.
6. Dowen JM, Bilodeau S, Orlando DA, et al., Multiple structural maintenance of chromosome complexes at transcriptional regulatory elements. Stem Cell Rep 2013; 1: 371-378.
7. Chen X, Xu H, Yuan P, et al., Integration of external signaling pathways with the core transcriptional network in embryonic stem cells. Cell 2008; 133: 1106-1117.
8. Kim J, Chu J, Shen X, et al., An extended transcriptional network for pluripotency of embryonic stem cells. Cell 2008; 132: 1049-1061.
9. Orkin SH, Hochedlinger K,. Chromatin connections to pluripotency and cellular reprogramming. Cell 2011; 145: 835-850.
10. Hu G, Wade PA,. NuRD and pluripotency: A complex balancing act. Cell Stem Cell 2012; 10: 497-503.
11. Kaji K, Caballero IM, MacLeod R, et al., The NuRD component Mbd3 is required for pluripotency of embryonic stem cells. Nat Cell Biol 2006; 8: 285-292.
12. Kaji K, Nichols J, Hendrich B,. Mbd3, a component of the NuRD co-repressor complex, is required for development of pluripotent cells. Development 2007; 134: 1123-1132.
13. McDonel P, Costello I, Hendrich B,. Keeping things quiet: Roles of NuRD and Sin3 co-repressor complexes during mammalian development. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2009; 41: 108-116.
14. Reynolds N, Latos P, Hynes-Allen A, et al., NuRD suppresses pluripotency gene expression to promote transcriptional heterogeneity and lineage commitment. Cell Stem Cell 2012; 10: 583-594.
15. Whyte WA, Bilodeau S, Orlando DA, et al., Enhancer decommissioning by LSD1 during embryonic stem cell differentiation. Nature 2012; 482: 221-225.
16. Ding J, Xu H, Faiola F, et al., Oct4 links multiple epigenetic pathways to the pluripotency network. Cell Res 2012; 22: 155-167.
17. Esch D, Vahokoski J, Groves MR, et al., A unique Oct4 interface is crucial for reprogramming to pluripotency. Nat Cell Biol 2013; 15: 295-301.
18. Pardo M, Lang B, Yu L, et al., An expanded Oct4 interaction network: Implications for stem cell biology, development, and disease. Cell Stem Cell 2010; 6: 382-395.
19. van den Berg DL, Snoek T, Mullin NP, et al., An Oct4-centered protein interaction network in embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 2010; 6: 369-381.
20. Simon JA, Kingston RE,. Mechanisms of polycomb gene silencing: Knowns and unknowns. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2009; 10: 697-708.
21. Bernstein BE, Mikkelsen TS, Xie X, et al., A bivalent chromatin structure marks key developmental genes in embryonic stem cells. Cell 2006; 125: 315-326.
22. Boyer LA, Plath K, Zeitlinger J, et al., Polycomb complexes repress developmental regulators in murine embryonic stem cells. Nature 2006; 441: 349-353.
23. Lee TI, Jenner RG, Boyer LA, et al., Control of developmental regulators by Polycomb in human embryonic stem cells. Cell 2006; 125: 301-313.
24. Landeira D, Sauer S, Poot R, et al., Jarid2 is a PRC2 component in embryonic stem cells required for multi-lineage differentiation and recruitment of PRC1 and RNA Polymerase II to developmental regulators. Nat Cell Biol 2010; 12: 618-624.
25. Pasini D, Cloos PA, Walfridsson J, et al., JARID2 regulates binding of the Polycomb repressive complex 2 to target genes in ES cells. Nature 2010; 464: 306-310.
26. Peng JC, Valouev A, Swigut T, et al., Jarid2/Jumonji coordinates control of PRC2 enzymatic activity and target gene occupancy in pluripotent cells. Cell 2009; 139: 1290-1302.
27. Shen X, Kim W, Fujiwara Y, et al., Jumonji modulates polycomb activity and self-renewal versus differentiation of stem cells. Cell 2009; 139: 1303-1314.
28. Chamberlain SJ, Yee D, Magnuson T,. Polycomb repressive complex 2 is dispensable for maintenance of embryonic stem cell pluripotency. Stem Cells 2008; 26: 1496-1505.
29. Reynolds N, Salmon-Divon M, Dvinge H, et al., NuRD-mediated deacetylation of H3K27 facilitates recruitment of Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 to direct gene repression. EMBO J 2012; 31: 593-605.
30. Chinnadurai G,. CtBP, an unconventional transcriptional corepressor in development and oncogenesis. Mol Cell 2002; 9: 213-224.
31. Shi Y, Sawada J, Sui G, et al., Coordinated histone modifications mediated by a CtBP co-repressor complex. Nature 2003; 422: 735-738.
32. Kim JH, Cho EJ, Kim ST, et al., CtBP represses p300-mediated transcriptional activation by direct association with its bromodomain. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2005; 12: 423-428.
33. Hildebrand JD, Soriano P,. Overlapping and unique roles for C-terminal binding protein 1 (CtBP1) and CtBP2 during mouse development. Mol Cell Biol 2002; 22: 5296-5307.
34. Betschinger J, Nichols J, Dietmann S, et al., Exit from Pluripotency Is Gated by Intracellular Redistribution of the bHLH Transcription Factor Tfe3. Cell 2013; 153: 335-347.
35. Tarleton HP, Lemischka IR,. Delayed differentiation in embryonic stem cells and mesodermal progenitors in the absence of CtBP2. Mech Dev 2010; 127: 107-119.
36. Jang H, Kim TW, Yoon S, et al., O-GlcNAc regulates pluripotency and reprogramming by directly acting on core components of the pluripotency network. Cell Stem Cell 2012; 11: 62-74.
37. Chambers I, Silva J, Colby D, et al., Nanog safeguards pluripotency and mediates germline development. Nature 2007; 450: 1230-1234.
38. Niwa H, Miyazaki J, Smith AG,. Quantitative expression of Oct-3/4 defines differentiation, dedifferentiation or self-renewal of ES cells. Nat Genet 2000; 24: 372-376.
39. Lu J, Tan L, Li P, et al., All-trans retinoic acid promotes neural lineage entry by pluripotent embryonic stem cells via multiple pathways. BMC Cell Biol 2009; 10: 57.
40. Ernst J, Kellis M,. ChromHMM: Automating chromatin-state discovery and characterization. Nat Methods 2012; 9: 215-216.
41. Handoko L, Xu H, Li G, et al., CTCF-mediated functional chromatin interactome in pluripotent cells. Nat Genet 2011; 43: 630-638.
42. Yu P, Xiao S, Xin X, et al., Spatiotemporal clustering of the epigenome reveals rules of dynamic gene regulation. Genome Res 2013; 23: 352-364.
43. Heinz S, Benner C, Spann N, et al., Simple combinations of lineage-determining transcription factors prime cis-regulatory elements required for macrophage and B cell identities. Mol Cell 2010; 38: 576-589.
44. McLean CY, Bristor D, Hiller M, et al., GREAT improves functional interpretation of cis-regulatory regions. Nat Biotechnol 2010; 28: 495-501.
45. Whyte WA, Orlando DA, Hnisz D, et al., Master transcription factors and mediator establish super-enhancers at key cell identity genes. Cell 2013; 153: 307-319.
46. Dovey OM, Foster CT, Cowley SM,. Histone deacetylase 1 (HDAC1), but not HDAC2, controls embryonic stem cell differentiation. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 2010; 107: 8242-8247.
47. Riising EM, Comet I, Leblanc B, et al., Gene silencing triggers polycomb repressive complex 2 recruitment to CpG islands genome wide. Mol Cell 2014; 55: 347-360.
48. Ang YS, Tsai SY, Lee DF, et al., Wdr5 mediates self-renewal and reprogramming via the embryonic stem cell core transcriptional network. Cell 2011; 145: 183-197.
49. Leeb M, Dietmann S, Paramor M, et al., Genetic Exploration of the Exit from Self-Renewal Using Haploid Embryonic Stem Cells. Cell Stem Cell 2014; 14: 385-393.
50. Zhao LJ, Subramanian T, Vijayalingam S, et al., CtBP2 proteome: Role of CtBP in E2F7-mediated repression and cell proliferation. Genes Cancer 2014; 5: 31-40.
51. Srinivasan L, Atchison ML,. YY1 DNA binding and PcG recruitment requires CtBP. Genes Dev 2004; 18: 2596-2601.
52. Li G, Margueron R, Ku M, et al., Jarid2 and PRC2, partners in regulating gene expression. Genes Dev 2010; 24: 368-380.
53. Brien GL, Gambero G, O'Connell DJ, et al., Polycomb PHF19 binds H3K36me3 and recruits PRC2 and demethylase NO66 to embryonic stem cell genes during differentiation. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2012; 19: 1273-1281.
54. Margueron R, Reinberg D,. The Polycomb complex PRC2 and its mark in life. Nature 2011; 469: 343-349.
55. Pasini D, Bracken AP, Hansen JB, et al., The polycomb group protein Suz12 is required for embryonic stem cell differentiation. Mol Cell Biol 2007; 27: 3769-3779.
56. Sauvageau M, Sauvageau G,. Polycomb group proteins: Multi-faceted regulators of somatic stem cells and cancer. Cell Stem Cell 2010; 7: 299-313.
57. Shen X, Liu Y, Hsu YJ, et al., EZH1 mediates methylation on histone H3 lysine 27 and complements EZH2 in maintaining stem cell identity and executing pluripotency. Mol Cell 2008; 32: 491-502.
58. Klymenko T, Muller J,. The histone methyltransferases Trithorax and Ash1 prevent transcriptional silencing by Polycomb group proteins. EMBO Rep 2004; 5: 373-377.
59. Tie F, Banerjee R, Stratton CA, et al., CBP-mediated acetylation of histone H3 lysine 27 antagonizes Drosophila Polycomb silencing. Development 2009; 136: 3131-3141.
60. Zhao LJ, Subramanian T, Zhou Y, et al., Acetylation by p300 regulates nuclear localization and function of the transcriptional corepressor CtBP2. J Biol Chem 2006; 281: 4183-4189.
61. Brockdorff N,. Noncoding RNA and Polycomb recruitment. RNA 2013; 19: 429-442.
62. Kaneko S, Son J, Bonasio R, et al., Nascent RNA interaction keeps PRC2 activity poised and in check. Genes Dev 2014; 28: 1983-1988.
63. Hentze MW,. Enzymes as RNA-binding proteins: A role for (di)nucleotide-binding domains? Trends Biochem Sci 1994; 19: 101-103.
64. Cui TX, Kryczek I, Zhao L, et al., Myeloid-derived suppressor cells enhance stemness of cancer cells by inducing microRNA101 and suppressing the corepressor CtBP2. Immunity 2013; 39: 611-621.