Regulation of cargo recognition, commitment, and unloading drives cotranslational protein targeting

Journal of Cell Biology

Volumn 205, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 693-706

  Saraogi, Ishu ^a,b   Akopian, David ^a   Shan, Shu Ou ^a  

^a California Institute of Technology   (United States)

^b INDIAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE EDUCATION AND RESEARCH BHOPAL   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DOCKING PROTEIN; FLUORESCENT DYE; GUANOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASE; SIGNAL PEPTIDE; SIGNAL RECOGNITION PARTICLE; TRANSLOCON;

ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISSOCIATION; DISSOCIATION CONSTANT; ENERGY TRANSFER; EQUILIBRIUM CONSTANT; FORSTER RESONANCE ENERGY TRANSFER; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; MOLECULAR RECOGNITION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN PROCESSING; PROTEIN TARGETING; REGULATORY MECHANISM; RIBOSOME;

BACTERIAL PROTEINS; CRYSTALLIZATION; CYTOSOL; ESCHERICHIA COLI; ESCHERICHIA COLI PROTEINS; FLUORESCENCE RESONANCE ENERGY TRANSFER; FLUORESCENT DYES; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GTP PHOSPHOHYDROLASES; PEPTIDES; PROTEIN BIOSYNTHESIS; PROTEIN SORTING SIGNALS; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; PROTEIN TRANSPORT; RECEPTORS, CYTOPLASMIC AND NUCLEAR; RECEPTORS, PEPTIDE; RIBOSOMES; SIGNAL RECOGNITION PARTICLE;

EID: 84902330606     PISSN: 00219525     EISSN: 15408140     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1083/jcb.201311028     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Akopian, D., K. Dalal, K. Shen, F. Duong, and S.O. Shan. 2013. SecYEG activates GTPases to drive the completion of cotranslational protein targeting. J. Cell Biol. 200:397-405. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201208045
2. Ataide, S.F., N. Schmitz, K. Shen, A. Ke, S.O. Shan, J.A. Doudna, and N. Ban. 2011. The crystal structure of the signal recognition particle in complex with its receptor. Science. 331:881-886. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1196473
3. Bornemann, T., J. Jöckel, M.V. Rodnina, and W. Wintermeyer. 2008. Signal sequence-independent membrane targeting of ribosomes containing short nascent peptides within the exit tunnel. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 15:494-499. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.1402
4. Braig, D., C. Bär, J.-O. Thumfart, and H.-G. Koch. 2009. Two cooperating helices constitute the lipid-binding domain of the bacterial SRP receptor. J. Mol. Biol. 390:401-413. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2009.04.061
5. Braig, D., M. Mircheva, I. Sachelaru, E.O. van der Sluis, L. Sturm, R. Beckmann, and H.-G. Koch. 2011. Signal sequence-independent SRP-SR complex formation at the membrane suggests an alternative targeting pathway within the SRP cycle. Mol. Biol. Cell. 22:2309-2323. http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E11-02-0152
6. Cheng, Z.L., Y. Jiang, E.C. Mandon, and R. Gilmore. 2005. Identification of cytoplasmic residues of Sec61p involved in ribosome binding and cotranslational translocation. J. Cell Biol. 168:67-77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200408188
7. Cross, B.C.S., I. Sinning, J. Luirink, and S. High. 2009. Delivering proteins for export from the cytosol. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10:255-264. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm2657
8. Dalal, K., and F. Duong. 2010. Reconstitution of the SecY translocon in nanodiscs. Methods Mol. Biol. 619:145-156. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60327-412-8_9
9. del Alamo, M., D.J. Hogan, S. Pechmann, V. Albanese, P.O. Brown, and J. Frydman. 2011. Defining the specificity of cotranslationally acting chaperones by systematic analysis of mRNAs associated with ribosome-nascent chain complexes. PLoS Biol. 9:e1001100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001100
10. Doud, S.K., M.M. Chou, and D.A. Kendall. 1993. Titration of protein transport activity by incremental changes in signal peptide hydrophobicity. Biochemistry. 32:1251-1256. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/bi00056a008
11. Duong, F., and W. Wickner. 1997. Distinct catalytic roles of the SecYE, SecG and SecDFyajC subunits of preprotein translocase holoenzyme. EMBO J. 16:2756-2768. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/emboj/16.10.2756
12. du Plessis, D.J.F., G. Berrelkamp, N. Nouwen, and A.J.M. Driessen. 2009. The lateral gate of SecYEG opens during protein translocation. J. Biol. Chem. 284:15805-15814. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M901855200
13. Egea, P.F., S.O. Shan, J. Napetschnig, D.F. Savage, P. Walter, and R.M. Stroud. 2004. Substrate twinning activates the signal recognition particle and its receptor. Nature. 427:215-221. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature02250
14. Flanagan, J.J., J.C. Chen, Y.W. Miao, Y.L. Shao, J.L. Lin, P.E. Bock, and A.E. Johnson. 2003. Signal recognition particle binds to ribosome-bound signal sequences with fluorescence-detected subnanomolar affinity that does not diminish as the nascent chain lengthens. J. Biol. Chem. 278:18628-18637. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M300173200
15. Focia, P.J., I.V. Shepotinovskaya, J.A. Seidler, and D.M. Freymann. 2004. Heterodimeric GTPase core of the SRP targeting complex. Science. 303:373-377. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1090827
16. Gasper, R., S. Meyer, K. Gotthardt, M. Sirajuddin, and A. Wittinghofer. 2009. It takes two to tango: regulation of G proteins by dimerization. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10:423-429. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm2689
17. Gu, S.Q., F. Peske, H.J. Wieden, M.V. Rodnina, and W. Wintermeyer. 2003. The signal recognition particle binds to protein L23 at the peptide exit of the Escherichia coli ribosome. RNA. 9:566-573. http://dx.doi.org/10.1261/rna.2196403
18. Hainzl, T., S.H. Huang, G. Meriläinen, K. Brännström, and A.E. Sauer-Eriksson. 2011. Structural basis of signal-sequence recognition by the signal recognition particle. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 18:389-391. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.1994
19. Halic, M., M. Blau, T. Becker, T. Mielke, M.R. Pool, K. Wild, I. Sinning, and R. Beckmann. 2006a. Following the signal sequence from ribosomal tunnel exit to signal recognition particle. Nature. 444:507-511. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature05326
20. Halic, M., M. Gartmann, O. Schlenker, T. Mielke, M.R. Pool, I. Sinning, and R. Beckmann. 2006b. Signal recognition particle receptor exposes the ribosomal translocon binding site. Science. 312:745-747. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1124864
21. Holtkamp, W., S. Lee, T. Bornemann, T. Senyushkina, M.V. Rodnina, and W. Wintermeyer. 2012. Dynamic switch of the signal recognition particle from scanning to targeting. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 19:1332-1337. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.2421
22. Janda, C.Y., J. Li, C. Oubridge, H. Hernández, C.V. Robinson, and K. Nagai. 2010. Recognition of a signal peptide by the signal recognition particle. Nature. 465:507-510. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature08870
23. Jungnickel, B., and T.A. Rapoport. 1995. A posttargeting signal sequence recognition event in the endoplasmic reticulum membrane. Cell. 82:261-270. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(95)90313-5
24. Kedrov, A., I. Kusters, V.V. Krasnikov, and A.J.M. Driessen. 2011. A single copy of SecYEG is sufficient for preprotein translocation. EMBO J. 30:4387-4397. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2011.314
25. Keenan, R.J., D.M. Freymann, P. Walter, and R.M. Stroud. 1998. Crystal structure of the signal sequence binding subunit of the signal recognition particle. Cell. 94:181-191. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81418-X
26. Keenan, R.J., D.M. Freymann, R.M. Stroud, and P. Walter. 2001. The signal recognition particle. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 70:755-775. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.biochem.70.1.755
27. Kramer, G., D. Boehringer, N. Ban, and B. Bukau. 2009. The ribosome as a platform for co-translational processing, folding and targeting of newly synthesized proteins. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 16:589-597. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.1614
28. Lam, V.Q., D. Akopian, M. Rome, D. Henningsen, and S.O. Shan. 2010. Lipid activation of the signal recognition particle receptor provides spatial coordination of protein targeting. J. Cell Biol. 190:623-635. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201004129
29. Ménétret, J.-F., J. Schaletzky, W.M. Clemons Jr., A.R. Osborne, S.S. Skånland, C. Denison, S.P. Gygi, D.S. Kirkpatrick, E. Park, S.J. Ludtke, et al. 2007. Ribosome binding of a single copy of the SecY complex: implications for protein translocation. Mol. Cell. 28:1083-1092. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2007.10.034
30. Moazed, D., and H.F. Noller. 1989. Interaction of tRNA with 23S rRNA in the ribosomal A, P, and E sites. Cell. 57:585-597. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(89)90128-1
31. Park, E., and T.A. Rapoport. 2011. Preserving the membrane barrier for small molecules during bacterial protein translocation. Nature. 473:239-242. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature10014
32. Peluso, P., S.O. Shan, S. Nock, D. Herschlag, and P. Walter. 2001. Role of SRP RNA in the GTPase cycles of ffh and FtsY. Biochemistry. 40:15224-15233. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/bi011639y
33. Pettersen, E.F., T.D. Goddard, C.C. Huang, G.S. Couch, D.M. Greenblatt, E.C. Meng, and T.E. Ferrin. 2004. UCSF Chimera-a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 25:1605-1612. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcc.20084
34. Pool, M.R., J. Stumm, T.A. Fulga, I. Sinning, and B. Dobberstein. 2002. Distinct modes of signal recognition particle interaction with the ribosome. Science. 297:1345-1348. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1072366
35. Poritz, M.A., H.D. Bernstein, K. Strub, D. Zopf, H. Wilhelm, and P. Walter. 1990. An E. coli ribonucleoprotein containing 4.5S RNA resembles mammalian signal recognition particle. Science. 250:1111-1117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1701272
36. Rapoport, T.A. 2007. Protein translocation across the eukaryotic endoplasmic reticulum and bacterial plasma membranes. Nature. 450:663-669. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature06384
37. Saraogi, I., and S.O. Shan. 2011. Molecular mechanism of co-translational protein targeting by the signal recognition particle. Traffic. 12:535-542. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0854.2011.01171.x
38. Saraogi, I., D. Zhang, S. Chandrasekaran, and S.O. Shan. 2011. Site-specific fluorescent labeling of nascent proteins on the translating ribosome. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133:14936-14939. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja206626g
39. Schaffitzel, C., M. Oswald, I. Berger, T. Ishikawa, J.P. Abrahams, H.K. Koerten, R.I. Koning, and N. Ban. 2006. Structure of the E. coli signal recognition particle bound to a translating ribosome. Nature. 444:503-506. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature05182
40. Shan, S.O., R.M. Stroud, and P. Walter. 2004. Mechanism of Association and Reciprocal Activation of Two GTPases. PLoS Biol. 2:e320. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0020320
41. Shan, S.O., S.L. Schmid, and X. Zhang. 2009. Signal recognition particle (SRP) and SRP receptor: a new paradigm for multistate regulatory GTPases. Biochemistry. 48:6696-6704. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/bi9006989
42. Shen, K., and S.O. Shan. 2010. Transient tether between the SRP RNA and SRP receptor ensures efficient cargo delivery during cotranslational protein targeting. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 107:7698-7703. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1002968107
43. Shen, K., X. Zhang, and S.O. Shan. 2011. Synergistic actions between the SRP RNA and translating ribosome allow efficient delivery of the correct cargos during cotranslational protein targeting. RNA. 17:892-902. http://dx.doi.org/10.1261/rna.2610411
44. Shen, K., S. Arslan, D. Akopian, T. Ha, and S.O. Shan. 2012. Activated GTPase movement on an RNA scaffold drives co-translational protein targeting. Nature. 492:271-275. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature11726
45. Song, W.Q., D. Raden, E.C. Mandon, and R. Gilmore. 2000. Role of Sec61α in the regulated transfer of the ribosome-nascent chain complex from the signal recognition particle to the translocation channel. Cell. 100:333-343. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80669-8
46. Stjepanovic, G., K. Kapp, G. Bange, C. Graf, R. Parlitz, K. Wild, M.P. Mayer, and I. Sinning. 2011. Lipids trigger a conformational switch that regulates signal recognition particle (SRP)-mediated protein targeting. J. Biol. Chem. 286:23489-23497. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M110.212340
47. Ullers, R.S., E.N.G. Houben, A. Raine, C.M. ten Hagen-Jongman, M. Ehrenberg, J. Brunner, B. Oudega, N. Harms, and J. Luirink. 2003. Interplay of signal recognition particle and trigger factor at L23 near the nascent chain exit site on the Escherichia coli ribosome. J. Cell Biol. 161:679-684. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200302130
48. van den Berg, B., W.M. Clemons Jr., I. Collinson, Y. Modis, E. Hartmann, S.C. Harrison, and T.A. Rapoport. 2004. X-ray structure of a protein-conducting channel. Nature. 427:36-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature02218
49. Wu, Z.C., J. de Keyzer, A. Kedrov, and A.J.M. Driessen. 2012. Competitive binding of the SecA ATPase and ribosomes to the SecYEG translocon. J. Biol. Chem. 287:7885-7895. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M111.297911
50. Zhang, X., S. Kung, and S.O. Shan. 2008. Demonstration of a multistep mechanism for assembly of the SRP x SRP receptor complex: implications for the catalytic role of SRP RNA. J. Mol. Biol. 381:581-593. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2008.05.049
51. Zhang, X., C. Schaffitzel, N. Ban, and S.O. Shan. 2009. Multiple conformational switches in a GTPase complex control co-translational protein targeting. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 106:1754-1759. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0808573106
52. Zhang, X., R. Rashid, K. Wang, and S.O. Shan. 2010. Sequential checkpoints govern substrate selection during cotranslational protein targeting. Science. 328:757-760. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1186743
53. Zhang, X., V.Q. Lam, Y. Mou, T. Kimura, J. Chung, S. Chandrasekar, J.R. Winkler, S.L. Mayo, and S.O. Shan. 2011. Direct visualization reveals dynamics of a transient intermediate during protein assembly. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 108:6450-6455. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1019051108