Overview of receptor-based source apportionment studies for speciated atmospheric mercury

Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics

Volumn 15, Issue 14, 2015, Pages 7877-7895

  Cheng, I ^a   Xu, X ^b   Zhang, L ^a  

^a ENVIRONMENT CANADA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WINDSOR   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION; CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); MERCURY (ELEMENT); POLLUTANT SOURCE;

CANADA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84937139259     PISSN: 16807316     EISSN: 16807324     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5194/acp-15-7877-2015     Document Type: Review

References (99)

1. Abbot, M. L., Lin, C.-J., Martian, P., and Einerson, J. J.: Atmospheric mercury near Salmon Falls Creek Reservoir in southern Idaho, Appl. Geochem., 23, 438-453, 2008.
2. Akhtar, U. S.: Atmospheric total gaseous mercury concentration measurement in Windsor: A study of variability and potential sources, MASc Thesis, University of Windsor, Windsor, Ontario, Canada, 2008.
3. Belis, C. A., Karagulian, F., Larsen, B. R., and Hopke, P. K.: Critical review and meta-analysis of ambient particulate matter source apportionment using receptor models in Europe, Atmos. Environ., 69, 94-108, 2013.
4. Blanchard, P., Froude, F. A., Martin, J. B., Dryfhout-Clark, H., and Woods, J. T.: Four years of continuous total gaseous mercury (TGM) measurements at sites in Ontario, Canada, Atmos. Environ., 36, 3735-3743, 2002.
5. 2.5 source apportionment: reconciling receptor models for US nonurban and urban long-term networks, JAPCA J. Air Waste Ma., 61, 1204-1217, 2011.
6. Cheng, I., Lu, J., and Song, X.: Studies of Potential Sources that Contributed to Atmospheric Mercury in Toronto, Canada, Atmos. Environ., 43, 6145-6158, 2009.
7. Cheng, I., Zhang, L., Blanchard, P., Graydon, J. A., and Louis, V. L. St.: Source-receptor relationships for speciated atmospheric mercury at the remote Experimental Lakes Area, northwestern Ontario, Canada, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 1903-1922, doi:10.5194/acp-12-1903-2012, 2012.
8. Cheng, I., Zhang, L., Blanchard, P., Dalziel, J., Tordon, R., Huang, J., and Holsen, T. M.: Comparisons of mercury sources and atmospheric mercury processes between a coastal and inland site, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 2434-2443, 2013a.
9. Cheng, I., Zhang, L., Blanchard, P., Dalziel, J., and Tordon, R.: Concentration-weighted trajectory approach to identifying potential sources of speciated atmospheric mercury at an urban coastal site in Nova Scotia, Canada, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 6031-6048, doi:10.5194/acp-13-6031-2013, 2013b.
10. Choi, H.-D., Holsen, T. M., and Hopke, P. K.: Atmospheric Mercury (Hg) in the Adirondacks: Concentrations and Sources, Environ. Sci. Technol., 42, 5644-5653, 2008.
11. de Foy, B., Wiedinmyer, C., and Schauer, J. J.: Estimation of mercury emissions from forest fires, lakes, regional and local sources using measurements in Milwaukee and an inverse method, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 8993-9011, doi:10.5194/acp-12-8993-2012, 2012.
12. Draxler, R. R. and Rolph, G. D.: HYSPLIT (HYbrid Single-Particle Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory), NOAA Air Resources Laboratory, College Park, MD, available at: http://www.arl.noaa.gov/HYSPLIT.php (last access: 20 February 2015), 2014.
13. Ebinghaus, R., Slemr, F., Brenninkmeijer, C. A. M., Van Velthoven, P., Zahn, A., Hermann, M., O'Sullivan, D. A., and Oram, D. E.: Emissions of gaseous mercury from biomass burning in South America in 2005 observed during CARIBIC flights, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L08813, doi:10.1029/2006GL028866, 2007.
14. Eckley, C. S. and Branfireun, B.: Gaseous mercury emissions from urban surfaces: controls and spatiotemporal trends, Appl. Geochem., 23, 369-383, 2008.
15. Eckley, C. S., Parsons, M. T., Mintz, R., Lapalme, M., Mazur, M., Tordon, R., Elleman, R., Graydon, J. A., Blanchard, P., and St. Louis, V.: Impact of closing Canada's largest point-source of mercury emissions on local atmospheric mercury concentrations, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47, 10339-10348, 2013.
16. Fai¨n, X., Obrist, D., Hallar, A. G., Mccubbin, I., and Rahn, T.: High levels of reactive gaseous mercury observed at a high elevation research laboratory in the Rocky Mountains, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 8049-8060, doi:10.5194/acp-9-8049-2009, 2009.
17. th WRF User's Workshop, Boulder, CO, USA, 2006.
18. Fu, X., Feng, X., Qiu, G., Shang, L., and Zhang, H.: Speciated atmospheric mercury and its potential source in Guiyang, China, Atmos. Environ., 45, 4205-4212, 2011.
19. Fu, X. W., Feng, X., Liang, P., Deliger, Zhang, H., Ji, J., and Liu, P.: Temporal trend and sources of speciated atmospheric mercury at Waliguan GAW station, Northwestern China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 1951-1964, doi:10.5194/acp-12-1951-2012, 2012a.
20. Fu, X. W., Feng, X., Shang, L. H., Wang, S. F., and Zhang, H.: Two years of measurements of atmospheric total gaseous mercury (TGM) at a remote site in Mt. Changbai area, Northeastern China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 4215-4226, doi:10.5194/acp-12-4215-2012, 2012b.
21. Gao, F.: A comprehensive investigation of ambient Mercury in the Ohio River valley: source-receptor relationship and meteorological impact, Doctoral dissertation, Ohio University, Athens, Ohio, United States, 2007.
22. Graney, J. R., Dvonch, J. T., and Keeler, G. J.: Use of multi-element tracers to source apportion mercury in south Florida aerosols, Atmos. Environ., 38, 1715-1726, 2004.
23. Gustin, M. S., Weiss-Penzias, P. S., and Peterson, C.: Investigating sources of gaseous oxidized mercury in dry deposition at three sites across Florida, USA, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 9201-9219, doi:10.5194/acp-12-9201-2012, 2012.
24. Gustin, M. S., Amos, H. M., Huang, J., Miller, M. B., and Heidecorn, K.: Measuring and modeling mercury in the atmosphere: a critical review, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 5697-5713, doi:10.5194/acp-15-5697-2015, 2015.
25. Han, Y.-J., Holsen, T. M., Lai, S.-O., Hopke, P. K., Yi, S.-M., Liu, W., Pagano, J., Falanga, L., Milligan, M., and Andolina, C.: Atmospheric gaseous mercury concentrations in New York State: relationships with meteorological data and other pollutants, Atmos. Environ., 38, 6431-6446, 2004.
26. Han, Y.-J., Holsen, T. M., Hopke, P. K., and Yi, S.-M.: Comparison between Back-Trajectory Based Modeling and Lagrangian Backward Dispersion Modeling for Locating Sources of Reactive Gaseous Mercury, Environ. Sci. Technol., 39, 1715-1723, 2005.
27. Han, Y. J., Holsen, T. M., and Hopke, P. K.: Estimation of source locations of total gaseous mercury measured in New York State using trajectory-based models, Atmos. Environ., 41, 6033-6047, 2007.
28. 3 and CO over the North American export region observed by TES, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 3755-3776, doi:10.5194/acp-9-3755-2009, 2009.
29. Hegarty, J., Draxler, R. R., Stein, A. F., Brioude, J., Mountain, M., Eluszkiewicz, J., Nehrkorn, T., Ngan, F., and Andrews, A.: Evaluation of Lagrangian particle dispersion models with measurements from controlled tracer releases, J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol., 52, 2623-2637, 2013.
30. Holmes, C. D., Jacob, D. J., and Yang, X.: Global lifetime of elemental mercury against oxidation by atomic bromine in the free troposphere, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L20808, doi:10.1029/2006GL027176, 2006.
31. Holmes, C. D., Jacob, D. J., Mason, R. P., and Jaffe, D. A.: Sources and deposition of reactive gaseous mercury in the marine atmosphere, Atmos. Environ., 43, 2278-2285, 2009.
32. Hopke, P. K.: Recent developments in receptor modeling, J. Chemometr., 17, 255-265, 2003.
33. Hopke, P. K.: The Use of Source Apportionment for Air Quality Management and Health Assessments, J. Toxicol. Env. Heal. A, 71, 555-563, 2008.
34. Hopke, P. K. and Cohen, D. D.: Application of receptor modeling methods, Atmos. Pollut. Res., 2, 122-125, 2011.
35. Hopke, P. K., Ito, K., Mar, T., Christensen, W. F., Eatough, D. J., Henry, R. C., Kim, E., Laden, F., Lall, R., Larson, T. V., Liu, H., Neas, L., Pinto, J., Stölzel, M., Suh, H., Paatero, P., and Thurston, G. D.: PM source apportionment and health effects: 1. Intercomparison of source apportionment results, J. Expo. Sci. Environ. Epidemiol., 16, 275-286, 2005.
36. Huang, J., Choi, H.-D., Hopke, P. K., and Holsen, T. M.: Ambient Mercury Sources in Rochester, NY: Results from Principle Components Analysis (PCA) of Mercury Monitoring Network Data, Environ. Sci. Technol., 44, 8441-8445, 2010.
37. Jeong, U., Kim, J., Lee, H., Jung, J., Kim, Y. J., Song, C. H., and Koo, J.-H.: Estimation of the contributions of long range transported aerosol in East Asia to carbonaceous aerosol and PM concentrations in Seoul, Korea using highly time resolved measurements: a PSCF model approach, J. Environ. Monitor., 13, 1905-1918, doi:10.1039/c0em00659a, 2011.
38. Kabashnikov, V. P., Chaikovsky, A. P., Kucsera, T. L., and Metelskaya, N. S.: Estimated accuracy of three common trajectory statistical methods, Atmos. Environ., 45, 5425-5430, 2011.
39. Keeler, G. J., Landis, M. S., Norris, G. A., Christianson, E. M., and Dvonch, J. T.: Sources of mercury wet deposition in Eastern Ohio, USA, Environ. Sci. Technol., 40, 5874-5881, 2006.
40. Kim, K. H. and Kim, M. Y.: The temporal distribution characteristics of total gaseous mercury at an urban monitoring site in Seoul during 1999-2000, Atmos. Environ., 35, 4253-4263, 2001.
41. Kim, K. H., Shon, Z. H., Nguyen, H. T., Jung, K., Park, C. G., and Bae, G. N.: The effect of man made source processes on the behavior of total gaseous mercury in air: A comparison between four urban monitoring sites in Seoul Korea, Sci. Total Environ., 409, 3801-3811, 2011.
42. Kolker, A., Olson, M. L., Krabbenhoft, D. P., Tate, M. T., and Engle, M. A.: Patterns of mercury dispersion from local and regional emission sources, rural Central Wisconsin, USA, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 4467-4476, doi:10.5194/acp-10-4467-2010, 2010.
43. Lalonde, J. D., Amyot, M., Doyon, M. R., and Auclair, J. C.: Photo-induced Hg (II) reduction in snow from the remote and temperate Experimental Lakes Area (Ontario, Canada), J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4200, doi:10.1029/2001JD001534, 2003.
44. Landis, M. S., Lewis, C. W., Stevens, R. K., Keeler, G. J., Dvonch, J. T., and Tremblay, R. T.: Ft. McHenry tunnel study: Source profiles and mercury emissions from diesel and gasoline powered vehicles, Atmos. Environ., 41, 8711-8724, 2007.
45. Laurier, F. J. G., Mason, R. P., Whalin, L., and Kato, S.: Reactive gaseous mercury formation in the North Pacific Ocean's marine boundary layer: A potential role of halogen chemistry, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4529, doi:10.1029/2003JD003625, 2003.
46. Lee, G. S., Kim, P. R., Han, Y. J., Holsen, T. M., and Lee, S. H.: Tracing Sources of Total Gaseous Mercury to Yongheung Island off the Coast of Korea, Atmosphere, 5, 273-291, 2014.
47. 2.5 in St. Louis, MO using speciation trends network data, Atmos. Environ., 40, S360-S377, 2006.
48. 2.5: Comparing PMF and CMB results for four ambient monitoring sites in the southeastern United States, Atmos. Environ., 42, 4126-4137, 2008.
49. Li, J., Sommar, J., Wa¨ngberg, I., Lindqvist, O., and Wei, S.-Q.: Short-time variation of mercury speciation in the urban of Göteborg during GO¨TE-2005, Atmos. Environ., 42, 8382-8388, 2008.
50. Liu, B., Keeler, G. J., Dvonch, J. T., Barres, J. A., Lynam, M. M., Marsik, F. J., and Morgan, J. T.: Temporal variability of mercury speciation in urban air, Atmos. Environ., 41, 1911-1923, 2007.
51. Liu, W., Hopke, P. K., Han, Y. J., Yi, S. M., Holsen, T. M., Cybart, S., Kozlowski, K., and Milligan, M.: Application of receptor modeling to atmospheric constituents at Potsdam and Stockton, NY, Atmos. Environ., 37, 4997-5007, 2003.
52. Lyman, S. N. and Gustin, M. S.: Speciation of atmospheric mercury at two sites in northern Nevada, USA, Atmos. Environ., 42, 927-939, 2008.
53. Lyman, S. N. and Jaffe, D. A.: Formation and fate of oxidized mercury in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere, Nature Geosci., 5, 114-117, 2012.
54. Lynam, M. M. and Keeler, G. J.: Automated speciated mercury measurements in Michigan, Environ. Sci. Technol., 39, 9253-9262, 2005.
55. Lynam, M. M. and Keeler, G. J.: Source-receptor relationships for atmospheric mercury in urban Detroit, Michigan, Atmos. Environ., 40, 3144-3155, 2006.
56. Majewski, G., Czechowski, P. O., Badyda, A. J., and Rogula-Kozłowska, W.: The Estimation of Total Gaseous Mercury Concentration (TGM) Using Exploratory and Stochastic Methods, Pol. J. Environ. Stud., 22, 759-771, 2013.
57. Murphy, D. M., Hudson, P. K., Thomson, D. S., Sheridan, P. J., and Wilson, J. C.: Observations of mercury-containing aerosols, Environ. Sci. Technol., 40, 3163-3167, 2006.
58. Paatero, P. and Tapper, U.: Positive Matrix Factorization: a Non-Negative Factor Model with Optimal Utilization of Error Estimates of Data Values, Envirometrics, 5, 111-126, 1994.
59. Pant, P. and Harrison, R. M.: Critical review of receptor modelling for particulate matter: a case study of India, Atmos. Environ., 49, 1-12, 2012.
60. Parsons, M. T., McLennan, D., Lapalme, M., Mooney, C., Watt, C., and Mintz, R.: Total Gaseous Mercury Concentration Measurements at Fort McMurray, Alberta, Canada, Atmosphere, 4, 472-493, 2013.
61. Peterson, C., Gustin, M., and Lyman, S.: Atmospheric mercury concentrations and speciation measured from 2004 to 2007 in Reno, Nevada, USA, Atmos. Environ., 43, 4646-4654, 2009.
62. Pirrone, N., Cinnirella, S., Feng, X., Finkelman, R. B., Friedli, H. R., Leaner, J., Mason, R., Mukherjee, A. B., Stracher, G. B., Streets, D. G., and Telmer, K.: Global mercury emissions to the atmosphere from anthropogenic and natural sources, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 5951-5964, doi:10.5194/acp-10-5951-2010, 2010.
63. Reff, A., Eberly, S. I., and Bhave, P. V.: Receptor modeling of ambient particulate matter data using positive matrix factorization: review of existing methods, JAPCA J. Air Waste Ma., 57, 146-154, 2007.
64. Ren, X., Luke, W. T., Kelley, P., Cohen, M., Ngan, F., Artz, R., Walker, J., Brooks, S., Moore, C., Swartzendruber, P., Bauer, D., Remeika, J., Hynes, A., Dibb, J., Rolison, J., Krishnamurthy, N., Landing, W. M., Hecobian, A., Shook, J., and Huey, L. G.: Mercury Speciation at a Coastal Site in the Northern Gulf of Mexico: Results from the Grand Bay Intensive Studies in Summer 2010 and Spring 2011, Atmosphere, 5, 230-251, 2014.
65. Rolph, G. D.: Real-time Environmental Applications and Display sYstem (READY) Website, NOAA Air Resources Laboratory, College Park, MD, available at: http://www.ready.noaa.gov (last access: 20 February 2015), 2014.
66. Rutter, A. P., Schauer, J. J., Lough, G. C., Snyder, D. C., Kolb, C. J., Klooster, S. V., Rudolf, T., Manolopoulos, H., and Olson, M. L.: A comparison of speciated atmospheric mercury at an urban center and an upwind rural location, J. Environ. Monitor., 10, 102-108, 2007.
67. Rutter, A. P., Snyder, D. C., Stone, E. A., Schauer, J. J., Gonzalez-Abraham, R., Molina, L. T., Márquez, C., Cárdenas, B., and de Foy, B.: In situ measurements of speciated atmospheric mercury and the identification of source regions in the Mexico City Metropolitan Area, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 207-220, doi:10.5194/acp-9-207-2009, 2009.
68. Schroeder, W. H. and Munthe, J.: Atmospheric mercury - an overview, Atmos. Environ., 32, 809-822, 1998.
69. Selin, N. E. and Jacob, D. J.: Seasonal and spatial patterns of mercury wet deposition in the United States: Constraints on the contribution from North American anthropogenic sources, Atmos. Environ., 42, 5193-5204, 2008.
70. Sigler, J. M., Mao, H., and Talbot, R.: Gaseous elemental and reactive mercury in Southern New Hampshire, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 1929-1942, doi:10.5194/acp-9-1929-2009, 2009.
71. Slemr, F., Weigelt, A., Ebinghaus, R., Brenninkmeijer, C., Baker, A., Schuck, T., Rauthe-Schöch, A., Leedham, E., Hermann, M., van Velthoven, P., Oram, D., O'Sullivan D., Dyroff, C., Zahn, A., and Ziereis, H.: Mercury plumes in the global upper troposphere observed during flights with the CARIBIC Observatory from May 2005 until June 2013, Atmosphere, 5, 342-369, 2014.
72. Song, Y., Dai, W., Shao, M., Liu, Y., Lu, S., Kuster, W., and Goldan, P.: Comparison of receptor models for source apportionment of volatile organic compounds in Beijing, China, Environ. Pollut., 156, 174-183, 2008.
73. Sprovieri, F. and Pirrone, N.: Spatial and temporal distribution of atmospheric mercury species over the Adriatic Sea, Environ. Fluid Mech., 8, 117-128, 2008.
74. Stohl, A.: Trajectory statistics-a new method to establish sourcereceptor relationships of air pollutants and its application to the transport of particulate sulfate in Europe, Atmos. Environ., 30, 579-587, 1996.
75. Stohl, A.: Computation, accuracy and applications of trajectories-a review and bibliography, Atmos. Environ., 32, 947-966, 1998.
76. Stohl, A., Forster, C., Frank, A., Seibert, P., and Wotawa, G.: Technical note: The Lagrangian particle dispersion model FLEXPART version 6.2, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 2461-2474, doi:10.5194/acp-5-2461-2005, 2005.
77. Subir, M., Ariya, P. A., and Dastoor, A. P.: A review of the sources of uncertainties in atmospheric mercury modeling II. Mercury surface and heterogeneous chemistry - A missing link, Atmos. Environ., 46, 1-10, doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.07.047, 2012.
78. Swartzendruber, P. C.: The distribution and speciation of mercury in the free troposphere of the Pacific northwest, Doctoral dissertation, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA, 2006.
79. Swartzendruber, P. C., Jaffe, D. A., Prestbo, E. M., Weiss-Penzias, P., Selin, N. E., Park, R., Jacob, D., Strode, S., and Jaeglé, L.: Observations of reactive gaseous mercury in the free-troposphere at the Mt. Bachelor observatory, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D24301, doi:10.1029/2006JD007415, 2006.
80. Tauler, R., Viana, M., Querol, X., Alastuey, A., Flight, R. M., Wentzell, P. D., and Hopke, P. K.: Comparison of the results obtained by four receptor modelling methods in aerosol source apportionment studies, Atmos. Environ., 43, 3989-3997, 2009.
81. Temme, C., Blanchard, P., Steffen, A., Banic, C., Beauchamp, S., Poissant, L., Tordon, R., and Wiens, B.: Trend, seasonal and multivariate analysis study of total gaseous mercury data from the Canadian atmospheric mercury measurement network (CAM-Net), Atmos. Environ., 41, 5423-5441, 2007.
82. Thurston, G. D. and Spengler, J. D.: A quantitative assessment of source contributions to inhalable particulate matter pollution in metropolitan Boston, Atmos. Environ., 19, 9-25, 1985.
83. Timonen, H., Ambrose, J. L., and Jaffe, D. A.: Oxidation of elemental Hg in anthropogenic and marine airmasses, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 2827-2836, doi:10.5194/acp-13-2827-2013, 2013.
84. Travnikov, O., Lin, C.-J., Dastoor, A., Bullock, O. R., Hedgecock, I. M., Holmes, C., Ilyin, I., Jaeglé, L., Jung, G., Pan, L., Pongprueksa, P., Ryzhkov, A., Seigneur, C., and Skov, H.: Global and Regional Modelling, in: United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, Hemispheric Transport of Air Pollution 2010, Part B: Mercury, Air Pollution Studies No. 18, edited by: Pirrone, N. and Keating, T., ISSN 1014-4625, United Nations Publication, Geneva, Chap. 4, 97-144, 2010.
85. USEPA: Technology Transfer Network Clearinghouse for Inventories & Emissions Factors: SPECIATE Version 4.3, available at: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/software/speciate/index.html#speciate (last access: 20 February 2015), 2014a.
86. USEPA: EPA Positive Matrix Factorization (PMF) 5.0 Fundamentals and User Guide, available at: http://www.epa.gov/heasd/research/pmf.html (last access: 20 February 2015), 2014b.
87. Viana, M., Kuhlbusch, T. A. J., Querol, X., Alastuey, A., Harrison, R. M., Hopke, P. K., Winiwarter, W., Vallius, M., Szidat, S., Prévôt, A. S. H., Hueglin, C., Bloemen, H., Wåhlin, P., Vecchi, R., Miranda, A. I., Kasper-Giebl, A., Maenhaut, W., and Hitzenberger, R.: Source apportionment of particulate matter in Europe: a review of methods and results, J. Aerosol. Sci., 39, 827-849, 2008a.
88. Viana, M., Pandolfi, M., Minguillón, M. C., Querol, X., Alastuey, A., Monfort, E., and Celades, I.: Inter-comparison of receptor models for PM source apportionment: case study in an industrial area, Atmos. Environ., 42, 3820-3832, 2008b.
89. Wan, Q., Feng, X., Lu, J., Zheng, W., Song, X., Han, S., and Xu, H.: Atmospheric mercury in Changbai Mountain area, northeastern China I. The seasonal distribution pattern of total gaseous mercury and its potential sources, Environ. Res., 109, 201-206, 2009a.
90. Wan, Q., Feng, X., Lu, J., Zheng, W., Song, X., Han, S., and Xu, H.: Atmospheric mercury in Changbai Mountain area, northeastern China II. The distribution of reactive gaseous mercury and particulate mercury and mercury deposition fluxes, Environ. Res., 109, 721-727, 2009b.
91. Wang, Y., Huang, J., Hopke, P. K., Rattigan, O. V., Chalupa, D. C., Utell, M. J., and Holsen, T. M.: Effect of the shutdown of a large coal-fired power plant on ambient mercury species, Chemosphere, 92, 360-367, 2013.
92. Watson, J. G., Chen, L. W. A., Chow, J. C., Doraiswamy, P., and Lowenthal, D. H.: Source Apportionment: Findings from the U.S. Supersites Program, JAPCA J. Air Waste Ma., 58, 265-288, doi:10.3155/1047-3289.58.2.265, 2008.
93. Weiss-Penzias, P., Jaffe, D., Swartzendruber, P., Hafner, W., Chand, D., and Prestbo, E.: Quantifying Asian and biomass burning sources of mercury using the Hg / CO ratio in pollution plumes observed at the Mount Bachelor Observatory, Atmos. Environ., 41, 4366-4379, 2007.
94. Weiss-Penzias, P., Gustin, M. S., and Lyman, S. N.: Observations of speciated atmospheric mercury at three sites in Nevada, USA: evidence for a free tropospheric source of reactive gaseous mercury, J. Geophys. Res., 114, D14302, doi:10.1029/2008JD011607, 2009.
95. Weiss-Penzias, P. S., Gustin, M. S., and Lyman, S. N.: Sources of gaseous oxidized mercury and mercury dry deposition at two southeastern U.S. sites, Atmos. Environ., 45, 4569-4579, doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.05.069, 2011.
96. Xu, L., Chen, J., Yang, L., Niu, Z., Tong, L., Yin, L., and Chen, Y.: Characteristics and sources of atmospheric mercury speciation in a coastal city, Xiamen, China, Chemosphere, 119, 530-539, 2015.
97. Xu, X. and Akhtar, U. S.: Identification of potential regional sources of atmospheric total gaseous mercury in Windsor, Ontario, Canada using hybrid receptor modeling, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 7073-7083, doi:10.5194/acp-10-7073-2010, 2010.
98. Xu, X., Akhtar, U., Clark, K., and Wang, X.: Temporal Variability of Atmospheric Total Gaseous Mercury in Windsor, ON, Canada, Atmosphere, 5, 536-556, 2014.
99. Zhang, L., Vet, R., Wiebe, A., Mihele, C., Sukloff, B., Chan, E., Moran, M. D., and Iqbal, S.: Characterization of the size-segregated water-soluble inorganic ions at eight Canadian rural sites, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 7133-7151, doi:10.5194/acp-8-7133-2008, 2008.