Atmospheric mercury near Salmon Falls Creek Reservoir in southern Idaho

Applied Geochemistry

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 438-453

  Abbott, Michael L ^a   Lin, Che Jen ^b   Martian, Peter ^a   Einerson, Jeffrey J ^a  

^a IDAHO NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^b Lamar University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLIMATE CHANGE; DEPOSITION; MERCURY (METAL); PARTICLES (PARTICULATE MATTER); TRACE ANALYSIS;

DETECTION LIMIT; GASEOUS ELEMENTAL MERCURY (GEM); REACTIVE GASEOUS MERCURY (RGM);

ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY;

CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); DRY DEPOSITION; ESTIMATION METHOD; GAS; MEASUREMENT METHOD; MERCURY (ELEMENT); SEASONAL VARIATION;

IDAHO; NEVADA; NORTH AMERICA; OREGON; SALMON FALLS CREEK RESERVOIR; UNITED STATES; UTAH;

EID: 39149133043     PISSN: 08832927     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2007.12.012     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Abbott, M.L., 2003. Environmental Sampling FY-03 Annual Report-Understanding the movement of mercury at the INEEL. INEEL/EXT-03-01250, October 2003. Available at http://www.inl.gov/technicalpublications/Search/Search.asp.
2. Ashbaugh L.L., Malm W.C., and Sadeh W.Z. A residence time probability analysis of sulfur concentrations at Grand Canyon national park. Atmos. Environ. 19 (1985) 1263-1270
3. Caldwell C.A., Swartzendruber P., and Prestbo E. Concentration and dry deposition of mercury species in arid south-central New Mexico (2001-2002). Environ. Sci. Technol. 40 (2006) 7535-7540
4. Draxler, R.R., Rolph, G.D., 2003. HYSPLIT (Hybrid Single-Particle_Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory). Model access via NOAA ARL READY website http://www.arl.noaa.gov/ready/hysplit4.html. NOAA Air Resources Laboratory, Silver Spring, MD.
5. Driscoll C.T., Yan C., and Schofield C.L. The mercury cycle and fish in the Adirondack lakes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 28 (1994) 136A-143A
6. Engle M.A., Gustin M.S., and Zhang H. Quantifying natural source emissions from the Ivanhoe Mining District, north-central Nevada, USA. Atmos. Environ. 35 (2001) 3987-3997
7. Engstrom D.R., and Swain E.B. Recent declines in atmospheric mercury deposition in the upper Midwest. Environ. Sci. Technol. 31 (1997) 960-967
8. Fitzgerald W.F., Engstrom D.R., Mason R.P., and Nater E.A. The case for atmospheric mercury contamination in remote areas. Environ. Sci. Technol. 32 (1998) 1-7
9. Friedli H.R., Radke L.F., Prescott R., Hobbs P.V., and Sinha P. Mercury emissions from the August 2001 wildfires in Washington State and an agricultural waste fire in Oregon and atmospheric mercury budget estimates. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 17 (2003) 1039
10. Gallagher M.W., Nemitz E., Dorsey J.R., Fowler D., Sutton M.A., Flynn M., and Duyzer J. Measurements and parameterizations of small aerosol deposition velocities to grassland, arable crops, and forest: influence of surface roughness length on deposition. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 107 D12 (2002) (Art no. 4154)
11. Ganzeveld L., and Lelieveld J. Dry deposition parameterization in a chemistry general-circulation model and its influence on the distribution of reactive trace gases. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 100 (1995) 20999-21012
12. Gao N., Armatas G., Shanley J., Kamman N., Miller E., Keeler G., Scherbatskoy T., Holsen T., Yound T., McIlroy L., Drake S., Olsen B., and Cady C. Mass balance assessment for mercury in Lake Champlain. Environ. Sci. Technol. 40 (2006) 82-89
13. Golder G. Relations among stability parameters in the surface layer. Boundary Layer Meteorol. 3 (1972) 47-58
14. Guentzel J.L., Landing W.M., Gill G.A., and Pollman C.D. Processes influencing rainfall deposition of mercury in Florida. Environ. Sci. Technol. 35 (2001) 863-873
15. Gustin M. Are mercury emissions from geologic sources significant? A status report. Sci. Total Environ. 304 (2003) 153-167
16. Hall B.D., Olson M.L., Rutter A.P., Frontiera R.R., Krabbenhoft D.P., Gross D.S., Yuen M., Rudolph T.M., and Schauer J.J. Atmospheric mercury speciation in Yellowstone National Park. Sci. Total Environ. 367 (2006) 354-366
17. Hopke P.K., Gao N., and Cheng M.D. Combining chemical and meteorological data to infer source areas of airborne pollutants. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 19 (1993) 187-199
18. Hsu Y.-K., Holsen T.M., and Hopke P.K. Locating and quantifying PCB sources in Chicago: receptor modeling and field sampling. Environ. Sci. Technol. 37 (2003) 681-690
19. Jaffe D., Prestbo E., Swartzendruber P., Weiss-Penzias P., Kato S., Takami A., Hatakeyama S., and Kajii Y. Export of atmospheric mercury from Asia. Atmos. Environ. 39 (2005) 3029-3038
20. Kang W.-J., Trefry J.H., and Nelsen T.A. Direct atmospheric inputs versus runoff fluxes of mercury to the lower Everglades and Florida Bay. Environ. Sci. Technol. 34 (2000) 4058-4063
21. Landis M.W., Stevens R.K., Schaedlich F., and Prestbo E.M. Development and characterization of an annular denuder methodology for the measurement of divalent inorganic reactive gaseous mercury in ambient air. Environ. Sci. Technol. 36 (2002) 3000-3009
22. Lin C., Pongprueksa P., Lindberg S.E., Pehkonen S.O., Byun D., and Jang C. Scientific uncertainties in atmospheric mercury models. I: Model science evaluation. Atmos. Environ. 40 (2006) 2911-2928
23. Lin C.-J., Pongprueksa P., Bullock R.O., Lindberg S.E., Pehkonen S.O., Jang C., Braverman T., and Ho T.C. Scientific uncertainties in atmospheric mercury models. II: Sensitivity analysis in the CONUS domain. Atmos. Environ. 41 (2007) 6544-6560
24. Lindberg S.E., and Meyers T.P. Development of an automated micrometeorological method for measuring the emission of mercury vapor from wetland vegetation. Wetlands Ecol. Manage. 9 (2001) 333-347
25. Lindberg S.E., Kim K.-H., and Munthe J. The precise measurement of concentration gradients of mercury in air over soils: a review of past and recent measurements. Water Air Soil Pollut. 80 (1995) 383-392
26. Lindberg S.E., Meyers T.P., Taylor G.E., Turner R.R., and Schroeder W.H. Atmosphere-surface exchange of mercury in a forest: results of modeling and gradient approaches. J. Geophys. Res. 97 D2 (1992) 2519-2528
27. Lockhart W.L., Wilkinson P., Billeck B.N., Hunt R.V., Wagemann R., and Bruskill G.J. Current and historical inputs of mercury to high latitude lakes in Canada and to Hudson Bay. Water Air Soil Pollut. 80 (1995) 603-610
28. Lyman S.N., Gustin M.S., Presto E.M., and Marsik F.J. Estimation of dry deposition of atmospheric mercury in Nevada by direct and indirect methods. Environ. Sci. Technol. 41 (2007) 1970-1976
29. Mason R.R., and Sullivan K.A. Mercury in lake michigan. Environ. Sci. Technol. 31 (1997) 942-947
30. Mason R.P., Fitzgerald W.F., and Morel F.M. The boegeochemical cycling of elemental mercury: anthropogenic influences. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 58 (1994) 3191-3198
31. Pai P., Karamchandani P., and Seigneur C. Simulation of the regional atmospheric transport and fate of mercury using a comprehensive Eulerian model. Atmos. Environ. 31 (1997) 2727-2732
32. Pai P., Karamchandani P., Seigneur C., and Allan M.A. Sensitivity of simulated atmospheric mercury concentrations and deposition to model input parameters. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 104 (1999) 13855-13868
33. p) in southern Quebec, Canada. Atmos. Environ. 39 (2005) 1275-1287
34. Poissant L., Pilote M., Xu X., Zhang H., and Beauvais C. Atmospheric mercury speciation and deposition in the Bay St. Francois wetlands. J. Geophys. Res. 109 (2004) D11301
35. Schroeder W.H., and Munthe J. Atmospheric mercury - an overview. Atmos. Environ. 32 (1998) 809-822
36. Schuster P., Krabbenhoft D., Naftz D., Cecil D., Olson M., Dewild J., Susong D., Green J., and Abbott M. Atmospheric mercury deposition during the last 270 years: a Glacial ice core record of natural and anthropogenic sources. Environ. Sci. Technol. 36 (2002) 2303-2310
37. Seigneur C., Karamchandani P., Lohman K., and Vijayaraghavan K. Multiscale modeling of the atmospheric fate and transport of mercury. J. Geophys. Res. 106 D21 (2001) 27795-27809
38. Seinfeld J.J., and Pandis S.N. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (1998), John Wiley & Sons, New York
39. Swain E.B., Engstrom D.R., Brigham M.E., Henning T.A., and Brezonik P.L. Increasing rates of atmospheric mercury deposition in Midcontinental North America. Science 257 (1992) 784-787
40. Tekran, 1999. Model 2537A Mercury Vapour Analyzer User Manual, Toronto, Canada.
41. US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 1998. Mercury Study Report to Congress; EPA-452/R-97-003, Office of Air Quality and Standards, Office of Research and Development. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
42. Vette A.F., Landis M.S., and Keeler G.J. Deposition and emission of gaseous mercury to and from Lake Michigan during the Lake Michigan Mass Balance Study (July 1994-October 1995). Environ. Sci. Technol. 36 (2002) 4525-4532
43. Wang Y.Q., Zhang X.Y., and Arimoto R. The contribution from distant dust sources to the atmospheric particulate matter loadings at Xian, China during spring. Sci. Total Environ. 368 (2006) 875-883
44. Weiss-Penzias P., Jaffe D., Swartzendruber P., Dennison J.B., Chand D., Hafner W., and Prestbo E. Observations of Asian air pollution in the free troposphere at Mt. Bachelor Observatory in the spring of 2004. J. Geophys. Res. 110 (2006) D10304
45. Wesely M.L. Parameterization of surface resistances to gaseous dry deposition in regional-scale numerical models. Atmos. Environ. 23 (1989) 1293-1304
46. Zehner R.E., and Gustin M.S. Estimation of mercury vapor flux from natural substrate in Nevada. Environ. Sci. Technol. 36 (2002) 4039-4045
47. Zhang L., Brook J.R., and Vet R. A revised parameterization for gaseous dry deposition in air-quality models. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 3 (2003) 2067-2082
48. Zhang L., Gong S., Padro J., and Barrie L. A size-segregated particle dry deposition scheme for an atmospheric aerosol module. Atmos. Environ. 35 (2001) 549-560