Repeatability of foveal measurements using spectralis optical coherence tomography segmentation software

PLoS ONE

Volumn 10, Issue 6, 2015, Pages

  Ctori, Irene ^a   Huntjens, Byki ^a  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MALE; MEASUREMENT REPEATABILITY; NORMAL HUMAN; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; ORGAN SIZE; RETINA FOVEA; RETINA GANGLION CELL; THICKNESS; ADOLESCENT; CYTOLOGY; OBSERVER VARIATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY; RETINA; SOFTWARE; STANDARDS; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; FEMALE; FOVEA CENTRALIS; HEALTHY VOLUNTEERS; HUMANS; MALE; OBSERVER VARIATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETINA; SOFTWARE; TOMOGRAPHY, OPTICAL COHERENCE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84936867710     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129005     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Huang D, Swanson EA, Lin CP, Schuman JS, Stinson WG, Chang W, et al. Optical coherence tomography. Science. 1991; 254(5035):1178-81. PMID: 1957169
2. Anger EM, Unterhuber A, Hermann B, Sattmann H, Schubert C, Morgan JE, et al. Ultrahigh resolution optical coherence tomography of the monkey fovea. Identification of retinal sublayers by correlation with semithin histology sections. Exp Eye Res. 2004; 78(6):1117-25. PMID: 15109918
3. Vajzovic L, Hendrickson AE, O'Connell RV, Clark LA, Tran-Viet D, Possin D, et al. Maturation of the human fovea: Correlation of spectral-domain optical coherence tomography findings with histology. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012; 154(5):779-89. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2012.05.004 PMID: 22898189
4. Spaide RF, Curcio CA. Anatomical correlates to the bands seen in the outer retina by optical coherence tomography: Literature review and model. Retina. 2011; 31(8):1609. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e3182247535 PMID: 21844839
5. Regatieri CV, Branchini L, Duker JS. The role of spectral-domain OCT in the diagnosis and management of neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers. 2011; 42:S56.
6. Oh J, Smiddy WE, Flynn HW, Gregori G, Lujan B. Photoreceptor inner/outer segment defect imaging by spectral domain OCT and visual prognosis after macular hole surgery. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010; 51(3):1651-8. doi: 10.1167/iovs.09-4420 PMID: 19850825
7. Mojana F, Cheng L, Bartsch D-UG, Silva GA, Kozak I, Nigam N, et al. The role of abnormal vitreomacular adhesion in age-related macular degeneration: Spectral optical coherence tomography and surgical results. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008; 146(2):218-27. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2008.04.027 PMID: 18538742
8. Moreno-Montañés J, Olmo N, Alvarez A, García N, Zarranz-Ventura J. Cirrus high-definition optical coherence tomography compared with stratus optical coherence tomography in glaucoma diagnosis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010; 51(1):335-43. doi: 10.1167/iovs.08-2988 PMID: 19737881
9. Chakravarthy U, Williams M. The Royal College of Ophthalmologists guidelines on AMD: Executive summary. Eye. 2013; 27:1429-31. doi: 10.1038/eye.2013.233 PMID: 24158023
10. Lee S, Fallah N, Forooghian F, Ko A, Pakzad-Vaezi K, Merkur AB, et al. Comparative analysis of repeatability of manual and automated choroidal thickness measurements in nonneovascular age-related macular degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013; 54(4):2864-71. doi: 10.1167/iovs.12-11521 PMID: 23538060
11. Chiu SJ, Izatt JA, O'Connell RV, Winter KP, Toth CA, Farsiu S. Validated automatic segmentation of AMD pathology including drusen and geographic atrophy in SD-OCT images. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012; 53(1):53-61. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-7640 PMID: 22039246
12. Leung CK, Cheung CY, Weinreb RN, Lee G, Lin D, Pang CP, et al. Comparison of macular thickness measurements between time domain and spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008; 49(11):4893-7. doi: 10.1167/iovs.07-1326 PMID: 18450592
13. Nassif N, Cense B, Hyle Park B, Yun SH, Chen TC, Bouma BE, et al. In vivo human retinal imaging by ultra high-speed spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Optics Letters. 2004; 29(5):480-2. PMID: 15005199
14. Seigo MA, Sotirchos ES, Newsome S, Babiarz A. In vivo assessment of retinal neuronal layers in multiple sclerosis with manual and automated optical coherence tomography segmentation techniques. J Neurol. 2012; 259(10):2119-30. doi: 10.1007/s00415-012-6466-x PMID: 22418995
15. Tan CSH, Li KZ, Lim TH. A novel technique of adjusting segmentation boundary layers to achieve comparability of retinal thickness and volumes between spectral domain and time domain optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012; 53(9):5515-9. doi: 10.1167/iovs.12-9868 PMID: 22786905
16. Wolf-Schnurrbusch UEK, Ceklic L, Brinkmann CK, Iliev ME, Frey M, Rothenbuehler SP, et al. Macular thickness measurements in healthy eyes using six different optical coherence tomography instruments. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009; 50(7):3432-7. doi: 10.1167/iovs.08-2970 PMID: 19234346
17. Krebs I, Smretschnig E, Moussa S, Brannath W, Womastek I, Binder S. Quality and reproducibility of retinal thickness measurements in two spectral-domain optical coherence tomography machines. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011; 52(9):6925-33. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-6612 PMID: 21791591
18. Comyn O, Heng LZ, Ikeji F, Bibi K, Hykin PG, Bainbridge JW, et al. Repeatability of Spectralis OCT measurements of macular thickness and volume in diabetic macular edema. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012; 53(12):7754-9. doi: 10.1167/iovs.12-10895 PMID: 23111610
19. Patel PJ, Chen FK, Ikeji F, Xing W, Bunce C, Da Cruz L, et al. Repeatability of stratus optical coherence tomography measures in neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008; 49(3):1084-8. doi: 10.1167/iovs.07-1203 PMID: 18326734
20. Patel PJ, Chen FK, Ikeji F, Tufail A. Intersession repeatability of optical coherence tomography measures of retinal thickness in early age-related macular degeneration. Acta Ophthalmol. 2011; 89(3):229-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2009.01659.x PMID: 19845557
21. Pinilla IMDP, Garcia-Martin EMD, Fernandez-Larripa SMD, Fuentes-Broto LP, Sanchez-Cano AIP, Abecia EMDP. Reproducibility and repeatability of cirrus and spectralis fourier-domain optical coherence tomography of healthy and epiretinal membrane eyes. Retina. 2013; 33(7):1448-55. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e3182807683 PMID: 23538575
22. Bressler SB. Reproducibility of spectral-domain optical coherence tomography retinal thickness measurements and conversion to equivalent time-domain metrics in diabetic macular edema. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2014; 132(9):1113. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.1698 PMID: 25058482
23. Carpineto P, Nubile M, Toto L, Aharrh Gnama A, Marcucci L, Mastropasqua L, et al. Correlation in foveal thickness measurements between spectral-domain and time-domain optical coherence tomography in normal individuals. Eye. 2009; 24(2):251-8. doi: 10.1038/eye.2009.76 PMID: 19390564
24. Folgar FA, Yuan EL, Farsiu S, Toth CA. Lateral and axial measurement differences between spectraldomain optical coherence tomography systems. J Biomed Opt. 2014. doi: 10.1117/1. JBO.19.1.016014
25. Heidelberg Engineering. Spectralis HRA + OCT User manual software version 5.7. 2013.
26. Menke MN, Dabov S, Knecht P, Sturm V. Reproducibility of retinal thickness measurements in healthy subjects using spectralis optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009; 147(3):467-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2008.09.005 PMID: 19026403
27. Pierro L, Giatsidis SM, Mantovani E, Gagliardi M. Macular thickness interoperator and intraoperator reproducibility in healthy eyes using 7 optical coherence tomography instruments. Am J Ophthalmol. 2010; 150(2):199-204. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2010.03.015 PMID: 20570233
28. Thibos L, Wheeler W, Horner D. Power vectors: An application of fourier analysis to the description and statistical analysis of refractive error. Optom Vis Sci. 1997; 74(6): 367-75. PMID: 9255814
29. Paunescu LA, Schuman JS, Price LL, Stark PC, Beaton S, Ishikawa H, et al. Reproducibility of nerve fiber thickness, macular thickness, and optic nerve head measurements using Stratus OCT. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004; 45(6):1716-24. PMID: 15161831
30. Nolan JM, Stringham JM, Beatty S, Snodderly DM. Spatial profile of macular pigment and its relationship to foveal architecture. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008; 49(5):2134-42. doi: 10.1167/iovs.07-0933 PMID: 18436846
31. Polito A, Del Borrello M, Isola M, Zemella N, Bandello F. Repeatability and reproducibility of fast macular thickness mapping with stratus optical coherence tomography. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005; 123(10):1330-7. PMID: 16219723
32. Ctori I, Gruppetta S, Huntjens B. The effects of ocular magnification on Spectralis spectral domain optical coherence tomography scan length. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2014. doi: 10.1007/s00417-014-2915-9
33. Tick S, Rossant F, Ghorbel I, Gaudric A, Sahel JA, Chaumet-Riffaud P, et al. Foveal shape and structure in a normal population. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011; 52(8):5105-10. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-7005 PMID: 21803966
34. Hammer DX, Iftimia NV, Ferguson RD, Bigelow CE, Ustun TE, Barnaby AM, et al. Foveal fine structure in retinopathy of prematurity: An adaptive optics fourier domain optical coherence tomography study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008; 49(5):2061-70. doi: 10.1167/iovs.07-1228 PMID: 18223243
35. Mohammad S, Gottlob I, Kumar A, Thomas M, Degg C, Sheth V, et al. The functional significance of foveal abnormalities in albinism measured using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology. 2011; 118(8):1645-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.01.037 PMID: 21570122
36. van der Veen RLP, Ostendorf S, Hendrikse F, Berendschot TTJM. Macular pigment optical density relates to foveal thickness. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2009; 19(5):836-41. PMID: 19787606
37. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study research group. Photocoagulation for diabetic macular edema. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Report No.1. Arch Ophthalmol. 1985; 103:1796-806 doi: 10.1001/archopht.1985.01050120030015 PMID: 2866759
38. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986; 1(8476):307-10. PMID: 2868172
39. Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Statistical methods in medical research. 1999; 8(2):135-60. PMID: 10501650
40. McAlinden C, Khadka J, Pesudovs K. Statistical methods for conducting agreement (comparison of clinical tests) and precision (repeatability or reproducibility) studies in optometry and ophthalmology. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2011; 31(4):330-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2011.00851.x PMID: 21615445
41. Balasubramanian M, Bowd C, Vizzeri G, Weinreb RN, Zangwill LM. Effect of image quality on tissue thickness measurements obtained with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Opt Express. 2009; 17(5):4019-36. PMID: 19259243
42. Langenegger SJ, Funk J, Töteberg-Harms M. Reproducibility of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurements using the eye tracker and the retest function of spectralis SD-OCT in glaucomatous and healthy control eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011; 52(6):3338-44. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-6611 PMID: 21330656
43. Pesudovs K, Weisinger HS. A comparison of autorefractor performance. Optom Vis Sci. 2004; 81(7):554-8. PMID: 15252356
44. Putnam NM, Hofer HJ, Doble N, Chen L, Carroll J, Williams DR. The locus of fixation and the foveal cone mosaic. J Vision. 2005; 5(7):632-9. doi: 10.1167/5.7.3
45. El-Ashry M, Hegde V, James P, Pagliarini S. Analysis of macular thickness in British population using optical coherence tomography (OCT): An emphasis on interocular symmetry. Curr Eye Res. 2008; 33:693-9. doi: 10.1080/02713680802323140 PMID: 18696345
46. Zeffren BS, Applegate RA, Bradley A, van Heuven WA. Retinal fixation point location in the foveal avascular zone. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1990; 31(10):2099-105. PMID: 2211007
47. Eriksson U, Alm A. Repeatability in and interchangeability between the macular and the fast macular thickness map protocols: A study on normal eyes with Stratus optical coherence tomography. Acta Ophthalmol. 2009; 87(7):725-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2008.01345.x PMID: 18937816
48. Gilmore ED, Hudson c. Eccentricity and measurement variability and repeatability with the retinal thickness analyser. Br J Ophthalmol. 2004; 88:62-5. PMID: 14693775
49. Wagner-Schuman M, Dubis AM, Nordgren RN, Lei Y, Odell D, Chiao H, et al. Race- and sex-related differences in retinal thickness and foveal pit morphology. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011; 52(1):625-34. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-5886 PMID: 20861480
50. Dubis AM, McAllister JT, Carroll J. Reconstructing foveal pit morphology from optical coherence tomography imaging. Br J Ophthalmol. 2009; 93:1223-7. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2008.150110 PMID: 19474001
51. Fiore T, Lupidi M, Androudi S, Giansanti F, Fruttini D, Cagini C. Repeatability of retinal macular thickness measurements in healthy subjects and diabetic patients with clinically significant macular edema: Evaluation of the follow-up system of Spectralis optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmologica. 2015. doi: 10.1159/000380832
52. Srinivasan VJ, Monson BK, Wojtkowski M, Bilonick RA, Gorczynska I, Chen R, et al. Characterization of outer retinal morphology with high-speed, ultrahigh-resolution optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008; 49(4):1571-9. doi: 10.1167/iovs.07-0838 PMID: 18385077
53. Varma R, Skaf M, Barron E. Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in normal human eyes. Ophthalmology. 1996; 103(12):2114-9. PMID: 9003346
54. Matsumoto H, Sato T, Kishi S. Outer nuclear layer thickness at the fovea determines visual outcomes in resolved central serous chorioretinopathy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009; 148(1):105-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2009.01.018 PMID: 19327740
55. Saidha S, Syc SB, Durbin MK, Eckstein C, Oakley JD, Meyer SA, et al. Visual dysfunction in multiple sclerosis correlates better with optical coherence tomography derived estimates of macular ganglion cell layer thickness than peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness. Mult Scler. 2011; 17(12):1449-63. doi: 10.1177/1352458511418630 PMID: 21865411
56. Meyer zu Westrup V, Dietzel M, Pauleikhoff D, Hense H-W. The association of retinal structure and macular pigment distribution. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014; 55(2):1169-75. doi: 10.1167/iovs.13-12903 PMID: 24474270