Cirrus high-definition optical coherence tomography compared with stratus optical coherence tomography in glaucoma diagnosis

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 51, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 335-343

  Moreno Montañés, Javier ^a   Olmo, Natalia ^a   Alvarez, Aurora ^a   García, Noelia ^a   Zarranz Ventura, Javier ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY CLINIC OF NAVARRA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; OPTICAL RESOLUTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; RETINA NERVE CELL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; GONIOSCOPY; INSTRUMENTATION; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NERVE FIBER; OPEN ANGLE GLAUCOMA; OPTIC DISK; OPTIC NERVE DISEASE; PATHOLOGY; RETINA GANGLION CELL; STATISTICAL MODEL; VISUAL DISORDER; VISUAL FIELD;

AREA UNDER CURVE; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA, OPEN-ANGLE; GONIOSCOPY; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NERVE FIBERS; OPTIC DISK; OPTIC NERVE DISEASES; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RETINAL GANGLION CELLS; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, OPTICAL COHERENCE; VISION DISORDERS; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 75749124329     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: 15525783     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.08-2988     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Huang D, Swanson EA, Lin CP, et al. Optical coherence tomography. Science. 1991;254:1178-1181.
2. Stratus OCT Model 3000 User Manual. Dublin, CA: Carl Zeiss Meditec; 2003.
3. Lin SC, Singh K, Jampel HD, et al. American Academy of Ophthalmology; Ophthalmic Technology Assessment Committee Glaucoma Panel. Optic nerve head and retinal nerve fiber layer analysis: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:1937-1949.
4. Cirrus HD-OCT. Details Define your Decisions. Dublin, CA: Carl Zeiss Meditec. CIR. 1595 DS-Nr. 0-1487-872.
5. Mills RP, Budenz DL, Lee PP, et al. Categorizing the stage of glaucoma from pre-diagnosis to end-stage disease. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;141:24-30.
6. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology. 1983;148:839-843.
7. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307-310.
8. Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas. 1960;20:37-46.
9. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159-174.
10. Chang R, Budenz DL. New developments in optical coherence tomography for glaucoma. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2008;19:127-135.
11. Quigley HA, Dunkelberger GR, Green WR. Retinal ganglion cell atrophy correlated with automated perimetry in human eyes with glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1989;107:453-464.
12. Sommer A, Katz J, Quigley HA, et al. Clinically detectable nerve fiber layer atrophy precedes the onset of glaucomatous field loss. Arch Ophthalmol. 1991;199:77-81.
13. Kerrigan-Baumrind LA, Quigley HA, Pease ME, et al. Number of ganglion cells in glaucoma eyes compared with threshold visual field tests in the same persons. Invest. Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:741-748.
14. Stratus OCT User Manual. Dublin, CA: Carl Zeiss Meditec. 2002: PN 55648 REV. A 4/03, 1-1-1-3.
15. DeLeón-Ortega JE, Arthur SN, McGwin G, et al. Discrimination between glaucomatous and nonglaucomatous eyes using quantitative imaging devices and subjective optic nerve head assessment. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:3374-3380.
16. Hood DC, Harizman N, Kanadani FN, et al. Retinal nerve fibre thickness measured with optical coherence tomography accurately detects confirmed glaucomatous damage. Br J Ophthalmol. 2007;91:905-907.
17. Budenz DL, Michael A, Chang RT, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of the StratusOCT for perimetric glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2005;112:3-9.
18. Anton A, Moreno-Montañes J, Blázquez F, et al. Usefulness of optical coherence tomography parameters of the optic disc and the retinal nerve fiber layer to differentiate glaucomatous, ocular hypertensive, and normal eyes. J Glaucoma. 2007;16:1-8.
19. Forooghian F, Cukras C, Meyerle CB, et al. Evaluation of time domain and spectral domain optical coherence tomography in the measurement of diabetic macular edema. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49:4290-4296.
20. Gupta V, Gupta P, Singh R, et al. Spectral-domain Cirrus highdefinition optical coherence tomography is better than time-domain Stratus optical coherence tomography for evaluation of macular pathologic features in uveitis. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;145:1018-1022.
21. Ahlers C, Simader C, Geitzenauer W, et al. Automatic segmentation in three-dimensional analysis of fibrovascular pigment epithelial detachment using high-definition optical coherence tomography. Br J Ophthalmol. 2008;92:197-203.
22. Wu Z, Vazeen M, Varma R, et al. Factors associated with variability in retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurements obtained by optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:1505-1512.
23. Smith M, Frost A, Graham CM, et al. Effect of pupillary dilatation on glaucoma tomography assessments using optical coherence. Br J Ophthalmol. 2007;91:1686-1690.
24. Savini G, Zanini M, Barboni P. Influence of pupil size and cataract on retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurements by Stratus OCT. J Glaucoma. 2006;15:336-340.
25. Stein DM, Ishikawa H, Hariprasad R, et al. A new quality assessment parameter for optical coherence tomography. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006;90:186-190.
26. Sehi M, Guaqueta DC, Feuer WJ, et al. A comparison of structural measurements using 2 Stratus optical coherence tomography instruments. J Glaucoma. 2007;16:287-292.
27. Leal BC, Moura FC, Monteiro ML. Comparação entre o polarímetro de varredura a laser, a tomografia de coerência óptica 1 e o Stratus-OCT na detecção da perda axonal da atrofia em banda do nervo óptico. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2006;69:531-537.
28. Bourne RR, Medeiros FA, Bowd C, et al. Comparability of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurements of optical coherence tomography instruments. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:1280-1285.
29. Kanamori A, Nakamura M, Escano MF, et al. Evaluation of the glaucomatous damage on retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measured by optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;135:513-520.
30. Leung CK, Yung WH, Ng AC, et al. Evaluation of scanning resolution on retinal nerve fiber layer measurement using optical coherence tomography in normal and glaucomatous eyes. J Glaucoma. 2004;13:479-485.
31. Grimes DA, Schulz KF. Refining clinical diagnosis with likelihood ratios. Lancet. 2005;365:1500-1505.
32. Parikh RS, Parikh S, Sekhar GC, et al. Diagnostic capability of optical coherence tomography (Stratus OCT 3) in early glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:2238-2243.
33. De León-Ortega JE, Sakata LM, Monheit BE, et al. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II and Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3 to discriminate glaucomatous and nonglaucomatous eyes. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;144:525-532.
34. Medeiros FA, Ng D, Zangwill LM, et al. The effects of study design and spectrum bias on the evaluation of diagnostic accuracy of confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:214-222.