The effects of ocular magnification on Spectralis spectral domain optical coherence tomography scan length

Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology

Volumn 253, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 733-738

  Ctori, Irene ^a   Gruppetta, Stephen ^a   Huntjens, Byki ^a  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Axial length; Keratometry; Optical coherence tomography; Scan length; Spectralis

Indexed keywords

ANATOMY; ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; BIOMETRY; CORNEA; EYE AXIS LENGTH; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; REFRACTION ERROR; RETINA; YOUNG ADULT;

ANATOMY, CROSS-SECTIONAL; AXIAL LENGTH, EYE; BIOMETRY; CORNEA; FEMALE; HEALTHY VOLUNTEERS; HUMANS; MALE; REFRACTIVE ERRORS; RETINA; TOMOGRAPHY, OPTICAL COHERENCE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84939980660     PISSN: 0721832X     EISSN: 1435702X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00417-014-2915-9     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Huang D, Swanson EA, Lin CP, Schuman JS, Stinson WG, Chang W, Hee MR, Flotte T, Gregory K, Puliafito CA (1991) Optical coherence tomography. Science 254:1178–1181
2. Anger EM, Unterhuber A, Hermann B, Sattmann H, Schubert C, Morgan JE, Cowey A, Ahnelt PK, Drexler W (2004) Ultrahigh resolution optical coherence tomography of the monkey fovea. Identification of retinal sublayers by correlation with semithin histology sections. Exp Eye Res 78:1117–1125
3. Leung CK, Cheung CY, Weinreb RN, Lee G, Lin D, Pang CP, Lam DSC (2008) Comparison of macular thickness measurements between time domain and spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 49:4893–4897
4. Nassif N, Cense B, Hyle Park B, Yun SH, Chen TC, Bouma BE, Tearney GJ, Boer JFD (2004) In vivo human retinal imaging by ultrahigh-speed spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Opt Lett 29:480–482
5. Regatieri CV, Branchini L, Duker JS (2011) The role of spectral-domain OCT in the diagnosis and management of neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging 42:S56
6. Oh J, Smiddy WE, Flynn HW, Gregori G, Lujan B (2010) Photoreceptor inner/outer segment defect imaging by spectral domain OCT and visual prognosis after macular hole surgery. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 51:1651–1658
7. Mojana F, Cheng L, Bartsch D-UG, Silva GA, Kozak I, Nigam N, Freeman WR (2008) The role of abnormal vitreomacular adhesion in age-related macular degeneration: spectral optical coherence tomography and surgical results. Am J Ophthalmol 146:218–227
8. Moreno-Montañés J, Olmo N, Alvarez A, García N, Zarranz-Ventura J (2010) Cirrus high-definition optical coherence tomography compared with stratus optical coherence tomography in glaucoma diagnosis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 51:335–343
9. Chakravarthy U, Williams M (2013) The royal college of ophthalmologists guidelines on AMD: executive summary. Eye 27:1429–1431
10. Lee S, Fallah N, Forooghian F, Ko A, Pakzad-Vaezi K, Merkur AB, Kirker AW, Albiani DA, Young M, Sarunic MV, Beg MF (2013) Comparative analysis of repeatability of manual and automated choroidal thickness measurements in nonneovascular age-related macular degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 54:2864–2871
11. Chiu SJ, Izatt JA, O’Connell RV, Winter KP, Toth CA, Farsiu S (2012) Validated automatic segmentation of AMD pathology including drusen and geographic atrophy in SD-OCT images. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 53:53–61
12. Carpineto P, Nubile M, Toto L, Aharrh Gnama A, Marcucci L, Mastropasqua L, Ciancaglini M (2009) Correlation in foveal thickness measurements between spectral-domain and time-domain optical coherence tomography in normal individuals. Eye 24:251–258
13. Folgar FA, Yuan EL, Farsiu S, Toth CA (2014) Lateral and axial measurement differences between spectral-domain optical coherence tomography systems. J Biomed Opt 19:16014
14. Bennett AG, Rudnicka AR, Edgar DF (1994) Improvements on Littmann’s method of determining the size of retinal features by fundus photography. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 232:361–367
15. Rudnicka AR, Burk ROW, Edgar DF, Fitzke FW (1998) Magnification characteristics of fundus imaging systems. Ophthalmology 105:2186–2192
16. Garway-Heath DF, Rudnicka AR, Lowe T, Foster PJ, Fitzke FW, Hitchings RA (1998) Measurement of optic disc size: equivalence of methods to correct for ocular magnification. Br J Ophthalmol 82:643–649
17. Sanchez-Cano A, Baraibar B, Pablo LE, Honrubia FM (2008) Magnification characteristics of the optical coherence tomograph Stratus OCT 3000. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 28:21–28
18. Almeida MS, Carvalho LA (2007) Different schematic eyes and their accuracy to the in vivo eye: a quantitative comparison study. Braz J Phys 37:378–387
19. Leung CK, Cheng ACK, Chong KKL, Leung KS, Mohamed S, Lau CSL, Cheung CYL, Chu GC, Lai RYK, Pang CCP, Lam DSC (2007) Optic disc measurements in myopia with optical coherence tomography and confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 48:3178–3183
20. Odell D, Dubis AM, Lever JF, Stepien KE, Carroll J (2011) Assessing errors inherent in OCT-derived macular thickness maps. J Ophthalmol. doi:10.1155/2011/692574
21. Rauscher FM, Sekhon N, Feuer WJ, Budenz DL (2009) Myopia affects retinal nerve fiber layer measurements as determined by optical coherence tomography. J Glaucoma 18:501–505
22. Savini G, Barboni P, Parisi V, Carbonelli M (2012) The influence of axial length on retinal nerve fibre layer thickness and optic-disc size measurements by spectral-domain OCT. Br J Ophthalmol 96:57–61
23. Bayraktar S, Bayraktar Z, Yilmaz ÃF (2001) Influence of scan radius correction for ocular magnification and relationship between scan radius with retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measured by optical coherence tomography. J Glaucoma 10:163–169
24. Wakitani Y, Sasoh M, Sugimoto M, Ito Y, Ido M, Uji Y (2003) Macular thickness measurements in healthy subjects with different axial lengths using optical coherence tomography. Retina 23:177–182
25. Wagner-Schuman M, Dubis AM, Nordgren RN, Lei Y, Odell D, Chiao H, Weh E, Fischer W, Sulai Y, Dubra A, Carroll J (2011) Race- and sex-related differences in retinal thickness and foveal pit morphology. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 52:625–634
26. Ooto S, Hangai M, Tomidokoro A, Saito H, Araie M, Otani T, Kishi S, Matsushita K, Maeda N, Shirakashi M, Hi A, Ohkubo S, Sugiyama K, Iwase A, Yoshimura N (2011) Effects of age, sex, and axial length on the three-dimensional profile of normal macular layer structures. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 52:8769–8779
27. Kirby ML, Galea M, Loane E, Stack J, Beatty S, Nolan JM (2009) Foveal anatomic associations with the secondary peak and the slope of the macular pigment spatial profile. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 50:1383–1391
28. Menke MN, Dabov S, Knecht P, Sturm V (2009) Reproducibility of retinal thickness measurements in healthy subjects using spectralis optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol 147:467–472
29. Atchinson DA, Smith G (2000) Schematic eyes. In: Optics of the human eye. Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford:pp 250–251
30. Paunescu LA, Schuman JS, Price LL, Stark PC, Beaton S, Ishikawa H, Wollstein G, Fujimoto JG (2004) Reproducibility of nerve fiber thickness, macular thickness, and optic nerve head measurements using Stratus OCT. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45:1716–1724
31. Nolan JM, Stringham JM, Beatty S, Snodderly DM (2008) Spatial profile of macular pigment and its relationship to foveal architecture. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 49:2134–2142
32. Verkicharla PK, Mallen EAH, Atchison DA (2013) Repeatability and comparison of peripheral eye lengths with two instruments. Optom Vis Sci 90:215–222
33. Lam AKC, Chan R, Pang PCK (2001) The repeatability and accuracy of axial length and anterior chamber depth measurements from the IOLMaster™. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 21:477–483
34. Song H, Chui TYP, Zhong Z, Elsner AE, Burns SA (2011) Variation of cone photoreceptor packing density with retinal eccentricity and age. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 52:7376–7384
35. Visser N, Berendschot T, Verbakel F, de Brabander J, Nuijts R (2012) Comparability and repeatability of corneal astigmatism measurements using different measurement technologies. J Cataract Refract Surg 38:1764–1770
36. Pesudovs K, Weisinger HS (2004) A comparison of autorefractor performance. Optom Vis Sci 81:554–558
37. Tan JC, Poinoosawmy D, Fitzke FW, Hitchings RA (2004) Magnification changes in scanning laser tomography. J Glaucoma 13:137–141
38. Röck T, Wilhelm B, Bartz-Schmidt KU, Röck D (2014) The influence of axial length on confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography size measurements: A pilot study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 252:589–593
39. Patel NB, Wheat JL, Rodriguez A, Tran V, Harwerth RS (2012) Agreement between retinal nerve fiber layer measures from Spectralis and Cirrus spectral domain OCT. Optom Vis Sci 89:E652–E666