Reproducibility and repeatability of cirrus and spectralis fourier-domain optical coherence tomography of healthy and epiretinal membrane eyes

Retina

Volumn 33, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 1448-1455

  Pinilla, Isabel ^a,b   Garcia Martin, Elena ^b,c   Fernandez Larripa, Sonia ^b,c   Fuentes Broto, Lorena ^d   Sanchez Cano, Ana I ^d   Abecia, Emilio ^a,b  

^a HOSPITAL CLÍNICO UNIVERSITARIO LOZANO BLESA   (Spain)

^b INSTITUTO ARAGONÉS DE CIENCIAS DE LA SALUD   (Spain)

^c HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO MIGUEL SERVET   (Spain)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ZARAGOZA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; EPIRETINAL MEMBRANE; FEMALE; FOURIER DOMAIN OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEASUREMENT REPEATABILITY; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY DEVICE; REPRODUCIBILITY; RETINA FOVEA; RETINAL THICKNESS; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL ACUITY CHART; ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; RETINA MACULA LUTEA; STANDARDS; VERY ELDERLY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; EPIRETINAL MEMBRANE; FEMALE; FOVEA CENTRALIS; HUMANS; MACULA LUTEA; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TOMOGRAPHY, OPTICAL COHERENCE;

EID: 84879969917     PISSN: 0275004X     EISSN: 15392864     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e3182807683     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Truong SN, Alam S, Zawadzki RJ, et al. High resolution Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography of retinal angiomatous proliferation. Retina 2007;27:915-925.
2. Choma M, Sarunic M, Yang C, Izatt J. Sensitivity advantage of swept source and Fourier domain optical coherence tomography. Opt Express 2003;11:2183-2189.
3. Wojtkowski M, Srinivasan V, Ko T, et al. Ultrahigh-resolution, high-speed, Fourier domain optical coherence tomography and methods for dispersion compensation. Opt Express 2004;12: 2404-2422.
4. Yi K, Mujat M, Sun W, et al. Imaging of optic nerve head drusen: improvements with spectral domain optical coherence tomography. J Glaucoma 2009;18:373-378.
5. You JW, Chen TC, Mujat M, et al. Pulsed illumination spectraldomain optical coherence tomography for human retinal imaging. Opt Express 2006;14:6739-6748.
6. Pierro L, Giatsidis SM, Mantovani E, Gagliardi M. Macular thickness interoperator and intraoperator reproducibility in healthy eyes using 7 optical coherence tomography instruments. Am J Ophthalmol 2010;150:199-204.e191.
7. Garcia-Martin E, Pinilla I, Idoipe M, et al. Intra and interoperator reproducibility of retinal nerve fibre and macular thickness measurements using Cirrus Fourier-domain OCT. Acta Ophthalmol 2011;89:e23-e29.
8. Garcia-Martin E, Pueyo V, Pinilla I, et al. Fourier-domain OCT in multiple sclerosis patients: reproducibility and ability to detect retinal nerve fiber layer atrophy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011;52:4124-4131.
9. Menke MN, Dabov S, Knecht P, Sturm V. Reproducibility of retinal thickness measurements in healthy subjects using spectralis optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol 2009; 147:467-472.
10. Gupta V, Gupta P, Singh R, et al. Spectral-domain Cirrus highdefinition optical coherence tomography is better than timedomain Stratus optical coherence tomography for evaluation of macular pathologic features in uveitis. Am J Ophthalmol 2008;145:1018-1022.
11. Kakinoki M, Sawada O, Sawada T, et al. Comparison of macular thickness between Cirrus HD-OCT and Stratus OCT. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging 2009;40:135-140.
12. Kiernan DF, Hariprasad SM, Chin EK, et al. Prospective comparison of cirrus and stratus optical coherence tomography for quantifying retinal thickness. Am J Ophthalmol 2009;147:267-275.e262.
13. Pierre-Kahn V, Tadayoni R, Haouchine B, et al. Comparison of optical coherence tomography models OCT1 and Stratus OCT for macular retinal thickness measurement. Br J Ophthalmol 2005;89:1581-1585.
14. Giani A, Cigada M, Choudhry N, et al. Reproducibility of retinal thickness measurements on normal and pathologic eyes by different optical coherence tomography instruments. Am J Ophthalmol 2010;150:815-824.
15. Han IC, Jaffe GJ. Comparison of spectral- and time-domain optical coherence tomography for retinal thickness measurements in healthy and diseased eyes. Am J Ophthalmol 2009; 147:847-858, 858.e841.
16. Watanabe A, Arimoto S, Nishi O. Correlation between metamorphopsia and epiretinal membrane optical coherence tomography findings. Ophthalmology 2009;116:1788-1793.
17. Inoue M, Morita S, Watanabe Y, et al. Inner segment/outer segment junction assessed by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography in patients with idiopathic epiretinal membrane. Am J Ophthalmol 2010;150:834-839.
18. Michalewski J, Michalewska Z, Cisiecki S, Nawrocki J. Morphologically functional correlations of macular pathology connected with epiretinal membrane formation in spectral optical coherence tomography (SOCT). Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2007;245:1623-1631.
19. Oster SF, Mojana F, Brar M, et al. Disruption of the photoreceptor inner segment/outer segment layer on spectral domainoptical coherence tomography is a predictor of poor visual acuity in patients with epiretinal membranes. Retina 2010;30: 713-718.
20. Schuman JS, Pedut-Kloizman T, Hertzmark E, et al. Reproducibility of nerve fiber layer thickness measurements using optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology 1996;103: 1889-1898.
21. Wu Z, Huang J, Dustin L, Sadda SR. Signal strength is an important determinant of accuracy of nerve fiber layer thickness measurement by optical coherence tomography. J Glaucoma 2009;18:213-216.
22. Photocoagulation for diabetic macular edema. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study report number 1. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study research group. Arch Ophthalmol 1985;103:1796-1806.
23. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307-310.
24. Kiernan DF, Mieler WF, Hariprasad SM. Variety, variability and veracity: macular thickness and reproducibility among optical coherence tomography systems. Am J Ophthalmol 2010;150:138-140.e132.
25. Wolf-Schnurrbusch UE, Ceklic L, Brinkmann CK, et al. Macular thickness measurements in healthy eyes using six different optical coherence tomography instruments. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2009;50:3432-3437.
26. Falkner-Radler CI, Glittenberg C, Hagen S, et al. Spectraldomain optical coherence tomography for monitoring epiretinal membrane surgery. Ophthalmology 2010;117:798-805.
27. Krebs I, Smretschnig E, Moussa S, et al. Quality and reproducibility of retinal thickness measurements in two spectral-domain optical coherence tomography machines. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011;52:6925-6933.