A novel technique of adjusting segmentation boundary layers to achieve comparability of retinal thickness and volumes between spectral domain and time domain optical coherence tomography

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 53, Issue 9, 2012, Pages 5515-5519

  Tan, Colin S H ^a,b   Li, Kelvin Z ^a   Lim, Tock Han ^a,b  

^a NATIONAL HEALTHCARE GROUP EYE INSTITUTE   (Singapore)

^b TAN TOCK SENG HOSPITAL   (Singapore)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CENTRAL RETINAL THICKNESS; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; MEASUREMENT REPEATABILITY; NORMAL HUMAN; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RELIABILITY; SPECTRAL DOMAIN OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; TIME DOMAIN OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HISTOLOGY; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; RETINA; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STANDARD;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RETINA; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, OPTICAL COHERENCE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84867906922     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: 15525783     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.12-9868     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Fung AE, Lalwani GA, Rosenfeld PJ, et al. An optical coherence tomography-guided, variable dosing regimen with intravitreal ranibizumab (Lucentis) for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;143:566-583.
2. Legarreta JE, Gregori G, Punjabi OS, et al. Macular thickness measurements in normal eyes using spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2008;39:S43-S49.
3. Wolf-Schnurrbusch UE, Ceklic L, Brinkmann CK, et al. Macular thickness measurements in healthy eyes using six different optical coherence tomography instruments. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50:3432-3437.
4. Carpineto P, Nubile M, Toto L, et al. Correlation in foveal thickness measurements between spectral-domain and timedomain optical coherence tomography in normal individuals. Eye (Lond). 2010;24:251-258.
5. Leung CK, Cheung CY, Weinreb RN, et al. Comparison of macular thickness measurements between time domain and spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49:4893-4897.
6. Menke MN, Dabov S, Sturm V. Comparison of three different optical coherence tomography models for total macular thickness measurements in healthy controls. Ophthalmologica. 2009;223:352-356.
7. Lammer J, Scholda C, Prunte C, et al. Retinal thickness and volume measurements in diabetic macular edema: a comparison of four optical coherence tomography systems. Retina. 2011;31:48-55.
8. Huang J, Liu X, Wu Z, et al. Macular thickness measurements in normal eyes with time-domain and Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography. Retina. 2009;29:980-987.
9. Chopovska Y, Jaeger M, Rambow R, Lorenz B. Comparison of central retinal thickness in healthy children and adults measured with the Heidelberg Spectralis OCT and the Zeiss Stratus OCT 3. Ophthalmologica. 2011;225:27-36.
10. Grover S, Murthy RK, Brar VS, Chalam KV. Comparison of retinal thickness in normal eyes using Stratus and Spectralis optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51:2644-2647.
11. Kakinoki M, Sawada O, Sawada T, et al. Comparison of macular thickness between Cirrus HD-OCT and Stratus OCT. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2009;40:135-140.
12. Han IC, Jaffe GJ. Comparison of spectral-and time-domain optical coherence tomography for retinal thickness measurements in healthy and diseased eyes. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009; 147:847-858.
13. Giani A, Cigada M, Choudhry N, et al. Reproducibility of retinal thickness measurements on normal and pathologic eyes by different optical coherence tomography instruments. Am J Ophthalmol. 2010;150:815-824.
14. Forooghian F, Cukras C, Meyerle CB, et al. Evaluation of time domain and spectral domain optical coherence tomography in the measurement of diabetic macular edema. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49:4290-4296.
15. Pierro L, Giatsidis SM, Mantovani E, Gagliardi M. Macular thickness interoperator and intraoperator reproducibility in healthy eyes using 7 optical coherence tomography instruments. Am J Ophthalmol. 2010;150:199-204.
16. Matt G, Sacu S, Buehl W, et al. Comparison of retinal thickness values and segmentation performance of different OCT devices in acute branch retinal vein occlusion. Eye (Lond). 2011;25:511-518.
17. Costa RA, Calucci D, Skaf M, et al. Optical coherence tomography 3: automatic delineation of the outer neural retinal boundary and its influence on retinal thickness measurements. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:2399-2406.
18. Heussen FM, Ouyang Y, McDonnell EC, et al. Comparison of manually corrected retinal thickness measurements from multiple spectral-domain optical coherence tomography instruments. Br J Ophthalmol. 2012;96:380-385.
19. Tan CS, Ouyang Y, Ruiz H, Sadda SR. Diurnal variation of choroidal thickness in normal, healthy subjects measured by spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53:261-266.
20. Tan CS, Ngo WK, Chew MC, Li KZ, Lim LW, Sadda SR. Diurnal variation of retinal thickness measured by optical coherence tomography in normal adults. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53:1639; author reply 1639-1640.
21. Jo YJ, Heo DW, Shin YI, Kim JY. Diurnal variation of retina thickness measured with time domain and spectral domain optical coherence tomography in healthy subjects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52:6497-6500.