Foveal shape and structure in a normal population

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 52, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 5105-5110

  Tick, Sarah ^a   Rossant, Florence ^b   Ghorbel, Itebeddine ^b   Gaudric, Alain ^c   Sahel, José Alain ^a   Chaumet Riffaud, Philippe ^a,d   Paques, Michel ^a  

^a CENTRE HOSPITALIER NATIONAL D OPHTALMOLOGIE DES QUINZE VINGTS   (France)

^b Institut Superieur d'Electronique de Paris   (France)

^c HÔPITAL LARIBOISIÈRE   (France)

^d BICÊTRE HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; PHOTORECEPTOR; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA; RETINA BIPOLAR GANGLION CELL; RETINA BLOOD VESSEL; RETINA FOVEA; RETINA INNER PLEXIFORM LAYER; THICKNESS; CELL MOTION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CYTOLOGY; FLUORESCENCE ANGIOGRAPHY; HISTOLOGY; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PRENATAL DEVELOPMENT; REFERENCE VALUE; RETINA CONE; STANDARD; VALIDATION STUDY; VASCULARIZATION;

ADULT; CELL MOVEMENT; FEMALE; FLUORESCEIN ANGIOGRAPHY; FOVEA CENTRALIS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; REFERENCE VALUES; RETINAL CONE PHOTORECEPTOR CELLS; RETINAL VESSELS; TOMOGRAPHY, OPTICAL COHERENCE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 80053300763     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: 15525783     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.10-7005     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Hendrickson AE. Organization of the adult primate fovea. In: Penfold PL, Provis GM, eds. Macular Degeneration. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer Verlag; 2005:1-20.
2. Göbel W, Hartmann F, Haigis W. Determination of retinal thickness in relation to the age and axial length using optical coherence tomography (in German). Ophthalmologe. 2001;98:157-162.
3. Tewari HK, Wagh VB, Sony P, et al. Macular thickness evaluation using the optical coherence tomography in normal Indian eyes. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2004;52:199-204.
4. Wong AC, Chan CW, Hui SP. Relationship of gender, body mass index, and axial length with central retinal thickness using optical coherence tomography. Eye. 2005;19:292-297.
5. Ishikawa H, Stein DM, Wollstein G, et al. Macular segmentation with optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:2012-2017.
6. Lim MC, Hoh ST, Foster PJ, et al. Use of optical coherence tomography to assess variations in macular retinal thickness in myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;6:974-978.
7. Asefzadeh B, Cavallerano AA, Fisch BM. Racial differences in macular thickness in healthy eyes. Optom Vis Sci. 2007;84:941-945.
8. Lam DS, Leung KS, Mohamed S, et al. Regional variations in the relationship between macular thickness measurements and myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:376-382.
9. Wu PC, Chen YJ, Chen CH, et al. Assessment of macular retinal thickness and volume in normal eyes and highly myopic eyes with third-generation optical coherence tomography. Eye. 2008;22:551-555.
10. Bagci AM, Shahidi M, Ansari R, et al. Thickness profiles of retinal layers by optical coherence tomography image segmentation. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;146:679-687.
11. Kelty PJ, Payne JF, Trivedi RH, et al. Macular thickness assessment in healthy eyes based on ethnicity using Stratus OCT optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49: 2668-2672.
12. Wagner-Schuman M, Dubis AM, Nordgren RN, et al. Racial and gender differences in retinal thickness and foveal pit morphology. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52:625-634.
13. Grover S, Murthy RK, Brar VS, Chalam KV. Normative data for macular thickness by high-definition spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (Spectralis). Am J Ophthalmol. 2009;148: 266-271.
14. Menke MN, Dabov S, Knecht P, Sturm V. Reproducibility of retinal thickness measurements in healthy subjects using Spectralis optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009;147:467-472.
15. Dubis AM, McAllister JT, Carroll J. Reconstructing foveal pit morphology from optical coherence tomography imaging. Br J Ophthalmol. 2009;93:1223-1227.
16. Ooto S, Hangai M, Sakamoto A, et al. Three-dimensional profile of macular retinal thickness in normal japanese eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51:465-473.
17. Oliver MD, Dotan SA, Chemke J, Abraham FA. Isolated foveal hypoplasia. Br J Ophthalmol. 1987;71:926-930.
18. Recchia FM, Recchia CC. Foveal dysplasia evident by optical coherence tomography in patients with a history of retinopathy of prematurity. Retina. 2007;27:1221-1226.
19. Charbel Issa P, Foerl M, Helb HM, et al. Multimodal fundus imaging in foveal hypoplasia: combined scanning laser ophthalmoscope imaging and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Arch Ophthalmol. 2008;126:1463-1465.
20. Marmor MF, Choi SS, Zawadzki RJ, Werner JS. Visual insignificance of the foveal pit: reassessment of foveal hypoplasia as fovea plana. Arch Ophthalmol. 2008;126:907-913.
21. McAllister JT, Dubis AM, Tait DM, et al. Arrested development: high-resolution imaging of foveal morphology in albinism. Vision Res. 2010;50:810-817.
22. Ecsedy M, Szamosi A, Karkó C, et al. Comparison of macular structure imaged by optical coherence tomography in preterm and full-term children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:5207-5211.
23. Hammer DX, Iftimia NV, Ferguson RD, et al. Foveal fine structure in retinopathy of prematurity: an adaptive optics Fourier domain optical coherence tomography study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49:2061-2070.
24. Provis JM, Diaz CM, Deher B. Ontogeny of the primate fovea: a central issue in retinal development. Prog Neurobiol. 1998;54: 549-581.
25. Springer AD, Hendrickson AE. Development of the primate area of high acuity. 1. Use of finite-element analysis models to identify mechanical variables affecting pit formation. Vis Neurosci. 2004;21:53-62.
26. Springer AD, Hendrickson AE. Development of the primate area of high acuity. 2. Quantitative morphological changes associated with retina and pars plana growth. Vis Neurosci. 2004;21:775-790.
27. Springer AD, Hendrickson AE. Development of the primate area of high acuity, 3: temporal relationships between pit formation, retinal elongation and cone packing. Vis Neurosci. 2005;2:171-185.
28. Menke MN, Dabov S, Knecht P, Sturm V. Reproducibility of retinal thickness measurements in healthy subjects using Spectralis optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009;147:467-472.
29. Ghorbel I, Rossant F, Bloch I, Tick S, Paques M. Automated Segmentation of Macular Layers in OCT images and quantitative evaluation of performances. Pattern Recognition. 2011;44:1590-1603.
30. Weickert J, Romeny BMTH, Viergever MA. Efficient and reliable schemes for nonlinear diffusion filtering. IEEE Trans Image Process. 1998;7:398-410.
31. Xu C, Prince JL. Snakes, shapes, and gradient vector flow. IEEE Trans Image Process. 1998;7:359-369.
32. Brown RG, Hwang PYC, eds. The discrete Kalman filter: state-space modeling and simulation in introduction to random signals and applied Kalman filtering. 3rd ed. New York: Wiley & Sons;1997:214-220.
33. Geman S, Geman D. Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distribution, and the Bayesian restoration of images. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Machine Intel. 1984;6:721-741.
34. Kirby ML, Galea M, Loane E, et al. Foveal anatomic associations with the secondary peak and the slope of the macular pigment spatial profile. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50:1383-1391.
35. Liew SH, Gilbert CE, Spector TD, et al. Central retinal thickness is positively correlated with macular pigment optical density. Exp Eye Res. 2006;82:915-920.
36. Nolan JM, Stringham JM, Beatty S, Snodderly DM. Spatial profile of macular pigment and its relationship to foveal architecture. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49:2134-2142.
37. Gillies MC, Zhu M, Chew E, et al. Familial asymptomatic macular telangiectasia type 2. Ophthalmology. 2009;116:2422-2429.
38. Yuodelis C, Hendrickson A. A qualitative and quantitative analysis of the human fovea during development. Vision Res. 1986;26:847-855.
39. Provis JM, Sandercoe T, Hendrickson AE. Astrocytes and blood vessels define the foveal rim during primate retinal development. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:2827-2836.
40. Provis JM, Hendrickson AE. The foveal avascular region of developing human retina. Arch Ophthalmol. 2008;126:507-511.
41. Hendrickson AE. Primate foveal development: a microcosm of current questions in neurobiology. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1994;35:3129-3133.
42. Mintz-Hittner HA, Knight-Nanan DM, Satriano DR, Kretzer FL. A small foveal avascular zone may be an historic mark of prematurity. Ophthalmology. 1999;106:1409-1413.
43. Abbott CJ, McBrien NA, Ulrike G, Pianta MJ. Relationship of the optical coherence tomography signal to underlying retinal histology in the tree shrew (Tupaia belangeri). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50:414-423.
44. Anger EM, Unterhuber A, Hermann B, et al. Ultrahigh resolution optical coherence tomography of the monkey fovea: identification of retinal sublayers by correlation with semithin histology sections. Exp Eye Res. 2004;78:1117-1125.
45. Lujan B, Roorda A, Knighton RW, Carroll J. Revealing Henle's fiber layer using spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52:1486-1492.
46. Li KY, Tiruveedhula P, Roorda P. Intersubject variability of foveal cone photoreceptor density in relation to eye length. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51:6858-6867.
47. Nelson DA, Krupsky S, Pollack A, et al. Special report: noninvasive multi-parameter functional optical imaging of the eye. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2005;36:57-66.