Antimicrobial peptides: Insights into membrane permeabilization, lipopolysaccharide fragmentation and application in plant disease control

Scientific Reports

Volumn 5, Issue , 2015, Pages

  Datta, Aritreyee ^a   Ghosh, Anirban ^a   Airoldi, Cristina ^b   Sperandeo, Paola ^b   Mroue, Kamal H ^c   Jimenez Barbero, Jesus ^d,e   Kundu, Pallob ^a   Ramamoorthy, Ayyalusamy ^c   Bhunia, Anirban ^a,c  

^a BOSE INSTITUTE   (India)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MILANO BICOCCA   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^d CIC BIOGUNE   (Spain)

^e BASQUE FOUNDATION FOR SCIENCE   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTIINFECTIVE AGENT; ANTIMICROBIAL CATIONIC PEPTIDE; LIPOPOLYSACCHARIDE; PROTEIN BINDING;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; CALORIMETRY; CANDIDA; CELL SURVIVAL; CELL WALL; CHEMISTRY; DENGUE VIRUS; DRUG EFFECTS; ESCHERICHIA COLI; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HEMOLYSIS; HUMAN; METABOLISM; MICROBIAL SENSITIVITY TEST; MOLECULAR GENETICS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; ORYZA; PLANT DISEASE; PREVENTION AND CONTROL; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE; TUMOR CELL LINE; XANTHOMONAS;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANTI-INFECTIVE AGENTS; ANTIMICROBIAL CATIONIC PEPTIDES; CALORIMETRY; CANDIDA; CELL LINE, TUMOR; CELL SURVIVAL; CELL WALL; DENGUE VIRUS; ESCHERICHIA COLI; HEMOLYSIS; HUMANS; LIPOPOLYSACCHARIDES; MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; MICROBIAL SENSITIVITY TESTS; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; ORYZA; PLANT DISEASES; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; XANTHOMONAS;

EID: 84935466406     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep11951     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Levy, S. B., Marshall, B. Antibacterial resistance worldwide: causes, challenges and responses. Nat Med 10, S122-9 (2004).
2. Zasloff, M. Antimicrobial peptides of multicellular organisms. Nature 415, 389-95 (2002).
3. Walsh, F. M., Amyes, S. G. B. Microbiology and drug resistance mechanisms of fully resistant pathogens. Curr Opin Microbiol 7, 439-444 (2004).
4. Taubes, G. The Bacteria Fight Back. Science 321, 356-361 (2008).
5. Hancock, R. E. Peptide antibiotics. Lancet 349, 418-22 (1997).
6. Brogden, K. A. Antimicrobial peptides: pore formers or metabolic inhibitors in bacteria? Nat Rev Microbiol 3, 238-50 (2005).
7. Sahl, H. G. Optimizing antimicrobial host defense peptides. Chem Biol 13, 1015-7 (2006).
8. Haney, E. F., Vogel, H. J. NMR of Antimicrobial Peptides. Annu Rep NMR Spectrosc 65, 1-51 (2009).
9. Maróti, G., Kereszt, A., Kondorosi, E., Mergaert, P. Natural roles of antimicrobial peptides in microbes, plants and animals. Res Microbiol 162, 363-74 (2011).
10. Hancock, R. E., Patrzykat, A. Clinical development of cationic antimicrobial peptides: from natural to novel antibiotics. Curr Drug Targets Infect Disord 2, 79-83 (2002).
11. Epand, R. M., Vogel, H. J. Diversity of antimicrobial peptides and their mechanisms of action. Biochim Biophys Acta 1462, 11-28 (1999).
12. Matsuzaki, K. Magainins as paradigm for the mode of action of pore forming polypeptides. Biochim Biophys Acta 1376, 391-400 (1998).
13. Ramamoorthy, A. Beyond NMR spectra of antimicrobial peptides: Dynamical images at atomic resolution and functional insights. Solid State Nucl Magn Reson 35, 201-207 (2009).
14. Bhunia, A., Mohanram, H., Domadia, P. N., Torres, J., Bhattacharjya, S. Designed beta-boomerang antiendotoxic and antimicrobial peptides: structures and activities in lipopolysaccharide. J Biol Chem 284, 21991-2004 (2009).
15. Snyder, D. S., McIntosh, T. J. The lipopolysaccharide barrier: correlation of antibiotic susceptibility with antibiotic permeability and fluorescent probe binding kinetics. Biochemistry 39, 11777-87 (2000).
16. Rosenfeld, Y., Barra, D., Simmaco, M., Shai, Y., Mangoni, M. L. A synergism between temporins toward gram-negative bacteria overcomes resistance imposed by the lipopolysaccharide protective layer. J Biol Chem 281, 28565-28574 (2006).
17. LaRock, C. N., Nizet, V. Cationic antimicrobial peptide resistance mechanisms of streptococcal pathogens. Biochim Biophys Acta doi: 10.1016/jbbamem.2015.02.010 (2015).
18. Malmsten, M. Antimicrobial peptides. Upsala J Med Sci 119, 199-204 (2014).
19. Maria-Neto, S., de Almeida, K. C., Macedo, M. L., Franco, O. L. Understanding bacterial resistance to antimicrobial peptides: From the surface to deep inside. Biochim Biophys Acta doi: 10.1016/jbbamem.2015.02.017 (2015).
20. Matamouros, S., Miller, S. I. S. Typhimurium strategies to resist killing by cationic antimicrobial peptides. Biochim Biophys Acta doi: 10.1016/jbbamem.2015.02.013 (2015).
21. Strange, R. N., Scott, P. R. Plant disease: a threat to global food security. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 43, 83-116 (2005).
22. Makovitzki, A., Viterbo, A., Brotman, Y., Chet, I., Shai, Y. Inhibition of fungal and bacterial plant pathogens in vitro and in planta with ultrashort cationic lipopeptides. Appl Environ Microbiol 73, 6629-36 (2007).
23. Melo, M. N. et al. Interaction of the Dengue virus fusion peptide with membranes assessed by NMR: The essential role of the envelope protein Trp101 for membrane fusion. J Mol Biol 392, 736-46 (2009).
24. Bhattacharjya, S. De novo designed lipopolysaccharide binding peptides: structure based development of antiendotoxic and antimicrobial drugs. Curr Med Chem 17, 3080-93 (2010).
25. Bhattacharjya, S., Domadia, P. N., Bhunia, A., Malladi, S., David, S. A. High-resolution solution structure of a designed peptide bound to lipopolysaccharide: transferred nuclear Overhauser effects, micelle selectivity, and anti-endotoxic activity. Biochemistry 46, 5864-74 (2007).
26. Ferguson, A. D. et al. A conserved structural motif for lipopolysaccharide recognition by procaryotic and eucaryotic proteins. Structure 8, 585-92 (2000).
27. Deretic, V., Dikshit, R., Konyecsni, W. M., Chakrabarty, A. M., Misra, T. K. The algR gene, which regulates mucoidy in Pseudomonas aeruginosa, belongs to a class of environmentally responsive genes. J Bacteriol 171, 1278-83 (1989).
28. Meluleni, G. J., Grout, M., Evans, D. J., Pier, G. B. Mucoid Pseudomonas aeruginosa growing in a biofilm in vitro are killed by opsonic antibodies to the mucoid exopolysaccharide capsule but not by antibodies produced during chronic lung infection in cystic fibrosis patients. J Immunol 155, 2029-38 (1995).
29. Rosenfeld, Y., Lev, N., Shai, Y. Effect of the hydrophobicity to net positive charge ratio on antibacterial and anti-endotoxin activities of structurally similar antimicrobial peptides. Biochemistry 49, 853-61 (2010).
30. Jiang, Z. et al. Effects of net charge and the number of positively charged residues on the biological activity of amphipathic alpha-helical cationic antimicrobial peptides. Biopolymers 90, 369-83 (2008).
31. Bai, Y. et al. Progressive structuring of a branched antimicrobial peptide on the path to the inner membrane target. J Biol Chem 287, 26606-17 (2012).
32. Kaconis, Y. et al. Biophysical mechanisms of endotoxin neutralization by cationic amphiphilic peptides. Biophys J 100, 2652-61 (2011).
33. Schmidtchen, A., Malmsten, M. (Lipo)polysaccharide interactions of antimicrobial peptides. J Colloid Interface Sci (2014) doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2014.11.024 (2014).
34. Mangoni, M. L. et al. Lipopolysaccharide, a key molecule involved in the synergism between temporins in inhibiting bacterial growth and in endotoxin neutralization. J Biol Chem 283, 22907-17 (2008).
35. Lee, D. K. et al. Lipid composition-dependent membrane fragmentation and pore-forming mechanisms of membrane disruption by pexiganan (MSI-78). Biochemistry 52, 3254-63 (2013).
36. Sciacca, M. F. et al. Two-step mechanism of membrane disruption by A? through membrane fragmentation and pore formation. Biophys J 103, 702-10 (2012).
37. Ghosh, A. et al. Sequence context induced antimicrobial activity: insight into lipopolysaccharide permeabilization. Mol Biosyst 10, 1596-612 (2014).
38. Clore, G. M., Gronenborn, A. M. Theory and applications of the transferred nuclear overhauser effect to the study of the conformations of small ligands bound to proteins. J Magn Reson 48, 402-417 (1982).
39. Yu, L., Tan, M., Ho, B., Ding, J. L., Wohland, T. Determination of critical micelle concentrations and aggregation numbers by fluorescence correlation spectroscopy: aggregation of a lipopolysaccharide. Anal Chim Acta 556, 216-25 (2006).
40. Laskowski, R. A., Rullmannn, J. A., MacArthur, M. W., Kaptein, R., Thornton, J. M. AQUA and PROCHECK-NMR: programs for checking the quality of protein structures solved by NMR. J Biomol NMR 8, 477-86 (1996).
41. Bhunia, A. et al. NMR structure of pardaxin, a pore-forming antimicrobial peptide, in lipopolysaccharide micelles: mechanism of outer membrane permeabilization. J Biol Chem 285, 3883-95 (2010).
42. Han, X., Bushweller, J. H., Cafiso, D. S., Tamm, L. K. Membrane structure and fusion-triggering conformational change of the fusion domain from influenza hemagglutinin. Nat Struct Biol 8, 715-20 (2001).
43. Zeitler, B. et al. De-novo design of antimicrobial peptides for plant protection. PLoS One 8, e71687 (2013).
44. Babalola, O. O. Beneficial bacteria of agricultural importance. Biotechnol Lett 32, 1559-70 (2010).
45. Lugtenberg, B., Kamilova, F. Plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Annu Rev Microbiol 63, 541-56 (2009).
46. Meindre, F. et al. The Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Solution Structure of the Synthetic AhPDF1.1b Plant Defensin Evidences the Structural Feature within the ?-Motif. Biochemistry 53, 7745-54 (2014).
47. Mirouze, M. et al. A putative novel role for plant defensins: a defensin from the zinc hyper-accumulating plant, Arabidopsis halleri, confers zinc tolerance. Plant J 47, 329-42 (2006).
48. Lay, F. T., Anderson, M. A. Defensins-components of the innate immune system in plants. Curr Protein Pept Sci 6, 85-101 (2005).
49. Dhople, V., Krukemeyer, A., Ramamoorthy, A. The human beta-defensin-3, an antibacterial peptide with multiple biological functions. Biochim Biophys Acta 1758, 1499-1512 (2006).
50. Li, W. et al. Proline-rich antimicrobial peptides: potential therapeutics against antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Amino Acids 46, 2287-94 (2014).
51. Fernandez, D. I., Lee, T. H., Sani, M. A., Aguilar, M. I., Separovic, F. Proline facilitates membrane insertion of the antimicrobial peptide maculatin 1.1 via surface indentation and subsequent lipid disordering. Biophys J 104, 1495-507 (2013).
52. Castro, M. S., Fontes, W. Plant defense and antimicrobial peptides. Protein Pept Lett 12, 13-8 (2005).
53. Montesinos, E., Bardají, E. Synthetic antimicrobial peptides as agricultural pesticides for plant-disease control. Chem Biodivers 5, 1225-37 (2008).
54. Jan, P. S., Huang, H. Y., Chen, H. M. Expression of a synthesized gene encoding cationic peptide cecropin B in transgenic tomato plants protects against bacterial diseases. Appl Environ Microbiol 76, 769-75 (2010).
55. Malnoy, M., Venisse, J. S., Reynoird, J. P., Chevreau, E. Activation of three pathogen-inducible promoters of tobacco in transgenic pear (Pyrus communis L.) after abiotic and biotic elicitation. Planta 216, 802-14 (2003).
56. D, M., M, I., R, T., A, B. Rapid recording of 2D NMR spectra without phase cycling. Application to the study of hydrogen exchange in proteins. J Magn Reson 85, 393-399 (1989).
57. V, S., M, P., R, L., V, S. Gradient-tailored water suppression for 1H-15N HSQC experiments optimized to retain full sensitivity. J Magn Reson 102, 241-245 (1993).
58. Güntert, P., Mumenthaler, C., Wüthrich, K. Torsion angle dynamics for NMR structure calculation with the new program DYANA. J Mol Biol 273, 283-98 (1997).
59. Grewal, R. K., Gupta, S., Das, S. Xanthomonas oryzae PV oryzae triggers immediate transcriptomic modulations in rice. BMC Genomics 13,49 (2012).