Rumen microbiome from steers differing in feed efficiency

PLoS ONE

Volumn 10, Issue 6, 2015, Pages

  Myer, Phillip R ^a   Smith, Timothy P L ^a   Wells, James E ^a   Kuehn, Larry A ^a   Freetly, Harvey C ^a  

^a U S MEAT ANIMAL RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BACTERIAL RNA; RNA 16S; BACTERIAL DNA;

AMPLICON; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL FOOD; ARTICLE; AVERAGE DAILY BODY WEIGHT GAIN; AVERAGE DAILY FOOD INTAKE; BACTERIUM; BACTEROIDETES; BULLOCK; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEED EFFICIENCY; FIRMICUTES; FOOD INTAKE; GENUS; LENTISPHAERAE; MALE; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY; MICROBIAL DIVERSITY; MICROBIOME; NEXT GENERATION SEQUENCING; NONHUMAN; NUTRITIONAL PARAMETERS; OPERATIONAL TAXONOMIC UNIT; PHYLUM; POPULATION ABUNDANCE; RNA SEQUENCE; RUMEN MICROORGANISM; SPECIES RICHNESS; TAXONOMY; WEIGHT GAIN; ANIMAL; BOVINE; CLASSIFICATION; DNA SEQUENCE; GENETICS; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; METABOLISM; MICROBIOLOGY; MICROFLORA; MOUSE; RUMEN;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); BACTEROIDETES; BOS; BOVINAE; FIRMICUTES; LACTOBACILLUS; LENTISPHAERAE; MEDICAGO SATIVA; MUS; PREVOTELLA; RUMINOCOCCUS; SUCCINICLASTICUM; ZEA MAYS;

ANIMAL FEED; ANIMALS; BACTERIA; CATTLE; DNA, BACTERIAL; MALE; MICE; MICROBIOTA; RUMEN; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

EID: 84932643480     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129174     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Benson AK, Kelly SA, Legge R, Ma F, Low SJ, Kim J, et al. Individuality in gut microbiota composition is a complex polygenic trait shaped by multiple environmental and host genetic factors. PNAS. 2010; 107(44): 18933-18938. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1007028107 PMID: 20937875
2. Canibe N, Højberg O, Højsgaard S, Jensen BB. Feed physical form and formic acid addition to the feed affect the gastrointestinal ecology and growth performance of growing pigs. J Animal Science. 2005; 83(6): 1287-1302. PMID: 15890806
3. Kim MS, Kim J, Kuehn LA, Bono JL, Berry ED, Kalchayanand N, et al. Investigation of bacterial diversity in the feces of cattle fed different diets. J Animal Science. 2014; 92: 683-694. doi: 10.2527/jas.2013-6841 PMID: 24352967
4. Hales KE, Brown Brandl TM, Freetly HC. Effects of decreased dietary roughage concentration on energy metabolism and nutrient balance in finishing beef cattle. J Animal Science. 2014; 92(1): 264-271. doi: 10.2527/jas.2013-6994 PMID: 24352959
5. Petri RM, Schwaiger T, Penner GB, Beauchemin KA, Forster RJ, McKinnon JJ, et al. Changes in the rumen epimural bacterial diversity of beef cattle as affected by diet and induced ruminal acidosis. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013; 79(12): 3744-3755. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03983-12 PMID: 23584771
6. Ley RE, Backhed F, Turnbaugh P, Lozupone CA, Knight RD, Gordon JI. Obesity alters gut microbial ecology. PNAS U.S.A. 2005; 102: 11070-11075. PMID: 16033867
7. Ley RE, Turnbaugh P, Klien PJ, Gordon JI. Microbial ecology: human gut microbes associated with obesity. Nature. 2006; 444: 1022-1023. PMID: 17183309
8. de Menezes AB, Lewis E, O'Donovan M, O'Neill BF, Clipson N, Doyle EM. Microbiome analysis of dairy cows fed pasture or total mixed ration diets. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2011; 78(2): 256-265. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2011.01151.x PMID: 21671962
9. Shanks OC, Kelty CA, Archibeque S, Jenkins M, Newton RJ, McLellan SL, et al. Community structures of fecal bacteria in cattle from different animal feeding operations. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011; 77(9): 2992-3001. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02988-10 PMID: 21378055
10. Arthur PF, Herd RM, Wilkins JF, Archer JA. Maternal productivity for Angus cows divergently selected for post-weaning residual feed intake. Aust J Exp Agric. 2005; 45: 985-993.
11. Lindholm-Perry AK, Kuehn LA, Oliver WT, Sexten AK, Miles JR, Rempel LA, et al. Adipose and Muscle Tissue Gene Expression of Two Genes (NCAPG and LCORL) Located in a Chromosomal Region Associated with Cattle Feed Intake and Gain. PLoS ONE. 2013; 8(11): e80882. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080882 PMID: 24278337
12. Yu Z, Morrison M. Improved extraction of PCR-quality community DNA from digesta and fecal samples. Biotechniques. 2004; 36(5): 808-813. PMID: 15152600
13. Aronesty E. ea-utils: Command-line tools for processing biological sequencing. 2011; data. Available: http://code.google.com/p/ea-utils
14. Blankenberg D, Gordon A, Von Kuster G, Coraor N, Taylor J, Nekrutenko A. Galaxy Team. Manipulation of FASTQ data with Galaxy. Bioinformatics. 2010; 26(14): 1783-1785. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq281 PMID: 20562416
15. Haas BJ, Gevers D, Earl AM, Feldgarden M, Ward DV, Giannoukos G, et al. Chimeric 16S rRNA sequence formation and detection in Sanger and 454-pyrosequenced PCR amplicons. Genome Res. 2011; 21: 494-504. doi: 10.1101/gr.112730.110 PMID: 21212162
16. DeSantis TZ, Hugenholtz P, Larsen N, Rojas M, Brodie EL, Keller K, et al. Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006; 72: 5069-5072. PMID: 16820507
17. Edgar RC. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics. 2010; 26(19): 2460-2461. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq461 PMID: 20709691
18. Price MN, Dehal PS, Arkin AP. FastTree 2 - Approximately maximum-likihood trees for large alignments. PLoS ONE. 2010; 5: E9490. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009490 PMID: 20224823
19. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc B. 1995; 57(1): 289-300.
20. Lozupone CA, Knight R. Unifrac: A new phylogenetic method for comparing microbial communities. Appl Environ. Microbiol. 2005; 71: 8228-8235. PMID: 16332807
21. Lozupone CA, Hamady M, Kelley ST, Knight R. Quantitative and qualitative β diversity measures lead to different insights into factors that structure microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007; 73(5): 1576-1585. PMID: 17220268
22. Lozupone CA, Lladser ME, Knights D, Stombaugh J, Knight R. UniFrac: an effective distance metric for microbial community comparison. The ISME Journal. 2011; 5: 169-172. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2010.133 PMID: 20827291
23. Jami E, White BA, Mizrahi I. Potential role of the bovine rumen microbiome in modulating milk composition and feed efficiency. PLoS ONE. 2014; 9(1): e85423. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085423 PMID: 24465556
24. Baker GC, Smith JJ, Cowan DA. Review and re-analysis of domain-specific 16S primers. J Microbiol Methods. 2003; 55(3): 541-555. PMID: 14607398
25. Hook SE, Steele MA, Northwood KS, Dijkstra J, France J, Wright ADG, et al. Impact of subacute ruminal acidosis (SARA) adaptation and recovery on the density and diversity of bacteria in the rumen of dairy cows. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2011; 78(2): 275-284. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2011.01154.x PMID: 21692816
26. Khafipour E, Li S, Plaizier JC, Krause DO. Rumen microbiome composition determined using two nutritional models of subacute ruminal acidosis. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009; 75(22): 7115-7124. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00739-09 PMID: 19783747
27. Jami E, Mizrahi I. Composition and similarity of bovine rumen microbiota across individual animals. PLoS ONE. 2012; 7(3): e33306. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033306 PMID: 22432013
28. Kim M, Morrison M, Yu Z. Status of the phylogenetic diversity census of ruminal microbiomes. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2011; 76(1): 49-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2010.01029.x PMID: 21223325
29. McCann JC, Wiley LM, Forbes TD, Rouquette FM Jr, Tedeschi LO. Relationship between the rumen microbiome and residual feed intake efficiency of Brahman bulls stocked on bermudagrass pastures. PLoS ONE. 2014; 9(3): e91864. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091864 PMID: 24642871
30. Ross EM, Moate PJ, Bath CR, Davidson SE, Sawbridge TI, Guthridge KM, et al. High throughput whole rumen metagenome profiling using untargeted massively parallel sequencing. BMC Genetics. 2012; 13:53. doi: 10.1186/1471-2156-13-53 PMID: 22747657
31. Weimer PJ, Stevenson DM, Mantovani HC, Man SLC. Host specificity of the ruminal bacterial community in the dairy cow following near-total exchange of ruminal contents. J Dairy Sci. 2010; 93(12): 5902-5912. doi: 10.3168/jds.2010-3500 PMID: 21094763
32. Flint HJ, Bayer EA, Rincon MT, Lamed R, White BA. Polysaccharide utilization by gut bacteria: potential for new insights from genomic analysis. Nat Rev. 2008; 6: 121-131. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1817 PMID: 18180751
33. Nyonyo T, Shinkai T, Mitsumori M. Improved culturability of cellulolytic rumen bacteria and phylogenetic diversity of culturable cellulolytic and xylanolytic bacteria newly isolated from the bovine rumen. FEMS Microbiology Ecology. 2014; 88(3): 528-537. doi: 10.1111/1574-6941.12318 PMID: 24612331
34. Cook GM, Rainey FA, Chen G, Stackebrandt E, Russell JB. Emendation of the Description of Acidaminococcus fermentans, atrans-Aconitate- and Citrate-Oxidizing Bacterium. Int J Syst Bacteriol.1994; 44: 576-578. PMID: 8068544
35. Prive F, Kaderbhai NN, Girdwood S, Worgan HJ, Pinloche E, Scollan ND, et al. Identification and Characterization of Three Novel Lipases Belonging to Families II and V from Anaerovibrio lipolyticus 5ST. PLoS ONE. 2013; 8(8): e69076. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069076 PMID: 23950883
36. Hayashi Y, Saito T, Ohshima T, Nakagawa Y, Arita T, Yashima A, et al. Terminal RFLP analysis to determine the oral microbiota with hyeprsalivation. Arch Microbiol. 2014; Available: http://dx.org/10.1007/s00203-014-0987-x.
37. Mao SY, Zhang RY, Wang DS, Zhu WY. Impact of subacute ruminal acidosis (SARA) adaptation on ruminal microbiota in dairy cattle using pyrosequencing. Anaerobe. 2013; 24: 12-19. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2013.08.003 PMID: 23994204
38. Jing L, Zhang R, Liu Y, Zhu W, Mao S. Intravenous lipopolysaccharide challenge alters ruminal bacterial microbiota and disrupts ruminal metabolism in dairy cattle. Br. J Nutr. 2014; 28: 1-13.
39. Van Gylswyk NO. Succiniclasticum ruminis gen. nov. sp. nov., a rumen bacterium converting succinate to propionate as sole energy yielding mechanism. Int. J Syst Bacteriol. 1995; 45: 297-300. PMID: 7537062
40. Kishimoto A Ushida K, Phillips GO, Ogasawara T, Sasaki Y. Identification of intestinal bacteria responsible for fermentation of gum arabic in pig model. Curr Microbiol. 2006; 53: 173-177. PMID: 16874552
41. Suen G, Stevenson DM, Bruce DC, Chertkov O, Copeland A, Cheng JF, et al. Complete Genome of the Cellulolytic Ruminal Bacterium Ruminococcus albus 7. J Bacteriol. 2011; 193(19): 5574-5575. doi: 10.1128/JB.05621-11 PMID: 21914885
42. Wells JE, Krause DO, Callaway TR, Russell JB. A bacteriocin-mediated antagonism by ruminal lactobacilli against Streptococcus bovis. FEMS Microbiology Ecology. 1997; 22(3): 237-243.
43. Carberry CA, Kenny DA, Han S, McCabe MS, Waters SM. Effect of phenotypic residual feed intake and dietary forage content on the rumen microbial community of beef cattle. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012; 78: 4949-4958. doi: 10.1128/AEM.07759-11 PMID: 22562991
44. Pitta D, Pinchak W, Dowd S, Osterstock J, Gontcharova V. Rumen bacterial diversity dynamics associated with changing from bermudagrass hay to grazed winter wheat diets. Microb Ecol. 2010; 59: 511-522. doi: 10.1007/s00248-009-9609-6 PMID: 20037795
45. Stevenson DM, Weimer PJ. Dominance of Prevotella and low abundance of classical ruminal bacterial species in the bovine rumen revealed by relative quantification real-time PCR. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007; 75(1): 165-174. PMID: 17235560
46. Hernandez-Sanabria E, Goonewardene LA, Wang Z, Durunna ON, Moore SS, Guan LL. Impact of Feed Efficiency and Diet on Adaptive Variations in the Bacterial Community in the Rumen Fluid of Cattle. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012; 78(4): 1203-1214. doi: 10.1128/AEM.05114-11 PMID: 22156428
47. Hess M, Sczyrba A, Egan R, Kim TW, Chokhawala H, Schroth G, et al. Metagenomic discovery of biomass-degrading genes and genomes from cow rumen. Science. 2011; 331: 463-467. doi: 10.1126/science.1200387 PMID: 21273488