Impact of feed efficiency and diet on adaptive variations in the bacterial community in the rumen fluid of cattle

Applied and Environmental Microbiology

Volumn 78, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 1203-1214

  Hernandez Sanabria, Emma ^a   Goonewardene, Laksiri A ^a   Wang, Zhiquan ^a   Durunna, Obioha N ^a   Moore, Stephen S ^a   Guan, Le Luo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

16S RRNA GENE; BACTERIAL COMMUNITY; COPY NUMBER; DRY MATTERS; FEED INTAKE; GRADIENT GEL ELECTROPHORESIS; HIGH ENERGY; HIGH ENERGY DENSITIES; MULTIVARIATE STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; PCR-DGGE; PHYLOTYPES; QUANTITATIVE REAL TIME PCR; RUMEN FLUIDS;

ANIMALS; ELECTROPHORESIS; GENES; HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; PRODUCTIVITY; RNA;

NUTRITION;

BACTERIAL DNA; RIBOSOME DNA; RNA 16S;

ADAPTATION; ASSIMILATION EFFICIENCY; BACTERIUM; CATTLE; DIET; ELECTROKINESIS; FOOD INTAKE; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; POPULATION DYNAMICS;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL LOAD; BACTERIUM; BIOTA; CATTLE; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DENATURING GRADIENT GEL ELECTROPHORESIS; DIET; DNA FINGERPRINTING; GENETICS; METAGENOME; MICROBIOLOGY; REAL TIME POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; RUMINANT STOMACH;

ANIMALS; BACTERIA; BACTERIAL LOAD; BIOTA; CATTLE; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DENATURING GRADIENT GEL ELECTROPHORESIS; DIET; DNA FINGERPRINTING; DNA, BACTERIAL; DNA, RIBOSOMAL; METAGENOME; REAL-TIME POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; RNA, RIBOSOMAL, 16S; RUMEN;

ANIMALIA; BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); BOS; EUBACTERIUM SP.; SUCCINIVIBRIO;

EID: 84863116386     PISSN: 00992240     EISSN: 10985336     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.05114-11     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Aminov RI, et al. 2006. Molecular diversity, cultivation, and improved FISH detection of a dominant group of human gut bacteria related to Roseburia and Eubacterium rectale. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72:6371-6376.
2. Archer JA, Richardson EC, Herd RM, Arthur PF. 1999. Potential for selection to improve efficiency of feed use in beef cattle: a review. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 50:147-161.
3. Arthur PF, et al. 2001. Genetic and phenotypic variance and covariance components for feed intake, feed efficiency, and other postweaning traits in Angus cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 79:2805-2811.
4. Arthur PF, Archer JA, Herd RM. 2004. Feed intake and efficiency in beef cattle: overview of recent Australian research and challenges for the future. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 44:361-369.
5. Balamurugan R, et al. 2008. Molecular Studies of fecal anaerobic commensal bacteria in acute diarrhea in children. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 46:514-519.
6. Balamurugan R, Rajendiran E, George S, Samuel GV, Ramakrishna BS. 2008. Real-time polymerase chain reaction quantification of specific butyrate-producing bacteria, Desulfovibrio and Enterococcus faecalis in the feces of patients with colorectal cancer. J. Gastroenterol. Hematol. 23: 1298-1303.
7. Basarab JA, et al. 2003. Residual feed intake and body composition in young growing cattle. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 83:189-204.
8. Ben-Dov E, Shapiro OH, Siboni N, Kushmaro A. 2006. Advantage of using inosine at the 3' termini of 16S rRNA gene universal primers for the study of microbial diversity. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72:6902-6906.
9. Bergman EN. 1990. Energy contribution of VFA from the gastrointestinal tract in various species. Physiol. Rev. 70:567-590.
10. Bernalier A, Rochet V, Leclerc M, Dore J, Pochart P. 1996. Diversity of H2 plus CO2-utilizing acetogenic bacteria from faeces of non-methaneproducing humans. Curr. Microbiol. 33:94-99.
11. Bevans DW, Beauchemin KA, Schwartzkopf-Genswein KS, McKinnon JJ, McAllister TA. 2005. Effect of rapid or gradual grain adaptation on subacute acidosis and feed intake by feedlot cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 83:1116-1132.
12. Breznak JA, Switzer JM. 1986. Acetate synthesis from H2 plus CO2 by termite gut microbes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 52:623-630.
13. Brulc JM, et al. 2009. Gene-centric metagenomis of the fiber-adherent bovine rumen microbiome reveals forage specific glycoside hydrolases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 106:1948-1953.
14. Canadian Council on Animal Care Ottawa. 1993. Olfert ED, Cross BM, McWilliams AA (ed.), Guide to the care and use of experimental steers, vol 1. Canadian Council on Animal Care Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
15. 2 and acetate transfers during xylan fermentation between a butyrate-producing xylanolytic species and hydrogenotrophic micro-organisms from the human gut. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 254:116-122.
16. Chaucheyras-Durand F, Walker ND, Bach A. 2008. Effects of active dry yeasts on the rumen microbial ecosystem: past, present and future. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech. 145:5-26.
17. Cotta MA, Whitehead TR, Falsen E, Moore E, Lawson PA. 2009. Robinsoniella peoriensis nov., sp. nov., isolated from a swine-manure storage pit and a human clinical source. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 59:150-155.
18. Crater AR, Barboza PS, Forster RJ. 2007. Regulation of rumen fermentation during seasonal fluctuation in food intake of muskoxen. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A Mol. Integr. Physiol. 146:233-241.
19. Duncan SH, Louis P, Thomson JM, Flint HJ. 2009. The role of pH in determining the species composition of the human colonic microbiota. Environ. Microbiol. 11:2112-2122.
20. Duval SM, McEwan NR, Graham RC, Wallace RJ, Newbold CJ. 2007. Effect of a blend of essential oil compounds on the colonization of starchrich substrates by bacteria in the rumen. J. Appl. Microbiol. 103:2132-2141.
21. Flint HJ, Duncan SH, Scott KP, Louis P. 2007. Interactions and competition within the microbial community of the human colon: links between diet and health. Environ. Microbiol. 9:1101-1111.
22. Fonty G, Gouet P, Jouany JP, Senaud J. 1987. Establishment of the microflora and anaerobic fungi in the rumen of lambs. J. Gen. Microbiol. 133:1835-1843.
23. Fonty G, et al. 2007. Establishment and development of ruminal hydrogenotrophs in methanogen-free lambs. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73:6391-6403.
24. France J, Siddons RC. 1993. Volatile fatty acid production, p 107-123. In Forbes JM, France J (ed), Quantitative aspects of ruminant digestion and metabolism. CAB International, Oxon, United Kingdom.
25. Guan LL, Nkrumah JD, Basarab JA, Moore SS. 2008. Linkage of microbiology to phenotype: correlation of rumen microbial ecology to cattle's feed efficiency. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 288:85-91.
26. Hegarty RS, Goopy JP, Herd RM, McCorkell B. 2007. Cattle selected for lower residual feed intake have reduced daily methane production. J. Anim. Sci. 85:1479-1486.
27. Herd R, Arthur PF. 2009. Physiological basis for residual feed intake. J. Anim. Sci. 87(Suppl. E):E64 -E71.
28. Hernandez-Sanabria E, et al. 2010. Linkage of particular bacterial PCRDGGE patterns to bovine ruminal fermentation parameters and feed efficiency traits. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 76:6338-6350.
29. Hristov AN, Ivan M, Rode LM, McAllister TA. 2001. Fermentation characteristics and ruminal ciliate protozoal populations in cattle fed medium- or high-concentrate barley-based diets. J. Anim. Sci. 79:515-524.
30. Janssen PH. 2010. Influence of hydrogen on rumen methane formation and fermentation balances through microbial growth kinetics and fermentation thermodynamics. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech. 160:1-22.
31. Kelly AK, et al. 2010. Effect of divergence in residual feed intake on feeding behavior, blood metabolic variables, and body composition traits in growing beef heifers. J. Anim. Sci. 88:109-123.
32. Kocherginskaya SA, Aminov RI, White BA. 2001. Analysis of the rumen bacterial diversity under two different diet conditions using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis, random sequencing, and statistical ecology approaches. Anaerobe 7:119-134.
33. Leedle JA, Bryant MP, Hespell RB. 1982. Diurnal variations in bacterial numbers and fluid parameters in ruminal contents of animals fed low- and high-forage diets. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 44:402-412.
34. Leser TD, et al. 2002. Culture-independent analysis of gut bacteria: the pig gastrointestinal tract microbiota revisited. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68:673-690.
35. Li M, Penner GB, Hernandez-Sanabria E, Oba M, Guan LL. 2009. Effects of sampling location and time, and host animal on assessment of bacterial diversity and fermentation parameters in the bovine rumen. J. Appl. Microbiol. 107:1924-1934.
36. Lovley DR, Greening RC, Ferry JG. 1984. Rapidly growing rumen methanogenic organism that synthesizes coenzymeMand has high affinity for formate. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 48:81-87.
37. Milinovich GJ, et al. 2008. Microbial ecology of the equine hindgut during oligofructose-induced laminitis. ISME J. 2:1089-1100.
38. Moore SS, Mujibi FD, Sherman EL. 2009. Molecular basis for residual feed intake in beef cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 87(Suppl. E):E41-E47.
39. Nkrumah JD, et al. 2006. Relationships of feedlot feed efficiency, performance and feeding behaviour with digestion, energy partitioning, methane production and metabolic rate in beef cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 84:145-153.
40. O'Herrin SM, Kenealy WR. 1993. Glucose and carbon dioxide metabolism by Succinivibrio dextrinosolvens. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 59:748-755.
41. Peters JP, Paulissen JB, Robinson JA. 1990. The effects of diet on water flux and volatile fatty acid concentrations in the rumen of growing beef steers fed once daily. J. Anim. Sci. 68:1711-1718.
42. Regensbogenova M, et al. 2004. Assessment of ciliates in the sheep rumen by DGGE. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 39:144-147.
43. Romero-Pérez GA, Ominski KH, McAllister T, Krause DO. 2010. Effect of environmental factors and influence of rumen and hindgut biogeography on bacterial communities in steers. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. doi:10.1128/AEM.01289-09.
44. Russell JB, Hespell RB. 1981. Microbial rumen fermentation. J. Dairy Sci. 64:1153-1169.
45. Russell JB, Jeraci JL. 1984. Effect of carbon monoxide on fermentation of fiber, starch, and amino acids by mixed rumen microorganisms in vitro. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 48:211-217.
46. Russell JB, Martin SA. 1984. Effect of various methane inhibitors on the fermentation of amino acids by mixed rumen microorganisms in vitro. J. Anim. Sci. 59:1329-1338.
47. Russell JB. 2002. Rumen microbiology and its role in ruminant nutrition, 1st ed. J. B. Russell, Ithaca, NY.
48. Soto-Navarro SA, et al. 2000. Influence of feed intake fluctuation and frequency of feeding on nutrient digestion, digesta kinetics, and ruminal fermentation profiles in limit-fed steers. J. Anim. Sci. 78:2215-2222.
49. Stevenson DM, Weimer PJ. 2007. Dominance of Prevotella and low abundance of classical ruminal bacterial species in the bovine rumen revealed by relative quantification real-time PCR. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 75:165-174.
50. Sun YZ, Mao SY, Zhu WY. 2009. Rumen chemical and bacterial changes during stepwise adaptation to a high-concentrate diet in goats. Animal 2:210-217.
51. Turnbaugh PJ, et al. 2006. An obesity-associated gut microbiome with increased capacity for energy harvest. Nature 444:1027-1031.
52. Walter J, et al. 2000. Detection and identification of gastrointestinal Lactobacillus species by using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis and species-specific PCR primers. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66:297-303.
53. Welkie DG, Stevenson DM, Weimer PJ. 2010. ARISA analysis of ruminal bacterial community dynamics in lactating dairy cows during the feeding cycle. Anaerobe 16:94-100.
54. Wolin MJ, Miller TL, Stewart CS. 1997. Microbe-microbe interactions, p. 467-491. In The rumen microbial ecosystem, 2nd ed. Hobson PM, Stewart CW (ed.). Blackie Academic and Professional, London, England, United Kingdom.
55. Zhou M, Hernandez-Sanabria E, Guan LL. 2009. Assessment of the microbial ecology of ruminal methanogens in cattle with different feed efficiencies. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75:6524-6533.
56. Zhou M, Hernandez-Sanabria E, Guan LL. 2010. Characterization of variation in rumen methanogenic communities under different dietary and host feed efficiency conditions, as determined by PCR-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 76:3776-3786.