Changes in the rumen epimural bacterial diversity of beef cattle as affected by diet and induced ruminal acidosis

Applied and Environmental Microbiology

Volumn 79, Issue 12, 2013, Pages 3744-3755

  Petri, R M ^a,b   Schwaiger, T ^a,b   Penner, G B ^b   Beauchemin, K A ^a   Forster, R J ^a   McKinnon, J J ^b   McAllister, T A ^a  

^a AGRICULTURE AND AGRI FOOD CANADA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BACTERIAL COMMUNITY; BACTERIAL COMMUNITY COMPOSITION; BACTERIAL DIVERSITY; BACTERIAL POPULATION; COMMUNITY STRUCTURES; DENATURING GRADIENT GEL ELECTROPHORESES (DGGE); OPERATIONAL TAXONOMIC UNITS; QUANTITATIVE REAL TIME PCR;

ELECTROPHORESIS; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; RECOVERY; RNA;

NUTRITION;

RNA 16S;

ABUNDANCE; CATTLE; COMMUNITY STRUCTURE; CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); DIET; FORAGE; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY; POPULATION STRUCTURE; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REAL TIME; TAXONOMY;

ACIDOSIS; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ARTICLE; BACTERIUM; CATTLE; CATTLE DISEASE; CHEMISTRY; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DENATURING GRADIENT GEL ELECTROPHORESIS; DIET; DNA SEQUENCE; GENETICS; METAGENOME; MICROBIOLOGY; MOLECULAR GENETICS; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PH; REAL TIME POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; RUMINANT STOMACH; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

ACIDOSIS; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; BACTERIA; BASE SEQUENCE; CATTLE; CATTLE DISEASES; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DENATURING GRADIENT GEL ELECTROPHORESIS; DIET; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; METAGENOME; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; REAL-TIME POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; RNA, RIBOSOMAL, 16S; RUMEN; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

ATOPOBIUM; BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); BOS; LACTOBACILLUS; OLSENELLA; OTUS; SOLOBACTERIUM; STREPTOCOCCUS; SUCCINICLASTICUM; SUCCINIVIBRIO; SYNTROPHOCOCCUS;

EID: 84878565534     PISSN: 00992240     EISSN: 10985336     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.03983-12     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Cheng K-J, Wallace RJ. 1979. The mechanism of passage of endogenous urea through the rumen wall and the role of ureolytic epithelial bacteria in the urea flux. Br. J. Nutr. 42:553-557.
2. Dinsdale D, Cheng KJ, Wallace RJ, Goodlad RA. 1980. Digestion of epithelial tissue of the rumen wall by adherent bacteria in infused and conventionally fed sheep. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 39:1059 -1066.
3. McCowan RP, Cheng KJ, Bailey CB, Costerton JW. 1978. Adhesion of bacteria to epithelial cell surfaces within the reticulo-rumen of cattle. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 35:149 -155.
4. McCowan RP, Cheng KJ, Costerton JW. 1980. Adherent bacterial populations on the bovine rumen wall: distribution patterns of adherent bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 39:233-241.
5. Kobayashi Y. 2006. Inclusion of novel bacteria in rumen microbiology: need for basic and applied science. Anim. Sci. J. 77:375-385.
6. Chen Y, Penner GB, Li M, Oba M, Guan LL. 2011. Changes in bacterial diversity associated with epithelial tissue in the beef cow rumen during the transition to a high-grain diet. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77:5770 -5781.
7. Cheng K-J, Fay JP, Howarth RE, Costerton JW. 1980. Sequence of events in the digestion of fresh legume leaves by rumen bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 40:613- 625.
8. Kocherginskaya SA, Aminov RI, White BA. 2001. Analysis of the rumen bacterial diversity under two different diet conditions using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis, random sequencing, and statistical ecology approaches. Anaerobe 7:119 -134.
9. Tajima K, Aminov RI, Nagamine T, Matsui H, Nakamura M, Benno Y. 2001. Diet-dependent shifts in the bacterial population of the rumen revealed with real-time PCR. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67:2766 -2774.
10. Sadet-Bourgeteau S, Martin C, Morgavi DP. 2010. Bacterial diversity dynamics in rumen epithelium of wethers fed forage and mixed concentrate forage diets. Vet. Microbiol. 146:98 -104.
11. Olfert ED, Cross BM, McWilliam AA. 1993. Guide to the care and use of experimental animals, vol 1. Canadian Council on Animal Care, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
12. Penner GB, Beauchemin KA, Mutsvangwa T. 2006. An evaluation of the accuracy and precision of a stand-alone submersible continuous ruminal pH measurement system. J. Dairy Sci. 89:2132-2140.
13. Kong Y, Teather R, Forster R. 2010. Composition, spatial distribution, and diversity of the bacterial communities in the rumen of cows fed different forages. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 74:612- 622.
14. Thuring RW, Sanders JP, Borst P. 1975. A freeze-squeeze method for recovering long DNA from agarose gels. Anal. Biochem. 66:213-220.
15. Dowd S, Callaway T, Wolcott R, Sun Y, McKeehan T, Hagevoort R, Edrington T. 2008. Evaluation of the bacterial diversity in the feces of cattle using 16S rDNA bacterial tag-encoded FLX amplicon pyrosequencing (bTEFAP). BMC Microbiol. 8:125. doi:10.1186/1471-2180-8-125.
16. Stevenson DM, Weimer PJ. 2007. Dominance of Prevotella and low abundance of classical ruminal bacterial species in the bovine rumen revealed by relative quantification real-time PCR. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 75:165-174.
17. Schloss PD, Westcott SL, Ryabin T, Hall JR, Hartmann M, Hollister EB, Lesniewski RA, Oakley BB, Parks DH, Robinson CJ, Sahl JW, Stres B, Thallinger GG, Van Horn DJ, Weber CF. 2009. Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75:7537-7541.
18. Huse SM, Welch DM, Morrison HG, Sogin ML. 2010. Ironing out the wrinkles in the rare biosphere through improved OTU clustering. Environ. Microbiol. 12:1889 -1898.
19. Edgar R, Haas B, Clemente J, Quince C, Knight R. 2011. UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection. Bioinformatics 27: 2194-2200.
20. Duval SM, McEwan NR, Graham RC, Wallace RJ, Newbold CJ. 2007. Effect of a blend of essential oil compounds on the colonization of starchrich substrates by bacteria in the rumen. J. Appl. Microbiol. 103:2132- 2141.
21. Martin AP. 2002. Phylogenetic approaches for describing and comparing the diversity of microbial communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68: 3673-3682.
22. Sadet S, Martin C, Meunier B, Morgavi DP. 2007. PCR-DGGE analysis reveals a distinct diversity in the bacterial population attached to the rumen epithelium. Animal 1:939 -944.
23. Li RW, Connor EE, Li C, Baldwin RL, VI, Sparks ME. 2012. Characterization of the rumen microbiota of pre-ruminant calves using metagenomic tools. Environ. Microbiol. 14:129 -139.
24. Li RW, Wu S, Baldwin RL, VI, Li W, Li C. 2012. Perturbation dynamics of the rumen microbiota in response to exogenous butyrate. PLoS One 7:e29392. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0029392.
25. Cho SJ, Cho KM, Shin EC, Lim WJ, Hong SY, Choi BR, Kang JM, Lee SM, Kim YH, Kim H, Yun HD. 2006. 16S rDNA analysis of bacterial diversity in three fractions of cow rumen. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 16:92- 101.
26. Pryde S, Richardson A, Stewart C, Flint H. 1999. Molecular analysis of the microbial diversity present in the colonic wall, colonic lumen, and cecal lumen of a pig. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65:5372-5377.
27. Boone DR, Castenholz RW, Garrity GM (ed). 2001. Bergey's manual of systematic bacteriology, 2nd ed. Springer, New York, NY.
28. Yang L, Chen J, Cheng X, Xi D, Yang S, Deng W, Mao H. 2010. Phylogenetic analysis of 16S rRNA gene sequences reveals rumen bacterial diversity in yaks (Bos grunniens). Mol. Biol. Rep. 37:553-562.
29. Morita H, Shiratori C, Murakami M, Takami H, Toh H, Kato Y, Nakajima F, Takagi M, Akita H, Masaoka T, Hattori M. 2008. Sharpea azabuensis gen. nov., sp. nov., a Gram-positive, strictly anaerobic bacterium isolated from the faeces of thoroughbred horses. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 58:2682-2686.
30. Bevans DW, Beauchemin KA, Schwartzkopf-Genswein KS, McKinnon JJ, McAllister TA. 2005. Effect of rapid or gradual grain adaptation on subacute acidosis and feed intake by feedlot cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 83:1116- 1132.
31. Schwartzkopf-Genswein KS, Beauchemin KA, McAllister TA, Gibb DJ, Streeter M, Kennedy AD. 2004. Effect of feed delivery fluctuations and feeding time on ruminal acidosis, growth performance, and feeding behavior of feedlot cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 82:3357-3365.
32. DuPont AW, DuPont HL. 2011. The intestinal microbiota and chronic disorders of the gut. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 8:523-531.
33. Jami E, Mizrahi I. 2012. Composition and similarity of bovine rumen microbiota across individual animals. PLoS One 7:e33306. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0033306.
34. Kim M, Morrison M, Yu Z. 2011. Status of the phylogenetic diversity census of ruminal microbiomes. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 76:49-63.
35. Khafipour E, Li S, Plaizier JC, Krause DO. 2009. Rumen microbiome composition determined using two nutritional models of subacute ruminal acidosis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75:7115-7124.
36. Nagaraja TG, Titgemeyer EC. 2007. Ruminal acidosis in beef cattle: the current microbiological and nutritional outlook. J. Dairy Sci. 90:E17-E38.
37. Costerton JW, Cheng KJ, Geesey GG, Ladd TI, Nickel JC, Dasgupta M, Marrie TJ. 1987. Bacterial biofilms in nature and disease. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 41:435- 464.
38. Heilig HGHJ, Zoetendal EG, Vaughan EE, Marteau P, Akkermans ADL, de Vos WM. 2002. Molecular diversity of Lactobacillus spp. and other lactic acid bacteria in the human intestine as determined by specific amplification of 16S ribosomal DNA. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68:114 -123.
39. Tajima K, Arai S, Ogata K, Nagamine T, Matsui H, Nakamura M, Aminov RI, Benno Y. 2000. Rumen bacterial community transition during adaptation to high-grain diet. Anaerobe 6:273-284.
40. Goad DW, Goad CL, Nagaraja TG. 1998. Ruminal microbial and fermentative changes associated with experimentally induced subacute acidosis in steers. J. Anim. Sci. 76:234 -241.
41. Petri RM, Forster RJ, Yang W, McKinnon JJ, McAllister TA. 2012. Characterization of rumen bacterial diversity and fermentation parameters in concentrate fed cattle with and without forage. J. Appl. Microbiol. 112:1152-1162.
42. Penner GB, Aschenbach JR, Gäbel G, Rackwitz R, Oba M. 2009. Epithelial capacity for apical uptake of short chain fatty acids is a key determinant for intraruminal pH and the susceptibility to subacute ruminal acidosis in sheep. J. Nutr. 139:1714 -1720.
43. Deng W, Xi D, Mao H, Wanapat M. 2008. The use of molecular techniques based on ribosomalRNAandDNAfor rumen microbial ecosystem studies: a review. Mol. Biol. Rep. 35:265-274.
44. Maeda H, Fujimoto C, Haruki Y, Maeda T, Kokeguchi S, Petelin M, Arai H, Tanimoto I. 2003. Quantitative real-time PCR using TaqMan and SYBR green for Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Prevotella intermedia, tetQ gene and total bacteria. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 39:81- 86.
45. Weimer PJ, Stevenson DM, Mertens DR, Thomas EE. 2008. Effect of monensin feeding and withdrawal on populations of individual bacterial species in the rumen of lactating dairy cows fed high-starch rations. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 80:135-145.
46. Li M, Penner GB, Hernandez-Sanabria E, Oba M, Guan LL. 2009. Effects of sampling location and time, and host animal on assessment of bacterial diversity and fermentation parameters in the bovine rumen. J. Appl. Microbiol. 107:1924 -1934.