Chitosan-catechol: A polymer with long-lasting mucoadhesive properties

Biomaterials

Volumn 52, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 161-170

  Kim, Kyuri ^a   Kim, Keumyeon ^a   Ryu, Ji Hyun ^a   Lee, Haeshin ^a  

^a Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST)   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Catechol functionalized polymer; Chitosan; Mucoadhesion; Mucosal drug delivery; Mussel inspired

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL MODIFICATION; CHITIN; CHITOSAN; CONJUGATED POLYMERS; COPOLYMERS; COVALENT BONDS; CROSSLINKING; MOLLUSCS; PHENOLS; PROTEINS;

CO-OPERATIVE EFFECTS; FUNCTIONALIZED POLYMERS; GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT; MUCOADHESION; MUCOADHESIVE POLYMERS; MUCOADHESIVE PROPERTIES; MUSSEL ADHESIVE PROTEINS; MUSSEL-INSPIRED;

POLYMERS;

CATECHOL; CHITOSAN; MUCIN; MUSSEL ADHESIVE PROTEIN; POLYMER; CATECHOL DERIVATIVE; TISSUE ADHESIVE;

ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL MODIFICATION; CROSS LINKING; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM; GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; MOUSE; MUCOADHESION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ANIMAL; BAGG ALBINO MOUSE; CACO 2 CELL LINE; CHEMISTRY; METABOLISM; MUCOSA; MUSCLE; UMBILICAL VEIN ENDOTHELIAL CELL;

ANIMALS; CACO-2 CELLS; CATECHOLS; CHITOSAN; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS; HUMAN UMBILICAL VEIN ENDOTHELIAL CELLS; HUMANS; MICE, INBRED BALB C; MUCOUS MEMBRANE; MUSCLES; TISSUE ADHESIVES;

EID: 84932608602     PISSN: 01429612     EISSN: 18785905     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.02.010     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Lehr C.M., Bouwstra J.A., Schacht E.H., Junginger H.E. Invitro evaluation of mucoadhesive properties of chitosan and some other natural polymers. Int J Pharm 1992, 78:43-48.
2. Khutoryanskiy V.V. Advances in mucoadhesion and mucoadhesive polymers. Macromol Biosci 2011, 11:748-764.
3. Luessen H.L., Rentel C.O., Kotze A.F., Lehr C.M., deBoer A.G., Verhoef J.C., et al. Mucoadhesive polymers in peroral peptide drug delivery. 4. Polycarbophil and chitosan are potent enhancers of peptide transport across intestinal mucosae invitro. JControl Release 1997, 45:15-23.
4. Luessen H.L., deLeeuw B.J., Langemeyer M.W.E., deBoer A.G., Verhoef J.C., Junginger H.E. Mucoadhesive polymers in peroral peptide drug delivery. 6. Carbomer and chitosan improve the intestinal absorption of the peptide drug buserelin invivo. Pharm Res 1996, 13:1668-1672.
5. Schipper N.G.M., Olsson S., Hoogstraate J.A., deBoer A.G., Varum K.M., Artursson P. Chitosans as absorption enhancers for poorly absorbable drugs. 2. Mechanism of absorption enhancement. Pharm Res 1997, 14:923-929.
6. Sogias I.A., Williams A.C., Khutoryanskiy V.V. Why is chitosan mucoadhesive?. Biomacromolecules 2008, 9:1837-1842.
7. Park H., Robinson J.R. Mechanisms of mucoadhesion of poly(acrylic acid) hydrogels. Pharm Res 1987, 4:457-464.
8. Snyman D., Hamman J.H., Kotze A.F. Evaluation of the mucoadhesive properties of N-trimethyl chitosan chloride. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 2003, 29:61-69.
9. Bernkop-Schnurch A., Schwarz V., Steininger S. Polymers with thiol groups: a new generation of mucoadhesive polymers?. Pharm Res 1999, 16:876-881.
10. Bernkop-Schnurch A. Thiomers: a new generation of mucoadhesive polymers. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2005, 57:1569-1582.
11. Sonia T.A., Sharma C.P. Chitosan and its derivatives for drug delivery perspective. Adv Polym Sci 2011, 243:23-53.
12. Sreenivas S.A., Pai K.V. Thiolated chitosans: novel polymers for mucoadhesive drug delivery - a review. Trop J Pharm Res 2008, 7:1077-1088.
13. Schmitz T., Grabovac V., Palmberger T.F., Hoffer M.H., Bernkop-Schnurch A. Synthesis and characterization of a chitosan-N-acetyl cysteine conjugate. Int J Pharm 2008, 347:79-85.
14. Bernkop-Schnurch A., Kast C.E., Richter M.F. Improvement in the mucoadhesive properties of alginate by the covalent attachment of cysteine. JControl Realease 2001, 71:277-285.
15. Davidovich-Pinhas M., Bianco-Peled H. Novel mucoadhesive system based on sulfhydryl-acrylate interactions. JMater Sci Mater Med 2010, 21:2027-2034.
16. Masuko T., Minami A., Iwasaki N., Majima T., Nishimura S.I., Lee Y.C. Thiolation of chitosan. Attachment of proteins via thioether formation. Biomacromolecules 2005, 6:880-884.
17. Leitner V.M., Walker G.F., Bernkop-Schnurch A. Thiolated polymers: evidence for the formation of disulphide bonds with mucus glycoproteins. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2003, 56:207-214.
18. Mortazavi S.A. An in-vitro assessment of mucus mucoadhesive interactions. Int J Pharm 1995, 124:173-182.
19. Lavelle E.C., Grant G., Pusztai A., Pfuller U., O'Hagan D.T. Mucosal immunogenicity of plant lectins in mice. Immunol 2000, 99:30-37.
20. Miyake K., Tanaka T., McNeil P.L. Lectin-based food poisoning: a new mechanism of protein toxicity. PloS one 2007, 2:e687.
21. Lee H., Scherer N.F., Messersmith P.B. Single-molecule mechanics of mussel adhesion. PNatl Acad Sci U S A 2006, 103:12999-13003.
22. Lee H., Dellatore S.M., Miller W.M., Messersmith P.B. Mussel-inspired surface chemistry for multifunctional coatings. Science 2007, 318:426-430.
23. Kim K., Ryu J.H., Lee D.Y., Lee H. Bio-inspired catechol conjugation converts water-insoluble chitosan into highly water-soluble, adhesive chitosan derivative for hydrogels and LbL assembly. Biomater Sci 2013, 1:783-790.
24. Hong S., Yang K., Kang B., Lee C., Song I.T., Byun E., et al. Hyaluronic acid catechol: a biopolymer exhibiting a pH-dependent adhesive or cohesive property for human neural stem cell engineering. Adv Func Mater 2013, 23:1774-1780.
25. Kot M., Zaborska W. Irreversible inhibition of jack bean urease by pyrocatechol. JEnzym Inhib Med Ch 2003, 18:413-417.
26. Lee Y., Chung H.J., Yeo S., Ahn C.H., Lee H., Messersmith P.B., et al. Thermo-sensitive, injectable, and tissue adhesive sol-gel transition hyaluronic acid/pluronic composite hydrogels prepared from bio-inspired catechol-thiol reaction. Soft Matter 2010, 6:977-983.
27. Ryu J.H., Lee Y., Kong W.H., Kim T.G., Park T.G., Lee H. Catechol-functionalized chitosan/pluronic hydrogels for tissue adhesives and hemostatic materials. Biomacromolecules 2011, 12:2653-2659.
28. Yu J., Wei W., Danner E., Ashley R.K., Israelachvili J.N., Waite J.H. Mussel protein adhesion depends on interprotein thiol-mediated redox modulation. Nat Chem Biol 2011, 7:588-590.
29. Liu Y., Ai K., Lu L. Polydopamine and its derivative materials: synthesis and promising applications in energy, environmental, and biomedical fields. Chem Rev 2014, 114:5057-5115.
30. Deacon M.P., Davis S.S., Waite J.H., Harding S.E. Structure and mucoadhesion of mussel glue protein in dilute solution. Biochemistry 1998, 37:14108-14112.
31. Schnurrer J., Lehr C.M. Mucoadhesive properties of the mussel adhesive protein. Int J Pharm 1996, 141:251-256.
32. Catron N.D., Lee H., Messersmith P.B. Enhancement of poly(ethylene glycol) mucoadsorption by biomimetic end group functionalization. Biointerphases 2006, 1:134-141.
33. Xu J., Soliman G.M., Barralet J., Cerruti M. Mollusk glue inspired mucoadhesives for biomedical applications. Langmuir 2012, 28:14010-14017.
34. Boddupalli B.M., Mohammed Z.N., Nath R.A., Banji D. Mucoadhesive drug delivery system: an overview. JAdv Pharm Technol Res 2010, 1:381-387.
35. Smart J.D. The basics and underlying mechanisms of mucoadhesion. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2005, 57:1556-1568.
36. 1H NMR method for the determination of the degree of deacetylation of chitosan. JPharm Biomed Anal 2003, 32:1149-1158.
37. Takeuchi H., Thongborisute J., Matsui Y., Sugihara H., Yamamoto H., Kawashima Y. Novel mucoadhesion tests for polymers and polymer-coated particles to design optimal mucoadhesive drug delivery systems. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2005, 57:1583-1594.
38. Thongborisute J., Takeuchi H. Evaluation of mucoadhesiveness of polymers by BIACORE method and mucin-particle method. Int J Pharm 2008, 354:204-209.
39. Jung L.S., Campbell C.T., Chinowsky T.M., Mar M.N., Yee S.S. Quantitative interpretation of the response of surface plasmon resonance sensors to adsorbed films. Langmuir 1998, 14:5636-5648.
40. Fefelova N.A., Nurkeeva Z.S., Mun G.A., Khutoryanskiy V.V. Mucoadhesive interactions of amphiphilic cationic copolymers based on [2-(methacryloyloxy)ethyl]trimethylammonium chloride. Int J Pharm 2007, 339:25-32.
41. Carvalho F.C., Bruschi M.L., Evangelista R.C., Gremiao M.P.D. Mucoadhesive drug delivery systems. Braz J Pharm Sci 2010, 46:1-17.
42. Chun M.K., Cho C.S., Choi H.K. Mucoadhesive drug carrier based on interpolymer complex of poly(vinyl pyrrolidone) and poly(acrylic acid) prepared by template polymerization. JControl Release 2002, 81:327-334.
43. Ahn J.S., Choi H.K., Chun M.K., Ryu J.M., Jung J.H., Kim Y.U., et al. Release of triamcinolone acetonide from mucoadhesive polymer composed of chitosan and poly(acrylic acid) invitro. Biomaterials 2002, 23:1411-1416.
44. Grabovac V., Guggi D., Bernkop-Schnurch A. Comparison of the mucoadhesive properties of various polymers. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2005, 57:1713-1723.
45. He P., Davis S.S., Illum L. Invitro evaluation of the mucoadhesive properties of chitosan microspheres. Int J Pharm 1998, 166:75-88.
46. McConnell E.L., Basit A.W., Murdan S. Measurements of rat and mouse gastrointestinal pH fluid and lymphoid tissue, and implications for in-vivo experiments. JPharm Pharmacol 2008, 60:63-70.
47. Fallingborg J. Intraluminal pH of the human gastrointestinal tract. Dan Med Bull 1999, 46:183-196.
48. Evans D.F., Pye G., Bramley R., Clark A.G., Dyson T.J., Hardcastle J.D. Measurement of gastrointestinal Ph profiles in normal ambulant human-subjects. Gut 1988, 29:1035-1041.
49. George M., Abraham T.E. pH sensitive alginate-guar gum hydrogel for the controlled delivery of protein drugs. Int J Pharm 2007, 335:123-129.
50. Akiyama Y., Nagahara N., Kashihara T., Hirai S., Toguchi H. In-vitro and in-vivo evaluation of mucoadhesive microspheres prepared for the gastrointestinal-tract using polyglycerol esters of fatty-acids and a poly(acrylic acid) derivative. Pharm Res 1995, 12:397-405.
51. Nicolson G.L., Lacorbiere M., Hunter T.R. Mechanism of cell entry and toxicity of an affinity-purified lectin from ricinus-communis and its differential effects on normal and virus-transformed fibroblasts. Cancer Res 1975, 35:144-155.
52. Van Huyen J.P.D., Bayry J., Delignat S., Gaston A.T., Michel O., Bruneval P., et al. Induction of apoptosis of endothelial cells by viscum album: a role for anti-tumoral properties of mistletoe lectins. Mol Med 2002, 8:600-606.
53. Hassan E.E., Gallo J.M. Asimple rheological method for the invitro assessment of mucin-polymer bioadhesive bond strength. Pharm Res 1990, 7:491-495.
54. Huang K., Lee B.P., Ingram D.R., Messersmith P.B. Synthesis and characterization of self-assembling block copolymers containing bioadhesive end groups. Biomacromolecules 2002, 3:397-406.
55. Lee Y., Lee H., Kim Y.B., Kim J., Hyeon T., Park H., et al. Bioinspired surface immobilization of hyaluronic acid on monodisperse magnetite nanocrystals for targeted cancer imaging. Adv Mater 2008, 20:4154-4157.
56. Allen A., Hutton D.A., Pearson J.P. The MUC2 gene product: a human intestinal mucin. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 1998, 30:797-801.
57. Millotti G., Laffleur F., Perera G., Vigl C., Pickl K., Sinner F., et al. Invivo evaluation of thiolated chitosan tablets for oral insulin delivery. JPharm Sci 2014, 10:3165-3170.
58. Mao S., Bakowsky U., Jintapattanakit A., Kissel T. Self-assembled polyelectrolyte nanocomplexes between chitosan derivatives and insulin. JPharm Sci 2005, 95:1035-1048.
59. Yin L., Ding J., He C., Cui L., Tang C., Yin C. Drug permeability and mucoadhesion properties of thiolated trimethyl chitosan nanoparticles in oral insulin delivery. Biomaterials 2009, 30:5691-5700.