Adaptability of non-genetic diversity in bacterial chemotaxis

eLife

Volumn 3, Issue October2014, 2014, Pages 1-30

  Frankel, Nicholas W ^a   Pontius, William ^b   Dufour, Yann S ^a   Long, Junjiajia ^b   Hernandez Nunez, Luis ^b   Emonet, Thierry ^a,b  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Yale University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BACTERIAL PROTEIN;

ADAPTATION; CELL CLONE; CHEMOTAXIS; ESCHERICHIA COLI; EVOLUTION; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; METABOLISM; PHENOTYPE; SINGLE CELL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; BACTERIAL PROTEINS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; CHEMOTAXIS; CLONE CELLS; ESCHERICHIA COLI; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, BACTERIAL; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PHENOTYPE; SELECTION, GENETIC; SINGLE-CELL ANALYSIS; STOCHASTIC PROCESSES;

EID: 84931864666     PISSN: None     EISSN: 2050084X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.03526     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Alon U, Camarena L, Surette MG, Aguera y Arcas B, Liu Y, Leibler S, Stock JB. 1998. Response regulator output in bacterial chemotaxis. The EMBO Journal 17:4238-4248. doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.15.4238.
2. Alon U, Surette MG, Barkai N, Leibler S. 1999. Robustness in bacterial chemotaxis. Nature 397:168-171. doi: 10.1038/16483.
3. Barkai N, Leibler S. 1997. Robustness in simple biochemical networks. Nature 387:913-917. doi: 10.1038/43199.
4. Beaumont HJE, Gallie J, Kost C, Ferguson GC, Rainey PB. 2009. Experimental evolution of bet hedging. Nature 462:90-93. doi: 10.1038/nature08504.
5. Berg HC, Brown DA. 1972. Chemotaxis in Escherichia coli analysed by three-dimensional tracking. Nature 239:500-504. doi: 10.1038/239500a0.
6. Blackburn N, Fenchel T, Mitchell J. 1998. Microscale nutrient patches in planktonic habitats shown by chemotactic bacteria. Science 282:2254-2256. doi: 10.1126/science.282.5397.2254.
7. Boldog T, Grimme S, Li M, Sligar SG, Hazelbauer GL. 2006. Nanodiscs separate chemoreceptor oligomeric states and reveal their signaling properties. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA 103:11509-11514. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0604988103.
8. Bruggeman FJ, Bluthgen N, Westerhoff HV. 2009. Noise Management by molecular networks. PLOS Computational Biology 5:e1000506. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000506.
9. Cantwell BJ, Draheim RR, Weart RB, Nguyen C, Stewart RC, Manson MD. 2003. CheZ Phosphatase Localizes to chemoreceptor Patches via CheA-short. Journal of Bacteriology 185:2354-2361. doi: 10.1128/JB.185.7.2354-2361.2003.
10. Celani A, Vergassola M. 2010. Bacterial strategies for chemotaxis response. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA 107:1391-1396. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0909673107.
11. Clark DA, Grant LC. 2005. The bacterial chemotactic response reflects a compromise between transient and steady-state behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA 102:9150-9155. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0407659102.
12. Cluzel P, Surette M, Leibler S, 2000. An ultrasensitive bacterial motor revealed by monitoring signaling proteins in single cells. Science 287:1652-1655. doi: 10.1126/science.287.5458.1652.
13. Donaldson-Matasci MC, Lachmann M, Bergstrom CT. 2008. Phenotypic diversity as an adaptation to environmental uncertainty. Evolutionary Ecology Research 10:493-515.
14. Dufour YS, Fu X, Hernandez-Nunez L, Emonet T. 2014. Limits of feedback control in bacterial chemotaxis. PLOS Computational Biology 10:e1003694. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003694.
15. Eisenbach M, Lengeler JW. 2004. Chemotaxis. London: Imperial College Press. xvi, 499 p.
16. Elowitz MB, Levine AJ, Siggia ED, Swain PS. 2002. Stochastic gene expression in a single cell. Science 297:1183-1186. doi: 10.1126/science.1070919.
17. Emonet T, Cluzel P. 2008. Relationship between cellular response and behavioral variability in bacterial chemotaxis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA 105:3304-3309. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0705463105.
18. Endres RG, Wingreen NS. 2006. Precise adaptation in bacterial chemotaxis through "assistance neighborhoods". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA 103:13040-13044. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0603101103.
19. Freed NE, Silander OK, Stecher B, Böhm A, Hardt WD, Ackermann M. 2008. A simple screen to identify promoters conferring high levels of phenotypic noise. PLOS Genetics 4:e1000307. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000307.
20. Haccou P, Iwasa Y. 1995. Optimal mixed strategies in stochastic environments. Theoretical Population Biology 47:212-243. doi: 10.1006/tpbi.1995.1009.
21. Huang S. 2009. Non-genetic heterogeneity of cells in development: more than just noise. Development 136:3853-3862. doi: 10.1242/dev.035139.
22. Huh D, Paulsson J. 2011. Non-genetic heterogeneity from stochastic partitioning at cell division. Nature Genetics 43:95-100. doi: 10.1038/ng.729.
23. Jiang LL, Qi OY, Tu YH. 2010. Quantitative modeling of Escherichia coli chemotactic motion in environments varying in space and time. PLOS Computational Biology 6:e1000735. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000735.
24. Kalinin Y, Neumann S, Sourjik V, Wu M. 2010. Responses of Escherichia coli bacteria to two opposing chemoattractant gradients depend on the chemoreceptor ratio. Journal of Bacteriology 192:1796-1800. doi: 10.1128/JB.01507-09.
25. Kentner D, Sourjik V. 2009. Dynamic map of protein interactions in the Escherichia coli chemotaxis pathway. Molecular Systems Biology 5:238. doi: 10.1038/msb.2008.77.
26. Kentner D, Thiem S, Hildenbeutel M, Sourjik V. 2006. Determinants of chemoreceptor cluster formation in Escherichia coli. Molecular Microbiology 61:407-417. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05250.x.
27. Khan S, Macnab RM, DeFranco AL, Koshland DE Jnr. 1978. Inversion of a behavioral response in bacterial chemotaxis: explanation at the molecular level. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA 75:4150-4154. doi: 10.1073/pnas.75.9.4150.
28. Kollmann M, Løvdok L, Bartholomé K, Timmer J, Sourjik V. 2005. Design principles of a bacterial signalling network. Nature 438:504-507. doi: 10.1038/nature04228.
29. Kussell E, Leibler S. 2005. Phenotypic diversity, population growth, and information in fluctuating environments. Science 309:2075-2078. doi: 10.1126/science.1114383.
30. Lan G, Sartori P, Neumann S, Sourjik V, Tu Y. 2012. The energy-speed-accuracy tradeoff in sensory adaptation. Nature Physics 8:422-428. doi: 10.1038/nphys2276.
31. Lane MC, Lockatell V, Monterosso G, Lamphier D, Weinert J, Hebel JR, Johnson DE, Mobley HL. 2005. Role of motility in the colonization of uropathogenic Escherichia coli in the urinary tract. Infection and Immunity 73:7644-7656. doi: 10.1128/IAI.73.11.7644-7656.2005.
32. Lanfranconi MP, Alvarez HM, Studdert CA. 2003. A strain isolated from gas oil-contaminated soil displays chemotaxis towards gas oil and hexadecane. Environmental Microbiology 5:1002-1008. doi: 10.1046/j.1462-2920.2003.00507.x.
33. Lestas I, Vinnicombe G, Paulsson J. 2010. Fundamental limits on the suppression of molecular fluctuations. Nature 467:174-178. doi: 10.1038/nature09333.
34. Levins R. 1962. Theory of fitness in a heterogeneous environment. 1. Fitness Set and Adaptive Function. American Naturalist 96:361.
35. Li MS, Hazelbauer GL. 2004. Cellular stoichiometry of the components of the chemotaxis signaling complex. Journal of Bacteriology 186:3687-3694. doi: 10.1128/JB.186.12.3687-3694.2004.
36. Lovdok L, Kollmann M, Sourjik V. 2007. Co-expression of signaling proteins improves robustness of the bacterial chemotaxis pathway. Journal of Biotechnology 129:173-180. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2007.01.024.
37. Lovdok L, Bentele K, Vladimirov N, Müller A, Pop FS, Lebiedz D, Kollmann M, Sourjik V. 2009. Role of translational coupling in robustness of bacterial chemotaxis pathway. PLOS Biology 7:e1000171. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000171.
38. Maamar H, Raj A, Dubnau D. 2007. Noise in gene expression determines cell Fate in Bacillus subtilis. Science 317:526-529. doi: 10.1126/science.114081.
39. Matthaus F, Jagodic M, Dobnikar J. 2009. E. coli Superdiffusion and chemotaxis-search strategy, precision, and motility. Biophysical Journal 97:946-957. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2009.04.065.
40. Mello BA, Tu Y. 2005. An allosteric model for heterogeneous receptor complexes: understanding bacterial chemotaxis responses to multiple stimuli. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA 102:17354-17359. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0506961102.
41. Mesibov R, Adler J. 1972. Chemotaxis toward Amino-Acids in Escherichia-Coli. Journal of Bacteriology 112:315-326.
42. Miller-Jensen K, Skupsky R, Shah PS, Arkin AP, Schaffer DV. 2013. Genetic selection for context-dependent stochastic phenotypes: Sp1 and TATA mutations increase phenotypic noise in HIV-1 gene expression. PLOS Computational Biology 9:e1003135. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003135.
43. Mora T, Walczak AM. 2013. Effect of phenotypic selection on stochastic gene expression. The Journal of Physical chemistry B 117:13194-13205. doi: 10.1021/jp403231f.
44. Oleksiuk O, Jakovljevic V, Vladimirov N, Carvalho R, Paster E, Ryu WS, Meir Y, Wingreen NS, Kollmann M, Sourjik V. 2011. Thermal robustness of signaling in bacterial chemotaxis. Cell 145:312-321. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.03.013.
45. O'Toole GA, Kolter R. 1998. Flagellar and twitching motility are necessary for Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm development. Molecular Microbiology 30:295-304. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1998.01062.x.
46. Park H, Pontius W, Guet CC, Marko JF, Emonet T, Cluzel P. 2010. Interdependence of behavioural variability and response to small stimuli in bacteria. Nature 468:819-823. doi: 10.1038/nature09551.
47. Park H, Guet CC, Emonet T, Cluzel P. 2011. Fine-Tuning of Chemotactic Response in E. Coli Determined by high-Throughput capillary assay. Current Microbiology 62:764-769. doi: 10.1007/s00284-010-9778-z.
48. Pontius W, Sneddon MW, Emonet T. 2013. Adaptation dynamics in densely clustered chemoreceptors. PLOS Computational Biology 9:e1003230. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003230.
49. Rueffler C, Hermisson J, Wagner GP. 2012. Evolution of functional specialization and division of labor. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA 109:E326-E335. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1110521109.
50. Saragosti J, Calvez V, Bournaveas N, Perthame B, Buguin A, Silberzan P. 2011. Directional persistence of chemotactic bacteria in a traveling concentration wave. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA 108:16235-16240. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1101996108.
51. Schulmeister S, Ruttorf M, Thiem S, Kentner D, Lebiedz D, Sourjik V. 2008. Protein exchange dynamics at chemoreceptor clusters in Escherichia coli. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA 105:6403-6408. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0710611105.
52. Schulmeister S, Grosse K, Sourjik V. 2011. Effects of receptor modification and temperature on dynamics of sensory complexes in Escherichia coli chemotaxis. BMC Microbiology 11:222. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-11-222.
53. Scott M, Gunderson CW, Mateescu EM, Zhang Z, Hwa T. 2010. Interdependence of cell growth and gene expression: origins and consequences. Science 330:1099-1102. doi: 10.1126/science.1192588.
54. Seymour JR, Marcos, Stocker R. 2009. Resource Patch formation and Exploitation throughout the Marine Microbial food Web. American Naturalist 173:E15-E29. doi: 10.1086/593004.
55. Shimizu TS, Tu YH, Berg HC. 2010. A modular gradient-sensing network for chemotaxis in Escherichia coli revealed by responses to time-varying stimuli. Molecular Systems Biology 6:382. doi: 10.1038/msb.2010.37.
56. Shoval O, Sheftel H, Shinar G, Hart Y, Ramote O, Mayo A, Dekel E, Kavanagh K, Alon U. 2012. Evolutionary trade-offs, Pareto optimality, and the geometry of phenotype space. Science 336:1157-1160. doi: 10.1126/science.1217405.
57. Sneddon MW, Pontius W, Emonet T. 2012. Stochastic coordination of multiple actuators reduces latency and improves chemotactic response in bacteria. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA 109:805-810. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1113706109.
58. Sourjik V, Berg HC. 2001. Using fluorescent resonance energy transfer (FRET) to study interactions of cytoplasmic and motor proteins in chemotaxis of E-coli. Biophysical Journal 80:198a.
59. Sourjik V, Wingreen NS. 2012. Responding to chemical gradients: bacterial chemotaxis. Current Opinion in Cell Biology 24:262-268. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2011.11.008.
60. Spencer SL, Gaudet S, Albeck JG, Burke JM, Sorger PK. 2009. Non-genetic origins of cell-to-cell variability in TRAIL-induced apoptosis. Nature 459:428-432. doi: 10.1038/nature08012.
61. Spudich JL, Koshland DE. 1976. Non-genetic individuality-Chance in single cell. Nature 262:467-471. doi: 10.1038/262467a0.
62. Stecher B, Hapfelmeier S, Müller C, Kremer M, Stallmach T, Hardt WD. 2004. Flagella and chemotaxis are required for efficient induction of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium colitis in streptomycin-pretreated mice. Infection and Immunity 72:4138-4150. doi: 10.1128/IAI.72.7.4138-4150.2004.
63. Stewart MK, Cookson BT. 2012. Non-genetic diversity shapes infectious capacity and host resistance. Trends in Microbiology 20:461-466. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2012.07.003.
64. Stocker R, Seymour JR, Samadani A, Hunt DE, Polz MF. 2008. Rapid chemotactic response enables marine bacteria to exploit ephemeral microscale nutrient patches. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA 105:4209-4214. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0709765105.
65. Stossel TP. 1999. Crawling Neutrophil Chasing a Bacterium. [cited 2014 12 May]; Available from. http://www.biochemweb.org/neutrophil.shtml.
66. Sze CW, Zhang K, Kariu T, Pal U, Li C. 2012. Borrelia burgdorferi needs chemotaxis to establish infection in mammals and to accomplish its enzootic cycle. Infection and Immunity 80:2485-2492. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00145-12.
67. Taniguchi Y, Choi PJ, Li GW, Chen H, Babu M, Hearn J, Emili A, Xie XS. 2010. Quantifying E. coli proteome and transcriptome with single-molecule sensitivity in single cells. Science 329:533-538. doi: 10.1126/science.1188308.
68. Taylor JR, Stocker R. 2012. Trade-Offs of chemotactic Foraging in turbulent Water. Science 338:675-679. doi: 10.1126/science.1219417.
69. Terry K, Williams SM, Connolly L, Ottemann KM. 2005. Chemotaxis plays multiple roles during Helicobacter pylori animal infection. Infection and Immunity 73:803-811. doi: 10.1128/IAI.73.2.803-811.2005.
70. Tu Y, Grinstein G. 2005. How white noise generates power-law switching in bacterial flagellar motors. Physical Review Letters 94:208101. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.208101.
71. Tu Y, Shimizu TS, Berg HC. 2008. Modeling the chemotactic response of Escherichia coli to time-varying stimuli. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA 105:14855-14860. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0807569105.
72. Veening JW, Smits WK, Kuipers OP. 2008. Bistability, epigenetics, and bet-hedging in bacteria. Annual Review of Microbiology 62:193-210. doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.62.081307.163002.
73. Vladimirov N, Løvdok L, Lebiedz D, Sourjik V. 2008. Dependence of bacterial chemotaxis on gradient shape and adaptation rate. PLOS Computational Biology 4:e1000242. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000242.
74. Vladimirov N, Lebiedz D, Sourjik V. 2010. Predicted Auxiliary navigation mechanism of Peritrichously Flagellated chemotactic bacteria. PLOS Computational Biology 6:e1000717. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000717.
75. Yi TM, Huang Y, Simon MI, Doyle J. 2000. Robust perfect adaptation in bacterial chemotaxis through integral feedback control. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 97:4649-4653. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.9.4649.
76. Zhang P, Khursigara CM, Hartnell LM, Subramaniam S. 2007. Direct visualization of Escherichia coli chemotaxis receptor arrays using cryo-electron microscopy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA 104:3777-3781. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0610106104.