Limits of Feedback Control in Bacterial Chemotaxis

PLoS Computational Biology

Volumn 10, Issue 6, 2014, Pages

  Dufour, Yann S ^a   Fu, Xiongfei ^a   Hernandez Nunez, Luis ^a,c   Emonet, Thierry ^a,b  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Yale University   (United States)

^c HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTUATORS; BIOCHEMISTRY; ROBUST CONTROL;

BACTERIAL CHEMOTAXIS; BEHAVIORAL FEEDBACK; BEHAVIORAL RESPONSE; CONDITION; INFORMATION TRANSFERS; MOTOR ADAPTATION; RESTING STATE; ROBUST PERFORMANCE; SENSORS AND ACTUATORS; SIGNALLING PATHWAYS;

FEEDBACK CONTROL;

ADAPTATION; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL CHEMOTAXIS; BACTERIAL PHENOMENA AND FUNCTIONS; CHEMOTAXIS; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); DYNAMICS; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FLAGELLUM; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; SENSOR; SIMULATION; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOLOGY; ESCHERICHIA COLI; PHENOTYPE; PHYSIOLOGY; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

BACTERIAL PROTEIN; MEMBRANE PROTEIN; METHYL-ACCEPTING CHEMOTAXIS PROTEINS;

BACTERIAL PROTEINS; CHEMOTAXIS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; ESCHERICHIA COLI; FEEDBACK, PHYSIOLOGICAL; MEMBRANE PROTEINS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PHENOTYPE; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

EID: 84903388915     PISSN: 1553734X     EISSN: 15537358     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003694     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Berg HC, Brown DA, (1972) Chemotaxis in Escherichia coli analysed by three-dimensional tracking. Nature 239: 500-504.
2. Sneddon MW, Pontius W, Emonet T, (2012) Stochastic coordination of multiple actuators reduces latency and improves chemotactic response in bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109: 805-810.
3. Min TL, Mears PJ, Chubiz LM, Rao CV, Golding I, et al. (2009) High-resolution, long-term characterization of bacterial motility using optical tweezers. Nat Methods 6: 831-835.
4. Sourjik V, Wingreen NS, (2012) Responding to chemical gradients: bacterial chemotaxis. Current opinion in cell biology 24: 262-268.
5. Bray D, Levin MD, Morton-Firth CJ, (1998) Receptor clustering as a cellular mechanism to control sensitivity. Nature 393: 85-88.
6. Sourjik V, Berg HC, (2004) Functional interactions between receptors in bacterial chemotaxis. Nature 428: 437-441.
7. Li M, Khursigara CM, Subramaniam S, Hazelbauer GL, (2011) Chemotaxis kinase CheA is activated by three neighbouring chemoreceptor dimers as effectively as by receptor clusters. Mol Microbiol 79: 677-685.
8. Alon U, Surette MG, Barkai N, Leibler S, (1999) Robustness in bacterial chemotaxis. Nature 397: 168-171.
9. Block SM, Segall JE, Berg HC, (1983) Adaptation kinetics in bacterial chemotaxis. J Bacteriol 154: 312-323.
10. Yi TM, Huang Y, Simon MI, Doyle J, (2000) Robust perfect adaptation in bacterial chemotaxis through integral feedback control. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97: 4649-4653.
11. Korobkova E, Emonet T, Vilar JM, Shimizu TS, Cluzel P, (2004) From molecular noise to behavioural variability in a single bacterium. Nature 428: 574-578.
12. Pontius W, Sneddon MW, Emonet T, (2013) Adaptation dynamics in densely clustered chemoreceptors. PLoS Comput Biol 9: e1003230.
13. Min TL, Mears PJ, Golding I, Chemla YR, (2012) Chemotactic adaptation kinetics of individual Escherichia coli cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109: 9869-9874.
14. Lazova MD, Ahmed T, Bellomo D, Stocker R, Shimizu TS, (2011) Response rescaling in bacterial chemotaxis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108: 13870-13875.
15. Tu Y, (2013) Quantitative modeling of bacterial chemotaxis: signal amplification and accurate adaptation. Annu Rev Biophys 42: 337-359.
16. Neumann S, Vladimirov N, Krembel AK, Wingreen NS, Sourjik V, (2014) Imprecision of adaptation in Escherichia coli chemotaxis. PLoS One 9: e84904.
17. Celani A, Vergassola M, (2010) Bacterial strategies for chemotaxis response. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107: 1391-1396.
18. Berg HC, (2003) The rotary motor of bacterial flagella. Annual review of biochemistry 72: 19-54.
19. Cluzel P, Surette M, Leibler S, (2000) An ultrasensitive bacterial motor revealed by monitoring signaling proteins in single cells. Science (New York, NY) 287: 1652-1655.
20. Yuan J, Berg HC, (2013) Ultrasensitivity of an adaptive bacterial motor. Journal of molecular biology 425: 1760-1764.
21. Kollmann M, Lovdok L, Bartholome K, Timmer J, Sourjik V, (2005) Design principles of a bacterial signalling network. Nature 438: 504-507.
22. Lovdok L, Bentele K, Vladimirov N, Muller A, Pop FS, et al. (2009) Role of translational coupling in robustness of bacterial chemotaxis pathway. PLoS Biol 7: e1000171.
23. Yuan J, Branch RW, Hosu BG, Berg HC, (2012) Adaptation at the output of the chemotaxis signalling pathway. Nature 484: 233-236.
24. Lele PP, Branch RW, Nathan VS, Berg HC, (2012) Mechanism for adaptive remodeling of the bacterial flagellar switch. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109: 20018-20022.
25. Vladimirov N, Lovdok L, Lebiedz D, Sourjik V, (2008) Dependence of bacterial chemotaxis on gradient shape and adaptation rate. PLoS Comput Biol 4: e1000242.
26. Shimizu TS, Tu Y, Berg HC, (2010) A modular gradient-sensing network for chemotaxis in Escherichia coli revealed by responses to time-varying stimuli. Mol Syst Biol 6: 382.
27. Si G, Wu T, Ouyang Q, Tu Y, (2012) Pathway-based mean-field model for Escherichia coli chemotaxis. Phys Rev Lett 109: 048101.
28. Spudich JL, Koshland DE Jr, (1976) Non-genetic individuality: chance in the single cell. Nature 262: 467-471.
29. Masson JB, Voisinne G, Wong-Ng J, Celani A, Vergassola M, (2012) Noninvasive inference of the molecular chemotactic response using bacterial trajectories. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109: 1802-1807.
30. Berg HC, Tedesco PM, (1975) Transient response to chemotactic stimuli in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 72: 3235-3239.
31. Park H, Pontius W, Guet CC, Marko JF, Emonet T, et al. (2010) Interdependence of behavioural variability and response to small stimuli in bacteria. Nature 468: 819-823.
32. Andrews BW, Yi TM, Iglesias PA, (2006) Optimal noise filtering in the chemotactic response of Escherichia coli. PLoS Comput Biol 2: e154.
33. Clark DA, Grant LC, (2005) The bacterial chemotactic response reflects a compromise between transient and steady-state behavior. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102: 9150-9155.
34. de Gennes PG, (2004) Chemotaxis: the role of internal delays. Eur Biophys J 33: 691-693.
35. Mears PJ, Koirala S, Rao CV, Golding I, Chemla YR, (2014) Escherichia coli swimming is robust against variations in flagellar number. eLife 3: e01916.
36. Schnitzer MJ, (1993) Theory of continuum random walks and application to chemotaxis. Phys Rev E Stat Phys Plasmas Fluids Relat Interdiscip Topics 48: 2553-2568.
37. Othmer HG, Xin X, Xue C, (2013) Excitation and Adaptation in Bacteria-a Model Signal Transduction System that Controls Taxis and Spatial Pattern Formation. International journal of molecular sciences 14: 9205-9248.
38. Tu Y, Berg HC, (2012) Tandem adaptation with a common design in Escherichia coli chemotaxis. Journal of molecular biology 423: 782-788.
39. Zhu X, Si G, Deng N, Ouyang Q, Wu T, et al. (2012) Frequency-Dependent Escherichia coli Chemotaxis Behavior. Phys Rev Lett 108: 128101.
40. Angeli D, Ferrell JE Jr, Sontag ED, (2004) Detection of multistability, bifurcations, and hysteresis in a large class of biological positive-feedback systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101: 1822-1827.
41. Oleksiuk O, Jakovljevic V, Vladimirov N, Carvalho R, Paster E, et al. (2011) Thermal robustness of signaling in bacterial chemotaxis. Cell 145: 312-321.
42. Turner L, Ryu WS, Berg HC, (2000) Real-time imaging of fluorescent flagellar filaments. J Bacteriol 182: 2793-2801.
43. Saragosti J, Calvez V, Bournaveas N, Perthame B, Buguin A, et al. (2011) Directional persistence of chemotactic bacteria in a traveling concentration wave. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108: 16235-16240.
44. Nicolau DV Jr, Armitage JP, Maini PK, (2009) Directional persistence and the optimality of run-and-tumble chemotaxis. Comput Biol Chem 33: 269-274.
45. Locsei JT, (2007) Persistence of direction increases the drift velocity of run and tumble chemotaxis. Journal of Mathematical Biology 55: 41-60.
46. Emonet T, Cluzel P, (2008) Relationship between cellular response and behavioral variability in bacterial chemotaxis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105: 3304-3309.