Predicted auxiliary navigation mechanism of peritrichously flagellated chemotactic bacteria

PLoS Computational Biology

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 2010, Pages

  Vladimirov, Nikita ^a   Lebiedz, Dirk ^b   Sourjik, Victor ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

^c GERMAN CANCER RESEARCH CENTER   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOCHEMISTRY; COMPETITION; NAVIGATION; PROBABILITY;

CHEMOTAXI; COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE; CONCENTRATION CHANGE; E. COLI; EVOLUTION RATE; FLAGELLAR MOTORS; HIGH EVOLUTIONS; SENSORY SYSTEM; SIMPLE BEHAVIORS; SWIMMING SPEED;

ESCHERICHIA COLI;

LIPID; MEMBRANE PROTEIN;

ACCURACY; ALGORITHM; ALPHA HELIX; ARTICLE; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; EXPOSURE; FORCE DIRECTED ALGORITHM; GENETIC ALGORITHM; LIPID EXPOSURE; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE; BACTERIAL PHENOMENA AND FUNCTIONS; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CHEMOTAXIS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FLAGELLUM; PHYSIOLOGY;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); ESCHERICHIA COLI;

BACTERIAL PHYSIOLOGICAL PHENOMENA; CHEMOTAXIS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FLAGELLA; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL;

EID: 77950899347     PISSN: 1553734X     EISSN: 15537358     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000717     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Kennedy MJ (1987) Role of motility, chemotaxis, and adhesion in microbial ecology. Ann NY Acad Sci 506: 260-273.
2. Kennedy MJJ, Lawless JGG (1985) Role of chemotaxis in the ecology of denitrifiers. Appl Environ Microbiol 49: 109-114.
3. Pilgram WK, Williams FD (1976) Survival value of chemotaxis in mixed cultures. Can J Microbiol 22: 1771-1773.
4. Freter R, O'Brien PC, Halstead SA (1978) Adhesion and chemotaxis as determinants of bacterial association with mucosal surfaces. Adv Exp Med Biol 107: 429-437.
5. Lauffenburger D (1991) Quantitative studies of bacterial chemotaxis and microbial population dynamics. Microb Ecol 22: 175-185.
6. Kelly FX, Dapsis KJ, Lauffenburger DA (1988) Effect of bacterial chemotaxis on dynamics of microbial competition. Microb Ecol 16: 115-131.
7. Berg HC, Purcell EM (1977) Physics of chemoreception. Biophys J 20: 193-219.
8. Bialek W, Setayeshgar S (2005) Physical limits to biochemical signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102: 10040-10045.
9. Kollmann M, Lovdok L, Bartholome K, Timmer J, Sourjik V (2005) Design principles of a bacterial signalling network. Nature 438: 504-507.
10. Endres RG, Wingreen NS (2008) Accuracy of direct gradient sensing by single cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105: 15749-15754.
11. Chung CY, Funamoto S, Firtel RA (2001) Signaling pathways controlling cell polarity and chemotaxis. Trends Biochem Sci 26: 557-566.
12. Berg HC, Brown DA (1972) Chemotaxis in Escherichia coli analysed by three- dimensional tracking. Nature 239: 500-504.
13. Turner L, Ryu WS, Berg HC (2000) Real-time imaging of fluorescent flagellar filaments. J Bacteriol 182: 2793-2801.
14. Vladimirov N, Løvdok L, Lebiedz D, Sourjik V (2008) Dependence of bacterial chemotaxis on gradient shape and adaptation rate. PLoS Comp Biol 4: e1000242.
15. Brown DA (1974) Chemotaxis in Escherichia coli: a biased random walk. Ph.D. Thesis. Dissertation, University of Colorado, Department of Physics and Astrophysics.
16. Andrews BW, Yi TM, Iglesias PA (2006) Optimal noise filtering in the chemotactic response of Escherichia coli. PLoS Comp Biol 2: 1407-1418.
17. Berg HC (1993) Random Walks in Biology Princeton University Press.
18. Mitchell J (1991) The influence of cell size on marine bacterial motility and energetics. Microb Ecol 22: 227-238.
19. Sourjik V, Berg HC (2004) Functional interactions between receptors in bacterial chemotaxis. Nature 428: 437-441.
20. Mello BA, Tu Y (2005) An allosteric model for heterogeneous receptor complexes: understanding bacterial chemotaxis responses to multiple stimuli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102: 17354-17359.
21. Sourjik V, Berg H (2002) Receptor sensitivity in bacterial chemotaxis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 123-127.
22. Keymer JE, Endres RG, Skoge M, Meir Y, Wingreen NS (2006) Chemosensing in escherichia coli: two regimes of two-state receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 1786-1791.
23. Skoge ML, Endres RG, Wingreen NS (2006) Receptor-receptor coupling in bacterial chemotaxis: evidence for strongly coupled clusters. Biophys J 90: 4317-4326.
24. Mello BA, Shaw L, Tu Y (2004) Effects of receptor interaction in bacterial chemotaxis. Biophys J 87: 1578-1595.
25. Endres RG, Wingreen NS (2006) Precise adaptation in bacterial chemotaxis through ''assistance neighborhoods''. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 13040-13044.
26. Hansen CH, Endres RG, Wingreen NS (2008) Chemotaxis in escherichia coli: a molecular model for robust precise adaptation. PLoS Comp Biol 4: 14-27.
27. Emonet T, Cluzel P (2008) Relationship between cellular response and behavioral variability in bacterial chemotaxis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105: 3304-3309.
28. Stewart RC, Jahreis K, Parkinson JS (2000) Rapid phosphotransfer to chey from a chea protein lacking the chey-binding domain. Biochemistry 39: 13157-13165.
29. Sourjik V, Berg HC (2002) Binding of the escherichia coli response regulator chey to its target measured in vivo by fluorescence resonance energy transfer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 12669-12674.
30. Cluzel P, Surette M, Leibler S (2000) An ultrasensitive bacterial motor revealed by monitoring signaling proteins in single cells. Science 287: 1652-1655.
31. Segall JE, Block SM, Berg HC (1986) Temporal comparisons in bacterial chemotaxis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83: 8987-8991.
32. Darnton NC, Turner L, Rojevsky S, Berg HC (2007) On torque and tumbling in swimming Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 189: 1756-1764.
33. Chen KC, Ford RM, Cummings PT (1998) The global turning probability density function for motile bacteria and its applications. J Theor Biol 195: 139-155.
34. Block SM, Segall JE, Berg HC (1983) Adaptation kinetics in bacterial chemotaxis. J Bacteriol 154: 312-323.
35. Staropoli JF, Alon U (2000) Computerized analysis of chemotaxis at different stages of bacterial growth. Biophys J 78: 513-519.