Variable selection method for fault isolation using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO)

Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems

Volumn 146, Issue , 2015, Pages 136-146

  Yan, Zhengbing ^a   Yao, Yuan ^b  

^a WENZHOU UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b NATIONAL TSING HUA UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Fault isolation; Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator; Multivariate statistical process monitoring; Quadratic programming; Variable selection

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; COMPUTER PROGRAM; LEARNING ALGORITHM; LEAST ABSOLUTE SHRINKAGE AND SELECTION OPERATOR; LINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MATHEMATICAL VARIABLE; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS CONTROL; PROCESS DESIGN; PROCESS MODEL; PROCESS MONITORING; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; QUALITY CONTROL; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICAL PARAMETERS; SYSTEM ANALYSIS; VARIABLE SELECTION METHOD;

EID: 84930643835     PISSN: 01697439     EISSN: 18733239     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemolab.2015.05.019     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Chiang L.H., Kotanchek M.E., Kordon A.K. Fault diagnosis based on Fisher discriminant analysis and support vector machines. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2004, 28:1389-1401.
2. Qin S.J. Survey on data-driven industrial process monitoring and diagnosis. Annu. Rev. Control. 2012, 36:220-234.
3. Jolliffe I. Principal Component Analysis 2002, Springer, New York. 2nd edition.
4. Miller P., Swanson R., Heckler C. Contribution plots: a missing link in multivariate quality control. Appl. Math. Comput. Sci. 1998, 8:775-792.
5. Westerhuis J., Gurden S., Smilde A. Generalized contribution plots in multivariate statistical process monitoring. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2000, 51:95-114.
6. Van den Kerkhof P., Vanlaer J., Gins G., Van Impe J.F.M. Analysis of smearing-out in contribution plot based fault isolation for statistical process control. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2013, 104:285-293.
7. Liu J., Wong D.S.H., Chen D.-S. Bayesian filtering of the smearing effect: fault isolation in chemical process monitoring. J. Process Control 2014, 24:1-21.
8. Dunia R., Qin S. Subspace approach to multidimensional fault identification and reconstruction. AICHE J. 1998, 44:1813-1831.
9. Yue H.H., Qin S.J. Reconstruction-based fault identification using a combined index. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2001, 40:4403-4414.
10. Alcala C.F., Qin S.J. Reconstruction-based contribution for process monitoring. Automatica 2009, 45:1593-1600.
11. Kariwala V., Odiowei P.E., Cao Y., Chen T. A branch and bound method for isolation of faulty variables through missing variable analysis. J. Process Control 2010, 20:1198-1206.
12. He B., Yang X., Chen T., Zhang J. Reconstruction-based multivariate contribution analysis for fault isolation: a branch and bound approach. J. Process Control 2012, 22:1228-1236.
13. Oh Y.S., Mo K.J., Yoon E.S., Yoon J.H. Fault diagnosis based on weighted symptom tree and pattern matching. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1997, 36:2672-2678.
14. Chu Y., Qin S., Han C. Fault detection and operation mode identification based on pattern classification with variable selection. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2004, 43:1701-1710.
15. Musulin E., Yélamos I., Puigjaner L. Integration of principal component analysis and fuzzy logic systems for comprehensive process fault detection and diagnosis. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2006, 45:1739-1750.
16. Huang C.-C., Chen T., Yao Y. Mixture discriminant monitoring: a hybrid method for statistical process monitoring and fault diagnosis/isolation. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2013, 52:10720-10731.
17. Yan Z., Huang C.-C., Yao Y. Semi-supervised mixture discriminant monitoring for chemical batch processes. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2014, 134:10-22.
18. Rato T.J., Reis M.S. Sensitivity enhancing transformations for monitoring the process correlation structure. J. Process Control 2014, 24:905-915.
19. Lindner B.S., Auret L. Data-driven fault detection with process topology for fault identification. In Proceedings of the 19th World Congress of the International Federation of Automatic Control 2014, (Cape Town, South Africa).
20. Bauer M., Cox J.W., Caveness M.H., Downs J.J., Thornhill N.F. Finding the direction of disturbance propagation in a chemical process using transfer entropy. IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol. 2007, 15:12-21.
21. Yu J., Rashid M.M. A novel dynamic Bayesian network-based networked process monitoring approach for fault detection, propagation identification, and root cause diagnosis. AICHE J. 2013, 59:2348-2365.
22. Rato T.J., Reis M.S. On-line process monitoring using local measures of association. Part II: design issues and fault diagnosis. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2015, 142:265-275.
23. Chiang L.H., Braatz R.D. Process monitoring using causal map and multivariate statistics: fault detection and identification. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2003, 65:159-178.
24. Tibshirani R. Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Methodol. 1996, 267-288.
25. Zou C., Qiu P. Multivariate statistical process control using LASSO. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 2009, 104:1586-1596.
26. Chiu C.-C., Yao Y. Multiway elastic net (MEN) for final product quality prediction and quality-related analysis of batch processes. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2013, 125:153-165.
27. Yan Z., Chiu C.-C., Yao Y., Doing W. Regularization-based statistical batch process modeling for final product quality prediction. AICHE J. 2014, 60:2815-2827.
28. He B., Zhang J., Chen T., Yang X. Penalized reconstruction-based multivariate contribution analysis for fault isolation. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2013, 52:7784-7794.
29. Efron B., Hastie T., Johnstone I., Tibshirani R. Least angle regression. Ann. Stat. 2004, 32:407-451.
30. Jackson J., Mudholkar G. Control procedures for residuals associated with principal component analysis. Technometrics 1979, 341-349.
31. Wang K., Jiang W. High-dimensional process monitoring and fault isolation via variable selection. J. Qual. Technol. 2009, 41:247.
32. Zou H., Hastie T., Tibshirani R. On the "degrees of freedom" of the lasso. Ann. Stat. 2007, 35:2173-2192.
33. Downs J., Vogel E. A plant-wide industrial process control problem. Comput. Chem. Eng. 1993, 17:245-255.
34. Lee G., Han C., Yoon E.S. Multiple-fault diagnosis of the Tennessee Eastman process based on system decomposition and dynamic PLS. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2004, 43:8037-8048.
35. Zhao C., Gao F. Fault-relevant Principal Component Analysis (FPCA) method for multivariate statistical modeling and process monitoring. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2014, 133:1-16.
36. Lau C.K., Ghosh K., Hussain M.A., Che Hassan C.R. Fault diagnosis of Tennessee Eastman process with multi-scale PCA and ANFIS. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2013, 120:1-14.
37. Chiang L.H., Jiang B., Zhu X., Huang D., Braatz R.D. Diagnosis of multiple and unknown faults using the causal map and multivariate statistics. J. Process Control 2015, 28:27-39.
38. Rato T.J., Reis M.S. Fault detection in the Tennessee Eastman benchmark process using dynamic principal components analysis based on decorrelated residuals (DPCA-DR). Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2013, 125:101-108.
39. Kano M., Nagao K., Hasebe S., Hashimoto I., Ohno H., Strauss R., Bakshi B. Comparison of statistical process monitoring methods: application to the Eastman challenge problem. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2000, 24:175-181.
40. Yin S., Ding S.X., Haghani A., Hao H., Zhang P. A comparison study of basic data-driven fault diagnosis and process monitoring methods on the benchmark Tennessee Eastman process. J. Process Control 2012, 22:1567-1581.
41. Ricker L. Decentralized control of the Tennessee Eastman challenge process. J. Process Control 1996, 6:205-221.