Fault detection in the Tennessee Eastman benchmark process using dynamic principal components analysis based on decorrelated residuals (DPCA-DR)

Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems

Volumn 125, Issue , 2013, Pages 101-108

  Rato, Tiago J ^a   Reis, Marco S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COIMBRA   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Dynamic principal component analysis; Missing data imputation; Multivariate statistical process control; Principal component analysis; Tennessee Eastman benchmark process

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DYNAMIC PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS BASED ON DECORRELATED RESIDUAL; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MEASUREMENT; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; RELIABILITY; SIMULATION;

EID: 84877316529     PISSN: 01697439     EISSN: 18733239     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemolab.2013.04.002     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Shewhart W.A. Economic Control of Quality of Manufactured Product 1931, D. Van Nostrand Company, Inc., New York.
2. Montgomery D.C. Introduction to Statistical Quality Control 2005, Wiley. fifth ed.
3. Page E.S. Continuous inspection schemes. Biometrics 1954, 41:100-115.
4. Roberts S.W. Control charts tests based on geometric moving averages. Technometrics 1959, 1:239-250.
5. Hotelling H. The generalization of student's ratio. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 1931, 2:360-378.
6. Crosier R.B. Multivariate generalizations of cumulative sum quality-control schemes. Technometrics 1988, 30:291-303.
7. Lowry C.A., Woodall W.H., Champ C.W., Rigdon S.E. A multivariate exponentially weighted moving average control chart. Technometrics 1992, 34:46-53.
8. Jackson J.E., Mudholkar G.S. Control procedures for residuals associated with principal component analysis. Technometrics 1979, 21:341-349.
9. Rato T.J., Reis M.S. Statistical Process Control of Multivariate Systems With Autocorrelation 2013, (submitted for publication).
10. Downs J.J., Vogel E.F. A plant-wide industrial process control problem. Computers and Chemical Engineering 1993, 17:245-255.
11. Ku W., Storer R.H., Georgakis C. Disturbance detection and isolation by dynamic principal component analysis. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 1995, 30:179-196.
12. Kourti T., MacGregor J.F. Process analysis, monitoring and diagnosis, using multivariate projection methods. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 1995, 28:3-21.
13. Anderson T.W. An Introduction to Multivariate Statistical Analysis 2003, Wiley, New Jersey. 3rd ed.
14. Tracy N.D., Young J.C., Mason R.L. Multivariate control charts for individual observations. Journal of Quality Technology 1992, 24:88-95.
15. Jackson J.E. Quality control methods for several related variables. Technometrics 1959, 1:359-377.
16. Kresta J.V., MacGregor J.F., Marlin T.E. Multivariate statistical monitoring of process operating performance. Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering 1991, 69:35-47.
17. MacGregor J.F., Kourti T. Statistical process control of multivariate processes. Control Engineering Practice 1995, 3:403-414.
18. Nelson P.R.C., Taylor P.A., MacGregor J.F. Missing data methods in PCA and PLS: score calculations with incomplete observations. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 1996, 35:45-65.
19. Arteaga F., Ferrer A. Dealing with missing data in MSPC: several methods, different interpretations, some examples. Journal of Chemometrics 2002, 16:408-418.
20. Russell E.L., Chiang L.H., Braatz R.D. Fault detection in industrial processes using canonical variate analysis and dynamic principal component analysis. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 2000, 51:81-93.
21. Chiang L.H., Braatz R.D. Process monitoring using causal map and multivariate statistics: fault detection and identification. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 2003, 65:159-178.
22. Odiowei P.P., Cao Y. State-space independent component analysis for nonlinear dynamic process monitoring. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 2010, 103:59-65.
23. Yin S., Ding S.X., Haghani A., Hao H., Zhang P. A comparison study of basic data-driven fault diagnosis and process monitoring methods on the benchmark Tennessee Eastman process. Journal of Process Control 2012, 22:1567-1581.
24. Lyman P.R., Georgakis C. Plant-wide control of the Tennessee Eastman problem. Computers and Chemical Engineering 1995, 19:321-331.
25. Russell E.L., Chiang L.H., Braatz R.D. Data-Driven Methods for Fault Detection and Diagnosis in Chemical Processes 2000, Springer.
26. Rato T.J., Reis M.S. Defining the structure of DPCA models and its impact on Process Monitoring and Prediction activities. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 2013, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemolab.2013.03.009.
27. Montgomery D.C., Runger G.C. Applied Statistics and Probability for Engineers 2003, John Wiley & Sons Inc.