Multiple-fault diagnosis of the Tennessee Eastman process based on system decomposition and dynamic PLS

Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research

Volumn 43, Issue 25, 2004, Pages 8037-8048

  Lee, Gibaek ^a   Han, Chonghun ^b   Yoon, En Sup ^b  

^a Chungju National University   (South Korea)

^b Seoul National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING; GRAPH THEORY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; RELIABILITY; STATISTICAL METHODS;

MULTIPLE-FAULT DIAGNOSIS; PARTIAL LEAST-SQUARES (PLS); SIGNED GRAPH;

DECOMPOSITION;

FAULT DIAGNOSIS;

ARTICLE; DECOMPOSITION; DIAGNOSIS; METHODOLOGY; PARTIAL LEAST SQUARE ANALYSIS; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RELIABILITY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; SYSTEM ANALYSIS;

EID: 9744237208     PISSN: 08885885     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ie049624u     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Becraft, W. R.; Guo, D. Z.; Lee, P. L.; Newel, R. B. Fault Diagnosis Strategies for Chemical Plants: A Review of Competing Technologies. Proceedings of Process Systems Engineering '91, Montebello, Canada, 1991; Vol. 2, pp 12.1-12.15.
2. Lee, G.; Song, S.-O.; Yoon, E. S. Multiple-Fault Diagnosis Based on System Decomposition and Dynamic PLS. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2003, 42, 6145-6154.
3. Downs, J. J.; Vogel, E. F. A Plant-wide Industrial Process Control Problem. Comput. Chem. Eng. 1993, 17, 245-255.
4. Chiang, L. H.; Russell, E. L.; Braatz, R. D. Fault Detection and Diagnosis in Industrial Systems; Springer: London, 2001.
5. Raich, A.; Çinar, A. Multivariate Statistical Methods for Monitoring Continuous Processes: Assessment of Discrimination Power of Disturbance Models and Diagnosis of Multiple Disturbances. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 1995, 30, 37-48.
6. Gertler, J.; Li, W.; Huang, Y.; McAvoy, T. Isolation Enhanced Principal Component Analysis. AIChE J. 1999, 45, 323-334.
7. Kano, M.; Nagao, K.; Hasebe, S.; Hashimoto, I.; Ohno, H.; Strauss, R.; Bakshi, B. Comparison of Statistical Process Monitoring Methods: Application to the Eastman Challenge Problem. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2000, 24, 175-181.
8. Raich, A.; Çinar, A. Diagnosis of Process Disturbances by Statistical Distance and Angle Measured. Comput. Chem. Eng. 1997, 21, 661-673.
9. Chiang, L. H.; Russell, E. L.; Braatz, R. D. Fault Diagnosis in Chemical Processes Using Fisher Discriminant Analysis, Discriminant Partial Least-Squares, and Principal Component Analysis. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2000, 50, 243-252.
10. Chen, G.; McAvoy, T. J. Predictive On-Line Monitoring of Continuous Processes. J. Process Control 1998, 8, 409-420.
11. Huang, Y.; Gertler, J.; McAvoy, T. J. Sensor and Actuator Fault Isolation by Structured Partial PCA with Nonlinear Extensions. J. Process Control 2000, 10, 459-469.
12. Lin, W.; Qian, Y.; Li, X. Nonlinear Dynamic Principal Component Analysis for On-line Process Monitoring and Diagnosis. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2000, 24, 423-429.
13. Kassidas, A.; Taylor, P. A.; MacGregor, J. F. Off-Line Diagnosis of Deterministic Faults in Continuous Dynamic Multivariable Processes Using Speech Recognition Methods. J. Process Control 1998, 8, 381-393.
14. Chiang, L. H.; Kotanchek, M. E.; Kordon, A. K. Fault Diagnosis Based on Fisher Discriminant Analysis and Support Vector Machines. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2004, 28, 1389-1401.
15. Akbaryan, F.; Bishnoi, P. R. Fault Diagnosis of Multivariate Systems Using Pattern Recognition and Multisensor Data Analysis Technique. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2001, 25, 1313-1339.
16. Chen, J.; Howell, J. Towards Distributed Diagnosis of the Tennessee Eastman Process Benchmark. Control Eng. Pract. 2002, 10, 971-987.
17. Yamashita, Y. Dimensionality Reduction in Computer-Aided Decision Making. Proceedings of Process Systems Engineering 2003, Kunming, China, 2004; Elsevier. Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2004; pp 356-361.
18. Maurya, M. R.; Rengaswamy, R.; Venkatasubramanian, V. Qualitative Trend Analysis of the Principal Components: Application to Fault Diagnosis. Proceedings of Process Systems Engineering 2003, Kunming, China, 2004; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2004; pp 968-973.
19. Baffi, G.; Martin, E. B.; Morris, A. J. Nonlinear Projection to Latent Structures Revisited: The Quadratic PLS Algorithm. Comput. Chem. Eng. 1999, 23, 395-411.
20. Wold, S. Nonlinear Partial Least-Squares Modelling. II. Spline Inner Relation. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 1992, 14, 71-84.
21. Wold, S.; Kettaneh-wold, N.; Skagerberg, B. Nonlinear PLS Modeling. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 1989, 7, 53-65.
22. Qin, S. J.; McAvoy, T. J. Nonlinear Far-IR Modeling via a Neural Net PLS Approach. Comput. Chem. Eng. 1996, 20, 147-159.
23. Holcomb, T. R.; Morari, M. PLS/Neural Networks. Comput. Chem. Eng. 1992, 16, 393-411.
24. Ricker, N. L.; Lee, J. H. Nonlinear Modeling and State Estimation for the Tennessee Eastman Challenge Process. Comput. Chem. Eng. 1995, 19, 983-1005.
25. Ku, W.; Storer, R. H.; Georgakis, C. Disturbance Detection and Isolation by Dynamic Principal Component Analysis. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 1995, 30, 179-196.