Object-centered orienting and IOR

Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

Volumn 76, Issue 8, 2014, Pages 2249-2255

  Theeuwes, Jan ^a   Mathôt, Sebastiaan ^b   Grainger, Jonathan ^b  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

Author keywords

Attention; Attention: object based; Inhibition of return

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMAN; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHYSIOLOGY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; ATTENTION; CUES; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; SPACE PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84930520915     PISSN: 19433921     EISSN: 1943393X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13414-014-0718-z     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 390–412.
2. Boi, M., Vergeer, M., Ogmen, H., & Herzog, M. H. (2011). Nonretinotopic exogenous attention. Current Biology, 21(20), 1732–1737.
3. Boon, P., Theeuwes, J., & Belopolsky, A. (2014). Updating visual-spatial working memory during object movement. Vision Research, 94, 51–57.
4. Burnham, B. R. (2007). Displaywide visual features associated with a search display ’ s appearance can mediate attentional capture. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(3), 392–422.
5. Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Johnston, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 1030–1044.
6. Gibson, B. S., & Egeth, H. (1994). Inhibition of return to object-based and environment-based locations. Perception & Psychophysics, 55, 323–339.
7. Gibson, B. S., & Kelsey, E. M. (1998). Stimulus-driven attentional capture is contingent on attentional set for displaywide visual features. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 699–706.
8. Godijn, R., & Theeuwes, J. (2004). The relationship between inhibition of return and saccade trajectory deviations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 538–554.
9. Handy, T. C., Grafton, S. T., Shroff, V. N. M., Ketay, S., & Gazzaniga, M. S. (2003). Graspable objects grasp attention when the potential for action is recognized. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 421–427.
10. Humphreys, G. W., & Riddoch, M. J. (2001). Detection by action: neuropsychological evidence for action-defined templates in search. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 84–88.
11. Klein, R. M. (1988). Inhibitory tagging system facilitates visual search. Nature, 334, 430–431.
12. Klein, R. M. (2000). Inhibition of return. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 138–147.
13. Lin, Z. (2013). Object-centered representations support flexible exogenous visual attention across translation and reflection. Cognition, 129(2), 221–231.
14. Mathôt, S., & Theeuwes, J. (2010). Gradual Remapping Results in Early Retinotopic and late Spatiotopic Inhibition of Return. Psychological Science, 21, 1793–1798.
15. Mathôt, S., Schreij, D., & Theeuwes, J. (2012). OpenSesame: An Open-source, Graphical Experiment Builder for the Social Sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 44(2), 314–324.
16. Mulckhuyse, M., Talsma, D., & Theeuwes, J. (2007). Grabbing attention without knowing: Automatic capture of attention by subliminal spatial cues. Visual Cognition, 15, 779–788.
17. Peirce, J. W. (2007). PsychoPy: Psychophysics software in Python. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 162(1–2), 8–13. doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2006.11.017
18. Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3–26.
19. Posner, M. I., & Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X: Control of language processes (pp. 531–556). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
20. Pratt, J., Kingstone, A., & Khoe, W. (1997). Inhibition of return in location- and identity-based choice decision tasks. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 964–971.
21. Pratt, J., Sekuler, A. B., & McAuliffe, J. (2001). The role of attentional set on attentional cueing and inhibition of return. Visual Cognition, 8, 33–46.
22. Ratcliff, R. (1993). Methods of dealing with reaction time outliers. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 510–532.
23. Reppa, I., Schmidt, W. C., & Leek, E. C. (2012). Successes and failures in producing attentional object-based cueing effects. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74, 43–69.
24. Schreij, D., Owens, C., & Theeuwes, J. (2008). Abrupt onsets capture attention independent of top-down control settings. Perception & Psychophysics, 70(2), 208–218.
25. Schreij, D., Theeuwes, J., & Olivers, C. N. L. (2010). Irrelevant onsets cause inhibition of return regardless of attentional set. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 72, 1725–1729.
26. Schreij, D., Los, S.A., Theeuwes, J., Enns, J.T., & Olivers, C.N.L. (2014). The interaction between stimulus-driven and goal driven orienting as revealed by eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40, 378–390.
27. Theeuwes, J. (1991). Exogenous and endogenous control of attention: The effect of visual onsets and offsets. Perception & Psychophysics, 49, 83–90.
28. Theeuwes, J. (1994). Stimulus-driven capture and attentional set: Selective search for color and visual abrupt onsets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 799–806.
29. Theeuwes, J. (2010). Top-down and bottom-up control of visual selection. Acta Psychologica, 123, 77–99.
30. Theeuwes, J., & Chen, C. Y. D. (2005). Attentional capture and inhibition (of return): the effect on perceptual sensitivity. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 1305–1312.
31. Theeuwes, J., & Godijn, R. (2002). Irrelevant singletons capture attention: evidence from inhibition of return. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 764–770.
32. Theeuwes, J., Mathôt, S., & Grainger, J. (2013). Exogenous object-centered attention. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 75, 812–818.
33. Tipper, S. P., Driver, J., & Weaver, B. (1991). Object-centered inhibition of return of visual attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43A, 289–298.
34. Tipper, S. P., Weaver, B., Jerreat, L. M., & Burak, A. L. (1994). Object based and environment-based inhibition of return of visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 478–499.
35. Tipper, S. P., Jordan, H., & Weaver, B. (1999). Scene-based and object-centered inhibition of return: evidence for dual orienting mechanisms. Perception & Psychophysics, 61(1), 50–60.
36. Ungerleider, L. G., & Mishkin, M. (1982). Two cortical visual systems. In D. J. Ingle, M. A. Goodale, & R. J. W. Mansfield (Eds.), Analysis of visual behavior (pp. 549–586). Cambridge: MIT Press.
37. Yantis, S., & Serences, J. (2003). Neural mechanisms of space-based and object based attentional control. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 13, 187–193.