Object-centered representations support flexible exogenous visual attention across translation and reflection

Cognition

Volumn 129, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 221-231

  Lin, Zhicheng ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Exogenous attention; Mirror images; Non retinotopic processing; Object centered representation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CONFUSION; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; EYE MOVEMENT; HUMAN; LUMINANCE; MOTION; OBJECT MANIPULATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REACTION TIME; VISION; VISUAL ORIENTATION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EXOGENOUS ATTENTION; MIRROR IMAGES; NON-RETINOTOPIC PROCESSING; OBJECT-CENTERED REPRESENTATION;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ATTENTION; CUES; GENERALIZATION (PSYCHOLOGY); HUMANS; MOTION PERCEPTION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; VISUAL FIELDS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 84881619904     PISSN: 00100277     EISSN: 18737838     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.07.001     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Abrams R.A., Dobkin R.S. Inhibition of return: Effects of attentional cuing on eye movement latencies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1994, 20(3):467-477.
2. Awh E., Dhaliwal H., Christensen S., Matsukura M. Evidence for two components of object-based selection. Psychological Science 2001, 12(4):329-334.
3. Barrett D.J., Bradshaw M.F., Rose D. Endogenous shifts of covert attention operate within multiple coordinate frames: Evidence from a feature-priming task. Perception 2003, 32(1):41-52.
4. Barrett D.J., Bradshaw M.F., Rose D., Everatt J., Simpson P.J. Reflexive shifts of covert attention operate in an egocentric coordinate frame. Perception 2001, 30(9):1083-1091.
5. Boi, M., Ogmen, H., Krummenacher, J., Otto, T. U., & Herzog, M. H. (2009). A (fascinating) litmus test for human retino- vs. non-retinotopic processing. Journal of Vision, 9(13), 5 1-11.
6. Boi M., Vergeer M., Ogmen H., Herzog M.H. Nonretinotopic exogenous attention. Current Biology 2011, 21(20):1732-1737.
7. Brainard D.H. The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision 1997, 10(4):433-436.
8. Carrasco M. Visual attention: the past 25 years. Vision Research 2011, 51(13):1484-1525.
9. Carrasco M., Ling S., Read S. Attention alters appearance. Nature Neuroscience 2004, 7(3):308-313.
10. Corballis M.C., Beale I.L. The psychology of left and right 1976, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
11. Corbetta M., Shulman G.L. Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2002, 3(3):201-215.
12. Duncan J. Selective attention and the organization of visual information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1984, 113(4):501-517.
13. Egeth H.E., Yantis S. Visual attention: Control, representation, and time course. Annual Review of Psychology 1997, 48:269-297.
14. Egly R., Driver J., Rafal R.D. Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: Evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1994, 123(2):161-177.
15. Folk C.L., Remington R.W., Johnston J.C. Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1992, 18(4):1030-1044.
16. Gross C.G., bornstein M.H. Left and right in science and art. Leonardo 1978, 11:29-38.
17. Guzman-Martinez E., Leung P., Franconeri S., Grabowecky M., Suzuki S. Rapid eye-fixation training without eyetracking. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2009, 16(3):491-496.
18. Kahneman D., Treisman A., Gibbs B.J. The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information. Cognitive Psychology 1992, 24(2):175-219.
19. Kramer A.F., Jacobson A. Perceptual organization and focused attention: The role of objects and proximity in visual processing. Perception and Psychophysics 1991, 50(3):267-284.
20. Kristjansson A., Mackeben M., Nakayama K. Rapid, object-based learning in the deployment of transient attention. Perception 2001, 30(11):1375-1387.
21. Kristjansson A., Nakayama K. A primitive memory system for the deployment of transient attention. Perception and Psychophysics 2003, 65(5):711-724.
22. Lavie N., Lin Z., Zokaei N., Thoma V. The role of perceptual load in object recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2009, 35(5):1346-1358.
23. Lin, Z. (in preparation-a). Spontaneous object-centered spatial coding: A perceptual foundation of visuospatial perspective-taking.
24. Lin, Z. (in preparation-b). Voluntary spatial attention induces retinotopic facilitation and object-centered suppression.
25. Lin, Z., & Murray, S. O. (in preparation-a). Postdictive visual priming: Target representations retrospectively determine visual priming through a context-centered mechanism.
26. Lin, Z., & Murray, S. O. (in preparation-b). Visible propagation from invisible exogenous cueing.
27. Lin Z., He S. Automatic frame-centered object representation and integration revealed by iconic memory, visual priming, and backward masking. Journal of Vision 2012, 12(11):1-18.
28. Matsukura M., Vecera S.P. Interference between object-based attention and object-based memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2009, 16(3):529-536.
29. Mayfrank L., Kimmig H., Fischer B. The role of attention in the preparation of visually guided saccadic eye movements in man. Eye movements: From physiology to cognition 1987, 37-45. North-Holland, New York. J.K. O'Regan, B.A. Levy-Schoen (Eds.).
30. Mortier K., Donk M., Theeuwes J. Attentional capture within and between objects. Acta Psychology (Amst) 2003, 113(2):133-145.
31. Mulckhuyse M., Talsma D., Theeuwes J. Grabbing attention without knowing: Automatic capture of attention by subliminal spatial cues. Visual Cognition 2007, 15(7):779-788.
32. Nakayama K., Mackeben M. Sustained and transient components of focal visual attention. Vision Research 1989, 29(11):1631-1647.
33. Palmer J. Set-size effects in visual search: The effect of attention is independent of the stimulus for simple tasks. Vision Research 1994, 34(13):1703-1721.
34. Pelli D.G. The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision 1997, 10(4):437-442.
35. Posner M.I. Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1980, 32:3-26.
36. Ro T., Rafal R.D. Components of reflexive visual orienting to moving objects. Perception and Psychophysics 1999, 61(5):826-836.
37. Rudel R.G., Teuber H.L. Discrimination of direction of line in children. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 1963, 56:892-898.
38. Schreij D., Olivers C.N. Object representations maintain attentional control settings across space and time. Cognition 2009, 113(1):111-116.
39. Shiu L.P., Pashler H. Negligible effect of spatial precuing on identification of single digits. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1994, 20(5):1037-1054.
40. Stankiewicz B.J., Hummel J.E., Cooper E.E. The role of attention in priming for left-right reflections of object images: Evidence for a dual representation of object shape. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1998, 24(3):732-744.
41. Sutherland N.S. Visual discrimination of orientation and shape by the octopus. Nature 1957, 179:11-13.
42. Theeuwes J. Top-down and bottom-up control of visual selection. Acta Psychologica 2010, 135(2):77-99.
43. Tipper S.P., Rafal R., Reuter-Lorenz P.A., Starrveldt Y., Ro T., Egly R., et al. Object-based facilitation and inhibition from visual orienting in the human split-brain. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1997, 23(5):1522-1532.
44. Treisman A. Perceiving and re-perceiving objects. American Psychologist 1992, 47(7):862-875.
45. Umilta C., Castiello U., Fontana M., Vestri A. Object-centred orienting of attention. Visual Cognition 1995, 2(2/3):165-181.
46. Vecera S.P., Farah M.J. Does visual attention select objects or locations?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1994, 123(2):146-160.
47. Weyl H. Symmetry 1952, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.