Erratum to Exogenous object-centered attention (Atten Percept Psychophys, 10.3758/s13414-013-0459-4);Exogenous object-centered attention

Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

Volumn 75, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 812-818

  Theeuwes, Jan ^a   Mathôt, Sebastiaan ^b   Grainger, Jonathan ^b  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

Attention; Attention: Object based; Attentional capture

Indexed keywords

EID: 84879426556     PISSN: 19433921     EISSN: 1943393X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13414-013-0621-z     Document Type: Erratum

References (31)

1. Boi, M., Vergeer, M., Ogmen, H., & Herzog, M. H. (2011). Nonretinotopic exogenous attention. Current Biology, 21(20), 1732-1737.
2. Breitmeyer, B. C., & Ganz, L. (1976). Implications of sustained and transient channels for theories of visual pattern masking, saccadic suppression, and information processing. Psychological Review, 83, 1-36.
3. Cousineau, D. (2005). Confidence intervals in within-subject designs: A simpler solution to Loftus and Masson's method. Tutorial in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 1, 4-45.
4. Driver, J., & Halligan, P. W. (1991). Can visual neglect operate in object-centred co-ordinates? An affirmative single-case study. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 8, 475-496.
5. Egly, R., Driver, J., & Rafal, R. D. (1994). Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: Evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 123, 161-177.
6. Golomb, J. D., Chun, M. M., & Mazer, J. A. (2008). The native coordinate system of spatial attention is retinotopic. Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 10654.
7. Golomb, J. D., & Kanwisher, N. (2012). Higher-level visual cortex represents retinotopic, not spatiotopic, object location. Cerebral Cortex, 10, 1093.
8. Haxby, J. V., Grady, C. L., Horwitz, B., Ungerleider, L. G., Mishkin, M., Carson, R. E., et al. (1991). Dissociation of object and spatial visual processing pathways in human extrastriate cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 88, 1621-1625.
9. Mathôt, S., Schreij, D., & Theeuwes, J. (2012). OpenSesame: An open-source, graphical experiment builder for the social sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 44(2), 314-324.
10. Mathôt, S., & Theeuwes, J. (2010a). Evidence for the predictive remapping of visual attention. Experimental Brain Research, 200, 117-122.
11. Mathôt, S., & Theeuwes, J. (2010b). Gradual remapping results in early retinotopic and late spatiotopic inhibition of return. Psychological Science, 21, 1793-1798.
12. Mathôt, S., & Theeuwes, J. (2011). Visual attention and stability. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 366, 516-527.
13. Mathôt, S., & Theeuwes, J. (2012). It's all about the transient: Intra-saccadic onset stimuli do not capture attention. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 5(2), e4.
14. Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3-26.
15. Posner, M. I., & Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X: Control of language processes (pp. 531-556). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
16. Reppa, I., Schmidt, W. C., & Leek, E. C. (2012). Successes and failures in producing attentional object-based cueing effects. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74, 43-69.
17. Schreij, D., Owens, C., & Theeuwes, J. (2008). Abrupt onsets capture attention independent of top-down control settings. Perception & Psychophysics, 70(2), 208-218.
18. Theeuwes, J. (1991). Exogenous and endogenous control of attention: The effect of visual onsets and offsets. Perception & Psychophysics, 49, 83-90.
19. Theeuwes, J. (1994). Stimulus-driven capture and attentional set: Selective search for color and visual abrupt onsets. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 20, 799-806.
20. Theeuwes, J. (1995). Abrupt luminance change pops-out; Abrupt color change does not. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 637-644.
21. Theeuwes, J. (2010). Top-down and bottom-up control of visual selection. Acta Psychologica, 123, 77-99.
22. Tipper, S. P., Driver, J., & Weaver, B. (1991). Object-centered inhibition of return of visual attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43A, 289-298.
23. Tipper, S. P., Jordan, H., & Weaver, B. (1999). Scene-based and object-centered inhibition of return: evidence for dual orienting mechanisms. Perception & Psychophysics, 61(1), 50-60.
24. Tipper, S. P., Weaver, B., Jerreat, L. M., & Burak, A. L. (1994). Object based and environment-based inhibition of return of visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 20, 478-499.
25. Todd, J. T., & van Gelder, P. (1979). Implications of a sustained-transient dichotomy for the measurement of human performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 5, 625-638.
26. Ungerleider, L. G., & Haxby, J. V. (1994). 'What' and 'where' in the human brain. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 4, 157-165. t.
27. Ungerleider, L. G., & Mishkin, M. (1982). Two cortical visual systems. In D. J. Ingle, M. A. Goodale, & R. J. W. Mansfield (Eds.), Analysis of visual behavior (pp. 549-586). Cambridge: MIT Press.
28. Vecera, S. P. (1994). Grouped locations and object-based attention: Comment on Egly, Driver, and Rafal (1994). Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 123, 316-320.
29. Yantis, S., & Egeth, H. E. (1999). On the distinction between visual salience and stimulus-driven attentional capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 661-676.
30. Yantis, S., & Jonides, J. (1984). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Evidence from selective search. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 10, 601-621.
31. Yantis, S., & Serences, J. (2003). Neural mechanisms of space-based and object based attentional control. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 13, 187-193.