Irrelevant onsets cause inhibition of return regardless of attentional set

Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

Volumn 72, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 1725-1729

  Schreij, Daniel ^a   Theeuwes, Jan ^a   Olivers, Christian N L ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; COLOR VISION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; EYE FIXATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; REACTION TIME;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTENTION; COLOR PERCEPTION; CUES; FEMALE; FIXATION, OCULAR; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; REACTION TIME; SPACE PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77958454270     PISSN: 19433921     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/APP.72.7.1725     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Belopolsky, A. V., Schreij, D., & Theeuwes, J. (2010). What is topdown about contingent capture? Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72, 326-341.
2. Bennett, P. J., & Pratt, J. (2001). The spatial distribution of inhibition of return. Psychological Science, 12, 76-80.
3. Berlucchi, G. (2006). Inhibition of return: A phenomenon in search of a mechanism and a better name. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 23, 1065-1074.
4. Berlucchi, G., Chelazzi, L., & Tassinari, G. (2000). Volitional covert orienting to a peripheral cue does not suppress cue-induced inhibition of return. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 648-663.
5. Enns, J. T., Austen, E. L., Di Lollo, V., Rauschenberger, R., & Yantis, S. (2001). New objects dominate luminance transients in setting attentional priority. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 27, 1287-1302.
6. Folk, C. L., & Remington, R. (1998). Selectivity in distraction by irrelevant featural singletons: Evidence for two forms of attentional capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 847-858.
7. Folk, C. L., & Remington, R. (2006). Top-down modulation of preattentive processing: Testing the recovery account of contingent capture. Visual Cognition, 14, 445-465.
8. Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Johnston, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 1030-1044.
9. Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Wu, S.-C. (2009). Additivity of abrupt onset effects supports nonspatial distraction, not the capture of spatial attention. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71, 308-313.
10. Gibson, B. S., & Amelio, J. (2000). Inhibition of return and attentional control settings. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 496-504.
11. Kahneman, D., Treisman, A., & Burkell, J. (1983). The cost of visual filtering. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 9, 510-522.
12. Klein, R. M. (2000). Inhibition of return. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 138-147.
13. Posner, M. I., & Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. Attention and performance X: Control of language processes (pp. 531-556). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. Pratt, J., & McAuliffe, J. (2002). Determining whether attentional control settings are inclusive or exclusive. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 1361-1370.
15. Pratt, J., Sekuler, A. B., & McAuliffe, J. (2001). The role of attentional set on attentional cueing and inhibition of return. Visual Cognition, 8, 33-46.
16. Rafal, R. D., Calabresi, P. A., Brennan, C. W., & Sciolto, T. K. (1989). Saccade preparation inhibits reorienting to recently attended locations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 15, 673-685.
17. Schreij, D., Owens, C., & Theeuwes, J. (2008). Abrupt onsets capture attention independent of top-down control settings. Perception & Psychophysics, 70, 208-218.
18. Schreij, D., Theeuwes, J., & Olivers, C. N. L. (2010). Abrupt onsets capture attention independent of top-down control settings II: Additivity is no evidence for filtering. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72, 672-682.
19. Theeuwes, J., & Godijn, R. (2002). Irrelevant singletons capture attention: Evidence from inhibition of return. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 764-770.
20. Tipper, S. P., Weaver, B., Jerreat, L. M., & Burak, A. L. (1994). Object-based and environment-based inhibition of return of visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 478-499.
21. Weger, U. W., Abrams, R. A., Law, M. B., & Pratt, J. (2008). Attending to objects: Endogenous cues can produce inhibition of return. Visual Cognition, 16, 659-674.
22. Yantis, S., & Jonides, J. (1984). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Evidence from visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 10, 601-621.