Inhibition of return in location- And identity-based choice decision tasks

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 59, Issue 6, 1997, Pages 964-971

  Pratt, Jay ^a   Kingstone, Alan ^b   Khoe, Wayne ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME;

CHOICE BEHAVIOR; DECISION MAKING; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); REACTION TIME;

EID: 0031203981     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03205511     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. ABRAMS, R. A., & DOBKIN, R. S. (1994). Inhibition of return: Effects of attentional cuing on eye movement latencies. Journal of Experimental Psvchology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 467-477.
2. GIBSON, B. S., & EGETH, H. (1994). Inhibition of return to object-based and environment-based locations. Perception & Psychophysics, 55, 323-339.
3. KLEIN, R., & TAYLOR, T. L. (1994). Categories of cognitive inhibition with reference to attention. In D. Dagenbach & T. Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp. 113-150). New York: Academic Press.
4. MAYLOR, E. A. (1985). Facilitatory and inhibitory components of orienting in visual space. In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.), Attention and performance XI (pp. 189-204). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. MAYLOR, E. A., & HOCKEY, R. (1987). Effects of repetition on the facilitatory and inhibitory components of orienting in visual space. Neuropsychologia, 25, 41-54.
6. MÜLLER, H. J., & VON MÜHLENEN, A. (1996). Attentional tracking and inhibition of return in dynamic displays. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 224-249.
7. POSNER, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3-25.
8. POSNER, M. I.,& COHEN, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X (pp. 531-556). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. PRATT, J. (1995). Inhibition of return in a discrimination task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 117-120.
10. PRATT, J., & ABRAMS, R. A. (1995). Inhibition of return to successively cued spatial locations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 1343-1353.
11. RAFAL, R. D., CALABRESI, P. A., BRENNAN, C. W., & SCIOLTO, T. K. (1989). Saccade preparation inhibits reorienting to recently attended locations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 15, 673-685.
12. REUTER-LORENZ, P. A., JHA, A. P., & ROSENQUIST, J. N. (1996). What is inhibited in inhibition of return? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 22, 367-378.
13. TERRY, K. M., VALDES, L. A., & NEILL, W. T. (1994). Does °inhibition of return° occur in discrimination tasks? Perception & Psvchophysics, 55, 279-286.
14. TIPPER, S. P., DRIVER, J., & WEAVER, B. (1991). Object-centered inhibition of return of visual attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43A, 289-298.
15. TIPPER, S. P., WEAVER, B., JERREAT, L. M., & BURAK, A. L. (1994). Object-and environment-based inhibition of return of visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 478-499.
16. VAUGHAN, J. (1984). Saccades directed at previously attended locations in space. In A. G. Gale & F. Johnson (Eds.), Theoretical and applied aspects of eye movement research (pp. 143-150). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
17. YANTIS, S. (1993). Stimulus-driven attentional capture. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2, 156-161.