How humans learn to think mathematically: Exploring the three worlds of mathematics

How Humans Learn to Think Mathematically: Exploring the Three Worlds of Mathematics

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 1-457

  Tall, David ^a  

^a LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84929674772     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139565202     Document Type: Book

References (239)

1. Akkoc, H., & Tall, D. O. (2002). The simplicity, complexity and complication of the function concept. In Anne D. Cockburn & Elena Nardi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 2, 25–32. Norwich, UK.
2. Alcock, L. J., & Simpson, A. P. (2004). Convergence of sequences and series: Interactions between visual reasoning and the learner's beliefs about their own role. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 57, 1–32.
3. Alcock, L. J., (2005). Convergence of sequences and series 2: Interactions between non-visual reasoning and the learner's beliefs about their own role. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 58, 77–110.
4. Alcock, L., & Weber, K. (2004). Semantic and syntactic proof productions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 56, 209–34.
5. Alexander, L., & Martray, C. (1989). The development of an abbreviated version of the Mathematics Anxiety Rating Scale. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 22, 143–50.
6. Argand, R. (1806). Essai sur une manière de représenter les quantités imaginaires dans les constructions géométriques. 1st ed., Paris. 2nd ed. reprinted, Paris: Albert Blanchard, 1971.
7. Ashcraft, M. H., & Kirk, E. P. (2001). The relationships among working memory, math anxiety, and performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 130 (2), 224–37.
8. Asiala, M., Brown, A., DeVries, D., Dubinsky, E., Mathews, D., & Thomas, K. (1996). A framework for research and curriculum development in undergraduate mathematics education. Research in Collegiate Mathematics Education II, CBMS Issues in Mathematics Education, 6, 1–32.
9. Askew, M., Brown, M., Rhodes, V., Johnson, D., & Wiliam, D. (1997). Effective Teachers of Numeracy, Final Report of a Study Carried Out for the Teacher Training Agency 1995–96 by the School of Education, King's College, London.
10. Atiyah, M. F. (2004). Collected Works. Vol. 6. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
11. Ausubel, D. P., Novak, J., & Hanesian, H. (1978). Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
12. Bachelard, G. (1938, reprinted 1983). La formation de l’esprit scientii que. Paris: J. Vrin.
13. Bakar, M. N., & Tall, D. O. (1992). Students’ mental prototypes for functions and graphs. International Journal of Mathematics Education in Science & Technology, 23 (1), 39–50.
14. Baron, R., Earhard, B., & Ozier, M. (1995). Psychology (Canadian edition). Scarborough, ON: Allyn & Bacon.
15. Baroody, A. J., & Costlick, R. T. (1998). Fostering Children's Mathematical power: An Investigative Approach to K–8 Mathematics Instruction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16. Barrow, I. (1670). Lectiones Geometricae, translated by Child (1916). The Geometrical Lectures of Isaac Barrow. Chicago and London: OpenCourt.
17. Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. Bayazit, I. (2006). The Relationship between Teaching and Learning the Function Concept. PhD thesis, University of Warwick.
19. Berkeley, G. (1734). The Analyst (ed. D. R. Wilkins, 2002). Retrieved from www.maths.tcd.ie/pub/HistMath/People/Berkeley/Analyst/Analyst.pdf (Accessed April 21, 2012).
20. Bernstein, A., & Robinson, A. (1966). Solution of an invariant subspace problem of K. T. Smith and P. R. Halmos. Pacific Journal of Mathematics, 16 (3), 421–31.
21. Beth, E. W., & Piaget, J. (1966). Mathematical Epistemology and Psychology, trans. by W. Mays. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel.
22. Betz, N. (1978). Prevalence, distribution, and correlates of math anxiety in college students. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 25 (5), 441–8.
23. Biggs, J., & Collis, K. (1982). Evaluating the Quality of Learning: The SOLO Taxonomy. New York: Academic Press.
24. Birkhoff, G., & MacLane, S. (1999). Algebra (3rd ed.). Providence RI: Chelsea Publishing Co., American Mathematical Society.
25. Bitner, J., Austin, S., & Wadlington, E. (1994). A comparison of math anxiety in traditional and nontraditional developmental college students. Research and Teaching in Developmental Education, 10 (2), 35–43.
26. Blokland, P., & Giessen, C. (2000). Graphic Calculus for Windows. Retrieved from: http://www.vusoft2.nl (Accessed February 19, 2013).
27. Boyer, C. B. (1923 /1939). The History of the Calculus and Its Conceptual Development. Reprinted by Dover, New York.
28. Breidenbach, D., Dubinsky, E., Hawks, J., & Nichols, D. (1992). Development of the process conception of function. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 23, 247–85.
29. Bruner, J. S. (1966). Towards a Theory of Instruction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
30. Bruner, J. S. (1977). The Process of Education (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
31. Burn, R. P. (1992). Numbers and Functions: Steps into Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32. Burns, M. (1998). Math: Facing an American Phobia. Sausalito, CA: Math Solutions Publications.
33. Burton, L. (2002). Recognising commonalities and reconciling differences in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 50 (2), 157–75.
34. Byers, W. (2007). How Mathematicians Think. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
35. Campbell, K., & Evans, C. (1997). Gender issues in the classroom: A comparison of mathematics anxiety. Education, 117 (3), 332–9.
36. Cantor, G. (1872). Uber die Ausdehnung eines Satzes aus der Theorie der trigonometrischen Reihen. Mathematische Annalen, 5, 123–32. Reproduced in G. Cantor, Gesammelte Abhandlungen mathematischen und philosophischen Inhalts, ed. E. Zermelo. Berlin: J. Springer, 1932, pp. 92–102. Reprinted Hildesheim: Olms.
37. Cardano, G. (1545). Ars magna. Translated and published as Ars Magna or The Rules of Algebra (1993). New York: Dover.
38. Chace, A. B. (1927–1929). The Rhind Mathematical Papyrus: Free Translation and Commentary with Selected Photographs, Translations, Transliterations and Literal Translations. Classics in Mathematics Education 8. 2 vols. Oberlin: Mathematical Association of America. (Reprinted Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 1979).
39. Challenger, M. (2009). From Triangles to a Concept: A Phenomenographic Study of A–level Students’ Development of the Concept of Trigonometry. PhD thesis, University of Warwick.
40. Chin, E. T. (2002). Building and Using Concepts of Equivalence Class and Partition. PhD thesis, University of Warwick.
41. Chin, E. T., & Tall, D. O. (2001). Developing formal mathematical concepts over time. In M. van den Heuvel-Panhuizen (Ed.), Proceedings of the 25th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 2, 241–8. Norwich, UK.
42. Chin, E. T., (2002). University students embodiment of quantii er. In Anne D. Cockburn & Elena Nardi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 4, 273–80. Norwich, UK.
43. Chin, K. E., & Tall, D. O. (2012). Making sense of mathematics through perception, operation and reason: The case of trigonometric functions. Proceedings of the 36th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 4, 264. Full paper http://homepages.warwick.ac.uk/staff/David. Tall/pdfs/dot2012c-chin-making-sense.pdf (Accessed February 18, 2013).
44. Clement, J., Lochhead, J., & Monk, G. S. (1981). Translation difi culties in learning mathematics. American Mathematics Monthly, 4, 286–90.
45. Clements, D. H., & Battista, M. T. (1992). Geometry and spatial reasoning. In D. Grouws (Ed.) Handbook of Research on Teaching and Learning Mathematics (pp. 420–64). New York: Macmillan.
46. Collis, K. F. (1978). Operational thinking in elementary mathematics. In J. A. Keats, K. F. Collis, & G. S. Halford (Eds.), Cognitive Development: Research Based on a Neo-Piagetian approach. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
47. Cornu, B. (1981). Apprentissage de la notion de limite: Modèles spontanées et modèles propres, Actes du Cinquième Colloque du Groupe Internationale PME, Grenoble, France, 322–6.
48. Cornu, B. (1991). Limits. In D. O. Tall (Ed.), Advanced Mathematical Thinking (pp. 153–66). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
49. Cottrill, J., Dubinsky, E., Nichols, D., Schwingendorf, K., Thomas, K., & Vidakovic, D. (1996). Understanding the limit concept: Beginning with a coordinated process scheme. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 15 (2), 167–92.
50. Courant, R. (1937). Differential and Integral Calculus. Vol. I. Translated from the German by E. J. McShane. Reprint of the second edition (1988). Wiley Classics Library. New York: Wiley-Interscience.
51. Craats, J. van de (2007). Contexten en eindexamens. Euclides 82 (7), 261–6.
52. Crick, F. (1994). The Astonishing Hypothesis. London: Simon & Schuster.
53. Davis, P. J., & Hersh, R. (1981). The Mathematical Experience. Boston: Houghton Miflin.
54. Davis, R. B. (1984). Learning Mathematics: The Cognitive Science Approach to Mathematics Education. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
55. Deacon, T. (1997). The Symbolic Species: The Co-evolution of Language and the Human Brain. London: Penguin.
56. Dedekind, R. (1872). Stetigkeit und irrationale Zahlen. Braunschweig: Vieweg. Reproduced in R. Dedekind, Gesammelte mathematische Werke, eds. R. Fricke, E. Noether, & O. Ore. Braunschweig: Vieweg, 1930–1932.
57. DeMarois, P. (1998). Facets and Layers of the Function Concept: The Case of College Algebra. PhD thesis, University of Warwick.
58. De Morgan, A. (1831). On the Study and Difi culties of Mathematics. London: Society for the Diffusion of Useful Knowledge.
59. Descartes, R. (1641). Meditations on First Philosophy In The Philosophical Writings of RenéDescartes, trans. by J. Cottingham, R. Stoothoff, & D. Murdoch, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.
60. Descartes, R. (1954). The Geometry of RenéDescartes, trans. by D. E. Smith & M. L. Latham. New York: Dover.
61. Dienes, Z. P. (1960). Building Up Mathematics. London: Hutchinson.
62. Donald, M. (2001). A Mind So Rare. New York: W. W. Norton.
63. Dufi n, J. M., & Simpson, A. P. (1993). Natural, conflicting and alien. Journal of Mathematical Behaviour, 12 (4), 313–28.
64. Duval, R. (1995). Sémiosis et pensée humaine. Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang.
65. Edelman, G. M. (1992). Bright air, brilliant i re. New York: Basic Books.
66. Ernest, P. (1998). Social Constructivism as a Philosophy of Mathematics. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
67. Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2002). The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind's Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books.
68. Feynman, R. (1985). Surely You’re joking Mr Feynman. New York: W. W. Norton. Reprinted 1992, London: Vintage.
69. Filloy, E., & Rojano, T. (1989). Solving equations: The transition from arithmetic to algebra. For the Learning of Mathematics, 9 (2), 19–25.
70. Fischbein, E. (1987). Intuition in Science and Mathematics: An Educational Approach. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
71. Foster, R. (2001). Children's Use of Apparatus in the Development of the Concept of Number. PhD thesis, University of Warwick.
72. Freudenthal, H. (1983). Didactic Phenomenology of Mathematical Structures. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel.
73. Furner, J. M., & Berman, B. T. (2003). Math anxiety: Overcoming a major obstacle to the improvement of student math performance. Childhood Education, Spring, 170–4.
74. Gauss, K. (1831). Theory of biquadratic residues, part 2. lecture presented to the Royal Society, Gottingen, April 23, 1831.
75. Glasersfeld, E. von (1995). Radical Constructivism. London: Routledge Falmer.
76. Gleason, A. M., & Hughes-Hallett, D. (1994). Calculus. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
77. Gödel, K. (1931). Über formal unentscheidbare Sätze der Principia Mathematica und verwandter Systeme, Monatshefte für Mathematik und Physik. Vol. 38. Available in English at http://home.ddc.net/ygg/etext/godel/ (Accessed February 19, 2013).
78. Gray, E. M. (1993). Qualitatively Different Approaches to Simple Arithmetic. PhD thesis, University of Warwick.
79. Gray, E. M., Pitta, D., Pinto, M. M. F., & Tall, D. O. (1999). Knowledge construction and diverging thinking in elementary and advanced mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 38 (1–3), 111–33.
80. Gray, E. M., & Tall, D. O. (1991). Duality, ambiguity & l exibility in successful mathematical thinking In Proceedings of the 15th Conference for the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 2, 72–9, Assisi, Italy.
81. Gray, E. M., (1994). Duality, ambiguity and l exibility: A proceptual view of simple arithmetic. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26 (2), 115–41.
82. Gray, E. M., (2001). Relationships between embodied objects and symbolic procepts: An explanatory theory of success and failure in mathematics. In Marja van den Heuvel-Panhuizen (Ed.), Proceedings of the 25th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 3, 65–72. Utrecht, The Netherlands.
83. Grice, H. P. (1989). Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
84. Gutiérrez, A., Jaime, A., & Fortuny, J. (1991). An alternative paradigm to evaluate the acquisition of the Van Hiele levels. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22 (3), 237–51.
85. Hadamard, J. (1945). The Psychology of Invention in the Mathematical Field. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Dover edition, New York, 1954.
86. Halmos, P. (1966). Invariant subspaces for polynomially compact operators. Pacific Journal of Mathematics, 16 (3), 433–7.
87. Hart, K. M., Johnson, D. C., Brown, M., Dickson, L., & Clarkson, R. (1989). Children's Mathematical Frameworks 8–13: A Study of Classroom Teaching. London: Routledge (formerly NFER Nelson).
88. Heath, T. L. (1921). History of Greek Mathematics. Vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Reprinted Dover Publications, New York, 1963.
89. Hembree, R. (1990). The nature, effects, and relief of mathematics anxiety. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21 (1), 33–46.
90. Herrmann, E., Call, J., Hernàndez-Lloreda, M. V., Hare, B., & Tomasello, M. (2007). Humans have evolved specialized skills of social cognition: The cultural intelligence hypothesis. Science, September 7, 2007, 317, 1360–6. Retrieved from: http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/reprint/317/5843/1360.pdf (Accessed April 6, 2012).
91. Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. van den (1998). Realistic Mathematics Education. Work in progress, Text based on the NORMA-lecture held in Kristiansand, Norway on June 5–9, 1998, Freudenthal Institute. Retrieved frpm: http://www.i.uu.nl/en/ rme/ (Accessed July 13, 2012).
92. Hiebert, J., & Lefevre, P. (1986). Procedural and conceptual knowle
93. dge. In J. Hiebert (Ed.), Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge: The Case of Mathematics (pp. 1–27). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
94. Hilbert, D. (1900). Mathematische Probleme. Göttingen Nachrichten, 253–97.
95. Hilbert, D. (1926).über das Unendliche. Mathematische Annalen (95), 161–90.
96. Hoffer, A. (1981). Geometry is more than proof. Mathematics Teacher, 74, 11–18.
97. Horgan, J. (1994). Proi le: Andre Weill, great French-born mathematician, Scientii c American, 270 (6), June 1994, 33–34.
98. Howat, H. (2006). Participation in Elementary Mathematics: An Analysis of Engagement, Attainment and Intervention. PhD thesis, University of Warwick.
99. Howson, G. C. (1982). A History of Mathematics Education in England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
100. Hughes-Hallett, D. (1991). Visualization and Calculus Reform. In W. Zimmermann & S. Cunningham (eds.), Visualization in Teaching and Learning Mathematics, MAA Notes No. 19, 121–126.
101. Inglis, M., Mejia-Ramos, J. P., & Simpson, A. P. (2007). Modelling mathematical argumentation: The importance of qualii cation. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66 (7), 3–21.
102. Inoue, S., & Matsuzawa, T. (2007). Working memory of numerals in chimpanzees. Current Biology, 17 (23), R1004–R1005.
103. Jackson, C., & Lefi ngwell, R. (1999). The role of instructors in creating math anxiety in students from kindergarten through college. Mathematics Teacher, 92 (7), 583–7.
104. James, W. (1890). The Principles of Psychology. Vols. I & II. New York: Henry Holt.
105. Johnson, D. C. (Ed.) (1989): Children's Mathematical Frameworks 8–13: A Study of Classroom Teaching. Windsor, UK: NFER-Nelson.
106. Jones, W. (2001). Applying psychology to the teaching of basic math: A case study. Inquiry, 6 (2), 60–5.
107. Jowett, B. (1871). Plato's The Republic. New York: Scribner ’ s Sons.
108. Joyce, D. E. (1998). Euclid's Elements. Retrieved from http://aleph0.clarku. edu/∼djoyce/java/elements/elements.html on 26th March 2012.
109. Kant, E. (1781). Kritik der reinen Vernunft (Critique of Pure Reason). Königsberg, Germany.
110. Katz, M., & Tall, D. O. (2012). The tension between intuitive ini nitesimals and formal analysis. In Bharath Sriraman (Ed.), Crossroads in the History of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (pp. 71–90). The Montana Mathematics Enthusiast Monographs in Mathematics Education 12. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
111. Keisler, H. J. (1976). Foundations of Infinitesimal Calculus. Boston: Prindle, Weber & Schmidt.
112. Kerslake, D. (1986). Fractions: Children's Strategies and Errors. London: NFER-Nelson.
113. Koichu, B. (2008). On considerations of parsimony in mathematical problem solving. In O. Figueras, J. L. Cortina, S. Alatorre, T. Rojano, & A. Sepulova (Eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Vol. 3 (pp. 273–80), Morelia, Mexico.
114. Koichu, B., & Berman, A. (2005). When do gifted high school students use geometry to solve geometry problems? The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 16 (4), 168–79.
115. Kollar, D. (2000). Article in the Sacramento Bee (California), December 11, 2000.
116. Krutetskii, V. A. (1976). The Psychology of Mathematical Abilities in Schoolchildren. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
117. Kuhn, T. (1962). The Structure of Scientii c Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
118. Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
119. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
120. Lakoff, G., (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.
121. Lakoff, G. & Nùñez, R. (2000). Where Mathematics Comes From: How the Embodied Mind Brings Mathematics into Being. New York: Basic Books.
122. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
123. Lean, G., & Clements, K. (1981). Spatial ability, visual imagery, and mathematical performance. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12 (3), 267–99.
124. Leibniz, G. W. (1920). The Early Mathematical Manuscripts of Leibniz, ed. and trans. by J. M. Child. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
125. Li, L., & Tall, D. O. (1993). Constructing different concept images of sequences and limits by programming. In Proceedings of PME 17, Japan, 2, 41–8.
126. Lima, R. N. de, & Tall, D. O. (2006). The concept of equation: What have students met before? In Proceedings of the 30th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Prague, Czech Republic, 4, 233–41.
127. Lima, R. N. de, (2008). Procedural embodiment and magic in linear equations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 67 (1), 3–18.
128. Ma, L. (1999 a). A meta-analysis of the relationship between anxiety toward mathematics and achievement in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30 (5), 520–40.
129. Ma, L. (1999 a). (1999 b). Knowing and Teaching Elementary Mathematics. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
130. MacLane, S. (1994). Responses to theoretical mathematics. Bulletin (new series) of the American Mathematical Society, 30 (2), 190–1.
131. Mason, J. (1989). Mathematical abstraction as the result of a delicate shift of attention. For the Learning of Mathematics, 9 (2), 2–8.
132. Mason, J. (2002). Researching Your Own Practice: The Discipline of Noticing. London: Routledge Falmer
133. Mason, J., Burton, L., & Stacey, K. (1982). Thinking Mathematically. London: Addison-Wesley.
134. Matthews, G. (1964). Calculus. London: John Murray.
135. McGowen, M. A. (1998). Cognitive Units, Concept Images, and Cognitive Collages: An Examination of the Process of Knowledge Construction. PhD thesis, University of Warwick.
136. McGowen, M. A., & Tall, D. O. (2013). Flexible Thinking and Met-befores: Impact on Learning Mathematics, with Particular Reference to the Minus Sign. Retrieved from: http://homepages.warwick.ac.uk/staff/David.Tall/downloads. html (Accessed February 19, 2013).
137. Md Ali, R. (2006). Teachers’ Indications and Pupils’ Construal and Knowledge of Fractions: The Case of Malaysia. PhD thesis, University of Warwick.
138. Mejia-Ramos, J. P. (2008). The Construction and Evaluation of Arguments in Undergraduate Mathematics. PhD thesis, University of Warwick.
139. Miller, G. A. (1956). The magic number seven plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81–97.
140. Monaghan, J. D. (1986). Adolescent's Understanding of Limits and Ini nity. PhD thesis, University of Warwick.
141. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
142. Neill, H., & Shuard, H. (1982). Teaching Calculus. London: Blackie & Son.
143. Neugebauer, O. (1969). The Exact Sciences in Antiquity (2nd ed.). Reprinted by Dover, New York.
144. Núñez, R., Edwards, L. D., & Matos, J. P. (1999). Embodied cognition as grounding for situatedness and context in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 39 (1–3), 45–65.
145. Nunokawa, K. (2005). Mathematical problem solving and learning mathematics: What we expect students to obtain. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 24, 325–40.
146. Pegg, J. (1991). Editorial. Australian Senior Mathematics Journal, 5 (2), 70.
147. Pegg, J., & Tall, D. O. (2005). The fundamental cycle of concept construction underlying various theoretical frameworks. International Reviews on Mathematical Education (ZDM), 37 (6), 468–75.
148. Peirce, C. S. (1991). Peirce on Signs: Writings on Semiotic (ed. Hoopes, J.). University of North Carolina Press.
149. Piaget, J. (1926). The Language and Thought of the Child. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.
150. Piaget, J. (1952). The Child's Conception of Number. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
151. Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1958). Growth of Logical Thinking. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
152. Pinto, M. M. F. (1998). Students’ Understanding of Real Analysis. PhD thesis, University of Warwick.
153. Pinto, M. M. F., & Tall, D. O. (1999). Student constructions of formal theory: Giving and extracting meaning. In O. Zaslavsky (Ed.), Proceedings of the 23rd Conference of PME, Haifa, Israel, 4, 65–73.
154. Pinto, M. M. F., (2001). Following students’ development in a traditional university classroom. In Marja van den Heuvel-Panhuizen (Ed.), Proceedings of the 25th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education 4, 57–64. Utrecht, The Netherlands.
155. Pinto, M. M. F., (2002). Building formal mathematics on visual imagery: A theory and a case study. For the Learning of Mathematics, 22 (1), 2–10.
156. Pitta, D. (1998). Beyond the Obvious: Mental Representations and Elementary Arithmetic. PhD thesis, University of Warwick.
157. Pitta, D., & Gray, E. M. (1997). In the mind: What can imagery tell us about success and failure in arithmetic? In G. A. Makrides (Ed.), Proceedings of the First Mediterranean Conference on Mathematics, Nicosia: Cyprus, 29–41.
158. Pitta, D.,(1999). Changing Emily's images. In A. Pinel (Ed.), Teaching, Learning and Primary Mathematics (pp. 56–60). Derby, UK: Association of Teachers of Mathematics.
159. Plake, B. S., & Parker, C. S. (1982). The development and validation of a revised version of the Mathematics Anxiety Rating Scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 42 (2), 551–7.
160. Playfair, J. (1860). Elements of geometry; containing the first six books of Euclid, with two books on the geometry of solids. To which are added, elements of plane and spherical trigonometry, Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott & Co.
161. Poincaré, H. (1913). The Foundations of Science, trans. by G. B. Halsted. New York: The Science Press.
162. Pólya, G. (1945). How to Solve It. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Reprinted 1957, Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
163. Poynter, A. (2004). Effect as a Pivot between Actions and Symbols: The case of Vector. PhD thesis, University of Warwick.
164. Presmeg, N. C. (1986). Visualisation and mathematical giftedness. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 17 (3), 297–311.
165. Reid, C. (1996). Hilbert. New York: Springer.
166. Richardson, F. C., & Suinn, R. M. (1972). The Mathematics Anxiety Rating Scale: Psychometric data. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 19 (6), 551–4.
167. Robinson, A. (1966). Non-Standard Analysis. Amsterdam: North Holland.
168. Rodd, M. M. (2000). On mathematical warrants. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 2 (3), 221–44.
169. Rosch, E., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W. D., Johnson, D. M., & Boyes-Barem, P. (1976). Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 382–439.
170. Rosnick, P. (1981). Some misconceptions concerning the concept of variable. Are you careful about defining your variables? Mathematics Teacher, 74 (6), 418–20
171. Sangwin, C. J. (2004). Assessing mathematics automatically using computer algebra and the internet. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications, 23 (1), 1–14.
172. Saussure, F. (1916). Cours de linguistique génerale (ed. Bally, C. & Séchehaye, A.). Paris: Payot.
173. Schools Mathematics Project (1982). Advanced Mathematics Book 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
174. Schwarzenberger, R. L. E., & Tall, D. O. (1978). Conl icts in the learning of real numbers and limits. Mathematics Teaching, 82, 44–9.
175. Sfard, A. (1991). On the dual nature of mathematical conceptions: Rel ections on processes and objects as different sides of the same coin. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22, 1–36.
176. Sfard, A. (1992). Operational origins of mathematical objects and the quandary of reii - cation– the case of function. In Guershon Harel & Ed Dubinsky (Eds.), The Concept of Function: Aspects of Epistemology and Pedagogy, MAA Notes 25 (pp. 59–84). Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.
177. Sfard, A. (2008). Thinking as Communicating. New York: Cambridge University Press.
178. Shefi eld, D., & Hunt, T. (2006). How does anxiety inl uence maths performance and what can we do about it? MSOR Connections, 6 (4), 19–23.
179. Skemp, R. R. (1971). The Psychology of Learning Mathematics. London: Penguin.
180. Skemp, R. R. (1976). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. Mathematics Teaching, 77, 20–6.
181. Skemp, R. R. (1979). Intelligence, Learning, and Action. London: John Wiley & Sons.
182. Snapper, E. (1979). The three crises in mathematics: Logicism, intuitionism and formalism. Mathematics Magazine, 52 (4), 207–16.
183. Steele, E., & Arth, A. (1998). Lowering anxiety in the math curriculum. Education Digest, 63 (7), 18–24.
184. Stewart, I. N., & Tall, D. O. (1983). Complex Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
185. Stewart, I. N., (2000). Algebraic Number Theory and Fermat's Last Theorem (3rd ed.). Natick, MA: A. K. Peters.
186. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. London: SAGE.
187. Stroyan, K. D. (1972). Uniform continuity and rates of growth of meromorphic functions. In W. J. Luxemburg & A. Robinson (Eds.), Contributions to Non-Standard Analysis (pp. 47–64). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
188. Struik, D. J. (1969). A Source Book in Mathematics, 1200–1800. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
189. Sullivan, K. (1976). The teaching of elementary calculus: An approach using ini nitesimals, American Mathematical Monthly, 83, 370–5.
190. Tall, D. O. (1977). Cognitive conl ict in the learning of mathematics. Presented at the i rst meeting of the International Group for the Psychology of Learning Mathematics, Utrecht, The Netherlands. Retrieved from: http://homepages.warwick.ac.uk/staff/David.Tall/pdfs/dot1977a-cog-conl-pme.pdf (Accessed February 19, 2013).
191. Tall, D. O. Cognitive aspects of proof, with special reference to the irrationality of. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Warwick, 206–7.
192. Tall, D. O. (1980 a). Looking at graphs through infinitesimal microscopes, windows and telescopes. Mathematical Gazette, 64, 22–49.
193. Tall, D. O. (1980 b). The anatomy of a discovery in mathematical research. For the Learning of Mathematics, 1 (2), 25–30.
194. Tall, D. O. (1980 c). Intuitive infinitesimals in the calculus. Abstracts of Short Communications, Fourth International Congress on Mathematical Education, Berkeley, p. C5. Full paper available from http://www.warwick.ac.uk/staff/David.Tall/pdfs/ dot1980c-intuitive-inls.pdf (Accessed February 19, 2013).
195. Tall, D. O. (1985). Understanding the calculus. Mathematics Teaching, 10, 49–53.
196. Tall, D. O. (1986 a). Building and Testing a Cognitive Approach to the Calculus Using Interactive Computer Graphics. PhD thesis, University of Warwick.
197. Tall, D. O. (1986 b). Constructing the concept image of a tangent. In Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference of PME, Montreal, 3, 69–75.
198. Tall, D. O. (1986 c). Talking about fractions. Micromath, 2 (2), 8–10.
199. Tall, D. O. (1986 d). A graphical approach to integration and the fundamental theorem. Mathematics Teaching, 113, 48–51.
200. Tall, D. O. (1991 a). Recent developments in the use of the computer to visualize and symbolize calculus concepts. In The Laboratory Approach to Teaching Calculus, M.A.A. Notes 20. (pp. 15–25). Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.
201. Tall, D. O. (1991 b). Real Functions and Graphs (for the BBC computer and Nimbus PC). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
202. Tall, D. O. (1991 c). Advanced Mathematical Thinking. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
203. Tall, D. O. (1992). Visualizing differentials in two and three dimensions. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications, 11 (1), 1–7.
204. Tall, D. O. (2001). A child thinking about infinity. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 20, 7–19.
205. Tall, D. O. (2004). Thinking through three worlds of mathematics. In Proceedings of the 28th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Bergen, Norway, 4, 281–8.
206. Tall, D. O. (2009). Dynamic mathematics and the blending of knowledge structures in the calculus. ZDM–The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 41 (4), 481–92.
207. Tall, D. O., Davis, G. E., & Thomas, M. O. J. (1997). What is the object of the encapsulation of a process? In F. Biddulph & K. Carr (Eds.), People in Mathematics Education, MERGA 20, Aotearoa, Rotarua, New Zealand, 2,132–9.
208. Tall, D. O., Lima, R. N. de, & Healy, L. (2013). Evolving a three-world framework for solving algebraic equations in the light of what a student has met before. Available from http://homepages.warwick.ac.uk/staff/David.Tall/downloads.html (Accessed February 19, 2013.)
209. Tall, D. O., Thomas, M. O. J., Davis, G. E., Gray, E. M., & Simpson, A. P. (2000). What is the object of the encapsulation of a process? Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 18 (2), 1–19.
210. Tall, D. O., & Vinner, S. (1981). Concept image and concept dei nition in mathematics, with special reference to limits and continuity. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12, 151–69.
211. Tall, D. O., Yevdokimov, O., Koichu, B., Whiteley, W., Kondratieva, M., & Cheng, Ying-Hao (2012). Cognitive development of proof. In G. Hanna & M. De Villiers (Eds.), ICMI 19: Proof and Proving in Mathematics Education.
212. Tarski, A. (1930). Une contribution á la théorie de la mesure. Fundamenta Mathematicae. 15, 42–50.
213. Tempelaar, D., & Caspers, W. (2008). De rol van de instaptoets. Nieuw Archief voor Wiskunde, 5 /9(1), 66–71.
214. Thurston, W. P. (1990). Mathematical education. Notices of the American Mathematical Society, 37 (7), 844–50.
215. Thurston, W. P. (1994). On proof and progress in mathematics. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 30 (2), 161–77.
216. Tobias, S. (1990). Mathematics anxiety: An update. NACADA Journal, 10, 47–50.
217. Tomasello, M. (1999). The Cultural Origins of Human Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
218. Toulmin, S. E. (1958). The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
219. Van der Waerden, B. L. (1980). A History of Algebra: From al Khwarizmi to Emmy Noether. New York: Springer-Verlag.
220. Van Hiele, P. M. (1957). The child's thought and geometry, trans. into English and reproduced in T. P. Carpenter, J. A. Dossey, & J. L. Koehler (Eds.), Classics in Mathematics Education (pp. 61–55). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
221. Van Hiele, (P. M. 1959). Development and the learning process. Acta Paedagogica Ultrajectina (pp. 1–31). Gröningen: J. B. Wolters.
222. Van Hiele, P. M. (1986). Structure and Insight. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
223. Van Hiele, P. M. (2002). Similarities and differences between the theory of learning and teaching of Skemp and the Van Hiele levels of thinking. In D. O. Tall & M. O. J. Thomas (Eds.), Intelligence, Learning and Understanding– A Tribute to Richard Skemp (pp. 27–47). Flaxton, Australia: Post Pressed.
224. Van Hiele-Geldof, D. (1984). The didactics of geometry in the lowest class of secondary school. In D. Fuys, D. Geddes, & R. Tischler (Eds.), English Translation of Selected Writings of Dina van Hiele-Geldof and Pierre M. van Hiele (pp. 1–214). Brooklyn, NY: Brooklyn College.
225. Vinner, S., & Hershkowitz R. (1980). Concept images and some common cognitive paths in the development of some simple geometric concepts. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference of PME, Berkeley, 177–84.
226. Vlassis, J. (2002). The balance model: Hindrance or support for the solving of linear equations with one unknown. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 49, 341–59.
227. Watson, A (2003). The relationship between physical embodiment and mathematical symbolism: The concept of vector. The Mediterranean Journal of Mathematics Education, 1 (2), 73–97.
228. Weber, H. (1893). Leopold Kronecker. Mathematische Annalen, 43, 1–25.
229. Weber, K. (2001). Student difficulty in constructing proofs: The need for strategic knowledge. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 48 (1), 101–19.
230. Weber, K. (2004). Traditional instruction in advanced mathematics courses: A case study of one professor's lectures and proofs in an introductory real analysis course. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 23, 115–33.
231. Werkgroep 3TU. (2006). Aansluiting vwo en technische univrsiteiten. Euclides, 81 (5), 242–7.
232. Wessel, C. (1799). Om directionens analytiske betegning, et forsøg, anvendt fornemmelig til plane og sphaeriske polygoners opløsning, Nye samling af det Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskabs Skrifter, 5, 496–518.
233. Wilensky, U. (1993). Connected Mathematics: Building Concrete Relationships with Mathematical Knowledge. PhD thesis, M.I.T. Retrieved from: http://ccl.northwestern.edu/papers/download/Wilensky-thesis.pdf (Accessed July 11, 2012).
234. Wilensky, U. (1998). What is normal anyway? Therapy for epistemological anxiety. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 33 (2), 171–202.
235. Wilkins, D. R. (2002). The Analyst by George Berkeley. Retrieved from www.maths.tcd.ie/pub/HistMath/People/Berkeley/Analyst/Analyst.pdf (Accessed April 21, 2012).
236. Wood, N. G. (1992). Mathematical Analysis: A Comparison of student development and historical development. PhD thesis, Cambridge University.
237. Woodard, T. (2004). The effects of math anxiety on post-secondary developmental students as related to achievement, gender, and age. Virginia Mathematics Teacher, Fall, 7–9.
238. Zeeman, E. C. (1960). Unknotting spheres in five dimensions. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 66, 198.
239. Zeeman, E. C. (1977). Catastrophe Theory. London: Addison-Wesley.